As demonstrated in Drosophila melanogaster, paired mushroom bodies in the insect brain play manifold roles in learning and memory (Aso et al., 2014a; Aso et al., 2014b; Cognigni et al., 2018). One diagnostic tool for identifying putative mushroom body homologues in other mandibulates is an antibody raised against the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A, encoded by the Drosophila gene DC0 (Kalderon and Rubin, 1988), and required for effective learning and memory (Skoulakis et al., 1993). The antibody, known as ‘anti-DC0’, selectively identifies the columnar neuropils of mushroom bodies of insects (Farris and Strausfeld, 2003) and of other arthropods with, until very recently, the notable exception of crustaceans (Wolff and Strausfeld, 2015). Indeed, numerous studies have disputed or expressed ambivalence about centers in comparable locations in the crustacean brain being mushroom body homologues (e.g., Strausfeld et al., 1998; Fanenbruck et al., 2004; Fanenbruck and Harzsch, 2005; Farris, 2013; Sandeman et al., 2014; Krieger et al., 2015; Krieger et al., 2019; Harzsch and Krieger, 2018; Machon et al., 2019; Wittfoth et al., 2019).

The discovery of mushroom bodies in mantis shrimps by Wolff et al. (2017) caused us to revise our view of mushroom bodies in crustaceans and to look for these centers in other lineages of this taxon. Here, we provide evidence that mushroom bodies generally occur in Crustacea, thereby further supporting Hexapoda + Crustacea as the established subphylum Pancrustacea (Zrzavý and Štys, 1997; Regier and Shultz, 2001).

Historically, identification of the insect mushroom body relied on just four neuroanatomical traits: an overall fungiform shape; a location exclusively in the brain’s rostrolateral protocerebrum; an internal composition comprising hundreds to tens of thousands of intrinsic neurons originating from minute cell bodies clustered at the brain’s rostral surface; and the possession of columnar lobes formed by the extended axon-like processes of intrinsic neurons. An often-included fifth character typical of almost all insects is a cap of neuropil called the calyx comprising the dendrites of intrinsic neurons, which receive inputs from the antennal lobes and other sensory neuropils. Even flightless Zygentoma (silverfish and firebrats) possess calyces (Farris, 2005a), as do Diplura and Collembola, two sister groups of Insecta (Böhm et al., 2012; Kollmann et al., 2011). However, Ephemeroptera (mayflies) and Odonata (dragonflies, darters) are calyxless; inputs to their mushroom bodies supply their columnar lobes directly (Strausfeld et al., 2009). Such distinctions demonstrate a general property of all well-defined protocerebral brain centers: retention of ancestral ground patterns despite evolved modifications such as losses of some components and elaborations of others. For the insect mushroom body these modifications include: variations of columnar lobe organization; expanded representations of sensory modalities; and loss, or hypertrophy, of the calyces (Strausfeld et al., 2009).

Despite such variations, the insect mushroom body has additional features that are always present. Foremost is that the columnar lobes are serially partitioned down their length such that inputs to the lobes are constrained to discrete synaptic domains (Li and Strausfeld, 1997; Ito et al., 1998; Strausfeld, 2002). These domains receive functionally defined inputs and supply functionally defined mushroom body output neurons (MBONs; Aso et al., 2014a) that extend to circumscribed regions of the medial and rostral protocerebrum. There, they contribute to further higher processing and have arrangements comparable to those relating the mammalian hippocampus to cortical areas (Bienkowski et al., 2018). Certain outputs from the columns also project recurrently to more distal levels of the mushroom body itself (Gronenberg, 1987; Zwaka et al., 2018). These arrangements are defined by neurons usually expressing GABA (Liu and Davis, 2009). The same organization typifies the columnar lobes of the stomatopod mushroom bodies where input and output neurons are arranged along the length of the lobes (Wolff et al., 2017).

Also apparent across insect species is that subsets of intrinsic neurons parse the mushroom body lobes into longitudinal subunits that are differentiated from each other with regard to their clonal lineages (Yang et al., 1995; Crittenden et al., 1998; Tanaka et al., 2008), as well as by their aminergic and peptidergic identities (Sjöholm et al., 2006; Strausfeld et al., 2000; Strausfeld et al., 2003). Comparable longitudinal divisions of the stomatopod mushroom body are represented by four columnar lobes that extend together approximately in parallel (Wolff et al., 2017). In Drosophila and other insects these characteristic attributes have been shown to be critical in supporting functions relating to the modality, valence, stored memories and behavioral relevance of information computed by the mushroom body (Li and Strausfeld, 1999; Aso et al., 2014a; Aso et al., 2014b; Owald et al., 2015; Takemura et al., 2017; Hattori et al., 2017; Cognigni et al., 2018).

In total, thirteen characters have been identified that define both the insect (Drosophila) and mantis shrimp (Stomatopod) mushroom bodies (see Wolff et al., 2017). We show here that crown eumalacostracan species belonging to lineages originating early in evolutionary history share the same expanded set of diagnostic characters that define insect mushroom bodies, including the partitioning of columns into discrete circuit-defined domains. These can occur not only as segment-like partitions of the columnar lobes but also as tuberous outswellings, as they do in basal insects belonging to Zygentoma and Pterygota (Farris, 2005a; Farris, 2005b; Strausfeld et al., 2009).

