Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California San Francisco, United States
  2. University of California Berkeley, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States

Abstract

While ongoing experience proceeds continuously, memories of past experience are often recalled as episodes with defined beginnings and ends. The neural mechanisms that lead to the formation of discrete episodes from the stream of neural activity patterns representing ongoing experience are unknown. To investigate these mechanisms, we recorded neural activity in the rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, structures critical for memory processes. We show that during spatial navigation, hippocampal CA1 place cells maintain a continuous spatial representation across different states of motion (movement and immobility). In contrast, during sharp-wave ripples (SWRs), when representations of experience are transiently reactivated from memory, movement- and immobility-associated activity patterns are most often reactivated separately. Concurrently, distinct hippocampal reactivations of movement- or immobility-associated representations are accompanied by distinct modulation patterns in prefrontal cortex. These findings demonstrate a continuous representation of ongoing experience can be separated into independently reactivated memory representations.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jai Y Yu

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kenneth Kay

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel F Liu

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher

    University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adrianna Loback

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marielena Sosa

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason E Chung

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mattias P Karlsson

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Margaret C Larkin

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Loren M Frank

    UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    loren@phy.ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1752-5677

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (RO1MH105174)

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Daniel F Liu
  • Marielena Sosa
  • Jason E Chung
  • Loren M Frank

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Jai Y Yu

University of California (LF-12-237680)

  • Loren M Frank

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Jai Y Yu
  • Kenneth Kay
  • Loren M Frank

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097084)

  • Loren M Frank

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Neil Burgess, University College London, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and US National Institutes of Health guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, approval number AN110101-03B. All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: April 9, 2017
  2. Accepted: July 31, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 25, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,715
    views
  • 796
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jai Y Yu
  2. Kenneth Kay
  3. Daniel F Liu
  4. Irene Grossrubatscher
  5. Adrianna Loback
  6. Marielena Sosa
  7. Jason E Chung
  8. Mattias P Karlsson
  9. Margaret C Larkin
  10. Loren M Frank
(2017)
Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility
eLife 6:e27621.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27621

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    MinHyuk Lee, Se Hoon Park ... KyeongJin Kang
    Research Article

    Establishing transepithelial ion disparities is crucial for sensory functions in animals. In insect sensory organs called sensilla, a transepithelial potential, known as the sensillum potential (SP), arises through active ion transport across accessory cells, sensitizing receptor neurons such as mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors. Because multiple receptor neurons are often co-housed in a sensillum and share SP, niche-prevalent overstimulation of single sensory neurons can compromise neighboring receptors by depleting SP. However, how such potential depletion is prevented to maintain sensory homeostasis remains unknown. Here, we find that the Ih-encoded hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel bolsters the activity of bitter-sensing gustatory receptor neurons (bGRNs), albeit acting in sweet-sensing GRNs (sGRNs). For this task, HCN maintains SP despite prolonged sGRN stimulation induced by the diet mimicking their sweet feeding niche, such as overripe fruit. We present evidence that Ih-dependent demarcation of sGRN excitability is implemented to throttle SP consumption, which may have facilitated adaptation to a sweetness-dominated environment. Thus, HCN expressed in sGRNs serves as a key component of a simple yet versatile peripheral coding that regulates bitterness for optimal food intake in two contrasting ways: sweet-resilient preservation of bitter aversion and the previously reported sweet-dependent suppression of bitter taste.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Melody C Iacino, Taylor A Stowe ... Mark J Ferris
    Research Article Updated

    Adolescence is characterized by changes in reward-related behaviors, social behaviors, and decision-making. These behavioral changes are necessary for the transition into adulthood, but they also increase vulnerability to the development of a range of psychiatric disorders. Major reorganization of the dopamine system during adolescence is thought to underlie, in part, the associated behavioral changes and increased vulnerability. Here, we utilized fast scan cyclic voltammetry and microdialysis to examine differences in dopamine release as well as mechanisms that underlie differential dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core of adolescent (P28-35) and adult (P70-90) male rats. We show baseline differences between adult and adolescent-stimulated dopamine release in male rats, as well as opposite effects of the α6 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) on modulating dopamine release. The α6-selective blocker, α-conotoxin, increased dopamine release in early adolescent rats, but decreased dopamine release in rats beginning in middle adolescence and extending through adulthood. Strikingly, blockade of GABAA and GABAB receptors revealed that this α6-mediated increase in adolescent dopamine release requires NAc GABA signaling to occur. We confirm the role of α6 nAChRs and GABA in mediating this effect in vivo using microdialysis. Results herein suggest a multisynaptic mechanism potentially unique to the period of development that includes early adolescence, involving acetylcholine acting at α6-containing nAChRs to drive inhibitory GABA tone on dopamine release.