Capturing the temporal evolution of choice across prefrontal cortex

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt  Is a corresponding author
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa
  4. Jonathan D Wallis
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Activity in prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been richly described using economic models of choice. Yet such descriptions fail to capture the dynamics of decision formation. Describing dynamic neural processes has proven challenging due to the problem of indexing the internal state of PFC and its trial-by-trial variation. Using primate neurophysiology and human magnetoencephalography, we here recover a single-trial index of PFC internal states from multiple simultaneously recorded PFC subregions. This index can explain the origins of neural representations of economic variables in PFC. It describes the relationship between neural dynamics and behavior in both human and monkey PFC, directly bridging between human neuroimaging data and underlying neuronal activity. Moreover, it reveals a functionally dissociable interaction between orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral PFC in guiding cost-benefit decisions. We cast our observations in terms of a neural network model of choice, providing formal links to mechanistic dynamical accounts of decision-making.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    laurence.hunt@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Timothy EJ Behrens, Senior editor, eLife.
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jonathan D Wallis

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael J Frank, Brown University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Ethical approval was obtained for this study. All procedures were in accord with the National Institute of Health guidelines (Assurance Number A3084-01) and the recommendations of the U.C. Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number R283).

Human subjects: All human subjects provided informed consent, including consent to publish. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from NHS Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee C, approval reference 08/H0606/46.

Version history

  1. Received: September 29, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 11, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 11, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Hunt et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,750
    views
  • 1,052
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa
  4. Jonathan D Wallis
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley
(2015)
Capturing the temporal evolution of choice across prefrontal cortex
eLife 4:e11945.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11945

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11945

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yali Pan, Steven Frisson ... Ole Jensen
    Research Article

    Humans can read and comprehend text rapidly, implying that readers might process multiple words per fixation. However, the extent to which parafoveal words are previewed and integrated into the evolving sentence context remains disputed. We investigated parafoveal processing during natural reading by recording brain activity and eye movements using MEG and an eye tracker while participants silently read one-line sentences. The sentences contained an unpredictable target word that was either congruent or incongruent with the sentence context. To measure parafoveal processing, we flickered the target words at 60 Hz and measured the resulting brain responses (i.e. Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging, RIFT) during fixations on the pre-target words. Our results revealed a significantly weaker tagging response for target words that were incongruent with the previous context compared to congruent ones, even within 100ms of fixating the word immediately preceding the target. This reduction in the RIFT response was also found to be predictive of individual reading speed. We conclude that semantic information is not only extracted from the parafovea but can also be integrated with the previous context before the word is fixated. This early and extensive parafoveal processing supports the rapid word processing required for natural reading. Our study suggests that theoretical frameworks of natural reading should incorporate the concept of deep parafoveal processing.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jack W Lindsey, Elias B Issa
    Research Article

    Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.