Because stomatopods are unique amongst crustaceans in possessing elaborated optic lobes that serve a multispectral color and polarization photoreceptor system (Thoen et al., 2017; Thoen et al., 2018), it could be argued that mushroom bodies in the mantis shrimp are unique apomorphies that have evolved specifically to serve those modalities. However, Stomatopoda are an outgroup of Eucarida (Euphausiacea + Decapoda) and the status of mushroom bodies as the ancestral ground pattern is supported by corresponding centers in the lateral protocerebrum of later evolving eumalacostracan lineages. For example, Lebbeus groenlandicus, a member of the caridid family Thoridae, has been shown to possess paired mushroom bodies each comprising a layered calyx supplying intrinsic neuron processes to columnar lobes (Sayre and Strausfeld, 2019). Here we describe neuroanatomical characters defining mushroom bodies also in cleaner shrimps (Stenopodidae) and several groups of carideans.

The recognition that mushroom bodies occur in crustaceans is not new. In his 1882 description of stomatopod brains, the Italian neuroanatomist Giuseppe Bellonci identified domed neuropils (corpo emielissoidale), from which extend columnar neuropils (corpo allungato). Bellonci explicitly homologized these with, respectively, the insect mushroom body calyx and its columnar lobes (Bellonci, 1882). Hanström adopted this terminology for his studies of Reptantia (Hanström, 1925; Hanström, 1931), a relatively recent malacostracan lineage that includes crayfish and lobsters. Hanström used the terms ‘hemiellipsoid body’ or corpora pedunculata to denote centers lacking columnar lobes he considered to be homologues of the mushroom body (Hanström, 1932). However, over the last four decades numerous studies on Reptantia have insisted that hemiellipsoid bodies are apomorphic – genealogically distinct from mushroom bodies – and that they represent the ancestral ground pattern of crustacean learning and memory centers (Kenning et al., 2013; Sandeman et al., 2014; Machon et al., 2019; Krieger et al., 2019). Apart from a fundamental misunderstanding of the original meaning of the term ‘hemiellipsoid body,’ that viewpoint is incorrect and is in conflict with the demonstration here, and in two recent studies, that mushroom bodies hallmark eumalacostracan lineages that diverged earlier than Reptantia (Wolff et al., 2017; Sayre and Strausfeld, 2019). Studies of Reptantia also show that at least one anomuran group has mushroom bodies equipped with columnar lobes (Strausfeld and Sayre, 2020). Comparisons across Eumalacostraca described here indicate that mushroom bodies are indeed ubiquitous across Crustacea. However, in contrast to mushroom bodies in insects, evolved modifications of the mushroom body ground pattern in crustaceans have resulted in highly divergent morphologies including, both within Caridea and in certain lineages of Reptantia, centers lacking defined lobes.

In the following, descriptions of mushroom bodies and their evolved derivatives are organized by lineage from the oldest to most recent as shown in Figure 1A. The exception is Leptostraca, the sister group of Eumalacostraca, which is considered in the Discussion. Each of the following descriptions is preceded by a brief Background of the species considered followed by Observations. To provide context we first provide an overview of mushroom body organization as exemplified by the stomatopod brain (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Reduced protocerebral centers in Dendrobranchiata (Figure 3A)

Background

Dendrobranchiata is the second oldest eumalacostracan lineage, today represented by peripatetic/pelagic penaeid shrimps. Using antibodies raised against α-tubulin, FMRFamide, and allatostatin on Penaeus vannamei, Meth et al. (2017) were unable to delineate a target neuropil supplied by the olfactory globular tract (OGT). Sullivan and Beltz (2004), using dye tracing into the OGT of Penaeus duorarum, identified a small twinned neuropil situated extremely rostral in the lateral protocerebrum. The neuropil receives collaterals from the OGT, the axons of which terminate mainly in lateral protocerebral neuropil beneath.

Observations

Immunostaining the lateral protocerebra of Penaeus vannamei with anti-DC0 (Figure 3A) resolves a small intensely immunoreactive four-component center, at the location identified by Sullivan and Beltz (2004). A similarly reduced center typifies some isopods (Figure 3B). There is a notable absence of a columnar lobe in the Penaeus center and in the corresponding neuropil of isopods.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Elaborated mushroom bodies in Stenopodidea (Figures 4 and 5)

Background

Mitochondrial genomics resolves the infraorder Stenopodidea as the sister taxon of Caridea (Shen et al., 2013). Its molecular clock age is Jurassic with a Cretaceous fossil calibration (Wolfe et al., 2019). The following description is restricted to the coral banded cleaner shrimp Stenopus hispidus, one of the few well-documented cleaner shrimps that inhabit tropical coral reefs and groom fish of external parasites or detritus (Vaughan et al., 2017). These shrimps are well known for their knowledge of place, occupying a specific territory – their cleaning station – to which they return daily and which is visited by favored fish (Limbaugh et al., 1961). Long-term memory in S. hispidus is suggested by observation of individuals pair bonding and recognizing a partner even after an absence of several days (Johnson, 1977). Allocentric recognition of place and partner recognition are mediated by chemoreception (Esaka et al., 2016).

