Lys29-linkage of ASK1 by Skp1−Cullin 1−Fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response

  1. Zhou Yu
  2. Taoyong Chen  Is a corresponding author
  3. Xuelian Li
  4. Mingjin Yang
  5. Songqing Tang
  6. Xuhui Zhu
  7. Yan Gu
  8. Xiaoping Su
  9. Meng Xia
  10. Weihua Li
  11. Xuemin Zhang
  12. Qingqing Wang
  13. Xuetao Cao
  14. Jianli Wang
  1. Institute of Immunology, China
  2. National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, China
  3. National Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology and Department of Immunology, China
  4. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, China
  5. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

Abstract

Protein ubiquitination regulated by ubiquitin ligases plays important roles in innate immunity. However, key regulators of ubiquitination during innate response and roles of new types of ubiquitination (apart from Lys48- and Lys63-linkage) in control of innate signaling have not been clearly understood. Here we report that F-box only protein Fbxo21, a functionally unknown component of SCF (Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein) complex, facilitates Lys29-linkage and activation of ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1), and promotes type I interferon production upon viral infection. Fbxo21 deficiency in mice cells impairs virus-induced Lys29-linkage and activation of ASK1, attenuates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 signaling pathway, and decreases the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I interferon, resulting in reduced antiviral innate response and enhanced virus replication. Therefore Fbxo21 is required for ASK1 activation via Lys29-linkage of ASK1 during antiviral innate response, providing mechanistic insights into non-proteolytic roles of SCF complex in innate immune response.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhou Yu

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Taoyong Chen

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    chenty@immunol.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xuelian Li

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mingjin Yang

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Songqing Tang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Xuhui Zhu

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Yan Gu

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xiaoping Su

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Meng Xia

    Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology and Department of Immunology, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Weihua Li

    National Center of Biomedical Analysis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Xuemin Zhang

    National Center of Biomedical Analysis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Qingqing Wang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Xuetao Cao

    National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    Xuetao Cao, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  14. Jianli Wang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ruslan Medzhitov, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health, and was approved by the Scientific Investigation Board of Second Military Medical University, Shanghai (Case No. SMMU-2015-0067).

Version history

  1. Received: December 28, 2015
  2. Accepted: April 9, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 11, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 31, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,473
    views
  • 705
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhou Yu
  2. Taoyong Chen
  3. Xuelian Li
  4. Mingjin Yang
  5. Songqing Tang
  6. Xuhui Zhu
  7. Yan Gu
  8. Xiaoping Su
  9. Meng Xia
  10. Weihua Li
  11. Xuemin Zhang
  12. Qingqing Wang
  13. Xuetao Cao
  14. Jianli Wang
(2016)
Lys29-linkage of ASK1 by Skp1−Cullin 1−Fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response
eLife 5:e14087.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14087

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14087

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.