Membrane affinity difference between MinD monomer and dimer is not crucial for MinD gradient formation in Bacillus subtilis

  1. Laura C Bohorquez
  2. Henrik Strahl  Is a corresponding author
  3. Davide Marenduzzo
  4. Martin J Thiele
  5. Frank Burmann
  6. Leendert Hamoen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
  2. Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
  3. SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
11 figures, 1 table and 5 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Localization of monomeric and dimeric MinD variants.

Cellular localization of (A) wild-type MinD, (B) MinD K16A, (C) MinD G12V, and (D) MinD D40A. Localization was monitored by an N-terminal monomeric GFP (mGFP) fusion. Fusion proteins were expressed in either a ΔminD or ΔminCD background. Fluorescence images (left panels) and corresponding phase contrast images (inset) are shown in the left panels. Some minicells are indicated with red arrows. Scale bar is 2 μm. Middle panels show the transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations calculated using an average of at least 30 cells (ΔminCD background) per dataset. Right panels depict the longitudinal FIPs using the ΔminCD background. The manually shaded red areas highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples for wild-type MinD and the D40A variants are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1. (E) Transversal FIP with standard deviations of exponentially growing wild-type cells stained with fluorescence membrane dye FM5-95, and wild-type cells expressing GFP are shown as controls. (F) Membrane affinities, with median values, estimated from the valley/peak ratios shown in the middle panels of (A–D) and controls (E). (G) Longitudinal FIP along the exponentially growing wild-type cells stained with the fluorescence membrane dye FM5-95. Strains used in (A) LB249 and LB305, (B) LB250 and LB306, (C) LB251 and LB307, (D) LB252 and LB308, (E) LB609 and (G) 168.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of GFP-MinD wild-type and D40A variants.

(A) Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs of GFP-MinD and GFP-MinD-D40A shown in Figure 1. Polar and septal areas were selected manually based on the fluorescence gradient. Polar areas are indicated in red. (B) Quantification of pixel intensities, with median values at poles and septa in the longitudinal FIP relative to the intensity of the total integrated intensity. Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test.

Effect of a minJ deletion on MinD-GFP localization.

(A) Fluorescence microscopy images of ΔminCD and ΔminJΔminCD mutant cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD variants. Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. (B) Quantification of related septal fluorescence intensities, with median values at septa (n>100). Since the strongly filamentous ΔminJ strain is delicate to handle, cells were grown on agarose patches on microscopy slides. Scale bar is 5 μm. Strains used for wt: LB405 and LB409, K16A: LB406 and LB410, G12V: LB407 and LB411, and D40A: LB408 and LB412.

Membrane recruitment of MinC by MinD variants.

Fluorescence microscopy images of cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD variants (cyan) and mCherry-MinC (red). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. (A) Wild-type MinD, (B) MinD K16A, (C) MinD G12V, (D) MinD D40A, (E) MinD I260E, (F) MinD D40A, I260E. Right panels show the transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations averaged over at least 30 cells. White arrows in (D) highlight colocalization. Scale bar is 2 μm. mGFP-MinD variants and mCherry-MinC were expressed in a ΔminCD background strain. Strains used: (A) LB318, (B) LB319, (C) LB320, (D) LB321, (E) LB643, and (F) LB644.

Membrane association of different amphipathic helices.

(A) Schematic presentation of the tandem amphipathic helix and the weak amphipathic helix from Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B241-253. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images and transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations of cells expressing the different amphipathic helix sequences fused to the C-terminus of GFP. A strain expressing cytoplasmic GFP was included for comparison. Scale bar is 2 μm. Strains used: FBB043 (GFP-AHMinD), FBB05 (GFP-AH2x), FBB046 (GFP-AHNS4B), LB609 (GFP). (C) Average membrane affinities calculated from the transverse FIPs (n>30). Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Membrane affinity affects MinD gradient.

Fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations of cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD containing either the native amphipathic helix (wt) (A), the tandem MinD amphipathic helix (2xAH) (B), or the weak Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B amphipathic helix (NS4B-AH) (C). The manually shaded red areas highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1. (D) Relative membrane affinities with median values of the different mGFP-MinD variants were calculated from transverse FIPs (n>30). Significance of difference was confirmed using a t-test. The MinD variants were expressed in a ΔminD background. Phase contrast images are shown as insets. Some double septa are indicated with red arrows. Scale bar is 2 μm. Red areas in the intensity profiles highlight the polar gradients. Strains used in (A) LB249, (B) LB507, and (C) LB508.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD with different membrane anchors.

(A) Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs from cells expressing mGFP-MinD variants with different membrane affinities shown in Figure 5. Polar and septal areas were selected manually based on the fluorescence gradient. Polar areas are indicated in red. (B) Calculated pixel intensities and median values at poles and septa in the longitudinal FIP relative to the integrated area of intensity.

Functionality of MinD with different membrane affinities.

(A) Minicell formation in cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD with different membrane affinities. The MinD variants were expressed in a ΔminD background (n>300). Standard deviations are indicated. (B) Cell length distributions of the different strains (n>300). Strains used: 1901 (ΔminD), LB249 (wild-type MinD), LB507 (2xAH), and LB508 (NS4B-AH).

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Increased MinD membrane affinity affects MinC recruitment.

Fluorescence microscopy images of cells expressing monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD (cyan) and mCherry-MinC (red), with either the native membrane anchor (A), the tandem amphipathic helix (B), or the weak Hepatitis C virus protein NS4B-derived amphipathic helix (C). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in insets. Scale bar is 2 μm. Transverse fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) with standard deviations are shown in the right panels (n>30). Right panels depict the longitudinal FIPs with manually shaded red areas to highlight the polar gradients. Additional examples are shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 1. The mGFP-MinD variants and mCherry-MinC were expressed in a ΔminCD background strain. Strains used: (A) LB318, (B) LB584, (C) LB559.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Longitudinal fluorescence intensity profiles (FIPs) of mCherry-MinC in cells expressing different monomeric GFP (mGFP)-MinD membrane-binding variants.

Additional examples of longitudinal FIPs from cells expressing mCherry-MinC and mGFP-MinD variants with different membrane affinities are shown in Figure 7. Upper FIPs and lower FIPs depict MinD and MinC gradients, respectively. The latter is indicated by ‘MinC’.

Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of MinD localization.

Whole-cell kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of MinD distribution, taking into account dimer-to-monomer transition rates (ATPase activity), membrane affinities, and MinJ interaction (schematic model). The following conditions have been simulated: (A) Start situation whereby (i) diffusion along the membrane is 10-fold slower compared to cytoplasm, (ii) MinD dimer diffuses 2-fold slower compared to the monomer in both environments, (iii) 10% stronger membrane affinity for dimer, (iv) membrane dwell time of monomers and dimers on average 1.4–4.5 s, (v) dimerization and monomerization rates such that dimers and monomers are approximately in a 1:1 ratio, (vi) transition from dimer to monomer occurs stochastically with a half-life of approximately 1/s, and (vii) MinD dimers in close proximity to polar regions (peak MinJ concentration) will remain attached for some time, so that approximately 25% of MinD dimers are associated with the polar caps, representing MinJ. (B) Same as simulation A, but membrane-attached monomers have a 2-fold higher chance of forming dimers compared to cytoplasmic monomers. (C) Same as simulation A, but MinJ also stimulates MinD dimerization. (D) Same as simulation C, but MinD ATPase activity, i.e., dimer-to-monomer transition, only occurs at the membrane. (E) Same as simulation D, but with a 10-fold higher ATPase activity, i.e., dimer-to-monomer transition. (F) Same as simulation C, but MinD dimers are not retained by MinJ. (G) Same as simulation C, but diffusion rates of monomer and dimer are the same. (H) Same as simulation C, but the membrane affinity of MinD monomers and dimers is the same. (I) Same as simulation C, but membrane affinity of MinD is stronger, such that the diffusion is a further 10-fold slower on the membrane. (J) Same as simulation C, but membrane affinity of MinD is 2-fold weaker. (K) Same as simulation C, but now MinD dimers can also form tetramers. Graphs indicate the average lateral projection of MinD in simulated cells.

