Convergent extension (CE) is the evolutionarily conserved morphogenetic engine that drives elongation of the body axis in animals ranging from insects to mammals (Tada and Heisenberg, 2012). Multiple cell behaviors can contribute to CE, but by far the most well-understood process is cell intercalation, by which cells rearrange in a polarized manner (Walck-Shannon and Hardin, 2014). Cell intercalation, in turn, is thought to be driven by multiple subcellular behaviors, including extension of mediolaterally directed cellular protrusions (e.g. [Keller and Hardin, 1987; Shih and Keller, 1992]) and active shrinkage of mediolaterally oriented cell-cell junctions (e.g. [Bertet et al., 2004; Blankenship et al., 2006]). More recent data suggest that these two subcellular behaviors likely work in concert (Sun et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2014). Understanding the molecular mechanisms governing protrusive activity and junction shrinking during cell intercalation will be essential to understanding convergent extension.

The junction shrinking mechanism for cell intercalation was initially described in Drosophila (Bertet et al., 2004; Blankenship et al., 2006) and was subsequently identified in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells in vertebrates (Lienkamp et al., 2012; Nishimura et al., 2012; Shindo and Wallingford, 2014; Trichas et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2014). In all tissues examined by live imaging, junction shrinkage is accompanied by pulsed actomyosin contractions that are restricted to or enriched at mediolaterally oriented cell-cell junctions and absent from or less common at the junctions perpendicular to the anterior-posterior axis (Bertet et al., 2004; Blankenship et al., 2006; Shindo and Wallingford, 2014; Williams et al., 2014). A major unresolved question concerns the molecular mechanism by which actomyosin activity is restricted to specific cell-cell junctions during intercalation.

In Drosophila, pair-rule genes and Toll receptors are crucial regulators of polarized actomyosin (Paré et al., 2014; Zallen and Wieschaus, 2004), but homologous genes do not appear to be involved in vertebrates. Instead, the most well-characterized regulator of mediolateral cell intercalation in vertebrates is the Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) signaling system (Butler and Wallingford, 2017). Indeed, PCP signaling controls cell intercalation during gastrulation and neural tube closure in frogs, fish, and mice, and mutations in PCP genes are now a well-defined genetic risk factor for human neural tube birth defects (NTDs) (De Marco et al., 2014; Juriloff and Harris, 2012; Wallingford et al., 2013). Understanding PCP signaling is therefore a critical challenge in developmental cell biology.

One fundamental principle of PCP signaling is that cell polarity is imparted by asymmetric enrichment of the core PCP proteins (Butler and Wallingford, 2017; Strutt and Strutt, 2009). As shown first in Drosophila, the Prickle (Pk) and Van Gogh (Vangl) proteins act in concert on one side of the cell, and Dishevelled and Frizzled act on the complementary side (Axelrod, 2001; Bastock et al., 2003; Strutt, 2001; Tree et al., 2002). Interestingly, FRAP studies in Drosophila have shown that these patterns of enrichment are driven by planar polarization of the junctional turnover kinetics of PCP proteins, underscoring the dynamic nature of the PCP signaling system (Strutt et al., 2011). Similar patterns of enrichment and turnover have been reported in vertebrate epithelia (Butler and Wallingford, 2015; Chien et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2016), but less is known about PCP protein localization dynamics during cell intercalation.

For example, complementary, asymmetric domains of PCP protein enrichment have been described during vertebrate CE (Ciruna et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2005; McGreevy et al., 2015; Ossipova et al., 2015; Roszko et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2008), but how PCP protein enrichment is coordinated in space and time with the subcellular behaviors that drive intercalation remains essentially unexplored. This gap in our knowledge is critical, because recent work demonstrates that PCP proteins are required for the junction shrinking behaviors that contribute critically to cell intercalation (Lienkamp et al., 2012; Nishimura et al., 2012; Shindo and Wallingford, 2014). Thus, there is a pressing need for a quantitative, dynamic picture of PCP protein localization as it relates both to subcellular behaviors involved in cell intercalation and to the actomyosin machinery that drives them.

To this end, we established methods for robust quantification of PCP protein localization in a living vertebrate neural plate as well as methods for correlating PCP protein dynamics with the subcellular behaviors that drive epithelial cell intercalation. Strikingly, we find that in addition to expected patterns of spatial asymmetry, PCP protein enrichment is tightly linked to cell-cell junction behavior: Prickle2 (Pk2) and Vangl2 were dynamically enriched specifically at shrinking cell-cell junctions and depleted from elongating junctions during cell intercalation. FRAP analysis revealed that these patterns of enrichment reflected differences in the kinetics of protein turnover at these sites. Moreover, Pk2 enrichment was temporally and spatially correlated with planar polarized oscillations of junctional actomyosin enrichment. Importantly, all these dynamic relationships were disrupted when PCP signaling was manipulated. Thus, our studies reveal an intimate link between the dynamic localization of core PCP proteins, actomyosin assembly, and polarized junction shrinking during cell intercalation of the closing vertebrate neural tube.

