1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
  2. Cell Biology

Common intermediates and kinetics, but different energetics, in the assembly of SNARE proteins

  1. Sylvain Zorman
  2. Aleksander A Rebane
  3. Lu Ma
  4. Guangcan Yang
  5. Matthew A Molski
  6. Jeff Coleman
  7. Frederic Pincet
  8. James E Rothman
  9. Yongli Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Yale University, United States
  3. UMR CNRS 8550 Associée aux Universités Paris 6 et Paris 7, Ecole Normale Supérieure, France
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03348
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Sylvain Zorman
  2. Aleksander A Rebane
  3. Lu Ma
  4. Guangcan Yang
  5. Matthew A Molski
  6. Jeff Coleman
  7. Frederic Pincet
  8. James E Rothman
  9. Yongli Zhang
(2014)
Common intermediates and kinetics, but different energetics, in the assembly of SNARE proteins
eLife 3:e03348.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03348
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) are evolutionarily conserved machines that couple their folding/assembly to membrane fusion. However, it is unclear how these processes are regulated and function. To determine these mechanisms, we characterized the folding energy and kinetics of four representative SNARE complexes at a single-molecule level using high-resolution optical tweezers. We found that all SNARE complexes assemble by the same step-wise zippering mechanism: slow N-terminal domain (NTD) association, a pause in a force-dependent half-zippered intermediate and fast C-terminal domain (CTD) zippering. The energy release from CTD zippering differs for yeast (13 kBT) and neuronal SNARE complexes (27 kBT), and is concentrated at the C-terminal part of CTD zippering. Thus, SNARE complexes share a conserved zippering pathway and polarized energy release to efficiently drive membrane fusion, but generate different amounts of zippering energy to regulate fusion kinetics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sylvain Zorman

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Aleksander A Rebane

    Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Lu Ma

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Guangcan Yang

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Matthew A Molski

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Jeff Coleman

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Frederic Pincet

    UMR CNRS 8550 Associée aux Universités Paris 6 et Paris 7, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. James E Rothman

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Yongli Zhang

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    yongli.zhang@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Zorman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,692
    views
  • 362
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sylvain Zorman
  2. Aleksander A Rebane
  3. Lu Ma
  4. Guangcan Yang
  5. Matthew A Molski
  6. Jeff Coleman
  7. Frederic Pincet
  8. James E Rothman
  9. Yongli Zhang
(2014)
Common intermediates and kinetics, but different energetics, in the assembly of SNARE proteins
eLife 3:e03348.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03348

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03348

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    PROTAC-induced protein structural dynamics in targeted protein degradation

    Kingsley Y Wu, Ta I Hung, Chia-en A Chang
    Research Article

    PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) are small molecules that induce target protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. PROTACs recruit the target protein and E3 ligase; a critical first step is forming a ternary complex. However, while the formation of a ternary complex is crucial, it may not always guarantee successful protein degradation. The dynamics of the PROTAC-induced degradation complex play a key role in ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. In this study, we computationally modelled protein complex structures and dynamics associated with a series of PROTACs featuring different linkers to investigate why these PROTACs, all of which formed ternary complexes with Cereblon (CRBN) E3 ligase and the target protein bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4BD1), exhibited varying degrees of degradation potency. We constructed the degradation machinery complexes with Culling-Ring Ligase 4A (CRL4A) E3 ligase scaffolds. Through atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, we illustrated how PROTAC-dependent protein dynamics facilitating the arrangement of surface lysine residues of BRD4BD1 into the catalytic pocket of E2/ubiquitin cascade for ubiquitination. Despite featuring identical warheads in this PROTAC series, the linkers were found to affect the residue-interaction networks, and thus governing the essential motions of the entire degradation machine for ubiquitination. These findings offer a structural dynamic perspective on ligand-induced protein degradation, providing insights to guide future PROTAC design endeavors.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Drug Discovery: How to exploit the recycling system of a cell

    Sasha L Evans, Bethany A Haynes ... Rivka L Isaacson
    Insight

    Nature has inspired the design of improved inhibitors for cancer-causing proteins.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Wide transition-state ensemble as key component for enzyme catalysis

    Gabriel E Jara, Francesco Pontiggia ... Dorothee Kern
    Research Article

    Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the theoretical framework to explain the enormous rate accelerations of chemical reactions by enzymes. Given that proteins display large ensembles of conformations, unique TSs would pose a huge entropic bottleneck for enzyme catalysis. To shed light on this question, we studied the nature of the enzymatic TS for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations. We find a structurally wide set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate and hence a broad transition-state ensemble (TSE). A conformationally delocalized ensemble, including asymmetric TSs, is rooted in the macroscopic nature of the enzyme. The computational results are buttressed by enzyme kinetics experiments that confirm the decrease of the entropy of activation predicted from such wide TSE. TSEs as a key for efficient enzyme catalysis further boosts a unifying concept for protein folding and conformational transitions underlying protein function.