Appendix 1—figure 1
Amino acid sequence alignment between E. coli and B. subtilis MinD proteins.

The E. coli and B. subtilis MinD proteins share 44% identical residues. The five conserved motifs of the ATPase protein family are framed in blue. The exchanged conserved amino acids are highlighted in blue (G12V, K16A, D40A). The C-terminal membrane-targeting amphipathic helices are framed in red (MTS).

Appendix 1—figure 2
Western blot analysis of GFP-MinD variants.

Western blot analysis of strains expressing different mGFP-MinD protein fusions. Cells were grown in LB medium at 37°C until early exponential phase, followed by induction for three doubling times with 0.1% xylose. Anti-GFP primary antibody was used to detect the different fusion proteins. Strains used: LB305 (wt), LB306 (K16A), LB307 (G12V), LB308 (D40A), LB507 (2xAH), LB508 (NS4B-AH). Black arrowhead indicates full-length mGFP-MinD (~57.7 kDa), the asterisk indicates a nonspecific band.

Appendix 1—figure 3
Effect of membrane potential dissipation on membrane binding.

Fluorescence images of cells expressing mGFP-MinD variants with the wild-type amphipathic helix (wt) (A) and the strong (2xAH) membrane binding amphipathic helix (B). Corresponding phase contrast images are shown in the insets. The membrane potential was dissipated by the proton-ionophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (100 μM for 10 min). mGFP-MinD fusions were expressed from the ectopic amyE locus using a xylose-inducible promoter and a ΔminD background. Strains used: (A) LB249, (B) LB507.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)168Barbe et al., 2009Wild-type
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)1901Marston et al., 1998minD::erm
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)3381van Baarle and Bramkamp, 2010minC::km
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)3309van Baarle and Bramkamp, 2010minCD::km
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)RD021Bramkamp et al., 2008minJ::tet
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB249This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB250This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB251This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB252This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB305This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB306This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB307This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB308This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB318This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB319This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB320This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB321This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB405This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB406This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB407This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB408This paperminCD::km amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB409This paperminCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB410This paperminCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB411This paperminCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB412This paperminCD::km minJ::tet amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB507This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(2xAH with linker in between)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB508This paperminD::erm amyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-HCV-NS4B-AH
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB559This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-HCV-NS4B-AH aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB584This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(2xAH with linker in between) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)FBB043This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-AH(MinD)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)FBB053This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-BsMTS-tandem(MinD)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)FBB046This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-GFP-AH(NS4B)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB609This paperamyE::spc Phyperspank-sfGFP (from pDR111-N015-sfGFP)
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB643This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(I260E) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km
Strain, strain background (B. subtilis)LB644This paperamyE::spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A I260E) aprE::cat Pspac-mCherry-minC minCD::km
Recombinant DNA reagentpAPNC213Morimoto et al., 2002Plasmidbla aprE3’ spc Pspac-lacI aprE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpDR111-N015-sfGFPNordholt et al., 2017Plasmidbla amyE3’ spc Phyperspank-lacI-sfGFP amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS113Strahl and Hamoen, 2010Plasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(K16A) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpSG1729Lewis and Marston, 1999Plasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpSG1730Marston et al., 1998Plasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpSG2Fort and Errington, 1985Plasmidbla cat
