1. Cell Biology
  2. Plant Biology
Download icon

Correction: Fluorescent sensors reporting the activity of ammonium transceptors in live cells

Correction
  • Cited 0
  • Views 461
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2015;4:e06986 doi: 10.7554/eLife.06986

Main text

De Michele R, Ast C, Loqué D, Ho CH, Andrade SL, Lanquar V, Grossmann G, Gehne S, Kumke MU, Frommer WB. 2013. Fluorescent sensors reporting the activity of ammonium transceptors in live cells. eLife 2:e00800. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00800. Published 2 July 2013

In the published article, Amtrac kinetics derived from the same dataset were intentionally shown for comparison in three different figures (Figures 4C, 5D, and 8B). For clarification, a corresponding statement has now been added to the respective legends. The Amtrac fluorescence response kinetics were repeated multiple times independently with similar results.

Figure 2 of the published article contained an error: the graph showed two sensors labelled #16 (see below).

The upper of the two was correctly labelled #16 (in red). The lower should have been labelled #21 (see below).

In addition, in Figure 7D, the 11th TMH of Archaeoglobus fulgidus was highlighted in grey, but this was not explained in the legend.

The article has been corrected accordingly.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roberto De Michele

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cindy Ast

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dominique Loqué

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cheng-Hsun Ho

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Susana LA Andrade

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Viviane Lanquar

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guido Grossmann

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sören Gehne

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michael U Kumke

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Wolf B Frommer

    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: February 18, 2015 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2015, De Michele et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 461
    Page views
  • 6
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)