We characterized PCP protein dynamics in the neural plate of Xenopus, as studies in this animal consistently prefigure similar results in mammalian systems yet provide exceptional views of dynamic cell biological processes. Because Dishevelled and Frizzled function in both PCP and canonical Wnt signaling, their roles are more difficult to interrogate, so we focused instead on Prickle and Vangl, which act solely in PCP signaling and are required for CE and neural tube closure in vertebrates, including Xenopus (Darken et al., 2002; Goto et al., 2005; Goto and Keller, 2002; Kibar et al., 2001; Takeuchi et al., 2003). Previous work suggests that Prickle and Vangl localize to the anterior face of cells in the Xenopus neural plate (Ossipova et al., 2015), but we sought to establish a more robust quantification of this pattern as a foundation for the time-lapse studies described below.

We used mRNA injection to express fluorescent protein (FP) fusions to PCP proteins in Xenopus. Because overexpression of PCP proteins has a well-documented effect on PCP signaling, we used titration experiments to empirically determine the lowest possible dose of mRNA that allowed imaging in the Xenopus neural plate. Under these conditions, GFP-Vangl2 displayed a strong asymmetric bias to anterior cell faces (Figure 1A), while at slightly higher doses of injected mRNA, low levels of Vangl2 could be observed at the posterior faces as well (not shown), consistent with previous reports (Ossipova et al., 2015; Roszko et al., 2015). Core PCP proteins are encoded by multi-gene families, and despite the reported role of Prickle1 in convergent extension, GFP-Pk1 did not display asymmetric enrichment in our hands (not shown). However, GFP-Prickle2 (Butler and Wallingford, 2015) was strongly enriched anteriorly (Figure 1A). GFP-Pk2 was also restricted to the apicolateral cell junctional regions, as expected (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Knockdown experiments confirmed that Pk2 was physiologically relevant for convergent extension and neural tube closure in Xenopus (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). In double-labeling experiments, GFP-Vangl2 strongly co-localized with RFP-Pk2 (Figure 1A, Video 1).

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 1

Download asset

We quantified these localization patterns at the population level by binning cell-cell junctions into two groups based on their orientation. To maintain a consistent nomenclature with previous work on cell intercalation, we refer to junctions aligned within 45 degrees of the mediolateral axis as ‘V-junctions’ and the perpendicular junctions (between 45 and 90 degrees off the mediolateral axis) as ‘T-junctions.’ An important subtlety to note here is that the V-junctions are mediolaterally aligned, but actually separate cells that are anteroposterior neighbors. We found that GFP-Pk2 was significantly enriched at V-junctions as compared to T-junctions (Figure 1B). In a more granular view of the data, we observed a significant correlation between GFP-Pk2 pixel intensity and junction angle, with higher enrichment along more mediolaterally oriented junctions (Figure 1C).

To test these quantification schemes, we took advantage of the fact that in many other systems, disruption of any one core PCP protein leads to loss of polarized enrichment of the others. We used targeted injection to co-express reagents for disrupting PCP signaling together with a nuclear RFP lineage tracer, allowing us to compare normal and experimental cells in the same embryo (Figure 1D,E). Xdd1 is a well-defined, PCP-specific dominant negative of Dvl2 (Sokol, 1996; Wallingford et al., 2000) that disrupts convergent extension of the neural tube in Xenopus (Wallingford and Harland, 2001; Wallingford and Harland, 2002); we found that Xdd1 expression severely disrupted Prickle2 asymmetries in the neural plate using both ensemble and individual metrics (Figure 1B,C).

To extend this analysis, we explored Pk2 signaling by expressing a deletion construct lacking the PET and LIM domains (Pk2-ΔPΔL), as this construct disrupted PCP in Xenopus multiciliated cells and an equivalent deletion of Pk1 disrupts CE (Butler and Wallingford, 2015; Takeuchi et al., 2003). We found that Pk2-ΔPΔL strongly disrupted axis elongation in Xenopus (Figure 1—figure supplement 3) and also severely disrupted the planar asymmetry of co-expressed wild-type Pk2-GFP in the neural plate (Figure 1B,C). These results establish the Xenopus neural plate as an effective, quantitative platform for studies of PCP protein localization.

