Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers
  2. Jeremy G Owen
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy
  4. Melinda A Ternei
  5. Denise O Guimarães
  6. Ulysses A de Frias
  7. Monica T Pupo
  8. Prudy Seepe
  9. Zhiyang Feng
  10. Sean F Brady  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, United States
  2. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  3. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  4. Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, South Africa
  5. Nanjing Agricultural University, China

Abstract

Recent bacterial (meta)genome sequencing efforts suggest the existence of an enormous untapped reservoir of natural-product-encoding biosynthetic gene clusters in the environment. Here we use the pyro-sequencing of PCR amplicons derived from both nonribosomal peptide adenylation domains and polyketide ketosynthase domains to compare biosynthetic diversity in soil microbiomes from around the globe. We see large differences in domain populations from all except the most proximal and biome-similar samples, suggesting that most microbiomes will encode largely distinct collections of bacterial secondary metabolites. Our data indicate a correlation between two factors, geographic distance and biome-type, and the biosynthetic diversity found in soil environments. By assigning reads to known gene clusters we identify hotspots of biomedically relevant biosynthetic diversity. These observations not only provide new insights into the natural world, they also provide a road map for guiding future natural products discovery efforts.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers

    Laboratory for Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jeremy G Owen

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Melinda A Ternei

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Denise O Guimarães

    Laboratório de Produtos Naturais, Curso de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ulysses A de Frias

    School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Monica T Pupo

    School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Prudy Seepe

    KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhiyang Feng

    College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sean F Brady

    Laboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    sbrady@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon Clardy, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 5, 2014
  2. Accepted: January 7, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 13, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Charlop-Powers et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,851
    Page views
  • 963
    Downloads
  • 101
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zachary Charlop-Powers
  2. Jeremy G Owen
  3. Boojala Vijay B Reddy
  4. Melinda A Ternei
  5. Denise O Guimarães
  6. Ulysses A de Frias
  7. Monica T Pupo
  8. Prudy Seepe
  9. Zhiyang Feng
  10. Sean F Brady
(2015)
Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism
eLife 4:e05048.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05048

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05048

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Pianpian Zhao, Zhifeng Sheng ... Hou-Feng Zheng
    Research Article

    The ‘diabetic bone paradox’ suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Songyuan Wu, Xiaoling Tong ... Fangyin Dai
    Research Article

    The color pattern of insects is one of the most diverse adaptive evolutionary phenotypes. However, the molecular regulation of this color pattern is not fully understood. In this study, we found that the transcription factor Bm-mamo is responsible for black dilute (bd) allele mutations in the silkworm. Bm-mamo belongs to the BTB zinc finger family and is orthologous to mamo in Drosophila melanogaster. This gene has a conserved function in gamete production in Drosophila and silkworms and has evolved a pleiotropic function in the regulation of color patterns in caterpillars. Using RNAi and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology, we showed that Bm-mamo is a repressor of dark melanin patterns in the larval epidermis. Using in vitro binding assays and gene expression profiling in wild-type and mutant larvae, we also showed that Bm-mamo likely regulates the expression of related pigment synthesis and cuticular protein genes in a coordinated manner to mediate its role in color pattern formation. This mechanism is consistent with the dual role of this transcription factor in regulating both the structure and shape of the cuticle and the pigments that are embedded within it. This study provides new insight into the regulation of color patterns as well as into the construction of more complex epidermal features in some insects.