1. Developmental Biology
  2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Download icon

WNT signaling memory is required for ACTIVIN to function as a morphogen in human gastruloids

Research Article
  • Cited 34
  • Views 6,063
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e38279 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38279

Abstract

Self-organization of discrete fates in human gastruloids is mediated by a hierarchy of signaling pathways. How these pathways are integrated in time, and whether cells maintain a memory of their signaling history remains obscure. Here, we dissect the temporal integration of two key pathways, WNT and ACTIVIN, which along with BMP control gastrulation. CRISPR/Cas9-engineered live reporters of SMAD1, 2 and 4 demonstrate that in contrast to the stable signaling by SMAD1, signaling and transcriptional response by SMAD2 is transient, and while necessary for pluripotency, it is insufficient for differentiation. Pre-exposure to WNT, however, endows cells with the competence to respond to graded levels of ACTIVIN, which induces differentiation without changing SMAD2 dynamics. This cellular memory of WNT signaling is necessary for ACTIVIN morphogen activity. A re-evaluation of the evidence gathered over decades in model systems, re-enforces our conclusions and points to an evolutionarily conserved mechanism.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE111717.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anna Yoney

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4988-9237
  2. Fred Etoc

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Albert Ruzo

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas Carroll

    Bioinformatics Resouce Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jakob J Metzger

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Iain Martyn

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shu Li

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christoph Kirst

    Center for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4867-5288
  9. Eric D Siggia

    Center for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    siggiae@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7482-1854
  10. Ali H Brivanlou

    Laboratory of Stem Cell biology and Molecular Embryology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    brvnlou@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1761-280X

Funding

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship DGE132526)

  • Anna Yoney

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Research Project R01GM101653)

  • Eric D Siggia
  • Ali H Brivanlou

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Research Project R01HD080699)

  • Eric D Siggia
  • Ali H Brivanlou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lee L Rubin, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: May 11, 2018
  2. Accepted: October 11, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 12, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Yoney et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,063
    Page views
  • 822
    Downloads
  • 34
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Jody A Summers, Elizabeth Martinez
    Research Article Updated

    Postnatal ocular growth is regulated by a vision-dependent mechanism that acts to minimize refractive error through coordinated growth of the ocular tissues. Of great interest is the identification of the chemical signals that control visually guided ocular growth. Here, we provide evidence that the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), may play a pivotal role in the control of ocular growth using a chicken model of myopia. Microarray, real-time RT-qPCR, and ELISA analyses identified IL-6 upregulation in the choroids of chick eyes under two visual conditions that introduce myopic defocus and slow the rate of ocular elongation (recovery from induced myopia and compensation for positive lenses). Intraocular administration of atropine, an agent known to slow ocular elongation, also resulted in an increase in choroidal IL-6 gene expression. Nitric oxide appears to directly or indirectly upregulate choroidal IL-6 gene expression, as administration of the non-specific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME, inhibited choroidal IL-6 gene expression, and application of a nitric oxide donor stimulated IL-6 gene and protein expression in isolated chick choroids. Considering the pleiotropic nature of IL-6 and its involvement in many biological processes, these results suggest that IL-6 may mediate many aspects of the choroidal response in the control of ocular growth.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Juliet R Girard et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Mechanistic studies of Drosophila lymph gland hematopoiesis are limited by the availability of cell-type-specific markers. Using a combination of bulk RNA-Seq of FACS-sorted cells, single-cell RNA-Seq, and genetic dissection, we identify new blood cell subpopulations along a developmental trajectory with multiple paths to mature cell types. This provides functional insights into key developmental processes and signaling pathways. We highlight metabolism as a driver of development, show that graded Pointed expression allows distinct roles in successive developmental steps, and that mature crystal cells specifically express an alternate isoform of Hypoxia-inducible factor (Hif/Sima). Mechanistically, the Musashi-regulated protein Numb facilitates Sima-dependent non-canonical, and inhibits canonical, Notch signaling. Broadly, we find that prior to making a fate choice, a progenitor selects between alternative, biologically relevant, transitory states allowing smooth transitions reflective of combinatorial expressions rather than stepwise binary decisions. Increasingly, this view is gaining support in mammalian hematopoiesis.