rsEGFP2 enables fast RESOLFT nanoscopy of living cells

  1. Tim Grotjohann
  2. Ilaria Testa
  3. Matthias Reuss
  4. Tanja Brakemann
  5. Christian Eggeling
  6. Stefan W Hell  Is a corresponding author
  7. Stefan Jakobs  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  2. Abberior Instruments GmbH, Germany
  3. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
  4. University of Göttingen, Germany
3 figures, 3 videos and 1 table

Figures

Figure 1 with 3 supplements
Characteristics of rsEGFP2.

(A) Absorption (black dashed line), excitation (red dotted line), and emission (green solid line) spectra of rsEGFP2 in its equilibrium state at pH 7.5. (B) Switching curves of rsEGFP2 (blue) and rsEGFP (red). Switching was performed on purified proteins immobilized in a PAA-layer (pH ~6.5) by alternating irradiation with 491 nm (~2 kW/cm²) and 405 nm light (~2 kW/cm², 40 µs). Fluorescence was recorded only during irradiation with light of 491 nm. Each curve is an average over 10 switching cycles. (C) Changes in the absorption spectrum of rsEGFP2 upon switching with light of 488 nm from the equilibrium to the off-state. The spectra were taken at the indicated time points and recorded on purified rsEGFP2 at pH 7.5 (D) Absorption spectra of equilibrium-state rsEGFP2 at different pH values. The absorption bands at 408 nm and 503 nm presumably correspond to the protonated and the de-protonated cis-chromophore, respectively. (E) Switching fatigue of rsEGFP2 (blue) and rsEGFP (red). Switching was performed on living PtK2 cells expressing Vimentin-rsEGFP or Vimentin-rsEGFP2 by alternate irradiation with 405 nm (2 kW/cm²) and 491 nm (5.7 kW/cm²) light. Illumination times were chosen so that the fluorescence was fully switched to the minimum or maximum, respectively, in each cycle. Each plotted data point is the average (over 100 cycles) of the maximum fluorescence intensity in each cycle. The data points were fitted by a mono-exponential function, and the resulting curve was baseline corrected and normalized to 1. (F) Comparison of the ensemble off-switching halftimes (defined as the time after which the fluorescence reached 50% of its initial value) of rsEGFP (red) and rsEGFP2 (blue) at different 491 nm light intensities. On-switching 405 nm light was kept constant (3 kW/cm2). Data were collected on living PtK2 cells expressing Vimentin-rsEGFP or Vimentin-rsEGFP2, respectively. Inset: Graph showing the ratio (R) of the off-switching halftime of rsEGFP divided by the off-switching halftime of rsEGFP2 against the 491 nm light intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Alignment of the amino acid sequences of EGFP (GenBank Accession #U55762), rsEGFP (GenBank Accession #JQ969017), and rsEGFP2.

Differences are highlighted.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Single-molecule brightness values of EGFP, rsEGFP, and rsEGFP2 measured in PBS buffer (pH 7.5).

Average and standard deviation of >30 FCS measurements at various laser intensities between 5 and 100 kW/cm2. Values normalized to EGFP. The error bars represent the error in the FCS experiments with the value for EGFP normalized to 1 in each individual experiment.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.005
Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Off-switching speed of rsEGFP and rsEGFP2.

(A) Off-switching kinetics of rsEGFP and rsEGFP2 embedded in a PAA layer (pH ~6.5) determined at different intensities of the 491 nm off-switching light. Each curve is an average of 100 measurements. In each measurement the proteins were switched into the on-state for 40 µs with 405 nm light (2 kW/cm²) and subsequently the decay of fluorescence was recorded over time at the indicated 491 nm light intensities. (B) Dependence of the residual fluorescence (off-state fluorescence) in the ensemble off-state as a function of the off-switching light intensity. (C) Dependence of the residual fluorescence (off-state fluorescence) in the off-state of Vimentin-rsEGFP or Vimentin-rsEGFP2 in living Ptk2 cells as a function of the off-switching light intensity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.006
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Expression of various functional rsEGFP2 fusion proteins in mammalian cells.

(A) rsEGFP2-KDEL (targeting to the ER), (B) Keratin19-rsEGFP2, (C) Histone H2B-rsEGFP2, (D) Vimentin-rsEGFP2, (E) Pex16-rsEGFP2, and (F) rsEGFP2-alpha-tubulin. Shown are single confocal sections (C, F) and maximum intensity projections of confocal images (A, B, D, E) recorded on living cells. Fluorescence was excited by simultaneous irradiation with light of 488 nm and 405 nm. (AE): PtK2 cells; (F): Vero cell. Scale bars: 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.008
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Semi-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of rsEGFP2.

Purified monomeric EGFP, dimeric dTomato, tetrameric DsRed, and rsEGFP2 were separated on a semi-native gel (a two-phase polyacrylamide gel) consisting out of a 12.5% separation gel (6.3 ml H2O, 5 ml 1.5 M Tris–HCl pH 8.8, 8.3 ml Rotiphorese Gel 30 solution [Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany], 200 μl 10% [wt/vol] sodiumdodecyl sulphate [SDS], 200 μl 10% [wt/vol] ammonium persulfate (APS), 20 μl Tetramethylethylendiamin [TEMED]) and a 5% loading gel (5.6 ml H2O, 2.5ml 1.5 M Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 1.7 ml Rotiphorese Gel 30 solution, 100 μl 10% [wt/vol] SDS, 100 μl 10% [wt/vol] APS, 10 μl TEMED). Images were taken with a custom-built gel documentation system. To detect green fluorescence (EGFP and rsEGFP2) the gel was irradiated with light of 470 ± 5 nm and fluorescence was detected at 525 ± 30 nm. To detect red fluorescence (dTomato and DsRed) the gel was irradiated with light of 545 ± 10 nm and fluorescence was recorded at 617 ± 37. Both images were overlaid and are represented in false colors.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.009
Figure 3 with 3 supplements
RESOLFT time lapse imaging using rsEGFP2 in living mammalian PtK2 cells.

