Membrane affinity difference between MinD monomer and dimer is not crucial for MinD gradient formation in Bacillus subtilis
Figures
Localization of monomeric and dimeric MinD variants.
Cellular localization of (A) wild-type MinD, (B) MinD K16A, (C) MinD G12V, and (D) MinD D40A. Localization was monitored by an N-terminal monomeric GFP (mGFP) fusion. Fusion proteins were expressed in either a ΔminD or ΔminCD background. Fluorescence images (left panels) and corresponding phase contrast images (inset) are shown in the left panels. Some minicells are indicated with red arrows. Scale bar is 2 μm. Middle panels show the transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations calculated using an average of at least 30 cells (ΔminCD background) per dataset. Right panels depict the longitudinal FIPs using the ΔminCD background. The manually shaded red areas highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples for wild-type MinD and the D40A variants are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1. (E) Transversal FIP with standard deviations of exponentially growing wild-type cells stained with fluorescence membrane dye FM5-95, and wild-type cells expressing GFP are shown as controls. (F) Membrane affinities, with median values, estimated from the valley/peak ratios shown in the middle panels of (A–D) and controls (E). (G) Longitudinal FIP along the exponentially growing wild-type cells stained with the fluorescence membrane dye FM5-95. Strains used in (A) LB249 and LB305, (B) LB250 and LB306, (C) LB251 and LB307, (D) LB252 and LB308, (E) LB609 and (G) 168.
-
Figure 1—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of GFP-MinD wild-type and D40A variants.
(A) Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs of GFP-MinD and GFP-MinD-D40A shown in Figure 1. Polar and septal areas were selected manually based on the fluorescence gradient. Polar areas are indicated in red. (B) Quantification of pixel intensities, with median values at poles and septa in the longitudinal FIP relative to the intensity of the total integrated intensity. Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test.
-
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig1-figsupp1-data1-v1.xlsx
Effect of a minJ deletion on MinD-GFP localization.
(A) Fluorescence microscopy images of ΔminCD and ΔminJΔminCD mutant cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD variants. Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. (B) Quantification of related septal fluorescence intensities, with median values at septa (n>100). Since the strongly filamentous ΔminJ strain is delicate to handle, cells were grown on agarose patches on microscopy slides. Scale bar is 5 μm. Strains used for wt: LB405 and LB409, K16A: LB406 and LB410, G12V: LB407 and LB411, and D40A: LB408 and LB412.
-
Figure 2—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx
Membrane recruitment of MinC by MinD variants.
Fluorescence microscopy images of cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD variants (cyan) and mCherry-MinC (red). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. (A) Wild-type MinD, (B) MinD K16A, (C) MinD G12V, (D) MinD D40A, (E) MinD I260E, (F) MinD D40A, I260E. Right panels show the transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations averaged over at least 30 cells. White arrows in (D) highlight colocalization. Scale bar is 2 μm. mGFP-MinD variants and mCherry-MinC were expressed in a ΔminCD background strain. Strains used: (A) LB318, (B) LB319, (C) LB320, (D) LB321, (E) LB643, and (F) LB644.
-
Figure 3—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 3.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx
Membrane association of different amphipathic helices.
(A) Schematic presentation of the tandem amphipathic helix and the weak amphipathic helix from Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B241-253. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images and transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations of cells expressing the different amphipathic helix sequences fused to the C-terminus of GFP. A strain expressing cytoplasmic GFP was included for comparison. Scale bar is 2 μm. Strains used: FBB043 (GFP-AHMinD), FBB05 (GFP-AH2x), FBB046 (GFP-AHNS4B), LB609 (GFP). (C) Average membrane affinities calculated from the transverse FIPs (n>30). Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test.
-
Figure 4—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 4.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx
Membrane affinity affects MinD gradient.
Fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations of cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD containing either the native amphipathic helix (wt) (A), the tandem MinD amphipathic helix (2xAH) (B), or the weak Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B amphipathic helix (NS4B-AH) (C). The manually shaded red areas highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1. (D) Relative membrane affinities with median values of the different mGFP-MinD variants were calculated from transverse FIPs (n>30). Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test. The MinD variants were expressed in a ΔminD background. Phase contrast images are shown as insets. Some double septa are indicated with red arrows. Scale bar is 2 μm. Red areas in the intensity profiles highlight the polar gradients. Strains used in (A) LB249, (B) LB507, and (C) LB508.
