The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is essential for embryogenesis in a wide variety of organisms. Initially discovered in Drosophila where there is a single Hh ligand, the core components of the Hh pathway are conserved in vertebrates (Nüsslein-Volhard and Wieschaus, 1980). These include the vertebrate Hh receptor Patched1 (Ptch1), the obligate transducer of the pathway Smoothened (Smo), as well as the Gli transcription factors (Ci in Drosophila) that act as both activators (GliA) and repressors (GliR) to control target gene transcription (Briscoe and Thérond, 2013). There are three Hh ligands in vertebrates, Sonic (Shh), Indian (Ihh) and Desert (Dhh), that regulate a multitude of developmental processes including formation of the limbs and digits, the bones of the skull and face, and the patterning of the neural tube (Placzek and Briscoe, 2018). Diminished Hh signaling during embryogenesis results in birth defects whereas increased Hh signaling leads to tumors, highlighting the importance of the pathway and its regulation (Raleigh and Reiter, 2019).

Given the deep homology between invertebrate and vertebrate Hh signaling, the discovery that primary cilia are required for vertebrate, but not invertebrate, Hh signaling was unexpected (Huangfu et al., 2003; Huangfu and Anderson, 2006). Vertebrate Hh components dynamically traffic within primary cilia in response to Hh ligand (Corbit et al., 2005; Haycraft et al., 2005; Rohatgi et al., 2007). In the absence of ligand, Ptch1 is enriched on the ciliary membrane and Smo is barely detectable (Corbit et al., 2005; Rohatgi et al., 2007). Furthermore, full length Gli proteins traffic to the ciliary tip and back to the cytoplasm before being cleaved to their repressor form, which actively shuts down Hh target gene transcription in the nucleus (Kim et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2005; Wen et al., 2010; Humke et al., 2010). In contrast, upon ligand stimulation (Shh, Ihh or Dhh), the Ptch1 receptor binds the ligand and shuttles out of cilia (Rohatgi et al., 2007). Subsequently, Smo is enriched in the cilium and is subsequently activated (Kong et al., 2019; Corbit et al., 2005). Activated Smo promotes the processing of full-length Gli transcription factors into GliA, which turns on target genes (Aza-Blanc et al., 2000; Ruiz i Altaba, 1998). Ablation of cilia results in an absence of GliA and GliR production, rendering the pathway inert and leading to an absence of transcriptional response (Huangfu and Anderson, 2005). The dynamic ciliary movement of Shh components appears to be critical to pathway function, as alterations to cilia disrupt pathway output (Caspary et al., 2007; Huangfu and Anderson, 2006; Liem et al., 2012; Liem et al., 2009; Goetz et al., 2009; Murdoch and Copp, 2010; Tuz et al., 2014; Cortellino et al., 2009; Houde et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2005; Tran et al., 2008; Taylor et al., 2015).

Given that the fundamental logic of the pathway is conserved from flies through vertebrates, and that flies transduce Hh signals without relying on primary cilia, both evolutionary and mechanistic questions are raised as to how vertebrate cells co-opted the primary cilium for Hh signal transduction. One distinction lies in the fact that vertebrates use Hh signaling over a longer distance than flies, leading to the proposal that the primary cilium is a critical part of a mechanism underlying long range signaling (Bangs et al., 2015). For example, in neural patterning Shh is initially expressed in the notochord and is secreted to specify fates more than 20 cells away (Chiang et al., 1996; Briscoe et al., 2001; Roelink et al., 1994). At the evolutionary level, comparisons among organisms with cilia and or Hh have provided some clues. The round worm C. elegans have cilia yet do not possess Hh signaling as they don’t have most of the genes encoding the core components of Hh signal transduction (The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998; Roy, 2012). Curiously, a few components of Hh signaling such as fused and costal2 are in the C. elegans genome where they are functionally important for ciliogenesis (Ingham et al., 2011). Additionally, C. elegans retained a Ptch1 homolog important for development and pattern formation, but no Hh or Smo (Zugasti et al., 2005; Kuwabara et al., 2000). In contrast, planaria flatworms possess both cilia and Hh signaling but the cilia are not required to transduce Hh signaling (Rink et al., 2009). The first known evolutionary link between cilia and Hh is in sea urchins which transduce Hh signal in developing muscle tissue via motile cilia (Warner et al., 2014; Sigg et al., 2017). Subsequently, in vertebrates Hh signaling requires primary cilia. These data suggest that the mechanistic link of cilia and Hh is limited to deuterostomes and raises the question of whether the relationship of Hh and primary cilia originated near the last common ancestor of vertebrates, the urochordates.

ARL13B is a member of the ARF family of regulatory GTPases and is highly enriched on the ciliary membrane (Caspary et al., 2007). In mice, a null mutation of Arl13b leads to short cilia and to alterations in Shh signal transduction (Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011). ARL13 is ancient, predicted to be present in the last common eukaryotic ancestor. ARL13 appears to have been lost during evolution in organisms that lack cilia and duplicated to ARL13A and ARL13B in the urochordates, thus ARL13B is proposed to hold important clues in deciphering the links between primary cilia and vertebrate Hh signaling (Schlacht et al., 2013; Li et al., 2004; Kahn et al., 2008; East et al., 2012; Logsdon, 2004).

ARF regulatory GTPases, like ARL13B, are best known to play roles in membrane trafficking (D'Souza-Schorey and Chavrier, 2006). As is true for a large number of regulatory GTPases, ARL13B is functionally diverse (Sztul et al., 2019). It regulates endocytic traffic (Barral et al., 2012), as well as the phospholipid composition of the ciliary membrane through recruitment of the lipid phosphatase INPP5E to the ciliary membrane (Humbert et al., 2012). ARL13B also has a conserved role as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for ARL3, another ciliary ARF-like (ARL) protein (Gotthardt et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016; Hanke-Gogokhia et al., 2016; Ivanova et al., 2017). ARL13B regulates intraflagellar transport (IFT), the process that builds and maintains cilia (Cevik et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Nozaki et al., 2017). It is known to interact with several proteins associated with cilia, including the exocyst, tubulin and UNC119 (Seixas et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016; Larkins et al., 2011; Revenkova et al., 2018). Critical to this work, loss of ARL13B disrupts Shh signal transduction in at least two distinct ways: Smo enrichment in cilia occurs even in the absence of ligand and Gli activator production is diminished, although Gli repressor is made normally (Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011).

Due to the high enrichment of ARL13B on the ciliary membrane, ARL13B is assumed to function in its diverse roles from within the cilium. However, ARL13B is present in early endosomes and circular dorsal ruffles on the cell surface (Barral et al., 2012; Casalou et al., 2014). We previously showed that a V358A variant of ARL13B does not localize to cilia as it disrupts a known VxPx cilia localization sequence (Higginbotham et al., 2012; Mariani et al., 2016). Exogenous overexpression of a ARL13B^V358A construct in Arl13b null cells does not rescue ARL13B-dependent phenotypes such as cilia length as well as interneuron migration and connectivity, consistent with ciliary ARL13B mediating these processes (Higginbotham et al., 2012; Mariani et al., 2016). In contrast, we found that overexpressed ARL13B^V358A does rescue the Shh-dependent ciliary enrichment of Smo in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, arguing that ARL13B may function outside the cilium to regulate Smo traffic (Mariani et al., 2016). Together, these results raise the question of where ARL13B functions.

