1. Marianne De Paepe
  2. Marie-Agnès Petit  Is a corresponding author
  1. Micalis Institute, France

Bacteriophages are viruses that prey on bacteria. Also known as phages, they can multiply very quickly—hundreds of new viruses can be produced in a single infected bacterium in less than 30 minutes. However, relatively little is known about the impact of phage predation on human-associated bacteria in general, and even less on bacterial pathogens. Now, in eLife, Andrew Camilli of Tufts University School of Medicine and co-workers in Canada, Haiti and the United States, provide molecular evidence that phages prey on a bacterial pathogen during the course of an infection in humans (Seed et al., 2014).

Vibrio cholerae is the bacterium responsible for cholera. After being ingested, typically by drinking contaminated water, it multiplies in the digestive tract where it releases a toxin. This toxin causes profuse and watery diarrhoea, dehydration and death in 50% of cases if rehydration therapy is not administered.

In the delta region of the river Ganges in Bangladesh and India, cholera epidemics occur every year, and follow regular seasonal cycles. It has been proposed that this seasonal variation might be partly related to phages preying on the V. cholera bacteria—as the so-called vibriophages are most common in environmental waters at the end of the cholera season (Faruque et al., 2005a, 2005b).

Camilli and co-workers—including Kimberley Seed as the first author—report molecular data that indicate that vibriophages may preferentially prey on bacteria in the digestive tract of patients with cholera, rather than in environmental waters (Seed et al., 2014). Seed et al. looked at stool samples from two cholera patients (one from Haiti, one from Bangladesh) who had high viral loads of a type of vibriophage called ICP2. In each sample, they discovered that some of the bacteria were resistant to the phage, while the rest were sensitive to it. Then, Seed et al. sequenced the whole genomes of bacterial clones and discovered that the only differences between the phage-resistant and phage-sensitive isolates in each patient were clustered into a single gene. However, a different bacterial gene was mutated in each patient. Several different mutants of each gene were found. This strongly suggests that these mutations occurred, and were then selected for, in bacteria in the patient during the infection.

In the Haitian patient, almost all (> 99%) of the bacteria isolated were resistant to the phage; and, of the phage-resistant bacteria tested, all had one of six different mutations in a single gene called ompU. The OmpU protein forms a pore in the bacteria’s outer membrane to enable nutrients to be imported into the cell. The bacteria need this protein for their survival both in human hosts and in environmental waters. Since the OmpU mutants are resistant to phage attack, Seed et al.’s findings indicate that the OmpU protein is also used by the vibriophage ICP2 to infect the bacterial cells (i.e. it is also the ‘receptor’ for the ICP2 phage).

Seed et al. show that the selection of OmpU mutants by ICP2 vibriophages is not restricted to this isolated case. Out of a collection of 54 clinical isolates of V. cholerae collected in Bangladesh between 2001 and 2011, 15% have similar phage-resistant mutations in the ompU gene. Seed et al. also found that the changes in the OmpU protein were all in parts of the protein that are exposed on the outside of the bacterial cell; and importantly, that they had very little effect on the fitness of V. cholerae in a range of tests. This is reminiscent of the relationship between the bacterium E. coli and the phage lambda, where mutations in a surface protein can make the bacteria resistant to phage attack. These mutations also occur in a surface-exposed part of the protein and do not affect the other functions of this protein (Gehring et al., 1987; Hofnung, 1995). However, the E. coli/phage lambda studies were performed in the laboratory, whereas this V. cholerae study appears to be the first report that suggests a predator-prey relationship between phage and bacteria in the human intestine.

In the stool sample from the Bangladeshi patient, 22% of bacterial isolates were resistant to the ICP2 phage; and Seed et al. identified four different genetic changes that made the bacteria able to resist this phage attack. All of these mutations were in a gene called toxR, which encodes a protein that regulates the expression of numerous genes, including ompU. Since these ToxR mutants do not produce the phage’s receptor—the OmpU protein—this confers resistance to phage attack. However, the ToxR protein also regulates genes that control the virulence of the bacteria, and the ToxR mutants were unable to start new infections in an animal model of cholera. Therefore, in contrast with the OmpU mutants, it is more difficult to unambiguously assign the selection of ToxR mutants as resulting solely from defending against phage attack. Instead the selection of these non-infectious mutants could also be explained by such mutations making it ‘cheaper’ for these bacteria to grow in the digestive tract at the expense of the virulent clones.