-
Figure 5—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 5.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD with different membrane anchors.
(A) Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs from cells expressing mGFP-MinD variants with different membrane affinities shown in Figure 5. Polar and septal areas were selected manually based on the fluorescence gradient. Polar areas are indicated in red. (B) Calculated pixel intensities and median values at poles and septa in the longitudinal FIP relative to the integrated area of intensity.
-
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig5-figsupp1-data1-v1.xlsx
Functionality of MinD with different membrane affinities.
(A) Minicell formation in cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD with different membrane affinities. The MinD variants were expressed in a ΔminD background (n>300). Standard deviations are indicated. (B) Cell length distributions of the different strains (n>300). Strains used: 1901 (ΔminD), LB249 (wild-type MinD), LB507 (2xAH), and LB508 (NS4B-AH).
-
Figure 6—source data 1
Minicell and cell length data Figure 6.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig6-data1-v1.xlsx
Increased MinD membrane affinity affects MinC recruitment.
Fluorescence microscopy images of cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD (cyan) and mCherry-MinC (red), with either the native membrane anchor (A), the tandem amphipathic helix (B), or the weak Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B-derived amphipathic helix (C). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in insets. Scale bar is 2 μm. Transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations are shown in the right panels (n>30). Right panels depict the longitudinal FIPs with manually shaded red areas to highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples are shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 1. The mGFP-MinD variants and mCherry-MinC were expressed in a ΔminCD background strain. Strains used: (A) LB318, (B) LB584, (C) LB559.
-
Figure 7—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 7.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig7-data1-v1.xlsx
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of mCherry-MinC in cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD membrane-binding variants.
Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs from cells expressing mCherry-MinC and mGFP-MinD variants with different membrane affinities are shown in Figure 7. Upper FIPs and lower FIPs depict MinD and MinC gradients, respectively. The latter is indicated by ‘MinC’.
-
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Fluorescence intensity data Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-fig7-figsupp1-data1-v1.xlsx
Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of MinD localization.
Whole-cell kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of MinD distribution, taking into account dimer-to-monomer transition rates (ATPase activity), membrane affinities, and MinJ interaction (schematic model). The following conditions have been simulated: (A) Start situation whereby (i) diffusion along the membrane is 10-fold slower compared to cytoplasm, (ii) MinD dimer diffuses 2-fold slower compared to the monomer in both environments, (iii) 10% stronger membrane affinity for dimer, (iv) membrane dwell time of monomers and dimers on average 1.4–4.5 s, (v) dimerization and monomerization rates such that dimers and monomers are approximately in a 1:1 ratio, (vi) transition from dimer to monomer occurs stochastically with a half-life of approximately 1/s, and (vii) MinD dimers in close proximity to polar regions (peak MinJ concentration) will remain attached for some time, so that approximately 25% of MinD dimers are associated with the polar caps, representing MinJ. (B) Same as simulation A, but membrane-attached monomers have a 2-fold higher chance of forming dimers compared to cytoplasmic monomers. (C) Same as simulation A, but MinJ also stimulates MinD dimerization. (D) Same as simulation C, but MinD ATPase activity, i.e., dimer-to-monomer transition, only occurs at the membrane. (E) Same as simulation D, but with a 10-fold higher ATPase activity, i.e., dimer-to-monomer transition. (F) Same as simulation C, but MinD dimers are not retained by MinJ. (G) Same as simulation C, but diffusion rates of monomer and dimer are the same. (H) Same as simulation C, but the membrane affinity of MinD monomers and dimers is the same. (I) Same as simulation C, but membrane affinity of MinD is stronger, such that the diffusion is a further 10-fold slower on the membrane. (J) Same as simulation C, but membrane affinity of MinD is 2-fold weaker. (K) Same as simulation C, but now MinD dimers can also form tetramers. Graphs indicate the average lateral projection of MinD in simulated cells.
Amino acid sequence alignment between E. coli and B. subtilis MinD proteins.
