Prophage regulation of Shewanella fidelis 3313 motility and biofilm formation with implications for gut colonization dynamics in Ciona robusta

  1. Ojas Natarajan
  2. Susanne L Gibboney
  3. Morgan N Young
  4. Shen Jean Lim
  5. Felicia Nguyen
  6. Natalia Pluta
  7. Celine GF Atkinson
  8. Assunta Liberti
  9. Eric D Kees
  10. Brittany A Leigh
  11. Mya Breitbart
  12. Jeffrey A Gralnick
  13. Larry J Dishaw  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Pediatrics, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, United States
  2. College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, United States
  3. Biomedical Sciences Program, University of South Florida, United States
  4. Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, United States
  5. Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy
  6. BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, United States
  7. Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, United States
6 figures, 5 tables and 2 additional files

Figures

General prophage deletion scheme.

(a) Location of upstream, downstream, and flanking primers used in the deletion of SfPat, primer orientation shown with respect to the prophage. (b) Deletion of SfPat from S. fidelis 3313 identified after assembling Illumina (short-read) sequenced genomes and mapping onto the improved (short and long-read, PacBio, sequencing) WT genome. The figure illustrates SfPat deletion as revealed by subsequent Illumina sequencing. The solid gray areas on the SfPat genome indicate regions that share identity with the WT.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Effects of prophages on biofilm and swimming in S. fidelis 3313.

(a) Influence of prophages on in vitro biofilm formation over 24 hours quantified with crystal violet assay (n=3), (b) role of prophages in swimming quantified as the diameter of spread on soft agar after 24 hours (n=6), and (c) fold-change of pdeB (with Rho as internal control) from 24 hour biofilm (in vitro) (n=4) and 24 hour in vivo (n=4). *p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01; ns = not significant.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
qPCR showing relative fold change gene expression with Rho as an endogenous control.

(a) Cyclic-di-GMP regulators expression in WT and ΔSfPat in vitro after 24 hours of exposure (n=4), (b) Cyclic-di-GMP regulators expression in WT and ΔSfPat in vivo of Ciona MS4 after 24 hours of exposure (n=4). ns = not significant.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements
The influence of SfPat prophage on gut colonization in Ciona.

(a) Results of six biological replicates (n=6, each replicate being a pool of ten juvenile tunicates) of the experimental exposure of Ciona MS4 juveniles to either WT or ΔSfPat strains for 1 hour and 24 hours; retention quantification displayed as a Beeswarm plot of colony-forming units (CFUs). There is significant retention observed in WT after 24 hours. The MS4 juveniles reveal differential colonization of WT and ΔSfPat after 1 hour of exposure (b–e), where WT strain is stained with BacLight Red and ΔSfpat is stained with BacLight Green reveal (b) WT is seen localized in the lower esophagus to anterior stomach, while the ΔSfPat deletion strain localized to the hindgut, while (c) the WT is seen localized mostly as a fecal pellet in the center of the stomach, while ΔSfPat prefers to localize to the stomach wall. (d) The WT strain is retained in the pyloric cecum. (e) Summary schematic of asymmetric bilateral views of MS4 animals; top of image is anterior and stomach is posterior. The ventral side is the ‘En’ side, and the dorsal side is the opposite side. The findings can be summarized as such: WT is retained in E and S, in PC, and also in the HG, while the ΔSfPat is retained in the stomach folds, MG, and portions of the HG. Some overlap in signal is noted with yellow coloring. En = endostyle, E = esophagus, S = stomach, MG = mid gut, HG = hind gut, PC = pyloric cecum.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
BacLight-stained WT localization in Ciona MS4 after 1-hour exposure.

WT stained with BacLight Red exposed to Ciona MS4 for 1 hour. (a) WT found in esophagus (E), stomach (S), and fecal pellet (FP). (b) WT also found to occupy the hind gut (HG). (c) WT is retained in the center of the stomach but not the stomach walls.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
BacLight-stained ΔSfPat localization in Ciona MS4 after 1-hour exposure.

ΔSfPat localization in Ciona MS4 after 1-hour exposure. (a) Stained with BacLight Red, ΔSfPat is found adhered to the stomach (S) and mid gut (MG). (b) Stained with BacLight Green, ΔSfPat is found in the mid gut and hind gut (HG). (c) ΔSfPat is more localized in the stomach fold than the center of the stomach, with presence in the mid gut.

The influence of prophages on host gene expression.

(a) VCBP-C gene expression in MS4 juveniles after 1 hour of exposure to S. fidelis 3313 strains (n=4). (b) Survey of additional innate immune gene expression in MS4 juveniles after 24-hour exposure to WT or ΔSfPat mutant strains (n=3). Actin is the internal control. *p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01, ns = not significant.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Lysogen gene expression in response to host immune effector binding.

Gene expression of SfPat structural protein P5, recA and lexA of WT strain grown as a 24-hour biofilm while exposed to 50 μg/ml VCBP-C. Rho is the internal control (n=4). *p-value<0.05, ns = not significant.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
RefFinder identifying Rho as the stable endogenous control.

Rho is the most stable gene across strains when tested in vitro (n=3).

Author response image 1
WT S.

fidelis 3313 was exposed in vitro to 50 µg/ml VCBP-C in stationary cultures. Biofilms were observed for 24hrs. At 12 hrs, the presence of VCBP-C increased the amount of biofilms, whereas reduced biofilms were observed at 4 and 24hrs. Our findings (manuscript Fig 2a) reveal that SfPat contributes to biofilm formation, exposure to SfPat deletion mutants increases host VCBP-C expression (manuscript Fig. 4a), and VCBP-C binding to WT S. fidelis 3313 reduces the expression of SfPat P5 capsid protein (manuscript Fig. 5). These findings suggest that in vivo exposure/ colonization assays benefit from detailed time-course observations to be further explored in follow-up, future experiments.