Observations

We confirm here the original description by Sullivan and Beltz (2004) of the S. hispidus lateral protocerebral center that they referred to as a hemiellipsoid body divided into three contiguous domains that receive layered OGT terminals. A neuropil named by Sullivan and Beltz as the ‘lateral protocerebral complex’ and described as an entirely separate neuropil, as it is by Krieger et al. (2019), is clearly a columnar lobe originating from these domains and terminating as a set of tubercular swellings, (Figure 4A–C). The swellings are strongly immunoreactive to anti-DC0 (Figure 4D–F). Reduced silver staining (Figure 4C) and immunohistology (Figure 4E) demonstrate that the three domains (Ca1-Ca3) assume the configuration of a layered mushroom body calyx. Intrinsic neurons in each domain (Figure 5A,B,D) contribute many hundreds of axon-like fibers that converge into a common root, from which arises the compound columnar lobe terminating as three adjacent tubercular domains, corresponding to the three calyces (Figures 4D–F and 5A,B). Parallel fibers branch in these tubercles where they provide pre- and postsynaptic specializations (Figure 4A,B). As remarked above, anti-DC0 is expressed at high levels in the tubercles and at lower levels just distally in the columnar lobe (Figure 4D–F). And, as shown by immunolabelling with antibodies against GAD, 5HT and TH, the tubercles are further divided into smaller territories such that the entire structure assumes the serial domain arrangement characterizing the mushroom body ground pattern (Figure 4G–J).

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

The calyces correspond to Sullivan and Beltz’s ‘hemiellipsoid body.’ They are composed of many thousands of intrinsic neuron dendrites. Their axon-like extensions, resolved by Golgi impregnations (Figure 5A), converge predominantly beneath Ca2 in the columnar root but also recruit from both Ca1 and Ca3 through an elaborate system of interweaving processes (upper and lower insets, Figure 5A). Groups of parallel fibers segregate before invading different tubercles, each denoting a discrete integrative domain.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

As in Lebbeus and Stomatopoda, the calyces are profusely invaded by branches of TH-containing neurons (Figure 5B). These are arranged through three successive calycal layers (Figure 5C–E), each of which is defined by its elaborate cytoarchitecture reflecting specific neuronal components, as described from Stomatopoda and the alpheoid shrimp Lebbeus (Wolff et al., 2017; Sayre and Strausfeld, 2019). Layer 1 of each of the three calyces (Ca1-Ca3) contains ascending processes of slender varicose afferents and the apical dendrites of intrinsic neurons (Figure 5F,G). Climbing fibers enter the calyces from other lateral protocerebral centers. Layer 2 (Figure 5D,E) is denoted by the numerous parallel projecting terminals originating from the olfactory globular tract. Layer 3 (Figure 5D) contains the massively arborizing inner dendrites of intrinsic neurons, some of which are shown at the corresponding level in Figure 5A, upper right. Processes of intrinsic neurons sweep laterally beneath layer 3 to enter the root of the mushroom body’s columnar lobe (Clm R; Figure 5A,D).

Caridean mushroom bodies (and reniform body) (Figures 6–11)

Background

Caridea splits from its sister group Procaridea in the Carboniferous (Bracken et al., 2010), with most caridean crown group diversification occurring in the Jurassic (Wolfe et al., 2019). Caridea comprises the second largest decapod taxon, with two-thirds of its species occupying marine habitats. Here, we consider marine species belonging to the families Alpheidae and Thoridae (members of the superfamily Alpheoidea), and intertidal species of the family Crangonidae. These families originated approximately 220, 160 and 70 mya, respectively (Davis et al., 2018). Alpheidae is a diverse family that contains snapping shrimps, commonly referred to as pistol shrimps, which include the only known crustaceans to have evolved eusociality (Duffy et al., 2000), and visored shrimps closely related to the genus Alpheus (Anker et al., 2006). Pistol shrimps are represented here by the non-social species Alpheus bellulus, which, like other snapping shrimps, possesses asymmetric claws (chelae). The visored shrimp is Betaeus harrimani. Like pistol shrimps, B. harrimani is an active predator, although not employing concussion, and is also facultatively commensal, sharing burrows of the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis (Anker and Baeza, 2012). Unlike the genus Alpheus, Betaeus has symmetric claws, reflecting the more basal position of this genus within Alpheidae (Anker et al., 2006).

Observations

Comparisons of the brains of A. bellulus and B. harrimani revealed almost no discernible differences other than that the eyes and visual neuropils of B. harrimani are smaller than those of A. bellulus. Figures 6 and 7 therefore illustrate relevant features of the mushroom body using both species. Immunolabelling with anti-DC0 reveals an elaborate system of neuropils expressing high levels of the antigen, demonstrating the relationship of those areas predominantly to the globuli cell cluster medially and to the protocerebrum rostrally (Figure 6A,B). Notably, alpheid species lack eyestalks and possess very small compound eyes. The nested optic centers (lamina, medulla and lobula) are correspondingly reduced, and the enormous mushroom bodies occupy much of the rostral and lateral protocerebrum’s volume (Figure 6A,B). The calyx is elaborate, showing through its depth high affinity to DC0 (Figure 6C). As in Stomatopoda and Stenopodidea, the calyx has three layers, each of which is defined by the dendritic disposition of its intrinsic cells (Figure 6D–F). Intrinsic cells extend their axon-like processes in parallel bundles for a short distance before forming elaborate networks in the columnar lobes (Figure 6D,E), which extend dorso-ventrally as convoluted volumes comprising tubercular domains (Figure 6G). These volumes are heavily invested by anti-TH-, anti-5HT- and anti-GAD-positive arborizations (Figure 6H,I).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