To define where ARL13B functions in relation to cilia, we wanted an in vivo model so generated mice carrying the ARL13B^V358A point mutation using CRISPR/Cas9. Here we demonstrate that ARL13B^V358A protein was undetectable in Arl13b^V358A/V358A cilia in both neural tube and mouse embryonic fibroblast cilia, even after blocking retrograde ciliary traffic. We report that Arl13b^V358A/V358A mice were viable, fertile, and transduced Shh signal normally. We found ARL3 and INPP5E did not localize to the short cilia present in/on Arl13b^V358A/V358A cells. These data indicate that ARL13B’s roles within and outside cilia can be uncoupled; ARL13B’s role in regulating cilia length is from within cilia, whereas its control of Shh signaling appears to be from outside the cilium. Thus, these data imply that the cilia defects seen in the complete absence of ARL13B do not underlie the alterations in Shh transduction, which is unexpected given the requirement of cilia for Shh signal transduction.

Here we show that ARL13B’s role(s) in cell ciliation and cilia length, along with the ciliary enrichment of a subset of proteins, can be uncoupled from ARL13B’s function in regulating Shh signal transduction (Figure 7). Furthermore, we demonstrate this functional distinction correlates with ARL13B spatial localization to the cilium. By generating a mouse expressing a cilia-excluded variant of ARL13B from the endogenous locus, we showed ARL13B^V358A protein is not detectable in cilia of embryonic neural tube or MEFs, even upon retrograde ciliary dynein traffic blockade. Furthermore, we detected 30% less ARL13B protein overall in Arl13b^V358A/V358A embryos compared to control embryos. While this reduction is statistically significant, it is unclear whether it is biologically significant given that Arl13b^hnn/hnn null mutations are recessive and no Arl13b^hnn/+ heterozygous phenotype is reported (Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

In contrast to the E13.5 lethality of Arl13b^hnn/hnn embryos, we found Arl13b^V358A/V358A mice were viable and fertile with correct patterning of the neural tube, indicating normal Shh signal transduction. These results are consistent with our data showing that ARL13B^V358A protein retains all known biochemical function including GEF activity (Mariani et al., 2016; Ivanova et al., 2017). However, we observed several Arl13b^hnn/hnn phenotypes in Arl13b^V358A/V358A cells, including loss of ARL3 and INPP5E ciliary enrichment, along with low percentage of ciliated cells and shorter average cilia length. Taken together, our data show that despite the normal high ciliary enrichment of wild type ARL13B and the requirement of cilia for Shh signaling, cilia-excluded ARL13B^V358A is sufficient for Shh signal transduction.

We regard ARL13B^V358A as cilia-excluded based on several lines of evidence. We did not detect ciliary ARL13B^V358A in vivo or in vitro using any of five validated ARL13B antibodies. These antibodies are against two antigens, the full-length protein or residues 208–427, and were independently generated so are likely to recognize a number of epitopes. Given that four of five antibodies are polyclonal and ARL13B^V358A displays normal GTP binding, intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis, and ARL3 GEF activity, it is likely that the ARL13B^V358A protein retains the wild type structure enabling antibody recognition. Indeed, we observed little or no loss in sensitivity in detecting protein in the immunoblot assays. Furthermore, we could not forcibly enrich ciliary ARL13B^V358A through retrograde transport blockade with ciliobrevin-D nor could we detect any ciliary enrichment of ARL13B^V358A upon overexposure of the relevant fluorescent channel. Alternative ways of trafficking proteins out of cilia include BBSome-dependent or diffusion-dependent mechanisms raising the possibility that ARL13B is trafficked via dynein-independent mechanisms. The fact that we observed ciliary phenotypes, namely short cilia and abnormal ciliary ARL3 and INPP5E localization in ARL13B^V358A expressing cells, argue that ARL13B normally performs these functions from within cilia (Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016; Humbert et al., 2012; Nozaki et al., 2017). While we cannot exclude the possibility that sub-detectable levels of ARL13B^V358A are present and functional in cilia, we note such a level would need to be sufficient for Shh signaling yet insufficient for ARL3 or INPP5E ciliary localization along with proper regulation of cilia length.

Our data support ARL13B regulating different biological processes from its distinct subcellular localizations consistent with how other GTPases act from multiple sites in cells through different effectors. ARL13B^V358A disrupts cilia localization of INPP5E and ARL3, but not Shh components and thus provides a novel tool with which to identify additional ARL13B effectors. Such effectors may also inform us as to what subcellular compartment ARL13B functions from as the cellular ARL13B antibody staining we observe is inconclusive. It is surprising that ARL13B^V358A is sufficient to regulate Shh signaling because cilia are required for Shh signal transduction and because ARL13B is highly enriched in cilia (Caspary et al., 2007; Huangfu et al., 2003). These observations suggested that the ciliary defects observed in Arl13b^hnn/hnn mutants caused the Shh defects. However, our data indicate that ARL13B regulates cilia length and Shh signaling through distinct localization. Thus, the cilia defects in Arl13b^hnn/hnn mutants do not underlie Shh misregulation.

Based on the normal cilia trafficking of Shh components in Arl13b^V358A/V358A mutants and the abnormal cilia trafficking of Shh components in the complete absence of ARL13B (Larkins et al., 2011), ARL13B likely regulates Shh signaling from the cell body by controlling Shh component traffic to and/or from the primary cilium. Both Smo and ARL13B traffic is linked to endosomes providing one possible non-ciliary organelle (Barral et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2009; Milenkovic et al., 2009). Arl13b^hnn/hnn cells display constitutive Smo ciliary enrichment along with little enrichment of Gli proteins at the ciliary tip (Larkins et al., 2011). Our data do not distinguish between ARL13B playing direct roles in traffic of multiple Shh components or whether the normal Smo ciliary enrichment with ARL13B^V358A subsequently causes normal cilia traffic of downstream components. ARL13B regulates a step downstream of activated Smo that controls transcription factor Gli activation, but not repression (Caspary et al., 2007; Bay et al., 2018). We argue from our results that this step is also intact in the presence of ARL13B^V358A.

The fact that ARL13B^V358A can mediate normal ciliary Smo enrichment is especially interesting given that ARL3 and INPP5E localization to cilia is compromised by this mutation. This suggests that ARL13B controls cilia enrichment via multiple localizations and effectors. This is consistent with our understanding of ARF family members, as they are known to perform multiple tasks from different sites within a cell (Sztul et al., 2019). We speculate that ARL3 residence in cilia may require that ARL3 be in (or at least cycle through) its activated, GTP-bound conformation as ARL13B^V358A retains its ARL3 GEF activity, but not its cilia localization. ARL13B is in a common protein complex with INPP5E so absence of ARL13B from cilia may disrupt formation or maintenance of the complex there (Humbert et al., 2012; Nozaki et al., 2017). INPP5E regulates Shh signaling through regulation of the phosphoinositol composition of the ciliary membrane. INPP5E loss results in increased ciliary PIP₂ and enrichment of Shh repressors in cilia thus resulting in lowered Shh response (Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2015; Chávez et al., 2015; Dyson et al., 2017). It is not clear why the absence of ciliary INPP5E in ARL13B^V358A cells does not lead to aberrant Shh signal transduction.

