The human coronavirus HCoV-229E S-protein structure and receptor binding

  1. Zhijie Li
  2. Aidan CA Tomlinson
  3. Alan HM Wong
  4. Dongxia Zhou
  5. Marc Desforges
  6. Pierre J Talbot
  7. Samir Benlekbir
  8. John L Rubinstein
  9. James M Rini  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Toronto, Canada
  2. INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université du Québec, Canada
  3. The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Canada

Peer review process

This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.

History

  1. Version of Record published
  2. Accepted Manuscript published
  3. Accepted
  4. Received

Decision letter

  1. Pamela J Bjorkman
    Reviewing Editor; California Institute of Technology, United States
  2. Olga Boudker
    Senior Editor; Weill Cornell Medicine, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

[Editors’ note: this was accepted after the first round of peer review, so there is not an accompanying Author response.]

This manuscript from Li et al reports the HCoV‐229E S protein ectodomain structure and several structures of the receptor-binding domains from different RBD classes bound to the receptor hAPN. The latter structures provide a molecular basis for how sequence variation in the RBDs can be accommodated while maintaining a conserved interaction with hAPN. The cryo-EM structure of the HCoV‐229E S protein ectodomain in the prefusion conformation provides new insights into the arrangement and interactions of the S2 subunit, with implications for the conformational changes that are undergone during refolding of S2 to the post-fusion conformation.

Strengths of the manuscript are the clarity of the writing, quality of the structures, and presentation of the results, including movies. The three crystal structures and the cryo-EM structure are excellent, as are the cryo-EM data processing and interpretation. It is appreciated that the validation reports and EM maps were provided for review. The results and conclusions represent solid contributions to the coronavirus field and provide the first evidence for an arrangement of the S2 subunits that is substantially more 'open' than those observed in other S protein structures. Only a few minor suggestions are noted below.

Minor Comments:

1) The first paragraph of the Results section is redundant with the second-to-last paragraph of the Introduction. I would suggest removing it and replacing it with a single introductory sentence.

2) The authors introduce a domain nomenclature (D1, D2, D3...) that is different than the two currently used in the field. Using one of the previous systems may lead to less confusion for readers.

3) The Discussion describes the authors' analysis and interpretation of the RBD conformational changes and how 3 RBDs in the up conformation would be unstable and lead to conversion to the post-fusion conformation. It should be noted that this same analysis and interpretation were presented in Pallesen et al., 2017, shown in Figure 7.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51230.sa1

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhijie Li
  2. Aidan CA Tomlinson
  3. Alan HM Wong
  4. Dongxia Zhou
  5. Marc Desforges
  6. Pierre J Talbot
  7. Samir Benlekbir
  8. John L Rubinstein
  9. James M Rini
(2019)
The human coronavirus HCoV-229E S-protein structure and receptor binding
eLife 8:e51230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51230