As in Stomatopoda and varunid Brachyura (shore crabs), the alpheid protocerebrum has a prominent DC0-positive reniform body, the components of which correspond to those described for Neogonodactylus oerstedii and Hemigrapsus nudus (Thoen et al., 2019). This center consists of four discrete neuropils linked by a branching axonal tract (pedestal) that extends axons from a glomerular initial zone to three separate zones (lateral, distal and proximal) each with its own characteristic immunomorphology (Figure 7A–E). Abutting the mushroom body ventrally, these territories are similar to, but spatially distinct from, a columnar extension from the mushroom body calyx that, like the main columnar ensemble shown in Figure 6B,G, consists of discrete tubercles, each denoted by its affinity to antisera against GAD, DC0, TH and 5HT (Figure 7F–I).

We next consider Thoridae, a separate lineage of the superfamily Alpheoidea that includes the genera Lebbeus and Spirontocaris.

Backgound

Lebbeus groenlandicus and Spirontocaris lamellicornis are exotically patterned shrimps and protected from predation by sharp spiny protuberances from their exoskeleton. They are solitary, highly active, and territorial, living on reefs or rocks. The two species look similar; both are patterned into irregular white and orange-pink bands, a feature suggesting self-advertisement or aposomatic warning. There is one report of a lebbeid cleaning the mouths of fish, reminiscent of behavior by the banded coral shrimp described above (Jensen, 2006).

Observations

Figures 8, 9 and 10A expand a recent study of Lebbeus (Sayre and Strausfeld, 2019), resolving two completely distinct calyces that share a common organization into three concentric layers. These correspond to the dense arrangements of intrinsic neurons (inset to Figure 8A). Defined by their immunoreactivity to DC0 and affinity to a palette of antibodies (Figure 8A,B,D), the layers in the larger calyx (Ca1, Figure 8A) demonstrate elaborate synaptic strata enriched with synaptic proteins (Figure 8C). Dense arrangements of processes belonging to anti-5HT-positive afferent neurons (Figure 8C) correspond to intrinsic neuron layers (Figure 8B) and arrangements of anti-TH-positive terminals (Figure 8D). Thin processes of intrinsic neurons belonging to the two calyces extend centrally as two separate columnar lobes Clm1 and Clm2.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

The column provided by Ca1 (Clm1) demonstrates an orthogonal network – characteristic of insect and stomatopod mushroom bodies – of intrinsic cell processes intersected by afferent and efferent neurons and by modulatory elements (Figure 9B–E,H,I). The columns contain dense arrangements of synaptic specializations (Figure 9F,G) and although these do not clearly distinguish successive synaptic domains, the arrangement of anti-TH-positive processes reveals this organization, one of the diagnostic characteristics of the mushroom body ground pattern (Figure 9I). The smaller of the two calyces provides intrinsic fibers to its columnar extension (Clm2), which terminates as a system of tubercles corresponding to the organization of the mushroom bodies in basal insects (Zygentoma, Ephemeroptera). These also show dense arrangements of synaptic sites (Figure 9J, inset).

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Background

The family Crangonidae is here represented by the sand shrimp Crangon franciscorum and the horned shrimp Paracrangon echinata, belonging to the superfamily Crangonoidea, which originated at the end of the Cretaceous (Davis et al., 2018). Both species provide interesting comparisons with the alpheids with respect to their habitat and mode of life. Paracrangon looks superficially like an almost colorless version of Lebbeus. However, unlike Lebbeus, which is highly active and hunts on rocky substrates and reefs, P. echinata is an almost immobile nocturnal ambush predator confined to crevasses. Its relative inactivity may be attributable to having only four walking legs compared to Lebbeus‘s six (Jensen, 2011).

Observations

The lateral protocerebrum of Lebbeus (Figure 10A) or Spirontocaris lamellicornis (Figure 10B) is radically different from that of Paracrangon echinata (Figure 10C), which possesses a single but substantial calyx that has an intense affinity to anti-DC0. Its cytoarchitecture appears to be generally homogeneous apart from a subtle indication of a peripheral layer immediately beneath its rostral covering of globuli cells (Figure 10C). The calyx gives rise to a diminutive system of anti-DC0-positive parallel fibers that provide a narrow column terminating in a small tubercular cluster (Figure 10D).

Figure 10

Download asset Open asset

The last caridean considered here is Crangon franciscorum, which inhabits subtidal sandy habitats where it actively preys on smaller shrimp species, amphipods and other microfauna (Siegfried, 1982). The calyx of C. franciscorum shows low affinity to anti-DC0 but gives rise to a prominent system of anti-DC0-positive columns that terminate in swollen tubercles (Figure 11A). The entire system of the calyx, lobes and adjacent neuropils, including the visual system’s lobula, is densely packed with anti-GAD-positive processes (Figure 11B). The calyx possesses stratified arborizations, resolved by anti-5HT and anti-TH immunostaining, some of which suggest subdivisions laterally across the calyx (Figure 11C,D). In this species, several of the lateral protocerebral neuropils caudal to (beneath) the calyx appear to comprise many neuropil islets, each with as strong an affinity to anti-DC0 as has the calyx. The disposition of these islets suggests a system possibly corresponding to the reniform body (Figure 11A).