The E. coli and B. subtilis MinD proteins share 44% identical residues. The five conserved motifs of the ATPase protein family are framed in blue. The exchanged conserved amino acids are highlighted in blue (G12V, K16A, D40A). The C-terminal membrane-targeting amphipathic helices are framed in red (MTS).
Western blot analysis of GFP-MinD variants.
Western blot analysis of strains expressing different mGFP-MinD protein fusions. Cells were grown in LB medium at 37°C until early exponential phase, followed by induction for three doubling times with 0.1% xylose. Anti-GFP primary antibody was used to detect the different fusion proteins. Strains used: LB305 (wt), LB306 (K16A), LB307 (G12V), LB308 (D40A), LB507 (2xAH), LB508 (NS4B-AH). Black arrowhead indicates full-length mGFP-MinD (~57.7 kDa), the asterisk indicates a nonspecific band.
-
Appendix 1—figure 2—source data 1
Original Western blot Appendix 1—figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-app1-fig2-data1-v1.zip
-
Appendix 1—figure 2—source data 2
Original Western blot with markings Appendix 1—figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-app1-fig2-data2-v1.zip
Effect of membrane potential dissipation on membrane binding.
Fluorescence images of cells expressing mGFP-MinD variants with the wild-type amphipathic helix (wt) (A) and the strong (2xAH) membrane binding amphipathic helix (B). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. The membrane potential was dissipated by the proton-ionophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (100 μM for 10 min). mGFP-MinD fusions were expressed from the ectopic amyE locus using a xylose-inducible promoter and a ΔminD background. Strains used: (A) LB249, (B) LB507.
Tables
| Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | 168 | Barbe et al., 2009 | Wild-type | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | 1901 | Marston et al., 1998 | minD::erm | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | 3381 | van Baarle and Bramkamp, 2010 | minC::km | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | 3309 | van Baarle and Bramkamp, 2010 | minCD::km | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | RD021 | Bramkamp et al., 2008 | minJ::tet | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB249 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB250 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB251 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB252 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB305 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB306 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB307 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB308 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB318 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB319 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB320 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB321 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB405 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB406 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB407 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB408 | This paper | minCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB409 | This paper | minCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB410 | This paper | minCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB411 | This paper | minCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB412 | This paper | minCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB507 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(2xAH with linker in between) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB508 | This paper | minD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-HCV-NS4B-AH | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB559 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-HCV-NS4B-AH aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB584 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(2xAH with linker in between) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | FBB043 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-AH(MinD) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | FBB053 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-BsMTS-tandem(MinD) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | FBB046 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-AH(NS4B) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB609 | This paper | amyE::spc Phyperspank-sfGFP (from pDR111-N015-sfGFP) | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB643 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(I260E) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | LB644 | This paper | amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A I260E) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km | |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pAPNC213 | Morimoto et al., 2002 | Plasmid | bla aprE3’ spc Pspac-lacI aprE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pDR111-N015-sfGFP | Nordholt et al., 2017 | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Phyperspank-lacI-sfGFP amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS113 | Strahl and Hamoen, 2010 | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(K16A) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pSG1729 | Lewis and Marston, 1999 | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pSG1730 | Marston et al., 1998 | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pSG2 | Fort and Errington, 1985 | Plasmid | bla cat |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pSS153 | Syvertsson et al., 2021 | Plasmid | bla aprE3’ Phag-mCherry-cat aprE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pAPNCcat | This paper | Plasmid | bla aprE3’ cat Pspac-lacI aprE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS112 | This