Although it is perhaps counterintuitive, mutations that reduce virulence can have a selective advantage during an infection (Diard et al., 2013). Expressing so-called virulence proteins or factors is costly for an individual bacterium, and mutants that stop making these factors can, therefore, benefit at the expense of other bacteria that continue to do so. This advantage, however, is only short-lived as these less virulent mutants are unable to start new infections themselves. Regardless of the precise mechanism, the selection for the non-infectious ToxR mutants observed by Seed et al. suggests that phage predation may have contributed to the collapse of the infection and the selection of less virulent strains.

Finally, the results of Seed et al., together with the previous work by other groups that it builds on, highlight the important role that phages can play in shaping V. cholerae populations. These findings firmly place these viruses as an important ‘third’ party that must also be considered when trying to understand host–pathogen interactions.

References

    1. Gehring K
    2. Charbit A
    3. Brissaud E
    4. Hofnung M
    (1987)
    Bacteriophage lambda receptor site on the Escherichia coli K-12 LamB protein
    Journal of Bacteriology 169:2103–2106.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marianne De Paepe

    French National Institute for Agricultural Research and AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marie-Agnès Petit

    French National Institute for Agricultural Research and AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France
    For correspondence
    marie-agnes.petit@jouy.inra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: September 2, 2014 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2014, De Paepe and Petit

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,911
    Page views
  • 77
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marianne De Paepe
  2. Marie-Agnès Petit
(2014)
Phage Predation: Killing the killers
eLife 3:e04168.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04168

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Ceri Alan Fielding et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The outcome of infection is dependent on the ability of viruses to manipulate the infected cell to evade immunity, and the ability of the immune response to overcome this evasion. Understanding this process is key to understanding pathogenesis, genetic risk factors, and both natural and vaccine-induced immunity. SARS-CoV-2 antagonises the innate interferon response, but whether it manipulates innate cellular immunity is unclear. An unbiased proteomic analysis determined how cell surface protein expression is altered on SARS-CoV-2-infected lung epithelial cells, showing downregulation of activating NK ligands B7-H6, MICA, ULBP2, and Nectin1, with minimal effects on MHC-I. This occurred at the level of protein synthesis, could be mediated by Nsp1 and Nsp14, and correlated with a reduction in NK cell activation. This identifies a novel mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 host-shutoff antagonises innate immunity. Later in the disease process, strong antibody-dependent NK cell activation (ADNKA) developed. These responses were sustained for at least 6 months in most patients, and led to high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Depletion of spike-specific antibodies confirmed their dominant role in neutralisation, but these antibodies played only a minor role in ADNKA compared to antibodies to other proteins, including ORF3a, Membrane, and Nucleocapsid. In contrast, ADNKA induced following vaccination was focussed solely on spike, was weaker than ADNKA following natural infection, and was not boosted by the second dose. These insights have important implications for understanding disease progression, vaccine efficacy, and vaccine design.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Atanas Radkov et al.
    Research Article

    Members of the bacterial T6SS amidase effector (Tae) superfamily of toxins are delivered between competing bacteria to degrade cell wall peptidoglycan. Although Taes share a common substrate, they exhibit distinct antimicrobial potency across different competitor species. To investigate the molecular basis governing these differences, we quantitatively defined the functional determinants of Tae1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and a high-throughput in vivo genetic approach called deep mutational scanning (DMS). As expected, combined analyses confirmed the role of critical residues near the Tae1 catalytic center. Unexpectedly, DMS revealed substantial contributions to enzymatic activity from a much larger, ring-like functional hot spot extending around the entire circumference of the enzyme. Comparative DMS across distinct growth conditions highlighted how functional contribution of different surfaces is highly context-dependent, varying alongside composition of targeted cell walls. These observations suggest that Tae1 engages with the intact cell wall network through a more distributed three-dimensional interaction interface than previously appreciated, providing an explanation for observed differences in antimicrobial potency across divergent Gram-negative competitors. Further binding studies of several Tae1 variants with their cognate immunity protein demonstrate that requirements to maintain protection from Tae activity may be a significant constraint on the mutational landscape of tae1 toxicity in the wild. In total, our work reveals that Tae diversification has likely been shaped by multiple independent pressures to maintain interactions with binding partners that vary across bacterial species and conditions.