Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells
Abstract
The organisation of mammalian genomes into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs) contributes to chromatin structure, gene expression and recombination. TADs and many loops are formed by cohesin and positioned by CTCF. In proliferating cells, cohesin also mediates sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation. Current models of chromatin folding and cohesion are based on assumptions of how many cohesin and CTCF molecules organise the genome. Here we have measured absolute copy numbers and dynamics of cohesin, CTCF, NIPBL, WAPL and sororin by mass spectrometry, fluorescence-correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in HeLa cells. In G1-phase there are ~250,000 nuclear cohesin complexes, of which ~160,000 are chromatin-bound. Comparison with chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data implies that some genomic cohesin and CTCF enrichment sites are unoccupied in single cells at any one time. We discuss the implications of these findings for how cohesin can contribute to genome organisation and cohesion.
Data availability
Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD012712. Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO (GSE126990.
-
ChIP-seq data from Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cellsNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE126990.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim
- Johann Holzmann
- Kota Nagasaka
- Johannes Fuchs
- Gerhard Dürnberger
- Wen Tang
- Rene Ladurner
- Georg A Busslinger
- Karl Mechtler
- Iain Finley Davidson
- Jan-Michael Peters
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- Antonio Z Politi
- Merle Hantsche-Grininger
- Nike Walther
- Birgit Koch
- Jan Ellenberg
National Institutes of Health (Common Fund 4D Nucleome Program (U01 EB021223 / U01 DA047728))
- Jan Ellenberg
Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group (Allen Distinguished Investigator Program)
- Jan Ellenberg
EMBL International PhD Programme
- Nike Walther
Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG-852936)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Austrian Research Promotion Agency (Laura Bassi Centre for Optimized Structural Studies grant FFG-840283)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Austrian Science Fund (Wittgenstein award Z196-B20)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (653706)
- Jan Ellenberg
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (823839)
- Karl Mechtler
Austrian Science Fund (I 3686-B25 MEIOREC - ERA-CAPS)
- Karl Mechtler
Austrian Science Fund (FWF special research program SFB F34)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG-834223)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF LS09-13)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Seventh Framework Programme (241548 (MitoSys))
- Jan Ellenberg
- Jan-Michael Peters
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (693949)
- Jan-Michael Peters
Sixth Framework Programme (503464 (MitoCheck))
- Jan-Michael Peters
European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 1335-2016)
- Kota Nagasaka
Human Frontier Science Program (LT001527/2017)
- Kota Nagasaka
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2019, Holzmann et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,133
- views
-
- 965
- downloads
-
- 91
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
Proliferating animal cells maintain a stable size distribution over generations despite fluctuations in cell growth and division size. Previously, we showed that cell size control involves both cell size checkpoints, which delay cell cycle progression in small cells, and size-dependent regulation of mass accumulation rates (Ginzberg et al., 2018). While we previously identified the p38 MAPK pathway as a key regulator of the mammalian cell size checkpoint (Liu et al., 2018), the mechanism of size-dependent growth rate regulation has remained elusive. Here, we quantified global rates of protein synthesis and degradation in cells of varying sizes, both under unperturbed conditions and in response to perturbations that trigger size-dependent compensatory growth slowdown. We found that protein synthesis rates scale proportionally with cell size across cell cycle stages and experimental conditions. In contrast, oversized cells that undergo compensatory growth slowdown exhibit a superlinear increase in proteasome-mediated protein degradation, with accelerated protein turnover per unit mass, suggesting activation of the proteasomal degradation pathway. Both nascent and long-lived proteins contribute to the elevated protein degradation during compensatory growth slowdown, with long-lived proteins playing a crucial role at the G1/S transition. Notably, large G1/S cells exhibit particularly high efficiency in protein degradation, surpassing that of similarly sized or larger cells in S and G2, coinciding with the timing of the most stringent size control in animal cells. These results collectively suggest that oversized cells reduce their growth efficiency by activating global proteasome-mediated protein degradation to promote cell size homeostasis.
-
- Cell Biology
Recent studies showed an unexpected complexity of extracellular vesicle (EV) biogenesis pathways. We previously found evidence that human colorectal cancer cells in vivo release large multivesicular body-like structures en bloc. Here, we tested whether this large EV type is unique to colorectal cancer cells. We found that all cell types we studied (including different cell lines and cells in their original tissue environment) released multivesicular large EVs (MV-lEVs). We also demonstrated that upon spontaneous rupture of the limiting membrane of the MV-lEVs, their intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) escaped to the extracellular environment by a ‘torn bag mechanism’. We proved that the MV-lEVs were released by ectocytosis of amphisomes (hence, we termed them amphiectosomes). Both ILVs of amphiectosomes and small EVs separated from conditioned media were either exclusively CD63 or LC3B positive. According to our model, upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagosomes, fragments of the autophagosomal inner membrane curl up to form LC3B positive ILVs of amphisomes, while CD63 positive small EVs are of multivesicular body origin. Our data suggest a novel common release mechanism for small EVs, distinct from the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies or amphisomes, as well as the small ectosome release pathway.