Epithelial convergent extension in the closing Xenopus neural tube involves PCP-dependent polarized junction shrinking

Convergent extension is an inherently dynamic process, as cells constantly exchange neighbors. The dynamic nature of tissues engaged in convergent extension differs markedly from the settings in which PCP protein localization is most commonly studied. We therefore sought to exploit the strengths of Xenopus embryos to image PCP protein dynamics together with the subcellular behaviors that drive convergent extension in the closing neural tube. Curiously, the neural plate of Xenopus consists of two cell layers, an outer epithelial layer and a deeper mesenchymal layer (Schroeder, 1970). While cell intercalation of the deep mesenchymal cells has been characterized (Elul et al., 1997; Keller et al., 1992), the behaviors of the overlying epithelial cells have not. This distinction is not trivial, because it is the outer epithelial cells that display the robust patterns of PCP protein localization described above. To understand how PCP protein localization relates to convergent extension cell behaviors, we had first to characterize cell behaviors in this epithelium.

Neural tube closure spans roughly 6 hr in Xenopus, starting with the shaping of the neural tube at last gastrula stages, followed by the progressive elevation and apposition of the neural folds (Figure 2A). We immobilized embryos on a confocal microscope stage (Kieserman et al., 2010) and used image tiling to collect high-magnification images of the superficial neural plate across the entirety of neural tube closure (Video 2). This approach allowed assessment of tissue-level morphogenetic changes in the neural plate, as well as individual cell trajectories, which closely resembled those of previous studies ((Figure 2B; Figure 2—figure supplement 1) and see [Keller et al., 1992]). Moreover, our tiling approach provided sufficient magnification to quantify the discrete behaviors of individual cells, and tracking of cell clusters revealed extensive intercalations that were mediolaterally biased, resulting in convergence and extension (Figure 2C, Video 3).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 2

Download asset

Video 3

Download asset

Cell intercalations in the neural plate were associated with so-called T transitions, which are characterized by preferential contraction of junctions aligned in the mediolateral axis (T1-T2 transition) (Figure 3A,a’), followed by elongation of new junctions perpendicularly along the anteroposterior axis (T2-T3 transition)(Figure 3a’, a’’)(Bertet et al., 2004). As above, we first quantified these behaviors at the ensemble level and found that mediolaterally oriented V-junctions preferentially shrank, while the perpendicular T-junctions elongated (Figure 3B). Moreover, when we plotted the change in the length of cell-cell junctions against the average angle of that junction for all cells examined (n > 250), we observed a significantly positive correlation; V-junctions preferentially shrank along the mediolateral axis and T-junctions elongated perpendicularly (Figure 3C). Importantly, the orientation of shrinking and growing junctions in this analysis remained fairly constant, changing on average only 5 (±4) degrees over the course of measurement, and no junctions shifted by more than 20 degrees. Thus, in general, V-junctions separate anteroposterior (AP) neighbors and T-junctions separate mediolateral (ML neighbors). Finally, we also observed planar polarized formation and resolution of multicellular rosettes (Figure 3D–F), as have been described in other epithelia (Blankenship et al., 2006; Lienkamp et al., 2012; Trichas et al., 2012).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Because PCP signaling is essential for neural convergent extension, we next assessed the effect of PCP disruption specifically on junction shrinking behaviors in the neural epithelium. Using the mosaic approach described above, we found that expression of Xdd1 elicited the expected tissue level defect in the medially directed movement of the neural folds (Figure 4A, magenta nuclei indicate Xdd1 expressing cells).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Analysis of individual cell behaviors in these embryos revealed that Xdd1 expression significantly disrupted planar polarized junction shrinking, eliminating the strong correlation between junction angle and junction shrinkage or growth (Figure 4B, compare with Figure 3C). This uncoupling of junction behavior from orientation was associated with reduced junction shrinkage generally, and a reduction in the number of productive T transitions (Figure 4C). In fact, even the few productive T transitions that were observed were significantly slowed (Figure 4D).

Finally, these defects in cell intercalation behavior had a profound impact on cell shape. During neural plate shaping stages (12-14), the majority of neural epithelial cells in control embryos exhibited a shift from an anteroposterior orientation to a mediolateral orientation (Figure 4E, green), while Xdd1 expressing cells maintain their alignment in the anteroposterior axis (Figure 4E, blue). In fact, these cells actually increased their length-to-width ratios along the AP axis (not shown), likely as a result of forces generated by other cell behaviors that shape the neural plate at these stages (e.g. apical constriction, elongation of underlying mesoderm, etc.). Notably, genetic mutation of PCP genes in zebrafish also elicits similar spectrum of cell shape and orientation defects (Roszko et al., 2015). Finally, disruption of Prickle function by expression of the dominant-negative Pk2-ΔPΔL elicited the same spectrum of defects (Figure 4C,D, pink; Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Together with our data on PCP protein localization (Figure 1, above), these results establish the Xenopus neural plate as an effective platform with which to probe the relationship between epithelial cell intercalation behaviors and core PCP protein dynamics.