Figure 11

Download asset Open asset

Transformed mushroom body in recent astacids

Background

Fossil and geologically calibrated molecular phylogenies place the origin of the infraorder Astacidea, the lineage providing what are generally known as ‘lobsters’ and ‘crayfish’ at 250–400 mya (Wolfe et al., 2019). Here we identify derivations of the ancestral mushroom body in the lateral protocerebra of the North American freshwater species Orconectes immunis (calico crayfish) and Procambarus clarkii (Louisiana crawfish).

Observations

The description by Sullivan and Beltz (2001) of the hemiellipsoid body of Procambarus clarkii identified its overall organization as two layered volumes, which we have named the cupola and torus (Strausfeld and Sayre, 2020). Neither volume appears outwardly distinct, the matrix of each comprising many microglomeruli (Figure 12A). However, closer inspection shows that these are larger and more densely packed in the torus than the cupola (Figure 12A, inset). Golgi impregnations, described in Strausfeld and Sayre (2020), resolve further differences between these two neuropils: each possesses a constrained organization of intrinsic neurons, which have their dendrites and short axon-like processes limited to either the cupola or torus. Both neuropils contain elaborate systems of local interneurons and glomerular ensembles, suggestive of local circuits, orthogonal arrangements appearing more pronounced in the torus (see also Figure 12—figure supplement 1). Anti-DC0 immunoreactivity shows both cupola and torus to be usually, but not invariably, highly immunoreactive (compare Figure 12C with Figure 12D,E), as are discrete regions beneath them, here referred to as the subcalycal neuropil area VII Figure 12C (nomenclature from Blaustein et al., 1988) and, laterally, the reniform body (RB, Figure 12C). Depending on the angle of sectioning, the outer level is dome-like – hence the nomenclature cupola – whereas the inner level appears to have a toroidal architecture. These volumes are matched by the distribution of anti-GAD immunoreactivity (Figure 12E). Organization of the cupola and torus as two independent units is also matched by the distribution of profuse anti-TH-immunoreactive efferent neurons and more sparsely distributed anti-5HT-immunoreactive processes (Figure 12F–H). Recordings from these neurons show them to be multimodal output neurons, comparable to MBONs of mushroom body columns (Mellon, 2000; Mellon and Alones, 1997; McKinzie et al., 2003).

Figure 12 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

The chimeric mushroom body of Paguroidea and its evolved derivative

Background

Originating in the Devonian, Reptantia gave rise to two branches, one providing the infraorders Achelata, Polychelida and Astacidea, the other providing the infraorders Axiidea and Gebiidea, and infraorders Anomura and Brachyura (together Meiura). Fossil-calibrated molecular phylogenies (Wolfe et al., 2019) demonstrate the superfamily Paguroidea within the infraorder Anomura diverging in the late Triassic to provide six families of which two, Paguroidae and Coenobitidae, are marine and land hermit crabs, respectively. Coenobitidae is the younger, diverging approximately 35 mya. Here we compare anti-DC0-immunoreactive centers in the lateral protocerebrum of the marine hairy hermit crab Pagurus hirsutiusculus with those of the land hermit crab Coenobita clypeatus (McLaughlin et al., 2010).

Observations

In Pagurus, affinity to anti-DC0 (Figure 13A) reveals two immediately adjacent calycal domains in the lateral protocerebrum that together are continuous with an anti-DC0-positive columnar lobe. The neural architecture of the calyces (Figure 13B–D,F–H) is remarkably similar to the organization of afferents and intrinsic neurons in successive layers of the multistratified anti-DC0-immunoreactive hemiellipsoid body of the land hermit crab Coenobita clypeatus (Figure 13I–O). As demonstrated by Golgi impregnations (Wolff et al., 2012; Strausfeld and Sayre, 2020), both Pagurus and Coenobita have corresponding networks provided by a variety of morphological types of intrinsic neurons. These form precisely defined orthogonal networks (Figure 13B,C) of dendritic processes and terminals. In Pagurus, one population of intrinsic neurons provides axon-like extensions into the lobes (Strausfeld and Sayre, 2020). In Coenobita, all of the axon-like processes of intrinsic neurons are constrained to within the layered arrangements of its hemiellipsoid body (Wolff et al., 2012). In Pagurus, the dendrites of anti-5HT- and anti-TH-immunoreactive MBONs intersect intrinsic neuron terminals in the tubercular swellings at the end of the columnar lobes. The layered arrangements of the dendrites of these immunoreactive neurons reflect the repeat organization of precisely aligned intrinsic neuron dendrites across each calyx’s width (Figure 13C,E).

Figure 13

Download asset Open asset

The hemiellipsoidal mushroom body of Coenobita clypeatus

Background

The anomuran family Coenobitidae, to which the Caribbean land hermit crab belongs, is a recent group appearing approximately 35–40 mya (Bracken-Grissom et al., 2013; Wolfe et al., 2019). Coenobita clypeatus and its cousin the coconut crab Birgus latro have attracted considerable attention regarding olfactory adaptations associated with terrestrialization (Stensmyr et al., 2005). However, the juveniles develop in a marine habitat and, as expected, their antennular olfactory receptor neurons are typical of marine species in possessing ionotropic receptors, the axons of which terminate in large deutocerebral olfactory lobes (Harzsch and Hansson, 2008; Groh et al., 2013).