In Arl13b^hnn/hnn embryos and MEFs, cilia are shorter than normal and have a microtubule defect where the B-tubule of the microtubule outer doublet is open (Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011). Consistent with this, we observed shorter cilia in Arl13b^V358A/V358A MEFs. Similarly, we observed a comparable reduction in the percent of cilia in Arl13b^hnn/hnn and Arl13b^V358A/V358A MEFs compared to wild type MEFs. While loss of ARL13B results in short cilia, increased expression of ARL13B promotes cilia elongation so it is not yet clear what ARL13B’s role is in controlling cilia length (Lu et al., 2015; Hori et al., 2008; Caspary et al., 2007; Larkins et al., 2011). Additionally, it is unclear whether the mechanism from within cilia through which ARL13B controls length or percent of ciliated cells is the same, or distinct from, the mechanism through which ARL13B regulates ARL3 or INPP5E residence in cilia.

Perhaps the most intriguing implication of our data pertains to understanding the evolution of cilia and Hh signaling. ARL13 functions in cilia formation and maintenance in Chlamydomonas and C. elegans, neither of which have Hh signaling, consistent with the ancient role of ARL13 controlling ciliation and cilia length (Cevik et al., 2010; Cevik et al., 2013; Stolc et al., 2005; Miertzschke et al., 2014). Our data support ARL13B retaining ARL13’s ancient role in ciliogenesis. However, our data show that ARL13B does not work from within the cilium to regulate Shh component ciliary traffic or Shh signal transduction. As an ARL protein involved in membrane traffic, we speculate that ARL13B may have linked Shh component trafficking to the primary cilium, albeit from outside the cilium. That the ARL13 duplication could relate to the mechanism linking primary cilia and Hh signaling within the deuterostome lineage is a possibility worth exploring.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Aza-Blanc P
   2. Lin HY
   3. Ruiz i Altaba A
   4. Kornberg TB

   (2000)

   'Expression of the vertebrate Gli proteins inDrosophilareveals a distribution of activator and repressor activities'

   Development 127:4293–4301.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bangs FK
   2. Schrode N
   3. Hadjantonakis AK
   4. Anderson KV

   (2015) Lineage specificity of primary cilia in the mouse embryo

   Nature Cell Biology 17:113–122.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3091

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Barral DC
   2. Garg S
   3. Casalou C
   4. Watts GF
   5. Sandoval JL
   6. Ramalho JS
   7. Hsu VW
   8. Brenner MB

   (2012) Arl13b regulates endocytic recycling traffic

   PNAS 109:21354–21359.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218272110

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bay SN
   2. Long AB
   3. Caspary T

   (2018) Disruption of the ciliary GTPase Arl13b suppresses sonic hedgehog overactivation and inhibits medulloblastoma formation

   PNAS 115:1570–1575.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706977115

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Briscoe J
   2. Chen Y
   3. Jessell TM
   4. Struhl G

   (2001) A hedgehog-insensitive form of patched provides evidence for direct long-range morphogen activity of sonic hedgehog in the neural tube

   Molecular Cell 7:1279–1291.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Briscoe J
   2. Thérond PP

   (2013) The mechanisms of hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease

   Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 14:416–429.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3598

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Casalou C
   2. Seixas C
   3. Portelinha A
   4. Pintado P
   5. Barros M
   6. Ramalho JS
   7. Lopes SS
   8. Barral DC

   (2014) Arl13b and the non-muscle myosin heavy chain IIA are required for circular dorsal ruffle formation and cell migration

   Journal of Cell Science 127:2709–2722.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.143446

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Caspary T
   2. Larkins CE
   3. Anderson KV

   (2007) The graded response to sonic hedgehog depends on cilia architecture

   Developmental Cell 12:767–778.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.004

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Cavenagh MM
   2. Breiner M
   3. Schurmann A
   4. Rosenwald AG
   5. Terui T
   6. Zhang C
   7. Randazzo PA
   8. Adams M
   9. Joost HG
   10. Kahn RA

   (1994)

   'ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-like 3, a new member of the ARF family of GTP-binding proteins cloned from human and rat tissues'

   The Journal of Biological Chemistry 269:18937–18942.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Cevik S
    2. Hori Y
    3. Kaplan OI
    4. Kida K
    5. Toivenon T
    6. Foley-Fisher C
    7. Cottell D
    8. Katada T
    9. Kontani K
    10. Blacque OE

    (2010) Joubert syndrome Arl13b functions at ciliary membranes and stabilizes protein transport in Caenorhabditis elegans

    The Journal of Cell Biology 188:953–969.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200908133

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cevik S
    2. Sanders AA
    3. Van Wijk E
    4. Boldt K
    5. Clarke L
    6. van Reeuwijk J
    7. Hori Y
    8. Horn N
    9. Hetterschijt L
    10. Wdowicz A
    11. Mullins A
    12. Kida K
    13. Kaplan OI
    14. van Beersum SE
    15. Man Wu K
    16. Letteboer SJ
    17. Mans DA
    18. Katada T
    19. Kontani K
    20. Ueffing M
    21. Roepman R
    22. Kremer H
    23. Blacque OE

    (2013) Active transport and diffusion barriers restrict Joubert Syndrome-associated ARL13B/ARL-13 to an Inv-like ciliary membrane subdomain

    PLOS Genetics 9:e1003977.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003977

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chávez M
    2. Ena S
    3. Van Sande J
    4. de Kerchove d'Exaerde A
    5. Schurmans S
    6. Schiffmann SN

    (2015) Modulation of ciliary phosphoinositide content regulates trafficking and sonic hedgehog signaling output

    Developmental Cell 34:338–350.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Chiang C
    2. Litingtung Y
    3. Lee E
    4. Young KE
    5. Corden JL
    6. Westphal H
    7. Beachy PA

    (1996) Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking sonic hedgehog gene function

    Nature 383:407–413.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/383407a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Corbit KC
    2. Aanstad P
    3. Singla V
    4. Norman AR
    5. Stainier DY
    6. Reiter JF

    (2005) Vertebrate smoothened functions at the primary cilium

    Nature 437:1018–1021.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04117

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Cortellino S
    2. Wang C
    3. Wang B
    4. Bassi MR
    5. Caretti E
    6. Champeval D
    7. Calmont A
    8. Jarnik M
    9. Burch J
    10. Zaret KS
    11. Larue L
    12. Bellacosa A

