Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California San Francisco, United States
  2. University of California Berkeley, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States

Abstract

While ongoing experience proceeds continuously, memories of past experience are often recalled as episodes with defined beginnings and ends. The neural mechanisms that lead to the formation of discrete episodes from the stream of neural activity patterns representing ongoing experience are unknown. To investigate these mechanisms, we recorded neural activity in the rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, structures critical for memory processes. We show that during spatial navigation, hippocampal CA1 place cells maintain a continuous spatial representation across different states of motion (movement and immobility). In contrast, during sharp-wave ripples (SWRs), when representations of experience are transiently reactivated from memory, movement- and immobility-associated activity patterns are most often reactivated separately. Concurrently, distinct hippocampal reactivations of movement- or immobility-associated representations are accompanied by distinct modulation patterns in prefrontal cortex. These findings demonstrate a continuous representation of ongoing experience can be separated into independently reactivated memory representations.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jai Y Yu

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kenneth Kay

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel F Liu

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adrianna Loback

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marielena Sosa

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason E Chung

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mattias P Karlsson

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Margaret C Larkin

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Loren M Frank

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    loren@phy.ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1752-5677

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (RO1MH105174)

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Daniel F Liu
  • Marielena Sosa
  • Jason E Chung
  • Loren M Frank

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Jai Y Yu

University of California (LF-12-237680)

  • Loren M Frank

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Loren M Frank

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097084)

  • Loren M Frank

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and US National Institutes of Health guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, approval number AN110101-03B. All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2017, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,807
    views
  • 804
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank
(2017)
Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility
eLife 6:e27621.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (8 total) in a conditioned suppression setting, using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. The shock-paired visual cue further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an Immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

    1. Neuroscience
    Paul I Jaffe, Gustavo X Santiago-Reyes ... Russell A Poldrack
    Research Article

    Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are the dominant framework for modeling response time (RT) data from speeded decision-making tasks. While providing a good quantitative description of RT data in terms of abstract perceptual representations, EAMs do not explain how the visual system extracts these representations in the first place. To address this limitation, we introduce the visual accumulator model (VAM), in which convolutional neural network models of visual processing and traditional EAMs are jointly fitted to trial-level RTs and raw (pixel-space) visual stimuli from individual subjects in a unified Bayesian framework. Models fitted to large-scale cognitive training data from a stylized flanker task captured individual differences in congruency effects, RTs, and accuracy. We find evidence that the selection of task-relevant information occurs through the orthogonalization of relevant and irrelevant representations, demonstrating how our framework can be used to relate visual representations to behavioral outputs. Together, our work provides a probabilistic framework for both constraining neural network models of vision with behavioral data and studying how the visual system extracts representations that guide decisions.