Recombinant DNA reagentpSS153Syvertsson et al., 2021Plasmidbla aprE3’ Phag-mCherry-cat aprE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpAPNCcatThis paperPlasmidbla aprE3’ cat Pspac-lacI aprE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS112This paperPlasmidbla aprE3’ cat Pspac-mCherry aprE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS115This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(G12V) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS116This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD(D40A) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS117This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-MTS(minD) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS119This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-MTS(minD)-tandem (with linker in between) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS121This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-NS4B-AH amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS123This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem (with linker in between) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpHJS125This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-GFP-minD-NS4B-AH amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB11This paperPlasmidbla aprE3’ cat Pspac-mCherry-minC aprE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB21This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB22This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(K16A) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB23This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(G12V) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB24This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(D40A) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB49This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-BsMTS-tandem(with linker in between) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB50This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD-NS4B-AH amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB71This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP-minD(I260E) amyE5’
Recombinant DNA reagentpLB72This paperPlasmidbla amyE3’ spc Pxyl-mGFP(D40A I260E)-minD amyE5’
Sequence-based reagentLB1This paperPCR primersGCGCGGGATCCATGAAGACCAAAAAGCAGCAATATG
Sequence-based reagentLB2This paperPCR primersCGCGCGAATTCTCACATTCCTCCCTCAAGCCTTG
Sequence-based reagentHS05This paperPCR primersGCTAATTTTATTGCAATAACAGGTG (To linearize pAPNC213)
Sequence-based reagentHS06This paperPCR primersGACCGTTAGCGTTTAAGTACATC (To linearize pAPNC213)
Sequence-based reagentHS07This paperPCR primersTAAACGCTAACGGTCCAGTAATATTGACTTTTAAAAAAGG (cat cassette)
Sequence-based reagentHS08This paperPCR primersTGCAATAAAATTAGCTTATAAAAGCCAGTCATTAGGCC (cat cassette)
Sequence-based reagentHS437This paperPCR primersGCGCGGTCGACACATAAGGAGGAACTACTATGGTC (mCherry)
Sequence-based reagentHS438This paperPCR primers(mCherry)
Sequence-based reagentHS508This paperPCR primersCACAGAATAGTCTTTTAAGTAAGTC (aprE)
Sequence-based reagentHS509This paperPCR primersCCGGAACATCAGGATGCTGAC (aprE)
Sequence-based reagentHS410This paperPCR primersCCTGTCCACACAATCTAAACTTTCGAAAGATCCC (A206K mutation in GFP)
Sequence-based reagentHS411This paperPCR primersGGGATCTTTCGAAAGTTTAGATTGTGTGGACAGG (A206K mutation in GFP)
Sequence-based reagentHS112This paperPCR primersGCGGAGTAGGTGCGACAACAACATCTG (K16A mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS113This paperPCR primersCAGATGTTGTTGTCGCACCTACTCCGC (K16A mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS205This paperPCR primersGGAATGATGGCTAAGGAAAAGTCATTTTTCGG (I260E mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS206This paperPCR primersCCGAAAAATGACTTTTCCTTAGCCATCATTCC (I260E mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS320This paperPCR primersCTTCGGGAAAAGTGGGAGTAGGTAAG (G12V mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS321This paperPCR primersCTTACCTACTCCCACTTTTCCCGAAG (G12V mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS322This paperPCR primersGCTTAGTAGATACTGCGATAGGACTGCGC (D40A mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentHS323This paperPCR primersGCGCAGTCCTATCGCAGTATCTACTAAGC (D40A mutation in MinD)
Sequence-based reagentFB135This paperPCR primersCTTCGGATCCACGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTGGGTGAGGCTATCGTAATAAC (minD)
Sequence-based reagentFB136This paperPCR primersCTAGAACTAGAATTCTTAAGATCTTACTCCGAAAAATG (MinD MTS)
Sequence-based reagentFB149This paperPCR primersCTTCGGATCCACGGATCAGGAGTGCTTGAAGAGCAAAACAAAGG (MinD MTS)
Sequence-based reagentFB138This paperPCR primersCTAGAACTAGAATTCTTATGATCTCACTCCAAAAAATGATTTAATTTTCGCCATCATTCCTTTGTTTTGTTCTTCCAGCACTCCTCCAGATCTTACTCCGAAAAATGAC (MinD MTS with 2xAH with linker)
Sequence-based reagentFB141This paperPCR primersCTAGAACTAGAATTCTTAAATCCATTGGTGCAGTCTTCTCAGCAGTTGTGTCACTGTCAGTGATGACAGAATGCCGTTTTGCTCTTCAAGCACCTG (HCV-NS4B-AH)

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Laura C Bohorquez
  2. Henrik Strahl
  3. Davide Marenduzzo
  4. Martin J Thiele
  5. Frank Burmann
  6. Leendert Hamoen
(2026)
Membrane affinity difference between MinD monomer and dimer is not crucial for MinD gradient formation in Bacillus subtilis
eLife 13:RP101520.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101520.4