paper | Plasmid | bla aprE3’ cat Pspac-mCherry aprE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS115 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(G12V) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS116 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(D40A) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS117 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-MTS(minD) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS119 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-MTS(minD)-tandem (with linker in between) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS121 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-NS4B-AH amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS123 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem (with linker in between) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pHJS125 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD-NS4B-AH amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB11 | This paper | Plasmid | bla aprE3’ cat Pspac-mCherry-minC aprE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB21 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB22 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB23 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB24 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB49 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(with linker in between) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB50 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-NS4B-AH amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB71 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(I260E) amyE5’ |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pLB72 | This paper | Plasmid | bla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP(D40A I260E)-minD amyE5’ |
| Sequence-based reagent | LB1 | This paper | PCR primers | GCGCGGGATCCATGAAGACCAAAAAGCAGCAATATG |
| Sequence-based reagent | LB2 | This paper | PCR primers | CGCGCGAATTCTCACATTCCTCCCTCAAGCCTTG |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS05 | This paper | PCR primers | GCTAATTTTATTGCAATAACAGGTG (To linearize pAPNC213) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS06 | This paper | PCR primers | GACCGTTAGCGTTTAAGTACATC (To linearize pAPNC213) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS07 | This paper | PCR primers | TAAACGCTAACGGTCCAGTAATATTGACTTTTAAAAAAGG (cat cassette) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS08 | This paper | PCR primers | TGCAATAAAATTAGCTTATAAAAGCCAGTCATTAGGCC (cat cassette) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS437 | This paper | PCR primers | GCGCGGTCGACACATAAGGAGGAACTACTATGGTC (mCherry) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS438 | This paper | PCR primers | (mCherry) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS508 | This paper | PCR primers | CACAGAATAGTCTTTTAAGTAAGTC (aprE) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS509 | This paper | PCR primers | CCGGAACATCAGGATGCTGAC (aprE) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS410 | This paper | PCR primers | CCTGTCCACACAATCTAAACTTTCGAAAGATCCC (A206K mutation in GFP) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS411 | This paper | PCR primers | GGGATCTTTCGAAAGTTTAGATTGTGTGGACAGG (A206K mutation in GFP) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS112 | This paper | PCR primers | GCGGAGTAGGTGCGACAACAACATCTG (K16A mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS113 | This paper | PCR primers | CAGATGTTGTTGTCGCACCTACTCCGC (K16A mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS205 | This paper | PCR primers | GGAATGATGGCTAAGGAAAAGTCATTTTTCGG (I260E mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS206 | This paper | PCR primers | CCGAAAAATGACTTTTCCTTAGCCATCATTCC (I260E mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS320 | This paper | PCR primers | CTTCGGGAAAAGTGGGAGTAGGTAAG (G12V mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS321 | This paper | PCR primers | CTTACCTACTCCCACTTTTCCCGAAG (G12V mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS322 | This paper | PCR primers | GCTTAGTAGATACTGCGATAGGACTGCGC (D40A mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | HS323 | This paper | PCR primers | GCGCAGTCCTATCGCAGTATCTACTAAGC (D40A mutation in MinD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | FB135 | This paper | PCR primers | CTTCGGATCCACGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTGGGTGAGGCTATCGTAATAAC (minD) |
| Sequence-based reagent | FB136 | This paper | PCR primers | CTAGAACTAGAATTCTTAAGATCTTACTCCGAAAAATG (MinD MTS) |
| Sequence-based reagent | FB149 | This paper | PCR primers | CTTCGGATCCACGGATCAGGAGTGCTTGAAGAGCAAAACAAAGG (MinD MTS) |
| Sequence-based reagent | FB138 | This paper | PCR primers | CTAGAACTAGAATTCTTATGATCTCACTCCAAAAAATGATTTAATTTTCGCCATCATTCCTTTGTTTTGTTCTTCCAGCACTCCTCCAGATCTTACTCCGAAAAATGAC (MinD MTS with 2xAH with linker) |
| Sequence-based reagent | FB141 | This paper | PCR primers | CTAGAACTAGAATTCTTAAATCCATTGGTGCAGTCTTCTCAGCAGTTGTGTCACTGTCAGTGATGACAGAATGCCGTTTTGCTCTTCAAGCACCTG (HCV-NS4B-AH) |
Additional files
-
Supplementary file 1
Table with parameter values in simulation and physical units.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-supp1-v1.docx
-
MDAR checklist
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-mdarchecklist1-v1.pdf
-
Source code 1
Basic codes needed to model MinD gradient patterns in Bacillus subtilis.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-code1-v1.zip
-
Appendix 1—figure 2—source data 1
Original Western blot Appendix 1—figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-app1-fig2-data1-v1.zip
-
Appendix 1—figure 2—source data 2
Original Western blot with markings Appendix 1—figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101520/elife-101520-app1-fig2-data2-v1.zip