Prickle2 and Vangl2 are dynamically enriched specifically at shrinking cell-cell junctions

With these imaging and analysis systems in place, we performed time-lapse imaging with an eye toward understanding the dynamic relationship between PCP protein localization and epithelial cell behaviors. This analysis revealed several novel insights. First, we noted that the accumulation of Pk2 was junction-specific, displaying overt changes in intensity precisely at tricellular junctions (Figure 5A). Moreover, we found that GFP-Pk2 was dynamically enriched at shrinking junctions but depleted from elongating junctions (Figure 5A), suggesting that dynamic enrichment of Pk2 might not simply reflect the junction’s spatial orientation (e.g. to V- vs. T-junctions). This notion was support by the observation that even when adjacent junctions share a similar orientation, the GFP-Pk2 intensity at these junctions frequently differed substantially (Videos 4 and 5). For example, the still images in Figure 5B show three adjacent junctions sharing a roughly similar mediolateral alignment; none deviates by more than 20 degrees from the mediolateral at any point in the movie. Nonetheless, two of the junctions shrink during the movie (red brackets) while the third one grows (yellow brackets). Even among these similarly oriented junctions, shrinking is associated with increasing levels of Pk2-GFP intensity, and elongation with decreasing Pk2-GFP (Figure 5C). Similar results were obtained for Vangl2 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

To quantify these observations, we plotted the changes in GFP-Pk2 fluorescence intensity against corresponding changes in junction length, and we observed a strong and highly significant correlation (Figure 6A). Similar results were observed with Vangl2 (Figure 6B). We considered the possibility that these changes in intensity could reflect density, increasing simply if the amount of protein on a junction remains constant as that junction shrinks. To explore this idea, we examined a generic membrane marker (FP-caax) and found that while it did show a tendency to increase as junctions shrink, this increase was modest and the correlation was far weaker than that observed for PCP proteins (Figure 6C). Importantly, even when normalized against the membrane marker to account for changes in membrane-FP in the same junctions, the intensities of GFP-Vangl2 and GFP-Prickle2 still displayed strong and significant correlations with junction shrinkage (Figure 6—figure supplement 1).

Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

These findings suggest that the strength of asymmetric Pk2 and Vangl2 enrichment at a particular junction is at least as strongly tied to the dynamic behavior of that junction as it is to the junction’s orientation. As a final test of this idea, we selected a subset of V-junctions which remained aligned within 30 degrees of the ML axis for the entire movie and then plotted the average velocity of shrinking or growth against the average intensity of GFP-Pk2 at that junction. Again, we found a highly significant correlation (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). Together, these data suggest that the enrichment of Pk2 and Vangl2 is governed both by the reciprocal interaction of each individual pair of neighboring cells and is intricately linked to the behavior of the shared junction between them.

Turnover of Prickle2 and Vangl2 at cell-cell junctions is planar polarized during cell intercalation

Of the PCP protein dynamics we observed, we felt that the enrichment specifically at shrinking V-junctions was the most significant. Our data with Caax-GFP (Figure 6C) suggest that simply reducing the junction length is not sufficient to increase density to the full extent observed for Pk2 and Vangl2 at shrinking junctions. We reasoned, therefore, that PCP enrichment could also involve an active process, for example in which regulated turnover kinetics are more dynamic at some junctions and less so at others. FRAP studies have demonstrated that polarized PCP protein turnover is planar polarized in other cell types (Butler and Wallingford, 2015; Chien et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2016; Strutt et al., 2011), so we used this method to assess localization dynamics during cell intercalation in the closing neural tube (Figure 7A).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Both Pk2 and Vangl2 displayed striking differences in turnover kinetics at shrinking versus non-shrinking junctions, with significantly less recovery (i.e. higher stable fraction) for both Vangl2 and Prickle2 at shrinking junctions compared to non-shrinking junctions (Figure 7B,C). Moreover, when we integrated these FRAP data with time-lapse analysis of cell behaviors, we found that the stable fraction of both proteins correlated significantly with changes in junction length: more rapidly shrinking junctions displayed higher stable fractions of junctional PCP proteins (Figure 7D,E). Thus, the overall accumulation of Prickle2 and Vangl2 at shrinking junctions parallels the increased stability of these proteins at these sites, and together, these data suggest a key role for PCP protein trafficking in the coordination of cell-cell junction shrinkage.

Planar polarization of actomyosin during junction shrinking in the neural epithelium is PCP-dependent

We next sought to understand the link between PCP protein localization and the actomyosin machinery known to drive cell-cell junction shrinkage. Time-lapse imaging in Drosophila first demonstrated that cell intercalation by junction shrinkage is accompanied by pulsed accumulations of actomyosin at V-junctions (Bertet et al., 2004; Fernandez-Gonzalez et al., 2009; Rauzi et al., 2008). While this process is independent of PCP signaling in Drosophila, similar actomyosin pulses have been observed during PCP-dependent junction shrinking in mesenchymal cells of the Xenopus gastrula mesoderm (Shindo and Wallingford, 2014). Static analyses of Xenopus, chicks and mice also indicate that actomyosin is enriched at mediolaterally oriented junctions (McGreevy et al., 2015; Nishimura et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2014). However, the spatiotemporal relationship between actomyosin dynamics and subcellular behaviors during cell intercalation in the vertebrate neural tube remains poorly defined.