Observations

As shown in both B. latro and C. clypeatus, massive relays from the olfactory lobes project to the lateral protocerebra to terminate in greatly inflated centers referred to as hemiellipsoid bodies (Harzsch and Hansson, 2008). These neuropils are defined by numerous anti-DC0-positive stratifications (Figure 14A,B). Golgi impregnations and electron microscopy demonstrated that these tiered arrangements consist of orthogonal networks of intrinsic neurons, postsynaptic to afferent terminals and presynaptic to dendrites, resulting in an organization that corresponds to circuitry recognized in the insect mushroom body’s columnar lobe (Brown and Wolff, 2012; Wolff et al., 2012). Volumes of neuropil situated laterally beneath the dome are also anti-DC0-positive, as is a globular center corresponding to the reniform body (Figure 14A,B). The correspondence of this center’s internal organization with that of a mushroom body’s column is further demonstrated by the arrangements of dendritic trees belonging to output neurons, which are equivalent to MBONs. Figure 14C shows that anti-TH- and anti-5HT-immunoreactive dendrites extend across strata, each of which is also defined by synaptic configurations revealed by F-actin and anti-synapsin (Figure 14D) and, in Figure 14F, by anti-α-tubulin and an antibody against PKA-RII that regulates DC0 (see Methods). Antibodies against GAD reveal broadly distributed processes that are not aligned within rows but extend across them (Figure 14C,E).

Figure 14

Download asset Open asset

Extreme divergence of the mushroom body in Brachyura

Background

Brachyura (true crabs) is a species-rich infraorder, now comprising about 6800 species (Ng et al., 2008), which diverged 240 mya (Wolfe et al., 2019). Here we consider two species, both of which spend intertidal periods out of water, the shore crab Hemigrapsus nudus (Varunidae) and fiddler crab Uca (Minuca) minax (Ocypodidae). Fossil-calibrated molecular phylogenies indicate a mid-to-late Cretaceous origin for the Varunidae and Ocypodidae (Tsang et al., 2014; Wolfe et al., 2019).

The opportunistic detritivore H. nudus lives in a flat visual ecology interrupted by occasional pebbles and rocks. These shore crabs often come into immediate contact with each other, where they may initiate contact-induced actions, such as defensive aggression involving jousting and pushing, but there is no obvious ritualized courtship as there is in fiddler crabs. Individuals employ crevices as transitory residences, responding to predatory threats by opportunistically retreating and hiding in them (Jacoby, 1981). It is likely that they can deploy allocentric memory, judging from the habit of near- or fully-grown individuals to retreat to a specific location when threatened. These actions contrast with those of fiddler crabs, such as Uca minax – deposit feeders living on mudflats – that are renowned for their ritualized courtship displays and rapid path integration to established home sites to escape predation (Crane, 1975), and visual behaviors that relate to compound eyes adapted for vision in a flat world (Zeil and Hemmi, 2006).

Observations

Treatment of eyestalks of six H. nudus with anti-DC0 resulted in four of twelve eyestalks showing barely detectable immunoreactivity with one specimen exhibiting some immunoreactivity in a tributary of the OGT. Eight consistently showed various levels of immunoreactivity in regions of the rostral lateral protocerebrum. Figure 15A–F shows three of five specimens that all resolved strong immunoreactivity of large parts of the rostral neuropil associated with clusters of globuli cells lying over the lateral protocerebrum’s rostral surface. One cluster of globuli cells also supplies a well-defined anti-DC0-immunoreactive neuropil positioned immediately proximal to the lobula. This matches the elaborations of the reniform body (Figure 15E), as resolved in Golgi impregnations and Bodian reduced-silver-stained specimens (Thoen et al., 2019). This center is known to participate in visual habituation and was understandably (but mistakenly) interpreted by Maza et al. (2016) as a mushroom body. As shown by Thoen et al. (2019), this center is not a homologue of the mushroom body or the hemiellipsoid body but is present with either of those centers. Depending on the tilt of sectioning and the section’s depth the intensely anti-DC0-immunoreactive pedestal of the reniform body can be resolved extending obliquely from the rostro-dorsal to the caudal margin of the lateral protocerebrum (Figure 15A–F). Sections of fortuitously oriented blocks can reveal the entire reniform body complex, here shown digitally enhanced against other anti-DC0 territories in Figure 15E.

Figure 15 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 15 depicts territories of the lateral protocerebrum of H. nudus indicating that almost the entire rostral half of the neuropil is occupied by very large anti-DC0-immunoreactive domains characterized by cortex-like boundaries of fissures and lobes (Figure 15B). In H. nudus, the volume associated with the anti-DC0-labelled domain is relatively free of anti-GAD immunoreactivity, whereas antibodies raised against 5HT and TH suggest that anti-TH may be more abundant in the lateral protocerebrum’s upper half than in the lower (Figure 15G,H). The fiddler crab, Uca minax (Figure 15—figure supplement 1), reveals similar anti-RII-immunoreactive territories that also appear to be highly folded. Less extensive than those in H. nudus, the two most immunoreactive territories are separated by a volume showing lower affinity to anti-DC0. Notably, vibratome sections treated with SYNORF1 (anti-synapsin) and phalloidin (F-actin) to resolve synaptic microglomeruli, selectively reveal only specific subterritories of the volume occupied by the anti-DC0-positive center (inset: Figure 15—figure supplement 1 inset).

