Modulation of the Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel (ELIC) and the 5-HT3 receptor via a common vestibule site

  1. Marijke Brams
  2. Cedric Govaerts
  3. Kumiko Kambara
  4. Kerry L Price
  5. Radovan Spurny
  6. Anant Gharpure
  7. Els Pardon
  8. Genevieve L Evans
  9. Daniel Bertrand
  10. Sarah CR Lummis
  11. Ryan E Hibbs
  12. Jan Steyaert
  13. Chris Ulens  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
  3. HiQScreen, Switzerland
  4. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  5. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  6. VIB-VUB, Belgium

Abstract

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) or Cys-loop receptors are involved in fast synaptic signaling in the nervous system. Allosteric modulators bind to sites that are remote from the neurotransmitter binding site, but modify coupling of ligand binding to channel opening. In this study, we developed nanobodies (single domain antibodies), which are functionally active as allosteric modulators, and solved co-crystal structures of the prokaryote (Erwinia) channel ELIC bound either to a positive or a negative allosteric modulator. The allosteric nanobody binding sites partially overlap with those of small molecule modulators, including a vestibule binding site that is not accessible in some pLGICs. Using mutagenesis, we extrapolate the functional importance of the vestibule binding site to the human 5-HT3 receptor, suggesting a common mechanism of modulation in this protein and ELIC. Thus we identify key elements of allosteric binding sites, and extend drug design possibilities in pLGICs with an accessible vestibule site.

Data availability

Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 6SSI for the ELIC+PAM-Nb structure and 6SSP for the ELIC+NAM-Nb structure. The raw X-ray diffraction images for both data sets have been deposited on datadryad.org under accession number doi:10.5061/dryad.pv4097s.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marijke Brams

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cedric Govaerts

    Laboratory for the Structure and Function of Biological Membranes, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kumiko Kambara

    HiQScreen, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kerry L Price

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Radovan Spurny

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anant Gharpure

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4458-359X
  7. Els Pardon

    Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Genevieve L Evans

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8612-9539
  9. Daniel Bertrand

    HiQScreen, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sarah CR Lummis

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ryan E Hibbs

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jan Steyaert

    Center for Structural Biology, VIB-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3825-874X
  13. Chris Ulens

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    chris.ulens@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8202-5281

Funding

SBO/IWT (1200261)

  • Jan Steyaert
  • Chris Ulens

FWO-Vlaanderen (G.0762.13)

  • Jan Steyaert
  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (OT/13/095)

  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (C32/16/035)

  • Chris Ulens

KU Leuven (C14/17/093)

  • Chris Ulens

INSTRUCT-ERIC

  • Jan Steyaert

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Brams et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,744
    views
  • 230
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marijke Brams
  2. Cedric Govaerts
  3. Kumiko Kambara
  4. Kerry L Price
  5. Radovan Spurny
  6. Anant Gharpure
  7. Els Pardon
  8. Genevieve L Evans
  9. Daniel Bertrand
  10. Sarah CR Lummis
  11. Ryan E Hibbs
  12. Jan Steyaert
  13. Chris Ulens
(2020)
Modulation of the Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel (ELIC) and the 5-HT3 receptor via a common vestibule site
eLife 9:e51511.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51511

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51511

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Claire Meissner-Bernard, Friedemann Zenke, Rainer W Friedrich
    Research Article

    Biological memory networks are thought to store information by experience-dependent changes in the synaptic connectivity between assemblies of neurons. Recent models suggest that these assemblies contain both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (E/I assemblies), resulting in co-tuning and precise balance of excitation and inhibition. To understand computational consequences of E/I assemblies under biologically realistic constraints we built a spiking network model based on experimental data from telencephalic area Dp of adult zebrafish, a precisely balanced recurrent network homologous to piriform cortex. We found that E/I assemblies stabilized firing rate distributions compared to networks with excitatory assemblies and global inhibition. Unlike classical memory models, networks with E/I assemblies did not show discrete attractor dynamics. Rather, responses to learned inputs were locally constrained onto manifolds that ‘focused’ activity into neuronal subspaces. The covariance structure of these manifolds supported pattern classification when information was retrieved from selected neuronal subsets. Networks with E/I assemblies therefore transformed the geometry of neuronal coding space, resulting in continuous representations that reflected both relatedness of inputs and an individual’s experience. Such continuous representations enable fast pattern classification, can support continual learning, and may provide a basis for higher-order learning and cognitive computations.

    1. Neuroscience
    Cristina Gil Avila, Elisabeth S May ... Markus Ploner
    Research Article

    Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition whose neural mechanisms are incompletely understood. An imbalance of cerebral excitation and inhibition (E/I), particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), is believed to represent a crucial mechanism in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Thus, identifying a non-invasive, scalable marker of E/I could provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of chronic pain and aid in developing clinically useful biomarkers. Recently, the aperiodic component of the electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum has been proposed to represent a non-invasive proxy for E/I. We, therefore, assessed the aperiodic component in the mPFC of resting-state EEG recordings in 149 people with chronic pain and 115 healthy participants. We found robust evidence against differences in the aperiodic component in the mPFC between people with chronic pain and healthy participants, and no correlation between the aperiodic component and pain intensity. These findings were consistent across different subtypes of chronic pain and were similarly found in a whole-brain analysis. Their robustness was supported by preregistration and multiverse analyses across many different methodological choices. Together, our results suggest that the EEG aperiodic component does not differentiate between people with chronic pain and healthy individuals. These findings and the rigorous methodological approach can guide future studies investigating non-invasive, scalable markers of cerebral dysfunction in people with chronic pain and beyond.