Using a GFP-fusion to the myosin regulatory light chain Myl9 (Shindo and Wallingford, 2014), we observed a strong enrichment at V-junctions as compared to T-junctions. This enrichment was apparent at both the population level (Figure 8A–C, green) and in the significant correlation between Myl9 intensity and junction angle for individual junctions (Figure 8D, green, n > 450). Consistent with previous reports in other systems (Bertet et al., 2004; Shindo and Wallingford, 2014), Myl9 intensity was elevated in shrinking junctions (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). These correlations are likely to be functionally relevant, because changes in myosin enrichment strongly correlated with decreases in junction length. Similar results were obtained using the actin biosensor Utrophin-RFP (Burkel et al., 2007), and the changes in myosin intensity were also strongly correlated to changes in actin on individual junctions (Figure 8—figure supplement 1).

Figure 8 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Expression of Xdd1 or Pk2-ΔPΔL significantly disrupted the planar polarization of myosin enrichment (Figure 8A–D). Interestingly, these reagents appear to act via converse mechanisms: Expression of Xdd1 elicited an elevation of myosin levels at T-junctions, while expression of Pk2-ΔPΔL elicited a reduction of myosin enrichment at V-junctions (Figure 8C). This result was strikingly similar to the trend observed above for GFP-Pk2 intensities in these conditions (Figure 1B), further suggesting that PCP and Myl9 enrichments are functionally related. Thus, disruption of PCP signaling disrupts both asymmetric PCP protein localization and the planar polarization of actomyosin contraction in the closing neural tube.

PCP proteins and actomyosin dynamics are spatiotemporally coordinated with junction shrinkage

In light of observed spatiotemporal patterns of PCP protein localization (Figure 8), we more closely examined Myl9 and Pk2 localization during time-lapse movies. As expected from results in other systems, Myl9-GFP displayed a pulsatile behavior at shrinking V-junctions (Figure 9A–B, Video 6). Myl9 also pulsed at T-junctions, although such pulses tended to involve larger fluctuations and failed to persistently shrink the junction (Figure 9C). Strikingly, Pk2 intensity also displayed pulsatile enrichment, and moreover, changes in Pk2 were strongly correlated with similar changes in Myl9 intensity at cell-cell junctions (Figure 9A–D). Finally, the pulses of Pk2 and Myl9 were also strongly cross-correlated in time (Figure 9E). Together, these data demonstrate shared dynamic patterns of core PCP protein and actomyosin localization in space and time during cell intercalation and suggest that these systems work in close concert to drive junction shrinking in the Xenopus neural epithelium.

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Video 6

Download asset

Here, we have used image tiling and time-lapse microscopy in Xenopus embryos to generate high magnification movies of the closing vertebrate neural tube. These movies allowed us to quantify core PCP protein localization and dynamics as they relate to the cell behaviors associated with convergent extension. We focus here on junction shrinkage, which together with mediolateral protrusions is an essential sub-cellular behavior contributing to cell intercalation. We find that the Prickle2 and Vangl2 display a consistent pattern of localization and turnover in space and time during cell intercalation that is strongly linked to actomyosin assembly at cell-cell junctions. Directed, mechanistic studies will be required to fully understand the relationships reported here, but our data are nonetheless significant for providing a comprehensive and quantitative view of the spatial and temporal patterns of PCP protein localization during vertebrate collective cell movements.

Data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files

1. 1. Aigouy B
   2. Farhadifar R
   3. Staple DB
   4. Sagner A
   5. Röper JC
   6. Jülicher F
   7. Eaton S

   (2010) Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila

   Cell 142:773–786.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Antic D
   2. Stubbs JL
   3. Suyama K
   4. Kintner C
   5. Scott MP
   6. Axelrod JD

   (2010) Planar cell polarity enables posterior localization of nodal cilia and left-right axis determination during mouse and Xenopus embryogenesis

   PLoS One 5:e8999.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008999

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Axelrod JD

   (2001) Unipolar membrane association of dishevelled mediates frizzled planar cell polarity signaling

   Genes & Development 15:1182–1187.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.890501

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bastock R
   2. Strutt H
   3. Strutt D

   (2003) Strabismus is asymmetrically localised and binds to Prickle and Dishevelled during Drosophila planar polarity patterning

   Development 130:3007–3014.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00526

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bertet C
   2. Sulak L
   3. Lecuit T

