Bayesian analysis of retinotopic maps

  1. Noah C Benson  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jonathan Winawer
  1. New York University, United States

Abstract

Human visual cortex is organized into multiple retinotopic maps. Characterizing the arrangement of these maps on the cortical surface is essential to many visual neuroscience studies. Typically, maps are obtained by voxel-wise analysis of fMRI data. This method, while useful, maps only a portion of the visual field and is limited by measurement noise and subjective assessment of boundaries. We developed a novel Bayesian mapping approach which combines observation-a subject's retinotopic measurements from small amounts of fMRI time-with a prior-a learned retinotopic atlas. This process automatically draws areal boundaries, corrects discontinuities in the measured maps, and predicts validation data more accurately than an atlas alone or independent datasets alone. This new method can be used to improve the accuracy of retinotopic mapping, to analyze large fMRI datasets automatically, and to quantify differences in map properties as a function of health, development and natural variation between individuals.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed in this study have been made public on an Open Science Foundation website: https://osf.io/knb5g/Preprocessed MRI data as well as analyses and source code for reproducing figures and performing additional analyses can be found on the Open Science Foundation website https://osf.io/knb5g/.Performing Bayesian inference using your own retinotopic maps.To perform Bayesian inference on a FreeSurfer subject, one can use the neuropythy Python library (https://github.com/noahbenson/neuropythy). For convenience, this library has also been packaged into a Docker container that is freely available on Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com/r/nben/neuropythy).The following command will provide an explanation of how to use the Docker:> docker run -it --rm nben/neuropythy:v0.5.0 register_retinotopy --helpDetailed instructions on how to use the tools documented in this paper are included in the Open Science Foundation website mentioned above.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Noah C Benson

    Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    nben@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2365-8265
  2. Jonathan Winawer

    Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7475-5586

Funding

National Eye Institute (R01 EY027401)

  • Jonathan Winawer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mark Schira, University of Wollongong, Australia

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was conducted with the approval of the New York University Institutional Review Board (IRB-FY2016-363) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained for all subjects.

Version history

  1. Received: July 18, 2018
  2. Accepted: November 29, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 6, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 21, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Benson & Winawer

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,021
    views
  • 510
    downloads
  • 104
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Noah C Benson
  2. Jonathan Winawer
(2018)
Bayesian analysis of retinotopic maps
eLife 7:e40224.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40224

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40224

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sara Ibañez, Nilapratim Sengupta ... Christina M Weaver
    Research Article

    Normal aging leads to myelin alterations in the rhesus monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which are positively correlated with degree of cognitive impairment. It is hypothesized that remyelination with shorter and thinner myelin sheaths partially compensates for myelin degradation, but computational modeling has not yet explored these two phenomena together systematically. Here, we used a two-pronged modeling approach to determine how age-related myelin changes affect a core cognitive function: spatial working memory. First, we built a multicompartment pyramidal neuron model fit to monkey dlPFC empirical data, with an axon including myelinated segments having paranodes, juxtaparanodes, internodes, and tight junctions. This model was used to quantify conduction velocity (CV) changes and action potential (AP) failures after demyelination and subsequent remyelination. Next, we incorporated the single neuron results into a spiking neural network model of working memory. While complete remyelination nearly recovered axonal transmission and network function to unperturbed levels, our models predict that biologically plausible levels of myelin dystrophy, if uncompensated by other factors, can account for substantial working memory impairment with aging. The present computational study unites empirical data from ultrastructure up to behavior during normal aging, and has broader implications for many demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis or schizophrenia.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nicholas GW Kennedy, Jessica C Lee ... Nathan M Holmes
    Research Article

    How is new information organized in memory? According to latent state theories, this is determined by the level of surprise, or prediction error, generated by the new information: a small prediction error leads to the updating of existing memory, large prediction error leads to encoding of a new memory. We tested this idea using a protocol in which rats were first conditioned to fear a stimulus paired with shock. The stimulus was then gradually extinguished by progressively reducing the shock intensity until the stimulus was presented alone. Consistent with latent state theories, this gradual extinction protocol (small prediction errors) was better than standard extinction (large prediction errors) in producing long-term suppression of fear responses, and the benefit of gradual extinction was due to updating of the conditioning memory with information about extinction. Thus, prediction error determines how new information is organized in memory, and latent state theories adequately describe the ways in which this occurs.