Capturing the temporal evolution of choice across prefrontal cortex

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt  Is a corresponding author
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa
  4. Jonathan D Wallis
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Activity in prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been richly described using economic models of choice. Yet such descriptions fail to capture the dynamics of decision formation. Describing dynamic neural processes has proven challenging due to the problem of indexing the internal state of PFC and its trial-by-trial variation. Using primate neurophysiology and human magnetoencephalography, we here recover a single-trial index of PFC internal states from multiple simultaneously recorded PFC subregions. This index can explain the origins of neural representations of economic variables in PFC. It describes the relationship between neural dynamics and behavior in both human and monkey PFC, directly bridging between human neuroimaging data and underlying neuronal activity. Moreover, it reveals a functionally dissociable interaction between orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral PFC in guiding cost-benefit decisions. We cast our observations in terms of a neural network model of choice, providing formal links to mechanistic dynamical accounts of decision-making.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    laurence.hunt@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Timothy EJ Behrens, Senior editor, eLife.
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jonathan D Wallis

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael J Frank, Brown University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Ethical approval was obtained for this study. All procedures were in accord with the National Institute of Health guidelines (Assurance Number A3084-01) and the recommendations of the U.C. Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number R283).

Human subjects: All human subjects provided informed consent, including consent to publish. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from NHS Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee C, approval reference 08/H0606/46.

Version history

  1. Received: September 29, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 11, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 11, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Hunt et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,741
    views
  • 1,051
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Laurence Tudor Hunt
  2. Timothy EJ Behrens
  3. Takayuki Hosokawa
  4. Jonathan D Wallis
  5. Steven Wayne Kennerley
(2015)
Capturing the temporal evolution of choice across prefrontal cortex
eLife 4:e11945.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11945

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11945

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Yunlu Xue, Yimin Zhou, Constance L Cepko
    Research Advance

    Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is an inherited retinal disease in which there is a loss of cone-mediated daylight vision. As there are >100 disease genes, our goal is to preserve cone vision in a disease gene-agnostic manner. Previously we showed that overexpressing TXNIP, an α-arrestin protein, prolonged cone vision in RP mouse models, using an AAV to express it only in cones. Here, we expressed different alleles of Txnip in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), a support layer for cones. Our goal was to learn more of TXNIP’s structure-function relationships for cone survival, as well as determine the optimal cell type expression pattern for cone survival. The C-terminal half of TXNIP was found to be sufficient to remove GLUT1 from the cell surface, and improved RP cone survival, when expressed in the RPE, but not in cones. Knock-down of HSP90AB1, a TXNIP-interactor which regulates metabolism, improved the survival of cones alone and was additive for cone survival when combined with TXNIP. From these and other results, it is likely that TXNIP interacts with several proteins in the RPE to indirectly support cone survival, with some of these interactions different from those that lead to cone survival when expressed only in cones.

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Jose Rodriguez Gotor, Kashif Mahfooz ... John F Wesseling
    Research Article

    Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.