   (2004) Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation

   Nature 429:667–671.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02590

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Blankenship JT
   2. Backovic ST
   3. Sanny JS
   4. Weitz O
   5. Zallen JA

   (2006) Multicellular rosette formation links planar cell polarity to tissue morphogenesis

   Developmental Cell 11:459–470.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.007

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Borovina A
   2. Superina S
   3. Voskas D
   4. Ciruna B

   (2010) Vangl2 directs the posterior tilting and asymmetric localization of motile primary cilia

   Nature Cell Biology 12:407–412.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2042

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bosveld F
   2. Bonnet I
   3. Guirao B
   4. Tlili S
   5. Wang Z
   6. Petitalot A
   7. Marchand R
   8. Bardet PL
   9. Marcq P
   10. Graner F
   11. Bellaïche Y

   (2012) Mechanical control of morphogenesis by Fat/Dachsous/Four-jointed planar cell polarity pathway

   Science 336:724–727.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221071

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Burkel BM
   2. von Dassow G
   3. Bement WM

   (2007) Versatile fluorescent probes for actin filaments based on the actin-binding domain of utrophin

   Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 64:822–832.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20226

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Butler MT
    2. Wallingford JB

    (2015) Control of vertebrate core planar cell polarity protein localization and dynamics by Prickle 2

    Development 142:3429–3439.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.121384

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Butler MT
    2. Wallingford JB

    (2017) Planar cell polarity in development and disease

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18:375–388.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.11

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chien YH
    2. Keller R
    3. Kintner C
    4. Shook DR

    (2015) Mechanical strain determines the axis of planar polarity in ciliated epithelia

    Current Biology 25:2774–2784.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Ciruna B
    2. Jenny A
    3. Lee D
    4. Mlodzik M
    5. Schier AF

    (2006) Planar cell polarity signalling couples cell division and morphogenesis during neurulation

    Nature 439:220–224.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04375

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Darken RS
    2. Scola AM
    3. Rakeman AS
    4. Das G
    5. Mlodzik M
    6. Wilson PA

    (2002) The planar polarity gene strabismus regulates convergent extension movements in Xenopus

    The EMBO Journal 21:976–985.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.5.976

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. De Marco P
    2. Merello E
    3. Piatelli G
    4. Cama A
    5. Kibar Z
    6. Capra V

    (2014) Planar cell polarity gene mutations contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects in our population

    Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 100:633–641.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23255

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Elul T
    2. Koehl MA
    3. Keller R

    (1997) Cellular mechanism underlying neural convergent extension in Xenopus laevis embryos

    Developmental Biology 191:243–258.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1997.8711

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fernandez-Gonzalez R
    2. Simoes SM
    3. Röper JC
    4. Eaton S
    5. Zallen JA

    (2009) Myosin II dynamics are regulated by tension in intercalating cells

    Developmental Cell 17:736–743.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. Book

    1. Goldman RD
    2. Spector DL

    (2005)

    Live Cell Imaging: A Laboratory Manual

    Cold Spring Harbor, NY: CSHL Press.

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Goto T
    2. Davidson L
    3. Asashima M
    4. Keller R

    (2005) Planar cell polarity genes regulate polarized extracellular matrix deposition during frog gastrulation

    Current Biology 15:787–793.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Goto T
    2. Keller R

    (2002) The planar cell polarity gene strabismus regulates convergence and extension and neural fold closure in Xenopus

    Developmental Biology 247:165–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0673

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Habas R
    2. Kato Y
    3. He X

    (2001) Wnt/Frizzled activation of Rho regulates vertebrate gastrulation and requires a novel Formin homology protein Daam1

    Cell 107:843–854.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00614-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Hashimoto M
    2. Shinohara K
    3. Wang J
    4. Ikeuchi S
    5. Yoshiba S
    6. Meno C
    7. Nonaka S
    8. Takada S
    9. Hatta K
    10. Wynshaw-Boris A
    11. Hamada H

    (2010) Planar polarization of node cells determines the rotational axis of node cilia

    Nature Cell Biology 12:170–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Jiang D
    2. Munro EM
    3. Smith WC

    (2005) Ascidian prickle regulates both mediolateral and anterior-posterior cell polarity of notochord cells

    Current Biology 15:79–85.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Juriloff DM
    2. Harris MJ

    (2012) A consideration of the evidence that genetic defects in planar cell polarity contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects

    Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 94:824–840.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23079

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Keller R
    2. Hardin J

    (1987) Cell behaviour during active cell rearrangement: evidence and speculations

    Journal of Cell Science 8:369–393.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.1987.Supplement_8.21

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Keller R
    2. Shih J
    3. Sater A

    (1992) The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate

    Developmental Dynamics 193:199–217.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001930302

