SPIN1 promotes tumorigenesis by blocking the uL18 (universal large ribosomal subunit protein 18)-MDM2-p53 pathway in human cancer

  1. Ziling Fang
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Jun-Ming Liao
  4. Jun Deng
  5. Kevin D Plummer
  6. Peng Liao
  7. Tao Liu
  8. Wensheng Zhang
  9. Kun Zhang
  10. Li Li
  11. David Margolin
  12. Shelya X Zeng  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jianping Xiong  Is a corresponding author
  14. Hua Lu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tulane University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Southern New Hampshire University, United States
  3. Xavier University of Louisiana, United States
  4. Ochsner Clinical Foundation, United States
  5. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Abstract

Ribosomal proteins (RPs) play important roles in modulating the MDM2-p53 pathway. However, less is known about the upstream regulators of the RPs. Here we identify SPIN1 (Spindlin 1) as a novel binding partner of human RPL5/uL18 that is important for this pathway. SPIN1 ablation activates p53, suppresses cell growth, reduces clonogenic ability, and induces apoptosis of human cancer cells. Mechanistically, SPIN1 sequesters uL18 in the nucleolus, preventing it from interacting with MDM2, and thereby alleviating uL18-mediated inhibition of MDM2 ubiquitin ligase activity towards p53. SPIN1 deficiency increases ribosome-free uL18 and uL5 (human RPL11), which are required for SPIN1 depletion-induced p53 activation. Analysis of cancer genomic databases suggests that SPIN1 is highly expressed in several human cancers, and its overexpression is positively correlated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Altogether, our findings reveal that the oncogenic property of SPIN1 may be attributed to its negative regulation of uL18, leading to p53 inactivation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ziling Fang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bo Cao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jun-Ming Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jun Deng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kevin D Plummer

    Department of Economy, Southern New Hampshire University, New Hampshire, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Peng Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tao Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wensheng Zhang

    Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Facility of Xavier RCMI Center of Cancer Research, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kun Zhang

    Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Facility of Xavier RCMI Center of Cancer Research, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Li Li

    Laboratory Translational Cancer Research, Ochsner Clinical Foundation, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David Margolin

    Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinical Foundation, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shelya X Zeng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    szeng@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jianping Xiong

    Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    For correspondence
    jpxiong@ncu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hua Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    hlu2@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9285-7209

Funding

National Cancer Institute

  • Hua Lu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The experiment was not blind and was handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#4275R) of Tulane University School of Medicine. The maximum tumor volume per tumor allowed the IACUC committee is 1.5 cm diameter or 300 mm3 per tumor.

Copyright

© 2018, Fang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,296
    views
  • 413
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ziling Fang
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Jun-Ming Liao
  4. Jun Deng
  5. Kevin D Plummer
  6. Peng Liao
  7. Tao Liu
  8. Wensheng Zhang
  9. Kun Zhang
  10. Li Li
  11. David Margolin
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Jianping Xiong
  14. Hua Lu
(2018)
SPIN1 promotes tumorigenesis by blocking the uL18 (universal large ribosomal subunit protein 18)-MDM2-p53 pathway in human cancer
eLife 7:e31275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31275

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Yumin Fu, Xinyu Guo ... Lianxin Liu
    Review Article

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver tumor, is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and the incidence of liver cancer is still increasing worldwide. Curative hepatectomy or liver transplantation is only indicated for a small population of patients with early-stage HCC. However, most patients with HCC are not candidates for radical resection due to disease progression, leading to the choice of the conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug sorafenib as first-line treatment. In the past few years, immunotherapy, mainly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the clinical strategy for HCC. Combination therapy with ICIs has proven more effective than sorafenib, and clinical trials have been conducted to apply these therapies to patients. Despite significant progress in immunotherapy, the molecular mechanisms behind it remain unclear, and immune resistance is often challenging to overcome. Several studies have pointed out that the complex intercellular communication network in the immune microenvironment of HCC regulates tumor escape and drug resistance to immune response. This underscores the urgent need to analyze the immune microenvironment of HCC. This review describes the immunosuppressive cell populations in the immune microenvironment of HCC, as well as the related clinical trials, aiming to provide insights for the next generation of precision immunotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Li Min, Fanqin Bu ... Shutian Zhang
    Research Article

    It takes more than 20 years for normal colorectal mucosa to develop into metastatic carcinoma. The long time window provides a golden opportunity for early detection to terminate the malignant progression. Here, we aim to enable liquid biopsy of T1a stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and precancerous advanced adenoma (AA) by profiling circulating small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-derived RNAs. We exhibited a full RNA landscape for the circulating sEVs isolated from 60 participants. A total of 58,333 annotated RNAs were detected from plasma sEVs, among which 1,615 and 888 sEV-RNAs were found differentially expressed in plasma from T1a stage CRC and AA compared to normal controls (NC). Then we further categorized these sEV-RNAs into six modules by a weighted gene coexpression network analysis and constructed a 60-gene t-SNE model consisting of the top 10 RNAs of each module that could well distinguish T1a stage CRC/AA from NC samples. Some sEV-RNAs were also identified as indicators of specific endoscopic and morphological features of different colorectal lesions. The top-ranked biomarkers were further verified by RT-qPCR, proving that these candidate sEV-RNAs successfully identified T1a stage CRC/AA from NC in another cohort of 124 participants. Finally, we adopted different algorithms to improve the performance of RT-qPCR-based models and successfully constructed an optimized classifier with 79.3% specificity and 99.0% sensitivity. In conclusion, circulating sEVs of T1a stage CRC and AA patients have distinct RNA profiles, which successfully enable the detection of both T1a stage CRC and AA via liquid biopsy.