    (2009) Defective ciliogenesis, embryonic lethality and severe impairment of the sonic hedgehog pathway caused by inactivation of the mouse complex A intraflagellar transport gene Ift122/Wdr10, partially overlapping with the DNA repair gene Med1/Mbd4

    Developmental Biology 325:225–237.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. D'Souza-Schorey C
    2. Chavrier P

    (2006) ARF proteins: roles in membrane traffic and beyond

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7:347–358.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1910

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Dessaud E
    2. Yang LL
    3. Hill K
    4. Cox B
    5. Ulloa F
    6. Ribeiro A
    7. Mynett A
    8. Novitch BG
    9. Briscoe J

    (2007) Interpretation of the sonic hedgehog morphogen gradient by a temporal adaptation mechanism

    Nature 450:717–720.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06347

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Dyson JM
    2. Conduit SE
    3. Feeney SJ
    4. Hakim S
    5. DiTommaso T
    6. Fulcher AJ
    7. Sriratana A
    8. Ramm G
    9. Horan KA
    10. Gurung R
    11. Wicking C
    12. Smyth I
    13. Mitchell CA

    (2017) INPP5E regulates phosphoinositide-dependent cilia transition zone function

    The Journal of Cell Biology 216:247–263.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201511055

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. East MP
    2. Bowzard JB
    3. Dacks JB
    4. Kahn RA

    (2012) ELMO domains, evolutionary and functional characterization of a novel GTPase-activating protein (GAP) domain for arf protein family GTPases

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:39538–39553.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.417477

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Firestone AJ
    2. Weinger JS
    3. Maldonado M
    4. Barlan K
    5. Langston LD
    6. O'Donnell M
    7. Gelfand VI
    8. Kapoor TM
    9. Chen JK

    (2012) Small-molecule inhibitors of the AAA+ ATPase motor cytoplasmic dynein

    Nature 484:125–129.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10936

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Garcia-Gonzalo FR
    2. Phua SC
    3. Roberson EC
    4. Garcia G
    5. Abedin M
    6. Schurmans S
    7. Inoue T
    8. Reiter JF

    (2015) Phosphoinositides regulate ciliary protein trafficking to modulate hedgehog signaling

    Developmental Cell 34:400–409.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Goetz SC
    2. Ocbina PJ
    3. Anderson KV

    (2009) The primary cilium as a hedgehog signal transduction machine

    Methods in Cell Biology 94:199–222.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)94010-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gotthardt K
    2. Lokaj M
    3. Koerner C
    4. Falk N
    5. Gießl A
    6. Wittinghofer A

    (2015) A G-protein activation cascade from Arl13B to Arl3 and implications for ciliary targeting of lipidated proteins

    eLife 4:e11859.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11859

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hanke-Gogokhia C
    2. Wu Z
    3. Gerstner CD
    4. Frederick JM
    5. Zhang H
    6. Baehr W

    (2016) Arf-like protein 3 (ARL3) Regulates protein trafficking and ciliogenesis in mouse photoreceptors

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 291:7142–7155.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.710954

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Haycraft CJ
    2. Banizs B
    3. Aydin-Son Y
    4. Zhang Q
    5. Michaud EJ
    6. Yoder BK

    (2005) Gli2 and Gli3 localize to cilia and require the intraflagellar transport protein polaris for processing and function

    PLOS Genetics 1:e53.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010053

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Higginbotham H
    2. Eom TY
    3. Mariani LE
    4. Bachleda A
    5. Hirt J
    6. Gukassyan V
    7. Cusack CL
    8. Lai C
    9. Caspary T
    10. Anton ES

    (2012) Arl13b in primary cilia regulates the migration and placement of interneurons in the developing cerebral cortex

    Developmental Cell 23:925–938.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hori Y
    2. Kobayashi T
    3. Kikko Y
    4. Kontani K
    5. Katada T

    (2008) Domain architecture of the atypical Arf-family GTPase Arl13b involved in cilia formation

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 373:119–124.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Horner VL
    2. Caspary T

    (2011) Disrupted dorsal neural tube BMP signaling in the cilia mutant Arl13b hnn stems from abnormal shh signaling

    Developmental Biology 355:43–54.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Houde C
    2. Dickinson RJ
    3. Houtzager VM
    4. Cullum R
    5. Montpetit R
    6. Metzler M
    7. Simpson EM
    8. Roy S
    9. Hayden MR
    10. Hoodless PA
    11. Nicholson DW

    (2006) Hippi is essential for node cilia assembly and sonic hedgehog signaling

    Developmental Biology 300:523–533.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Huangfu D
    2. Liu A
    3. Rakeman AS
    4. Murcia NS
    5. Niswander L
    6. Anderson KV

    (2003) Hedgehog signalling in the mouse requires intraflagellar transport proteins

    Nature 426:83–87.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Huangfu D
    2. Anderson KV

    (2005) Cilia and hedgehog responsiveness in the mouse

    PNAS 102:11325–11330.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505328102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Huangfu D
    2. Anderson KV

    (2006) Signaling from smo to ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates

    Development 133:3–14.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02169

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Humbert MC
    2. Weihbrecht K
    3. Searby CC
    4. Li Y
    5. Pope RM
    6. Sheffield VC
    7. Seo S

    (2012) ARL13B, PDE6D, and CEP164 form a functional network for INPP5E ciliary targeting

    PNAS 109:19691–19696.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210916109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Humke EW
    2. Dorn KV
    3. Milenkovic L
    4. Scott MP
    5. Rohatgi R

    (2010) The output of hedgehog signaling is controlled by the dynamic association between suppressor of fused and the gli proteins

    Genes & Development 24:670–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1902910

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Ingham PW
    2. Nakano Y
    3. Seger C

    (2011) Mechanisms and functions of hedgehog signalling across the metazoa

    Nature Reviews Genetics 12:393–406.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2984

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Ivanova AA
    2. Caspary T
    3. Seyfried NT
    4. Duong DM
    5. West AB
    6. Liu Z
    7. Kahn RA

    (2017) Biochemical characterization of purified mammalian ARL13B protein indicates that it is an atypical GTPase and ARL3 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF)

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 292:11091–11108.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.784025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Kahn RA
    2. Bruford E
    3. Inoue H
    4. Logsdon JM
    5. Nie Z
    6. Premont RT
    7. Randazzo PA
    8. Satake M
    9. Theibert AB
    10. Zapp ML
    11. Cassel D

    (2008) Consensus nomenclature for the human ArfGAP domain-containing proteins

    The Journal of Cell Biology 182:1039–1044.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200806041

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kim J
    2. Kato M
    3. Beachy PA

    (2009) Gli2 trafficking links Hedgehog-dependent activation of smoothened in the primary cilium to transcriptional activation in the nucleus

    PNAS 106:21666–21671.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912180106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Kong JH
    2. Siebold C
    3. Rohatgi R

    (2019) Biochemical mechanisms of vertebrate hedgehog signaling

    Development 146:dev166892.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.166892

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Kuwabara PE
    2. Lee MH
    3. Schedl T
    4. Jefferis GS

    (2000)