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Kibar Z
    2. Vogan KJ
    3. Groulx N
    4. Justice MJ
    5. Underhill DA
    6. Gros P

    (2001) Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail

    Nature Genetics 28:251–255.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/90081

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kieserman EK
    2. Lee C
    3. Gray RS
    4. Park TJ
    5. Wallingford JB

    (2010) High-magnification in vivo imaging of Xenopus embryos for cell and developmental biology

    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2010:pdb.prot5427.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5427

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kinoshita N
    2. Iioka H
    3. Miyakoshi A
    4. Ueno N

    (2003) PKC delta is essential for Dishevelled function in a noncanonical Wnt pathway that regulates Xenopus convergent extension movements

    Genes & Development 17:1663–1676.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1101303

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lee J
    2. Andreeva A
    3. Sipe CW
    4. Liu L
    5. Cheng A
    6. Lu X

    (2012) PTK7 regulates myosin II activity to orient planar polarity in the mammalian auditory epithelium

    Current Biology 22:956–966.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.068

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Lienkamp SS
    2. Liu K
    3. Karner CM
    4. Carroll TJ
    5. Ronneberger O
    6. Wallingford JB
    7. Walz G

    (2012) Vertebrate kidney tubules elongate using a planar cell polarity-dependent, rosette-based mechanism of convergent extension

    Nature Genetics 44:1382–1387.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2452

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Luxenburg C
    2. Heller E
    3. Pasolli HA
    4. Chai S
    5. Nikolova M
    6. Stokes N
    7. Fuchs E

    (2015) Wdr1-mediated cell shape dynamics and cortical tension are essential for epidermal planar cell polarity

    Nature Cell Biology 17:592–604.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3146

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Marlow F
    2. Topczewski J
    3. Sepich D
    4. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2002) Zebrafish Rho kinase 2 acts downstream of Wnt11 to mediate cell polarity and effective convergence and extension movements

    Current Biology 12:876–884.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00864-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. McGreevy EM
    2. Vijayraghavan D
    3. Davidson LA
    4. Hildebrand JD

    (2015) Shroom3 functions downstream of planar cell polarity to regulate myosin II distribution and cellular organization during neural tube closure

    Biology Open 4:186–196.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20149589

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Newman-Smith E
    2. Kourakis MJ
    3. Reeves W
    4. Veeman M
    5. Smith WC

    (2015) Reciprocal and dynamic polarization of planar cell polarity core components and myosin

    eLife 4:e05361.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05361

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Nieuwkoop PD
    2. Faber J

    (1994)

    Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin)

    Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin).

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Ninomiya H
    2. Elinson RP
    3. Winklbauer R

    (2004) Antero-posterior tissue polarity links mesoderm convergent extension to axial patterning

    Nature 430:364–367.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02620

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Nishimura T
    2. Honda H
    3. Takeichi M

    (2012) Planar cell polarity links axes of spatial dynamics in neural-tube closure

    Cell 149:1084–1097.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Ossipova O
    2. Kim K
    3. Sokol SY

    (2015) Planar polarization of Vangl2 in the vertebrate neural plate is controlled by Wnt and Myosin II signaling

    Biology Open 4:722–730.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.201511676

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Panousopoulou E
    2. Tyson RA
    3. Bretschneider T
    4. Green JB

    (2013) The distribution of Dishevelled in convergently extending mesoderm

    Developmental Biology 382:496–503.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.07.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Paré AC
    2. Vichas A
    3. Fincher CT
    4. Mirman Z
    5. Farrell DL
    6. Mainieri A
    7. Zallen JA

    (2014) A positional Toll receptor code directs convergent extension in Drosophila

    Nature 515:523–527.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13953

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Rauzi M
    2. Verant P
    3. Lecuit T
    4. Lenne PF

    (2008) Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis

    Nature Cell Biology 10:1401–1410.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1798

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Rida PC
    2. Chen P

    (2009) Line up and listen: Planar cell polarity regulation in the mammalian inner ear

    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20:978–985.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.02.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Roszko I
    2. S Sepich D
    3. Jessen JR
    4. Chandrasekhar A
    5. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2015) A dynamic intracellular distribution of Vangl2 accompanies cell polarization during zebrafish gastrulation

    Development 142:2508–2520.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119032

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Schroeder TE

    (1970)

    Neurulation in Xenopus Laevis. an analysis and model based upon light and electron microscopy

    Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 23:427–462.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Shi D
    2. Usami F
    3. Komatsu K
    4. Oka S
    5. Abe T
    6. Uemura T
    7. Fujimori T

    (2016) Dynamics of planar cell polarity protein Vangl2 in the mouse oviduct epithelium

    Mechanisms of Development 141:78–89.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2016.05.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Shih J
    2. Keller R

    (1992)

    Cell motility driving mediolateral intercalation in explants of xenopus laevis

    Development 116:901–914.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Shindo A
    2. Wallingford JB

    (2014) PCP and septins compartmentalize cortical actomyosin to direct collective cell movement

    Science 343:649–652.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243126

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Sive HL
    2. Grainger RM
    3. Harland RM

    (2000)

    Early Development of Xenopus Laevis: A Laboratory Manual

    Early Development of Xenopus Laevis: A Laboratory Manual.

