Structural elucidation of a novel mechanism for the bacteriophage-based inhibition of the RNA degradosome

  1. An Van den Bossche  Is a corresponding author
  2. Steven W Hardwick
  3. Pieter-Jan Ceyssens
  4. Hanne Hendrix
  5. Marleen Voet
  6. Tom Dendooven
  7. Katarzyna J Bandyra
  8. Marc De Maeyer
  9. Abram Aertsen
  10. Jean-Paul Noben
  11. Ben F Luisi  Is a corresponding author
  12. Rob Lavigne  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Scietific Institute of Public Health, Belgium
  4. UHasselt, Belgium

Abstract

In all domains of life, the catalysed degradation of RNA facilitates rapid adaptation to changing environmental conditions, while destruction of foreign RNA is an important mechanism to prevent host infection. We have identified a virus-encoded protein termed gp37/Dip, which directly binds and inhibits the RNA degradation machinery of its bacterial host. Encoded by giant phage ΦKZ, this protein associates with two RNA binding sites of the RNase E component of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa RNA degradosome, occluding them from substrates and resulting in effective inhibition of RNA degradation and processing. The 2.2 Å crystal structure reveals that this novel homo-dimeric protein has no identifiable structural homologues. Our biochemical data indicate that acidic patches on the convex outer surface bind RNase E. Through the activity of Dip, ΦKZ has evolved a unique mechanism to down regulate a key metabolic process of its host to allow accumulation of viral RNA in infected cells.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Steven Hardwick
    (2016) crystal structure
    Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no: 5FT1).
    1. An Van den Bossche
    2. Jean-Paul Noben
    (2015) Mass spectrometry data set
    Publicly available at the PRIDE Archive (accession no: PXD003285).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. An Van den Bossche

    Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    An.vandenbossche@wiv-isp.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Steven W Hardwick

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pieter-Jan Ceyssens

    Division of Bacterial diseases, Scietific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hanne Hendrix

    Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marleen Voet

    Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tom Dendooven

    Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Katarzyna J Bandyra

    Department of Biochemsitry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marc De Maeyer

    Biochemistry, Molecular and Structural Biology Scetion, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Abram Aertsen

    Laboratory of Microbiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean-Paul Noben

    Biomedical Research Institute and Transnational University Limburg, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ben F Luisi

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    bfl20@cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rob Lavigne

    Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    rob.lavigne@biw.kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7377-1314

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0599.11 & Scolarship AV)

  • An Van den Bossche
  • Pieter-Jan Ceyssens
  • Hanne Hendrix
  • Rob Lavigne

Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (SBO 100042)

  • An Van den Bossche
  • Pieter-Jan Ceyssens
  • Rob Lavigne

Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven (CREA/09/017 & IDO/10/012)

  • Abram Aertsen
  • Rob Lavigne

Wellcome Trust (scholarship SH, BL)

  • Steven W Hardwick
  • Ben F Luisi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gisela Storz, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 1, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 18, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 22, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 10, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Van den Bossche et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,537
    views
  • 514
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. An Van den Bossche
  2. Steven W Hardwick
  3. Pieter-Jan Ceyssens
  4. Hanne Hendrix
  5. Marleen Voet
  6. Tom Dendooven
  7. Katarzyna J Bandyra
  8. Marc De Maeyer
  9. Abram Aertsen
  10. Jean-Paul Noben
  11. Ben F Luisi
  12. Rob Lavigne
(2016)
Structural elucidation of a novel mechanism for the bacteriophage-based inhibition of the RNA degradosome
eLife 5:e16413.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16413

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16413

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Dietmar Funck, Malte Sinn ... Jörg S Hartig
    Research Article

    Metabolism and biological functions of the nitrogen-rich compound guanidine have long been neglected. The discovery of four classes of guanidine-sensing riboswitches and two pathways for guanidine degradation in bacteria hint at widespread sources of unconjugated guanidine in nature. So far, only three enzymes from a narrow range of bacteria and fungi have been shown to produce guanidine, with the ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE) as the most prominent example. Here, we show that a related class of Fe2+- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (2-ODD-C23) highly conserved among plants and algae catalyze the hydroxylation of homoarginine at the C6-position. Spontaneous decay of 6-hydroxyhomoarginine yields guanidine and 2-aminoadipate-6-semialdehyde. The latter can be reduced to pipecolate by pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase but more likely is oxidized to aminoadipate by aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH7B in vivo. Arabidopsis has three 2-ODD-C23 isoforms, among which Din11 is unusual because it also accepted arginine as substrate, which was not the case for the other 2-ODD-C23 isoforms from Arabidopsis or other plants. In contrast to EFE, none of the three Arabidopsis enzymes produced ethylene. Guanidine contents were typically between 10 and 20 nmol*(g fresh weight)-1 in Arabidopsis but increased to 100 or 300 nmol*(g fresh weight)-1 after homoarginine feeding or treatment with Din11-inducing methyljasmonate, respectively. In 2-ODD-C23 triple mutants, the guanidine content was strongly reduced, whereas it increased in overexpression plants. We discuss the implications of the finding of widespread guanidine-producing enzymes in photosynthetic eukaryotes as a so far underestimated branch of the bio-geochemical nitrogen cycle and propose possible functions of natural guanidine production.