Tables

Table 1
All S. fidelis 3313 strains are submitted under the BioProject PRJNA 90327 on NCBI, accession: SAMN31793880 ID:31793880.
OrganismsPhenotypeNCBI RefSeq assembly
JG4066WTGCF_033441085.1
JG3862ΔSfPatGCF_033441065.1
Table 2
Primer sequences on S. flidelis 3313 used for generating ΔSfPat deletion suicide vector and for deletion verification.
Primer IDSequence (5’–3’)
EDK77AAATGGATCCCGATCAGCCTGCTAGTTTATT
EDK78ACGGAATAGGTTGAATGCGACTCAGGC
EDK79TCGCATTCAACCTATTCCGTCATGTTTAGCC
EDK80ACATGAGCTCGATGCAGATAAAGAGCCGTAAA
EDK81GTTTATTTTGTGGCAATCGCA
EDK82GGTAGCAGTGCTTAAACGAT
Table 3
Plasmids and strains used in the study.
Plasmids/ strainsGenotypeSource/reference
E. coli UQ950E. coli DH5αλ(pir) host for cloning; FΔ(argFac)169Φ80dlacZ58(ΔM15) glnV44(AS)rfbD1 gyrA96(NalR) recA1endA1spoT1 thi1 hsdR17 deoR Λ pir+Saltikov and Newman, 2003
pSMV3−Δ SfPatpSMV3 with 778 bp upstream and 779 bp downstream of flanking regions of SfPatThis study
Table 4
Ciona genes targeted and the necessary reverse transcription-qPCR primers.
GeneFunctionGenBank accession no.Primer (5’–3’)Reference
VCBP-C-FwdSecreted immune effector in the gutHQ324151AGACCAACGCCAACACAGTALiberti et al., 2018
VCBP-C-RevCCCCATACATTGCAGCATTTC
Actin–FwdCytoskeletal actinAJ297725CCCAAATCATGTTCGAAACCLiberti et al., 2018
Actin-RevReference geneACACCATCACCACTGTCGAA
IL17-1-FwdInterleukin 17NM_001129875.1AGGTTAAGAATCCCTATGGTGCLiberti et al., 2023
IL17-1-RevEffector cytokineCAAAGGCACAGACGCAAAGG
IL17-1R-FwdInterleukin 17 receptorNM_001245045TGTTGGCATGAGTGTTCGGT
IL17-1R-RevAGTTGGTTCTGCCCCAAAGT
NFκ-B-FwdImmune regulatoryNM_001078304TGTCGCTTGTCGTCATGGAALiberti et al., 2023
NFκ-B-RevTranscription factorAACACCCAAGACCGTCGAAA
TNFα-FwdTumor necrosis factorNM_001128107TTCAGAAAGATTGGACGACGALiberti et al., 2023
TNFα-RevInflammatory effectorTCGTTTAGAAATGCTGCTGTGG
C3A-R-FwdComplement C3NM_001078552TTGTAAGCTGGCACAAGGTGTThis study
C3A-R-RevInflammatory mediatorGACCGTAGTCTGGTAGAGGTC
MBL-FwdMannose binding lectinNM_001167707.2TTATTGATGGGAAAGTTTGGTThis study
MBL-RevTAACATCTCTGTTCTTGGGTC
Table 5
S. fidelis 3313 genes targeted and the necessary reverse transcription-qPCR primers.
GeneFunctionGenbank accession no.Primer (5’–3’)Reference
pleD-FwdRegulates production of cyclic di-GMPNZ_KI912459.1CTCTTCACCGCCACTTCTTThis study
pleD-RevGGTGTGGTCTCTTATGCCTATC
Chitinase-FwdChitin utilization geneNF027718.3CAGTGTAGCTAAGTCGTCATCThis study
Chitinase-RevCGCCAACCAGTGCTTTATTG
pilZ-FwdType IV Pilus control proteinNZ_JADX01000014.1TGGCAAGGTCGTTTGGATTAThis study
pilZ-RevAGGCAAGCTCACTGGAAAG
pdeB-FwdPhosphodiesteraseNF012772.3GCATCAGGGCTCTTACCAATAGThis study
pdeB-RevGAGGCGGTGATCCTTACAGATA
RecA-FwdBacterial recombinase/bacterial reference geneNZ_KI912459.1CGTAGTGGTGCGGTAGATGTThis study
RecA-RevCGCATTGCTTGGCTCATCAT
LexA-fwdRegulator of recombinaseNZ_JADX01000011.1TGACCCAGCTATGTTCCGCCThis study
LexA-RevGCTCAACCTTGTGTACGGCG
Rho-FwdBacterial reference geneNZ_JADX01000026.1CACGTACAAGTTGCCGAAATGThis study
Rho-RevCAAGACGGGTGATAGAGTCAAG
gyrB-FwdBacterial reference geneAM229309.2TCACGAGCATCATCACCCGTThis study
gyrB-RevGGCTTCCGTGGTGCGTTAAC

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ojas Natarajan
  2. Susanne L Gibboney
  3. Morgan N Young
  4. Shen Jean Lim
  5. Felicia Nguyen
  6. Natalia Pluta
  7. Celine GF Atkinson
  8. Assunta Liberti
  9. Eric D Kees
  10. Brittany A Leigh
  11. Mya Breitbart
  12. Jeffrey A Gralnick
  13. Larry J Dishaw
(2025)
Prophage regulation of Shewanella fidelis 3313 motility and biofilm formation with implications for gut colonization dynamics in Ciona robusta
eLife 14:RP103107.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103107.3