Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California San Francisco, United States
  2. University of California Berkeley, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States

Abstract

While ongoing experience proceeds continuously, memories of past experience are often recalled as episodes with defined beginnings and ends. The neural mechanisms that lead to the formation of discrete episodes from the stream of neural activity patterns representing ongoing experience are unknown. To investigate these mechanisms, we recorded neural activity in the rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, structures critical for memory processes. We show that during spatial navigation, hippocampal CA1 place cells maintain a continuous spatial representation across different states of motion (movement and immobility). In contrast, during sharp-wave ripples (SWRs), when representations of experience are transiently reactivated from memory, movement- and immobility-associated activity patterns are most often reactivated separately. Concurrently, distinct hippocampal reactivations of movement- or immobility-associated representations are accompanied by distinct modulation patterns in prefrontal cortex. These findings demonstrate a continuous representation of ongoing experience can be separated into independently reactivated memory representations.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jai Y Yu

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kenneth Kay

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel F Liu

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adrianna Loback

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marielena Sosa

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason E Chung

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mattias P Karlsson

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Margaret C Larkin

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Loren M Frank

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    loren@phy.ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1752-5677

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (RO1MH105174)

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Daniel F Liu
  • Marielena Sosa
  • Jason E Chung
  • Loren M Frank

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Jai Y Yu

University of California (LF-12-237680)

  • Loren M Frank

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Loren M Frank

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097084)

  • Loren M Frank

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and US National Institutes of Health guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, approval number AN110101-03B. All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2017, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,792
    views
  • 804
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank
(2017)
Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility
eLife 6:e27621.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Cristina Gil Avila, Elisabeth S May ... Markus Ploner
    Research Article

    Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition whose neural mechanisms are incompletely understood. An imbalance of cerebral excitation and inhibition (E/I), particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), is believed to represent a crucial mechanism in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Thus, identifying a non-invasive, scalable marker of E/I could provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of chronic pain and aid in developing clinically useful biomarkers. Recently, the aperiodic component of the electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum has been proposed to represent a non-invasive proxy for E/I. We, therefore, assessed the aperiodic component in the mPFC of resting-state EEG recordings in 149 people with chronic pain and 115 healthy participants. We found robust evidence against differences in the aperiodic component in the mPFC between people with chronic pain and healthy participants, and no correlation between the aperiodic component and pain intensity. These findings were consistent across different subtypes of chronic pain and were similarly found in a whole-brain analysis. Their robustness was supported by preregistration and multiverse analyses across many different methodological choices. Together, our results suggest that the EEG aperiodic component does not differentiate between people with chronic pain and healthy individuals. These findings and the rigorous methodological approach can guide future studies investigating non-invasive, scalable markers of cerebral dysfunction in people with chronic pain and beyond.

    1. Neuroscience
    Claire Meissner-Bernard, Friedemann Zenke, Rainer W Friedrich
    Research Article

    Biological memory networks are thought to store information by experience-dependent changes in the synaptic connectivity between assemblies of neurons. Recent models suggest that these assemblies contain both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (E/I assemblies), resulting in co-tuning and precise balance of excitation and inhibition. To understand computational consequences of E/I assemblies under biologically realistic constraints we built a spiking network model based on experimental data from telencephalic area Dp of adult zebrafish, a precisely balanced recurrent network homologous to piriform cortex. We found that E/I assemblies stabilized firing rate distributions compared to networks with excitatory assemblies and global inhibition. Unlike classical memory models, networks with E/I assemblies did not show discrete attractor dynamics. Rather, responses to learned inputs were locally constrained onto manifolds that ‘focused’ activity into neuronal subspaces. The covariance structure of these manifolds supported pattern classification when information was retrieved from selected neuronal subsets. Networks with E/I assemblies therefore transformed the geometry of neuronal coding space, resulting in continuous representations that reflected both relatedness of inputs and an individual’s experience. Such continuous representations enable fast pattern classification, can support continual learning, and may provide a basis for higher-order learning and cognitive computations.