Scrutiny of anti-DC0 territories identifies anti-synapsin as well as anti-TH- and anti-5HT-immunoreactive arrangements suggestive of mushroom body-like configurations (Figure 15I,J), the locations of which correspond to the boxed area of Figure 15D.

To screen for putative mushroom bodies or centers in corresponding locations we employed anti-DC0 immunostaining of lateral protocerebra. Identified centers were then subjected to various histological techniques to detect character arrangements that define the hexapod-stomatopod mushroom body ground pattern. The nuclear stain Syto13 was used to identify neuronal cell bodies and to distinguish minute basophilic cell bodies associated with anti-DC0-immunoreactive centers. Antisera were used to reveal neuroarchitectures as well as putative serotoninergic and dopaminergic neurons belonging to mushroom body input or output neurons (MBINs, MBONs; Aso et al., 2014a; Aso et al., 2014b) and feedforward or recurrent GABAergic elements within mushroom body circuitry (Perisse et al., 2016; Bicker et al., 1985; Leitch and Laurent, 1996). Reduced silver staining and α-tubulin immunohistology was employed to reveal the fibroarchitecture of the lateral protocerebrum. Golgi impregnation methods revealing quantities of single neurons were used to compare neuronal organization in mushroom bodies and their suspected ‘hemiellipsoid body’ homologues in Reptantia.

Data generated and analyzed for this study derive from histological material kept and curated in the first author's laboratory at the Department Neuroscience, University of Arizona.

1. Book

   1. Abel T
   2. Nguyen PV

   (2008) Regulation of hippocampus-dependent memory by cyclic AMP dependent protein kinase

   In: Vincent J. -C. L, Castellucci F, Belleville S, Sossin W. S, editors. Progress in Brain Research, 169. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 115–197.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00006-4

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Altner H
   2. Prillinger L

   (1980) Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, Thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance

   International Review of Cytology 67:69–139.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62427-4

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Andrew DR
   2. Brown SM
   3. Strausfeld NJ

   (2012) The minute brain of the copepod Tigriopus californicus supports a complex ancestral ground pattern of the tetraconate cerebral nervous systems

   The Journal of Comparative Neurology 520:3446–3470.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23099

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Anker A
   2. Ahyong ST
   3. Noel PY
   4. Palmer AR

   (2006)

   Morphological phylogeny of alpheid shrimps: parallel preadaptation and the origin of a key morphological innovation, the snapping claw

   Evolution 60:2507–2528.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Anker A
   2. Baeza JA

   (2012) Molecular and morphological phylogeny of hooded shrimps, genera Betaeus and Betaeopsis (Decapoda, Alpheidae): testing the center of origin biogeographic model and evolution of life history traits

   Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 64:401–415.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.04.015

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Aso Y
   2. Sitaraman D
   3. Ichinose T
   4. Kaun KR
   5. Vogt K
   6. Belliart-Guérin G
   7. Plaçais PY
   8. Robie AA
   9. Yamagata N
   10. Schnaitmann C
   11. Rowell WJ
   12. Johnston RM
   13. Ngo TT
   14. Chen N
   15. Korff W
   16. Nitabach MN
   17. Heberlein U
   18. Preat T
   19. Branson KM
   20. Tanimoto H
   21. Rubin GM

   (2014a) Mushroom body output neurons encode Valence and guide memory-based action selection in Drosophila

   eLife 3:e04580.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04580

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Aso Y
   2. Hattori D
   3. Yu Y
   4. Johnston RM
   5. Iyer NA
   6. Ngo TT
   7. Dionne H
   8. Abbott LF
   9. Axel R
   10. Tanimoto H
   11. Rubin GM

   (2014b) The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning

   eLife 3:e04577.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04577

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bauer RT

   (2019)

   Life cycle and seasonal migrations

   The Natural History of the Crustacea 5:203–230.

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Bellonci G

   (1882)

   Nuove ricerche Sulla struttura del ganglio ottico della Squilla mantis

   Memorie Della Accademia Delle Scienze dell'Istituto Di Bologna, Serie 4 Tomo 3:419–426.

