Structural determinants of adhesion by Protocadherin-19 and implications for its role in epilepsy

  1. Sharon R Cooper
  2. James D Jontes  Is a corresponding author
  3. Marcos Sotomayor  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Ohio State University, United States

Abstract

Non-clustered δ-protocadherins are homophilic cell adhesion molecules essential for the development of the vertebrate nervous system, as several are closely linked to neurodevelopmental disorders. Mutations in protocadherin-19 (PCDH19) result in a female-limited, infant-onset form of epilepsy (PCDH19-FE). Over 100 mutations in PCDH19 have been identified in patients with PCDH19-FE, about half of which are missense mutations in the adhesive extracellular domain. Neither the mechanism of homophilic adhesion by PCDH19, nor the biochemical effects of missense mutations are understood. Here we present a crystallographic structure of the minimal adhesive fragment of the zebrafish Pcdh19 extracellular domain. This structure reveals the adhesive interface for Pcdh19, which is broadly relevant to both non-clustered δ and clustered protocadherin subfamilies. In addition, we show that several PCDH19-FE missense mutations localize to the adhesive interface and abolish Pcdh19 adhesion in in vitro assays, thus revealing the biochemical basis of their pathogenic effects during brain development.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sharon R Cooper

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. James D Jontes

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    jontes.1@osu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8954-6127
  3. Marcos Sotomayor

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    sotomayor.8@osu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3333-1805

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R21MH09463)

  • James D Jontes

Ohio State University

  • Marcos Sotomayor

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM103403)

  • Marcos Sotomayor

National Institutes of Health (S10 RR029205)

  • Marcos Sotomayor

Department of Energy (GUP 40277)

  • Marcos Sotomayor

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. William I Weis, Stanford University Medical Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: October 25, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 27, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 18, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Cooper et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,714
    views
  • 567
    downloads
  • 73
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sharon R Cooper
  2. James D Jontes
  3. Marcos Sotomayor
(2016)
Structural determinants of adhesion by Protocadherin-19 and implications for its role in epilepsy
eLife 5:e18529.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18529

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18529

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.