    A C. elegans patched gene, ptc-1, functions in germ-line cytokinesis

    Genes & Development 14:1933–1944.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Larkins CE
    2. Aviles GD
    3. East MP
    4. Kahn RA
    5. Caspary T

    (2011) Arl13b regulates ciliogenesis and the dynamic localization of shh signaling proteins

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 22:4694–4703.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e10-12-0994

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Li Y
    2. Kelly WG
    3. Logsdon JM
    4. Schurko AM
    5. Harfe BD
    6. Hill-Harfe KL
    7. Kahn RA

    (2004) Functional genomic analysis of the ADP-ribosylation factor family of GTPases: phylogeny among diverse eukaryotes and function in C. elegans

    The FASEB Journal 18:1834–1850.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-2273com

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Li Y
    2. Wei Q
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Ling K
    5. Hu J

    (2010) The small GTPases ARL-13 and ARL-3 coordinate intraflagellar transport and ciliogenesis

    The Journal of Cell Biology 189:1039–1051.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200912001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Liem KF
    2. He M
    3. Ocbina PJ
    4. Anderson KV

    (2009) Mouse Kif7/Costal2 is a cilia-associated protein that regulates sonic hedgehog signaling

    PNAS 106:13377–13382.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906944106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Liem KF
    2. Ashe A
    3. He M
    4. Satir P
    5. Moran J
    6. Beier D
    7. Wicking C
    8. Anderson KV

    (2012) The IFT-A complex regulates shh signaling through cilia structure and membrane protein trafficking

    The Journal of Cell Biology 197:789–800.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201110049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Lim YS
    2. Chua CE
    3. Tang BL

    (2011) Rabs and other small GTPases in ciliary transport

    Biology of the Cell 103:209–221.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BC20100150

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Liu A
    2. Wang B
    3. Niswander LA

    (2005) Mouse intraflagellar transport proteins regulate both the activator and repressor functions of gli transcription factors

    Development 132:3103–3111.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01894

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. Book

    1. Logsdon JM

    (2004) Arf Family GTPases

    Kahn R. A, editors. Springer Nature.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2593-9

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Lu H
    2. Toh MT
    3. Narasimhan V
    4. Thamilselvam SK
    5. Choksi SP
    6. Roy S

    (2015) A function for the Joubert syndrome protein Arl13b in ciliary membrane extension and ciliary length regulation

    Developmental Biology 397:225–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.11.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Mariani LE
    2. Bijlsma MF
    3. Ivanova AA
    4. Suciu SK
    5. Kahn RA
    6. Caspary T

    (2016) Arl13b regulates shh signaling from both inside and outside the cilium

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 27:3780–3790.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-03-0189

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Miertzschke M
    2. Koerner C
    3. Spoerner M
    4. Wittinghofer A

    (2014) Structural insights into the small G-protein Arl13B and implications for Joubert syndrome

    Biochemical Journal 457:301–311.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20131097

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Milenkovic L
    2. Scott MP
    3. Rohatgi R

    (2009) Lateral transport of smoothened from the plasma membrane to the membrane of the cilium

    The Journal of Cell Biology 187:365–374.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200907126

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Murdoch JN
    2. Copp AJ

    (2010) The relationship between sonic hedgehog signaling, cilia, and neural tube defects

    Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 88:633–652.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20686

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Murray SA
    2. Morgan JL
    3. Kane C
    4. Sharma Y
    5. Heffner CS
    6. Lake J
    7. Donahue LR

    (2010) Mouse gestation length is genetically determined

    PLOS ONE 5:e12418.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012418

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Nachtergaele S
    2. Whalen DM
    3. Mydock LK
    4. Zhao Z
    5. Malinauskas T
    6. Krishnan K
    7. Ingham PW
    8. Covey DF
    9. Siebold C
    10. Rohatgi R

    (2013) Structure and function of the smoothened extracellular domain in vertebrate hedgehog signaling

    eLife 2:e01340.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Nozaki S
    2. Katoh Y
    3. Terada M
    4. Michisaka S
    5. Funabashi T
    6. Takahashi S
    7. Kontani K
    8. Nakayama K

    (2017) Regulation of ciliary retrograde protein trafficking by the joubert syndrome proteins ARL13B and INPP5E

    Journal of Cell Science 130:563–576.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.197004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Nüsslein-Volhard C
    2. Wieschaus E

    (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila

    Nature 287:795–801.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/287795a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Placzek M
    2. Briscoe J

    (2018) Sonic hedgehog in vertebrate neural tube development

    The International Journal of Developmental Biology 62:225–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.170293jb

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Raleigh DR
    2. Reiter JF

    (2019) Misactivation of hedgehog signaling causes inherited and sporadic cancers

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 129:465–475.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI120850

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Revenkova E
    2. Liu Q
    3. Gusella GL
    4. Iomini C

    (2018) The joubert syndrome protein ARL13B binds tubulin to maintain uniform distribution of proteins along the ciliary membrane

    Journal of Cell Science 131:jcs212324.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.212324

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Rink JC
    2. Gurley KA
    3. Elliott SA
    4. Sánchez Alvarado A

    (2009) Planarian hh signaling regulates regeneration polarity and links hh pathway evolution to cilia

    Science 326:1406–1410.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178712

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Rivero-Gutiérrez B
    2. Anzola A
    3. Martínez-Augustin O
    4. de Medina FS

    (2014) Stain-free detection as loading control alternative to ponceau and housekeeping protein immunodetection in western blotting

    Analytical Biochemistry 467:1–3.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2014.08.027

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Roelink H
    2. Augsburger A
    3. Heemskerk J
    4. Korzh V
    5. Norlin S
    6. Ruiz i Altaba A
    7. Tanabe Y
    8. Placzek M
    9. Edlund T
    10. Jessell TM

    (1994) Floor plate and motor neuron induction by vhh-1, a vertebrate homolog of hedgehog expressed by the notochord

    Cell 76:761–775.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90514-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Rohatgi R
    2. Milenkovic L
    3. Scott MP

    (2007) Patched1 regulates hedgehog signaling at the primary cilium

    Science 317:372–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139740

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Roy S

    (2012) Cilia and hedgehog: when and how was their marriage solemnized?