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Sokol SY

    (1996) Analysis of Dishevelled signalling pathways during Xenopus development

    Current Biology 6:1456–1467.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(96)00750-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Strutt DI

    (2001) Asymmetric localization of frizzled and the establishment of cell polarity in the Drosophila wing

    Molecular Cell 7:367–375.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00184-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Strutt H
    2. Strutt D

    (2009) Asymmetric localisation of planar polarity proteins: Mechanisms and consequences

    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20:957–963.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Strutt H
    2. Warrington SJ
    3. Strutt D

    (2011) Dynamics of core planar polarity protein turnover and stable assembly into discrete membrane subdomains

    Developmental Cell 20:511–525.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Sun Z
    2. Amourda C
    3. Shagirov M
    4. Hara Y
    5. Saunders TE
    6. Toyama Y

    (2017) Basolateral protrusion and apical contraction cooperatively drive Drosophila germ-band extension

    Nature Cell Biology 19:375–383.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3497

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Tada M
    2. Heisenberg CP

    (2012) Convergent extension: using collective cell migration and cell intercalation to shape embryos

    Development 139:3897–3904.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.073007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Takeuchi M
    2. Nakabayashi J
    3. Sakaguchi T
    4. Yamamoto TS
    5. Takahashi H
    6. Takeda H
    7. Ueno N

    (2003) The prickle-related gene in vertebrates is essential for gastrulation cell movements

    Current Biology 13:674–679.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00245-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Tree DR
    2. Shulman JM
    3. Rousset R
    4. Scott MP
    5. Gubb D
    6. Axelrod JD

    (2002) Prickle mediates feedback amplification to generate asymmetric planar cell polarity signaling

    Cell 109:371–381.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00715-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Trichas G
    2. Smith AM
    3. White N
    4. Wilkins V
    5. Watanabe T
    6. Moore A
    7. Joyce B
    8. Sugnaseelan J
    9. Rodriguez TA
    10. Kay D
    11. Baker RE
    12. Maini PK
    13. Srinivas S

    (2012) Multi-cellular rosettes in the mouse visceral endoderm facilitate the ordered migration of anterior visceral endoderm cells

    PLoS Biology 10:e1001256.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001256

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Walck-Shannon E
    2. Hardin J

    (2014) Cell intercalation from top to bottom

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15:34–48.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3723

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Wallingford JB
    2. Harland RM

    (2001)

    Xenopus dishevelled signaling regulates both neural and mesodermal convergent extension: parallel forces elongating the body Axis

    Development 128:2581–2592.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Wallingford JB
    2. Harland RM

    (2002) Neural tube closure requires Dishevelled-dependent convergent extension of the midline

    Development 129:5815–5825.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00123

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Wallingford JB
    2. Niswander LA
    3. Shaw GM
    4. Finnell RH

    (2013) The continuing challenge of understanding, preventing, and treating neural tube defects

    Science 339:1222002.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Wallingford JB
    2. Rowning BA
    3. Vogeli KM
    4. Rothbächer U
    5. Fraser SE
    6. Harland RM

    (2000) Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation

    Nature 405:81–85.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35011077

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Wallingford JB

    (2010) Planar cell polarity signaling, cilia and polarized ciliary beating

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 22:597–604.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.07.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Williams M
    2. Yen W
    3. Lu X
    4. Sutherland A

    (2014) Distinct apical and basolateral mechanisms drive planar cell polarity-dependent convergent extension of the mouse neural plate

    Developmental Cell 29:34–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Ybot-Gonzalez P
    2. Savery D
    3. Gerrelli D
    4. Signore M
    5. Mitchell CE
    6. Faux CH
    7. Greene ND
    8. Copp AJ

    (2007) Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure

    Development 134:789–799.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.000380

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Yin C
    2. Kiskowski M
    3. Pouille PA
    4. Farge E
    5. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2008) Cooperation of polarized cell intercalations drives convergence and extension of presomitic mesoderm during zebrafish gastrulation

    The Journal of Cell Biology 180:221–232.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704150

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Zallen JA
    2. Wieschaus E

    (2004) Patterned gene expression directs bipolar planar polarity in Drosophila

    Developmental Cell 6:343–355.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00060-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Mitchell T Butler

   Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States

   Present address

   UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3130-1186

2. John B Wallingford

   Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   wallingford@austin.utexas.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6280-8625

• 3,655

  views

• 614

  downloads

• 62

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.