Modulation of the Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel (ELIC) and the 5-HT3 receptor via a common vestibule site

  1. Marijke Brams
  2. Cedric Govaerts
  3. Kumiko Kambara
  4. Kerry L Price
  5. Radovan Spurny
  6. Anant Gharpure
  7. Els Pardon
  8. Genevieve L Evans
  9. Daniel Bertrand
  10. Sarah CR Lummis
  11. Ryan E Hibbs
  12. Jan Steyaert
  13. Chris Ulens  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
  3. HiQScreen, Switzerland
  4. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  5. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  6. VIB-VUB, Belgium

Abstract

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) or Cys-loop receptors are involved in fast synaptic signaling in the nervous system. Allosteric modulators bind to sites that are remote from the neurotransmitter binding site, but modify coupling of ligand binding to channel opening. In this study, we developed nanobodies (single domain antibodies), which are functionally active as allosteric modulators, and solved co-crystal structures of the prokaryote (Erwinia) channel ELIC bound either to a positive or a negative allosteric modulator. The allosteric nanobody binding sites partially overlap with those of small molecule modulators, including a vestibule binding site that is not accessible in some pLGICs. Using mutagenesis, we extrapolate the functional importance of the vestibule binding site to the human 5-HT3 receptor, suggesting a common mechanism of modulation in this protein and ELIC. Thus we identify key elements of allosteric binding sites, and extend drug design possibilities in pLGICs with an accessible vestibule site.

Data availability

Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 6SSI for the ELIC+PAM-Nb structure and 6SSP for the ELIC+NAM-Nb structure. The raw X-ray diffraction images for both data sets have been deposited on datadryad.org under accession number doi:10.5061/dryad.pv4097s.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marijke Brams

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cedric Govaerts

    Laboratory for the Structure and Function of Biological Membranes, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kumiko Kambara

    HiQScreen, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kerry L Price

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Radovan Spurny

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anant Gharpure

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4458-359X
  7. Els Pardon

    Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Genevieve L Evans

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8612-9539
  9. Daniel Bertrand

    HiQScreen, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sarah CR Lummis

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ryan E Hibbs

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jan Steyaert

    Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3825-874X
  13. Chris Ulens

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    chris.ulens@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8202-5281

Funding

SBO/IWT (1200261)

  • Jan Steyaert
  • Chris Ulens

FWO-Vlaanderen (G.0762.13)

  • Jan Steyaert
  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (OT/13/095)

  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (C32/16/035)

  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (C14/17/093)

  • Chris Ulens

INSTRUCT-ERIC

  • Jan Steyaert

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Brams et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,766
    views
  • 234
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marijke Brams
  2. Cedric Govaerts
  3. Kumiko Kambara
  4. Kerry L Price
  5. Radovan Spurny
  6. Anant Gharpure
  7. Els Pardon
  8. Genevieve L Evans
  9. Daniel Bertrand
  10. Sarah CR Lummis
  11. Ryan E Hibbs
  12. Jan Steyaert
  13. Chris Ulens
(2020)
Modulation of the Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel (ELIC) and the 5-HT3 receptor via a common vestibule site
eLife 9:e51511.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51511

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51511

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Ev L Nichols, Joo Lee, Kang Shen
    Research Article

    During development axons undergo long-distance migrations as instructed by guidance molecules and their receptors, such as UNC-6/Netrin and UNC-40/DCC. Guidance cues act through long-range diffusive gradients (chemotaxis) or local adhesion (haptotaxis). However, how these discrete modes of action guide axons in vivo is poorly understood. Using time-lapse imaging of axon guidance in C. elegans, we demonstrate that UNC-6 and UNC-40 are required for local adhesion to an intermediate target and subsequent directional growth. Exogenous membrane-tethered UNC-6 is sufficient to mediate adhesion but not directional growth, demonstrating the separability of haptotaxis and chemotaxis. This conclusion is further supported by the endogenous UNC-6 distribution along the axon’s route. The intermediate and final targets are enriched in UNC-6 and separated by a ventrodorsal UNC-6 gradient. Continuous growth through the gradient requires UNC-40, which recruits UNC-6 to the growth cone tip. Overall, these data suggest that UNC-6 stimulates stepwise haptotaxis and chemotaxis in vivo.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mihály Vöröslakos, Yunchang Zhang ... György Buzsáki
    Tools and Resources

    Brain states fluctuate between exploratory and consummatory phases of behavior. These state changes affect both internal computation and the organism’s responses to sensory inputs. Understanding neuronal mechanisms supporting exploratory and consummatory states and their switching requires experimental control of behavioral shifts and collecting sufficient amounts of brain data. To achieve this goal, we developed the ThermoMaze, which exploits the animal’s natural warmth-seeking homeostatic behavior. By decreasing the floor temperature and selectively heating unmarked areas, we observed that mice avoided the aversive state by exploring the maze and finding the warm spot. In its design, the ThermoMaze is analogous to the widely used water maze but without the inconvenience of a wet environment and, therefore, allows the collection of physiological data in many trials. We combined the ThermoMaze with electrophysiology recording, and report that spiking activity of hippocampal CA1 neurons during sharp-wave ripple events encode the position of mice. Thus, place-specific firing is not confined to locomotion and associated theta oscillations but persist during waking immobility and sleep at the same location. The ThermoMaze will allow for detailed studies of brain correlates of immobility, preparatory–consummatory transitions, and open new options for studying behavior-mediated temperature homeostasis.