    Differentiation 83:S43–S48.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2011.11.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Ruiz i Altaba A

    (1998)

    'Combinatorial Gli gene function in floor plate and neuronal inductions by Sonic hedgehog'

    Development 125:2203–2212.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Schlacht A
    2. Mowbrey K
    3. Elias M
    4. Kahn RA
    5. Dacks JB

    (2013) Ancient complexity, opisthokont plasticity, and discovery of the 11th subfamily of arf GAP proteins

    Traffic 14:636–649.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12063

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Seixas C
    2. Choi SY
    3. Polgar N
    4. Umberger NL
    5. East MP
    6. Zuo X
    7. Moreiras H
    8. Ghossoub R
    9. Benmerah A
    10. Kahn RA
    11. Fogelgren B
    12. Caspary T
    13. Lipschutz JH
    14. Barral DC

    (2016) Arl13b and the exocyst interact synergistically in ciliogenesis

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 27:308–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e15-02-0061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Sigg MA
    2. Menchen T
    3. Lee C
    4. Johnson J
    5. Jungnickel MK
    6. Choksi SP
    7. Garcia G
    8. Busengdal H
    9. Dougherty GW
    10. Pennekamp P
    11. Werner C
    12. Rentzsch F
    13. Florman HM
    14. Krogan N
    15. Wallingford JB
    16. Omran H
    17. Reiter JF

    (2017) Evolutionary proteomics uncovers ancient associations of cilia with signaling pathways

    Developmental Cell 43:744–762.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Stolc V
    2. Samanta MP
    3. Tongprasit W
    4. Marshall WF

    (2005) Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of flagellar regeneration in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii identifies orthologs of ciliary disease genes

    PNAS 102:3703–3707.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408358102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Sztul E
    2. Chen PW
    3. Casanova JE
    4. Cherfils J
    5. Dacks JB
    6. Lambright DG
    7. Lee FS
    8. Randazzo PA
    9. Santy LC
    10. Schürmann A
    11. Wilhelmi I
    12. Yohe ME
    13. Kahn RA

    (2019) ARF GTPases and their GEFs and GAPs: concepts and challenges

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 30:1249–1271.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-12-0820

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Taylor SP
    2. Dantas TJ
    3. Duran I
    4. Wu S
    5. Lachman RS
    6. Nelson SF
    7. Cohn DH
    8. Vallee RB
    9. Krakow D
    10. University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics Consortium

    (2015) Mutations in DYNC2LI1 disrupt cilia function and cause short rib polydactyly syndrome

    Nature Communications 6:7092.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8092

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Thacker JS
    2. Yeung DH
    3. Staines WR
    4. Mielke JG

    (2016) Total protein or high-abundance protein: which offers the best loading control for western blotting?

    Analytical Biochemistry 496:76–78.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.11.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium

    (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology

    Science 282:2012–2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5396.2012

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Tran PV
    2. Haycraft CJ
    3. Besschetnova TY
    4. Turbe-Doan A
    5. Stottmann RW
    6. Herron BJ
    7. Chesebro AL
    8. Qiu H
    9. Scherz PJ
    10. Shah JV
    11. Yoder BK
    12. Beier DR

    (2008) THM1 negatively modulates mouse sonic hedgehog signal transduction and affects retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia

    Nature Genetics 40:403–410.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Tuz K
    2. Bachmann-Gagescu R
    3. O'Day DR
    4. Hua K
    5. Isabella CR
    6. Phelps IG
    7. Stolarski AE
    8. O'Roak BJ
    9. Dempsey JC
    10. Lourenco C
    11. Alswaid A
    12. Bönnemann CG
    13. Medne L
    14. Nampoothiri S
    15. Stark Z
    16. Leventer RJ
    17. Topçu M
    18. Cansu A
    19. Jagadeesh S
    20. Done S
    21. Ishak GE
    22. Glass IA
    23. Shendure J
    24. Neuhauss SC
    25. Haldeman-Englert CR
    26. Doherty D
    27. Ferland RJ

    (2014) Mutations in CSPP1 cause primary cilia abnormalities and Joubert syndrome with or without jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy

    The American Journal of Human Genetics 94:62–72.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.11.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Van Valkenburgh H
    2. Shern JF
    3. Sharer JD
    4. Zhu X
    5. Kahn RA

    (2001) ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) and ARF-like 1 (ARL1) have both specific and shared effectors: characterizing ARL1-binding proteins

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:22826–22837.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M102359200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Wang Y
    2. Zhou Z
    3. Walsh CT
    4. McMahon AP

    (2009) Selective translocation of intracellular smoothened to the primary cilium in response to hedgehog pathway modulation

    PNAS 106:2623–2628.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812110106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Warner JF
    2. McCarthy AM
    3. Morris RL
    4. McClay DR

    (2014) Hedgehog signaling requires motile cilia in the sea urchin

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:18–22.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst176

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Wen X
    2. Lai CK
    3. Evangelista M
    4. Hongo JA
    5. de Sauvage FJ
    6. Scales SJ

    (2010) Kinetics of hedgehog-dependent full-length Gli3 accumulation in primary cilia and subsequent degradation

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 30:1910–1922.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01089-09

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Zhang Q
    2. Li Y
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Torres VE
    5. Harris PC
    6. Ling K
    7. Hu J

    (2016) GTP-binding of ARL-3 is activated by ARL-13 as a GEF and stabilized by UNC-119

    Scientific Reports 6:24534.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24534

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Zugasti O
    2. Rajan J
    3. Kuwabara PE

    (2005) The function and expansion of the patched- and Hedgehog-related homologs in C. elegans

    Genome Research 15:1402–1410.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3935405

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Thank you for submitting your article "ARL13B regulates Sonic Hedgehog signaling from outside primary cilia" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Anna Akhmanova as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

This work builds on Mariani et al., 2016 which demonstrated that restricting Arl13b from localizing to cilia does not interfere with Hh signaling, but does interfere with Shh-stimulated chemotaxis. The previous work demonstrated that Arl13b-GFP mutants R200C and V358A do not localize in cilia, but are able to support normal Hh responses and SMO localization to cilia. The R200C mutant, as described by Nozaki et al., 2016, could be detected inside cilia (Figure 3F). The major advance in this manuscript is the creation and phenotypic analysis of a mouse Arl13b^V358A allele. V358A excludes, as much as is measurable, ARL13B protein from the cilia. This work is a bit unusual in that the advances are based on negative results (absence of phenotypes and absence of localization).

Essential revisions:

Surprisingly, mice homozygous for the Arl13b^V358A allele do not display overt developmental defects, suggesting that Arl13b functions outside the cilium to promote Hh signaling. The authors conclude in their title: "Arl13b regulates Sonic Hedgehog signaling from outside primary cilia." The major limitation to their conclusions is that a small amount of ARL13B may be in cilia and that is sufficient for SHH function and, as the authors acknowledge elsewhere in the manuscript, "It is formally possible that an extremely small amount of Arl13b^V358A remains in cilia." As I'm sure the authors also realize, demonstrating that a protein does not localize to or function within a subdomain of the cell, especially an enzymatic protein that may operate at substoichiometric levels, is difficult. Although the expression level of Arl13b^V358A appears to be only slightly reduced compared to Wt Arl13b, it is concerning that no Arl13B signal could be detected anywhere in neural tube of V358A/V358A embryos (Figure 2C). This raises the concern that the antibodies used do not sensitively detect Arl13b^V358A. To make claims that Arl13b^V358A does not function in the cilium, the authors should use an orthogonal approach, such as tethering wild type Arl13b outside the cilium in the null MEFs, to assess whether it can operate outside the cilium. Additionally, it would be good to provide some estimate of the lowest level of detectable protein in the cilium to provide a statement indicating that only if "x" percentage of ARL13B were ciliary and sufficient for SHH signaling, then the conclusions would not be valid.

