Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers
  2. Jeremy G Owen
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy
  4. Melinda A Ternei
  5. Denise O Guimarães
  6. Ulysses A de Frias
  7. Monica T Pupo
  8. Prudy Seepe
  9. Zhiyang Feng
  10. Sean F Brady  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, United States
  2. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  3. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  4. Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, South Africa
  5. Nanjing Agricultural University, China

Abstract

Recent bacterial (meta)genome sequencing efforts suggest the existence of an enormous untapped reservoir of natural-product-encoding biosynthetic gene clusters in the environment. Here we use the pyro-sequencing of PCR amplicons derived from both nonribosomal peptide adenylation domains and polyketide ketosynthase domains to compare biosynthetic diversity in soil microbiomes from around the globe. We see large differences in domain populations from all except the most proximal and biome-similar samples, suggesting that most microbiomes will encode largely distinct collections of bacterial secondary metabolites. Our data indicate a correlation between two factors, geographic distance and biome-type, and the biosynthetic diversity found in soil environments. By assigning reads to known gene clusters we identify hotspots of biomedically relevant biosynthetic diversity. These observations not only provide new insights into the natural world, they also provide a road map for guiding future natural products discovery efforts.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers

    Laboratory for Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jeremy G Owen

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Melinda A Ternei

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Denise O Guimarães

    Laboratório de Produtos Naturais, Curso de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ulysses A de Frias

    School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Monica T Pupo

    School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Prudy Seepe

    KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhiyang Feng

    College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sean F Brady

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    sbrady@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon Clardy, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 5, 2014
  2. Accepted: January 7, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 13, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Charlop-Powers et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,865
    views
  • 970
    downloads
  • 106
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers
  2. Jeremy G Owen
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy
  4. Melinda A Ternei
  5. Denise O Guimarães
  6. Ulysses A de Frias
  7. Monica T Pupo
  8. Prudy Seepe
  9. Zhiyang Feng
  10. Sean F Brady
(2015)
Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism
eLife 4:e05048.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05048

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05048

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Ardalan Naseri, Degui Zhi, Shaojie Zhang
    Research Article Updated

    Runs-of-homozygosity (ROH) segments, contiguous homozygous regions in a genome were traditionally linked to families and inbred populations. However, a growing literature suggests that ROHs are ubiquitous in outbred populations. Still, most existing genetic studies of ROH in populations are limited to aggregated ROH content across the genome, which does not offer the resolution for mapping causal loci. This limitation is mainly due to a lack of methods for the efficient identification of shared ROH diplotypes. Here, we present a new method, ROH-DICE (runs-of-homozygous diplotype cluster enumerator), to find large ROH diplotype clusters, sufficiently long ROHs shared by a sufficient number of individuals, in large cohorts. ROH-DICE identified over 1 million ROH diplotypes that span over 100 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and are shared by more than 100 UK Biobank participants. Moreover, we found significant associations of clustered ROH diplotypes across the genome with various self-reported diseases, with the strongest associations found between the extended human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and autoimmune disorders. We found an association between a diplotype covering the homeostatic iron regulator (HFE) gene and hemochromatosis, even though the well-known causal SNP was not directly genotyped or imputed. Using a genome-wide scan, we identified a putative association between carriers of an ROH diplotype in chromosome 4 and an increase in mortality among COVID-19 patients (p-value = 1.82 × 10−11). In summary, our ROH-DICE method, by calling out large ROH diplotypes in a large outbred population, enables further population genetics into the demographic history of large populations. More importantly, our method enables a new genome-wide mapping approach for finding disease-causing loci with multi-marker recessive effects at a population scale.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Lisa Baumgartner, Jonathan J Ipsaro ... Julius Brennecke
    Research Advance

    Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C2H2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhinoG31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhinoG31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.