SPIN1 promotes tumorigenesis by blocking the uL18 (universal large ribosomal subunit protein 18)-MDM2-p53 pathway in human cancer

  1. Ziling Fang
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Jun-Ming Liao
  4. Jun Deng
  5. Kevin D Plummer
  6. Peng Liao
  7. Tao Liu
  8. Wensheng Zhang
  9. Kun Zhang
  10. Li Li
  11. David Margolin
  12. Shelya X Zeng  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jianping Xiong  Is a corresponding author
  14. Hua Lu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tulane University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Southern New Hampshire University, United States
  3. Xavier University of Louisiana, United States
  4. Ochsner Clinical Foundation, United States
  5. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Abstract

Ribosomal proteins (RPs) play important roles in modulating the MDM2-p53 pathway. However, less is known about the upstream regulators of the RPs. Here we identify SPIN1 (Spindlin 1) as a novel binding partner of human RPL5/uL18 that is important for this pathway. SPIN1 ablation activates p53, suppresses cell growth, reduces clonogenic ability, and induces apoptosis of human cancer cells. Mechanistically, SPIN1 sequesters uL18 in the nucleolus, preventing it from interacting with MDM2, and thereby alleviating uL18-mediated inhibition of MDM2 ubiquitin ligase activity towards p53. SPIN1 deficiency increases ribosome-free uL18 and uL5 (human RPL11), which are required for SPIN1 depletion-induced p53 activation. Analysis of cancer genomic databases suggests that SPIN1 is highly expressed in several human cancers, and its overexpression is positively correlated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Altogether, our findings reveal that the oncogenic property of SPIN1 may be attributed to its negative regulation of uL18, leading to p53 inactivation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ziling Fang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bo Cao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jun-Ming Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jun Deng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kevin D Plummer

    Department of Economy, Southern New Hampshire University, New Hampshire, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Peng Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tao Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wensheng Zhang

    Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Facility of Xavier RCMI Center of Cancer Research, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kun Zhang

    Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Facility of Xavier RCMI Center of Cancer Research, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Li Li

    Laboratory Translational Cancer Research, Ochsner Clinical Foundation, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David Margolin

    Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinical Foundation, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shelya X Zeng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    szeng@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jianping Xiong

    Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    For correspondence
    jpxiong@ncu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hua Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    hlu2@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9285-7209

Funding

National Cancer Institute

  • Hua Lu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The experiment was not blind and was handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#4275R) of Tulane University School of Medicine. The maximum tumor volume per tumor allowed the IACUC committee is 1.5 cm diameter or 300 mm3 per tumor.

Copyright

© 2018, Fang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,358
    views
  • 417
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ziling Fang
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Jun-Ming Liao
  4. Jun Deng
  5. Kevin D Plummer
  6. Peng Liao
  7. Tao Liu
  8. Wensheng Zhang
  9. Kun Zhang
  10. Li Li
  11. David Margolin
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Jianping Xiong
  14. Hua Lu
(2018)
SPIN1 promotes tumorigenesis by blocking the uL18 (universal large ribosomal subunit protein 18)-MDM2-p53 pathway in human cancer
eLife 7:e31275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31275

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.