(A) Cells expressing Vimentin-rsEGFP2: initial confocal (left) and subsequent RESOLFT images taken every 100 s. Lower row: magnifications of the indicated areas. (B) Lateral resolution measurement: raw images of cells expressing Keratin19-rsEGFP2 recorded with a RESOLFT Quad P microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) with similar imaging conditions as in (A) (on: 405 nm, 5 kW/cm², 20 µs; off: 488 nm, 34 kW/cm², 360 µs; read-out: 488 nm, 76 kW/cm², 20 µs). From left to right: confocal raw image and corresponding raw RESOLFT image. Magnifications of the boxed areas in the RESOLFT image. The graphs show averaged line profiles across the indicated filaments (iiv) within the respective boxes. The line profiles used for averaging were taken equidistant (20 nm) along the whole respective indicated area. (C),(D) rsEGFP2 targeted to the ER (rsEGFP2-KDEL): (C) 10 µm × 10 µm initial confocal (left) and subsequent RESOLFT images recorded every 5.9 s, and (D) 2.8 µm × 3.2 µm RESOLFT image-series imaged at 2 Hz. (E) RESOLFT imaging of peroxisomes labeled by Pex16-rsEGFP2 fusion proteins. Pixel step sizes: 20 nm (A, B) and 40 nm (CE). Pixel dwell times: 380 µs (A), 400 µs (B), 75 µs (C, D), and 120 µs (E). In (D) and (E) pixels were interpolated to a size of 20 nm × 20 nm. The arrows indicate moving structures. Richardson Lucy restoration was used for all RESOLFT images except (B). Scale bars: 1 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.010
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Raw RESOLFT images of Figure 3A.

No image processing was applied. Shown are PtK2 cells expressing Vimentin-rsEGFP2: initial confocal (left) and subsequent RESOLFT images taken every 100 s. Scale bar: 1 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.011
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Lateral resolution in fast RESOLFT imaging.

(A),(B) Typical examples. Shown are raw images of cells expressing Keratin19-rsEGFP2 taken on a RESOLFT Quad P microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) with a pixel dwell time similar as in Figure 3D,E. Imaging conditions: (on: 405 nm, 8 kW/cm², 2 µs; off: 488 nm, 68 kW/cm², 61 µs; read-out: 488 nm, 200 kW/cm², 7 µs; pixel size: 40 × 40 nm). From left to right: confocal raw image and corresponding raw RESOLFT image. The graphs show averaged line profiles across the indicated filaments within the respective boxes. The line profiles used for averaging were taken equidistant (40 nm) along the whole respective indicated area. Scale bar: 1 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.012
Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Comparison of rsEGFP and rsEGFP2 at RESOLFT imaging conditions.

(A) Repeated imaging of peroxisomes labeled by Pex16-rsEGFP or Pex16-EGFP2 fusion proteins. Imaging conditions were as in Figure 3D. Pixel step size: 40 nm; on: 405 nm, 4 kW/cm², 20 µs; off: 491 nm, 20 kW/cm², 50 µs; read-out: 491 nm, 76 kW/cm², 5 µs; pixel dwell time: 75 µs. Images were taken every 5 s. Shown are raw data. (B) Decay of the summed fluorescence intensities of the images shown in (A). Note that rsEGFP photobleaches faster than rsEGFP2. Scale bar: 1 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.013

Videos

Movie 1

Animated sequence of RESOLFT recordings of a living PtK2 cell expressing Vimentin-rsEGFP2 as shown in Figure 3A. 20 RESOLFT images were taken every 100 s. Image size: 10 µm × 10 µm. The movie is accelerated by a factor of 200 compared to the original recording speed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.014
Movie 2

Animated sequence of RESOLFT recordings of a living PtK2 cell expressing rsEGFP2 targeted to the ER as shown in Figure 3D. 100 RESOLFT images were taken every 0.5 s. Image size: 2.8 µm × 3.2 µm. The speed of the movie corresponds to the imaging speed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.015
Movie 3

Animated sequence of RESOLFT recordings of a living PtK2 cell expressing Pex16-rsEGFP2 to highlight the peroxisomes as shown in Figure 3E. 20 RESOLFT images were taken every 0.5 s. Image size: 3 µm × 2 µm. The speed of the movie corresponds to the imaging speed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.016

Tables

Table 1

Comparison of EGFP, rsEGFP and rsEGFP2 properties.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248.007
EGFPrsEGFPrsEGFP2
Extinction coefficient (ε) [M−1 cm−1]53.000 * 47.00061.300
Fluorescence quantum yield (ФFL)0.6*0.360.3
Excitation maximum on-state [nm]489493478
Emission maximum [nm]509510503
Absorption maximum off-state [nm]n.a.396408
Number of switching cycles to bleach to 50% of the initial fluor in the on-state (2 kW/cm2 at 405 nm, 5.7 kW/cm2 at 491 nm)n.a.∼1,100∼2,100
Chromophore maturation halftime at 37°C [min]∼25∼180∼20
  1. *
  2. Note, that the number of cycles may depend on the sample preparation and the experimental conditions.

  3. n.a.: not applicable.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tim Grotjohann
  2. Ilaria Testa
  3. Matthias Reuss
  4. Tanja Brakemann
  5. Christian Eggeling
  6. Stefan W Hell
  7. Stefan Jakobs
(2012)
rsEGFP2 enables fast RESOLFT nanoscopy of living cells
eLife 1:e00248.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00248