Figure 1 is not sufficiently interpretable in its present form. In the present data, the kinetics of ARL3 GEF activity by wild type or V358A reaches maximum activity ~40 seconds into the time course. By adding excessive protein, the reaction is too rapid to show any quantitative differences in the activity of the wild type and mutant proteins. This experiment, as currently presented, shows that the mutant protein does have some activity, but could mask a 10-fold lower activity than wild type. The argument that the mutation is outside the homology defining the catalytic domain and thus unlikely to function only for targeting ignores the possibility of interdomain allostery/regulation, which is found in many small GTPases. For example, the C-terminus could fold over and inhibit the GTPase domain when engaged with its trafficking machinery, and this inhibition would be relieved to activate the GTPase when properly localized. The authors should compare various concentrations of wild type and mutant protein to see if the kinetic profiles are separable at lower concentrations.

The other source for the claim that Arl13b^V358A cannot localize to cilia is the finding that ciliobrevin-D, a dynein inhibitor, does not cause the ciliary accumulation of Arl13b^V358A. It appears that ciliobrevin D treatment may not be efficiently blocking retrograde IFT as the increase of IFT88 in the majority of the ciliobrevin D-treated cells is subtle. Moreover, it is not clear that all ciliary proteins leave cilia in a dynein-dependent way. Nor is it clear that dynein is functional inside cilia of cells expressing Arl13b^V358A as Arl3 localization is decreased and Arl3 is important for dynactin and cargo unloading from dynein (Jin et al., Nature Communications 2014). Some of these limitations should be included in the Discussion.

The authors demonstrate that Arl3 localization is compromised in Arl13b^V358A-expressing mice. As Arl3 is thought to function at cilia, the prediction is that Arl13b^V358A mice would possess phenotypes similar to Arl3 loss of function. The authors do a nice job of assessing Hh-associated phenotypes. Do the mutant homozygous mice possess Arl3-associated phenotypes such as renal cysts and retinal degeneration? If not, do the authors propose that Arl3 also functions outside of the cilium?

Essential revisions:Surprisingly, mice homozygous for the Arl13bV358A allele do not display overt developmental defects, suggesting that Arl13b functions outside the cilium to promote Hh signaling. The authors conclude in their title: "Arl13b regulates Sonic Hedgehog signaling from outside primary cilia." The major limitation to their conclusions is that a small amount of ARL13B may be in cilia and that is sufficient for SHH function and, as the authors acknowledge elsewhere in the manuscript, "It is formally possible that an extremely small amount of Arl13bV358A remains in cilia." As I'm sure the authors also realize, demonstrating that a protein does not localize to or function within a subdomain of the cell, especially an enzymatic protein that may operate at substoichiometric levels, is difficult. Although the expression level of Arl13bV358A appears to be only slightly reduced compared to Wt Arl13b, it is concerning that no Arl13B signal could be detected anywhere in neural tube of V358A/V358A embryos (Figure 2C). This raises the concern that the antibodies used do not sensitively detect Arl13bV358A.

We appreciate the reviewers’ recognition that we acknowledge subdetectable amounts of ARL13B may be present in Arl13b^V358A/V358A cilia. As to the concern regarding ARL13B signal in the neural tube, we guide the reviewers to the overexposed images of neural tubes stained for ARL13B and IFT88 in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Upon overexposure, where the cilia staining of wildtype cells is saturated, we do observe cell body staining in Arl13b^V358A/V358A neural tube that is above background levels detected in Arl13b^hnn neural tube. We note that we do not detect any ARL13B in cilia in these images. In the images to which the reviewer refers in Figure 2, we calibrated to avoid saturation of the cilia in Arl13b^+/+ and Arl13b^V358A/+ samples. Therefore, we acquired the Arl13b^V358A/V358A neural tube images under the same exposure parameters and conditions.

These data suggest that the cellular pool of ARL13B is difficult to detect. To explore this further, we examined ARL13B and acetylated a tubulin staining in IFT172^wim MEFs which lack cilia. As controls we used wildtype, Arl13b^hnn (lacking ARL13B), and IFT172^wim Arl13b^hnn (lacking ARL13B and cilia) MEFs. As expected, we found acetylated a tubulin stained cilia only in wildtype and Arl13b^hnn MEFs, and no ARL13B positive cilia in Arl13b^hnn cells. Like in the neural tube, we took pictures using exposure levels that avoided saturation of the ARL13B channel (which we call normal exposure) and at 4X the normal exposure level, where the ARL13B channel is saturated in the cilium (which we call 4X or over exposed). At normal exposure, we do not detect signal above background staining in the cell body of wildtype, IFT172^wim, Arl13b^hnn, and IFT172^wim Arl13b^hnn cells. At 4X exposure, we observe ARL13B throughout the cytoplasm of wildtype and IFT172^wim cells, the signal is modestly higher than the background level that we detect in Arl13b^hnn and IFT172^wim Arl13b^hnn controls. Taken together, these data indicate that cellular ARL13B is just at the cusp of being detectable- but is present. We modified the text to reflect these points and added the MEF data as Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

To make claims that Arl13bV358A does not function in the cilium, the authors should use an orthogonal approach, such as tethering wild type Arl13b outside the cilium in the null MEFs, to assess whether it can operate outside the cilium.

We note that this result is consistent with previous work using a D1R-RAB23^S23N construct which greatly diminished, but did not ablate, DR’s ciliary localization (Figure 7, Leaf et al., 2015). Additionally, ARL13B is used to target proteins to cilia so this result indicates ARL13B is capable to target RAB23^S23N to the cilium.

As the reviewers suggested, tethering ARL13B outside the cilium would be a clever approach to bolster our claim. To this end, we generated a wild type ARL13B-RAB23^S23N fusion protein construct. The GTP-binding mutant RAB23^S23N disrupts RAB23 cilia localization, as well as proteins to which it is fused. We expressed either ARL13B-RAB23^S23N or ARL13B-GFP in Arl13b^hnn cells and found, like ARL13B-GFP, ARL13BRab23^S23N, localized in cilia (see Author response image 1. This indicates that we are not technically able to tether wild type ARL13B outside the cilium at this time.

Author response image 1

Download asset Open asset

Additionally, it would be good to provide some estimate of the lowest level of detectable protein in the cilium to provide a statement indicating that only if "x" percentage of ARL13B were ciliary and sufficient for SHH signaling, then the conclusions would not be valid.

We understand the desire to ascribe a clear quantitative measurement to the amount of ciliary ARL13B that might exist in Arl13b^V358A/V358A cilia. However, as the reviewers predicted, we are acutely aware of the challenges in doing so with, “an enzymatic protein that may operate at substoichiometric levels”. In reality, there is no way to know whether any estimate could be biologically meaningful. Rather, what our data clearly demonstrate that the cilia defects that we previously interpreted to be causing defective Shh signal transduction, persist in the Arl13b^V358A/V358A mice. We have modified the text to highlight this point.

Figure 1 is not sufficiently interpretable in its present form. In the present data, the kinetics of ARL3 GEF activity by wild type or V358A reaches maximum activity ~40 seconds into the time course. By adding excessive protein, the reaction is too rapid to show any quantitative differences in the activity of the wild type and mutant proteins. This experiment, as currently presented, shows that the mutant protein does have some activity, but could mask a 10-fold lower activity than wild type. The argument that the mutation is outside the homology defining the catalytic domain and thus unlikely to function only for targeting ignores the possibility of interdomain allostery/regulation, which is found in many small GTPases. For example, the C-terminus could fold over and inhibit the GTPase domain when engaged with its trafficking machinery, and this inhibition would be relieved to activate the GTPase when properly localized. The authors should compare various concentrations of wild type and mutant protein to see if the kinetic profiles are separable at lower concentrations.

We completely agree with this reviewer that by measuring ARL3 GEF activity using a single concentration of ARL13B (or mutant) one cannot conclude that no change to affinity for substrate results from mutation. And we did not make such a claim; rather, only that the mutant retains activity. We have gone over the entire manuscript with a renewed resolve to ensure that a reader not come away with the mistaken impression that we make such a claim. We have previously used the same approach described in this submission to test a series of 7 other designed mutations in ARL13B (Ivanova et al., 2017) and a human patient mutation (Rafiullah et al., 2017). Note that in our assays, we are testing ARL3 GEF activities using equimolar substrate (ARL3) and “enzyme” (ARL13B). This is consistent with a single turnover catalytic event and poor sensitivity in the assay. In addition, because there is spontaneous release of GDP during the course of the assay incubation, the GEF (ARL13B)-stimulated release has a narrower window than for standard enzyme assays. We also want to point out that in the initial demonstration of ARL3 GEF activity by ARL13B (Gotthardt et al., 2015) in which a number of ARL13B mutants were examined, they too used a single concentration of ARL13B but in this case it was 10-fold (5μM) over that of the substrate (ARL3, 0.5 μM). In only one figure in that paper did they report the effects of different concentrations of ARL13B on the GEF activity and they show that an increase of 10-fold (0.5 vs. 5.0 μM) resulted in less than a 50% change in rate of GDP release. We are aware of the limitations imposed on interpretations resulting from the lack of detailed dose response curves. Unfortunately, for a number of technical reasons we have found that attempts to generate such dose response curves are problematic and not publishable. We hope this clarifies the situation and reviewers better understand the limitations imposed upon us by this assay, which although not robust in turnover, we believe is a valid way to assess whether a point mutation results in substantial changes to activity.

The other source for the claim that Arl13bV358A cannot localize to cilia is the finding that ciliobrevin D, a dynein inhibitor, does not cause the ciliary accumulation of Arl13bV358A. It appears that ciliobrevin D treatment may not be efficiently blocking retrograde IFT as the increase of IFT88 in the majority of the ciliobrevin D-treated cells is subtle.

The effect is subtle but present. We found that treating cells with ciliobrevin-D over a longer time period or with higher concentrations resulted in ciliary disassembly, consistent with it efficiently blocking retrograde IFT. Thus, the 60 minute timepoint was as long as we could leave the cells and still observe cilia. To corroborate the IFT88 result, we repeated the experiment using GLI3. GLI3 is normally transported via IFT and accumulates at the ciliary tip upon retrograde transport being blocked. We found a defined increase in GLI3 at the ciliary tip following treatment with ciliobrevin-D. The magnitude is on par with our previous finding with IFT88. We did not detect ciliary ARL13B^V358A. We include these data and analysis in Figure 3, and amended the manuscript.

Moreover, it is not clear that all ciliary proteins leave cilia in a dynein-dependent way. Nor is it clear that dynein is functional inside cilia of cells expressing Arl13bV358A as Arl3 localization is decreased and Arl3 is important for dynactin and cargo unloading from dynein (Jin et al., Nature Communications 2014). Some of these limitations should be included in the Discussion.

The reviewers are correct that ARL13B movement in cilia may not be regulated by dynein motors and therefore would be unaffected by ciliobrevin-D treatment. The suggestion (below) to disrupt IFT27 function to address this possibility would be appropriate if we had the applicable reagents. As requested, we now discuss this possibility in the Discussion.

The authors demonstrate that Arl3 localization is compromised in Arl13bV358A-expressing mice. As Arl3 is thought to function at cilia, the prediction is that Arl13bV358A mice would possess phenotypes similar to Arl3 loss of function. The authors do a nice job of assessing Hh-associated phenotypes. Do the mutant homozygous mice possess Arl3-associated phenotypes such as renal cysts and retinal degeneration? If not, do the authors propose that Arl3 also functions outside of the cilium?

As indicated in the Materials and methods, we maintain Arl13b^V358A/V358A mice on an FVB/NJ background, which carry the Pde6^brd1 mutation that causes retinal degeneration and blindness by 3 weeks of age (Chang et al., 2002; Wong et al., 2006). We are crossing the mice to an appropriate background to examine the retinal phenotype. We do have some preliminary observations that Arl13b^V358A/V358A mice display kidney cysts so we do not currently have any data to support ARL3 functioning from outside the cilium.

References:

Chang, B, NL Hawes, RE Hurd, MT Davisson, S Nusinowitz, and JR Heckenlively. 2002. Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse, Vision research, 42: 517-25.

Gotthardt, K., M. Lokaj, C. Koerner, N. Falk, A. Giessl, and A. Wittinghofer. 2015. A G-protein activation cascade from Arl13B to Arl3 and implications for ciliary targeting of lipidated proteins, eLife, 4.

Ivanova, A. A., T. Caspary, N. T. Seyfried, D. M. Duong, A. B. West, Z. Liu, and R. A. Kahn. 2017. Biochemical characterization of purified mammalian ARL13B protein indicates that it is an atypical GTPase and ARL3 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), J Biol Chem, 292: 11091-108.

Leaf, Alison, and Mark Von Zastrow. 2015. Dopamine receptors reveal an essential role of IFTB, KIF17, and Rab23 in delivering specific receptors to primary cilia, eLife, 4: e06996.

Rafiullah, R., A. B. Long, A. A. Ivanova, H. Ali, S. Berkel, G. Mustafa, N. Paramasivam, M. Schlesner, S. Wiemann, R. C. Wade, E. Bolthauser, M. Blum, R. A. Kahn, T. Caspary, and G. A. Rappold. 2017. A novel homozygous ARL13B variant in patients with Joubert syndrome impairs its guanine nucleotide-exchange factor activity, Eur J Hum Genet, 25: 1324-34.

Wong, AA, and RE Brown. 2006. Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice, Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5: 389-403.

Author details

1. Eduardo D Gigante

   1. Neuroscience Graduate Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
   2. Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1486-5377

2. Megan R Taylor

   Emory College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Anna A Ivanova

   Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Richard A Kahn

   Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

   Contribution

   Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Tamara Caspary

   Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration

   For correspondence

   tcaspar@emory.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6579-7589

• 4,943

  Page views

• 677

  Downloads

• 31

  Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.