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Bicker G
    2. Schäfer S
    3. Kingan TG

    (1985) Mushroom body feedback interneurones in the honeybee show GABA-like immunoreactivity

    Brain Research 360:394–397.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(85)91262-4

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Bienkowski MS
    2. Bowman I
    3. Song MY
    4. Gou L
    5. Ard T
    6. Cotter K
    7. Zhu M
    8. Benavidez NL
    9. Yamashita S
    10. Abu-Jaber J
    11. Azam S
    12. Lo D
    13. Foster NN
    14. Hintiryan H
    15. Dong HW

    (2018) Integration of gene expression and brain-wide connectivity reveals the multiscale organization of mouse hippocampal networks

    Nature Neuroscience 21:1628–1643.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0241-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Blaustein DN
    2. Derby CD
    3. Simmons RB
    4. Beall AC

    (1988) Structure of the brain and medulla terminalis of the spiny lobster Panulirus argus and the Crayfish Procambarus clarkii, with an Emphasis on Olfactory Centers

    Journal of Crustacean Biology 8:493–519.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1548686

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Bodian D

    (1936) A new method for staining nerve fibers and nerve endings in mounted paraffin sections

    The Anatomical Record 65:89–97.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1090650110

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Böhm A
    2. Szucsich NU
    3. Pass G

    (2012) Brain anatomy in diplura (Hexapoda)

    Frontiers in Zoology 9:26.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-26

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Boxshall GA

    (1999) The evolution of arthropod limbs

    Biological Reviews 79:253–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006274

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Bracken HD
    2. De Grave S
    3. Toon A
    4. Felder DL
    5. Crandall KA

    (2010) Phylogenetic position, systematic status, and divergence time of the procarididea (Crustacea: decapoda)

    Zoologica Scripta 39:198–212.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00410.x

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Bracken-Grissom HD
    2. Cannon ME
    3. Cabezas P
    4. Feldmann RM
    5. Schweitzer CE
    6. Ahyong ST
    7. Felder DL
    8. Lemaitre R
    9. Crandall KA

    (2013) A comprehensive and integrative reconstruction of evolutionary history for anomura (Crustacea: decapoda)

    BMC Evolutionary Biology 13:128.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-128

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Bracken-Grissom HD
    2. Ahyong ST
    3. Wilkinson RD
    4. Feldmann RM
    5. Schweitzer CE
    6. Breinholt JW
    7. Bendall M
    8. Palero F
    9. Chan TY
    10. Felder DL
    11. Robles R
    12. Chu KH
    13. Tsang LM
    14. Kim D
    15. Martin JW
    16. Crandall KA

    (2014) The emergence of lobsters: phylogenetic relationships, morphological evolution and divergence time comparisons of an ancient group (decapoda: achelata, astacidea, glypheidea, polychelida)

    Systematic Biology 63:457–479.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Brand P
    2. Robertson HM
    3. Lin W
    4. Pothula R
    5. Klingeman WE
    6. Jurat-Fuentes JL
    7. Johnson BR

    (2018) The origin of the odorant receptor gene family in insects

    eLife 7:e38340.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Brauchle M
    2. Kiontke K
    3. MacMenamin P
    4. Fitch DH
    5. Piano F

    (2009) Evolution of early embryogenesis in rhabditid Nematodes

    Developmental Biology 335:253–262.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.07.033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Brown S
    2. Wolff G

    (2012) Fine structural organization of the hemiellipsoid body of the land hermit crab, Coenobita clypeatus

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 520:2847–2863.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23058

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Burrell BD
    2. Sahley CL

    (2001) Learning in simple systems

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11:757–764.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(01)00281-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Chablais J
    2. Feldmann RM
    3. Schweitzer CE

    (2011) A new triassic decapod, Platykotta akaina, from the Arabian Shelf of the Northern United Arab Emirates: Earliest Occurrence of the Anomura

     Paläontologische Zeitschrift 85:93–102.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-010-0080-y

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Cognigni P
    2. Felsenberg J
    3. Waddell S

    (2018) Do the right thing: neural network mechanisms of memory formation, expression and update in Drosophila

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 49:51–58.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.12.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Cournil I
    2. Helluy SM
    3. Beltz BS

    (1994) Dopamine in the lobster Homarus gammarus I. comparative analysis of dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivities in the nervous system of the juvenile

    Journal of Comparative Neurology 334:455–469.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903440308

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Couto A
    2. Alenius M
    3. Dickson BJ

    (2005) Molecular, anatomical, and functional organization of the Drosophila olfactory system

    Current Biology 15:1535–1547.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. Book

    1. Crane J

    (1975)

    Fiddler Crabs of the World (Ocypodidae: Genus Uca

    Princeton University Press.

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Crisp KM
    2. Klukas KA
    3. Gilchrist LS
    4. Nartey AJ
    5. Mesce KA

    (2002) Distribution and development of dopamine- and octopamine-synthesizing neurons in the medicinal leech

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 442:115–129.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10077

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Crittenden JR
    2. Skoulakis EM
    3. Han KA
    4. Kalderon D
    5. Davis RL

    (1998)

    Tripartite mushroom body architecture revealed by antigenic markers

    Learning & Memory 5:38–51.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Dacks AM
    2. Christensen TA
    3. Hildebrand JG

    (2006) Phylogeny of a serotonin-immunoreactive neuron in the primary olfactory center of the insect brain

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 498:727–746.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21076

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Dahl E

    (1985) Crustacea Leptostraca, principles of taxonomy and a revision of european shelf species

    Sarsia 70:135–165.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00364827.1985.10420626

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Davis KE
    2. De Grave S
    3. Delmer C
    4. Wills MA

    (2018) Freshwater transitions and symbioses shaped the evolution and extant diversity of caridean shrimps

    Communications Biology 1:16.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0018-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Derby CD
    2. Kozma MT
    3. Senatore A
    4. Schmidt M

    (2016) Molecular mechanisms of reception and perireception in crustacean chemoreception: a comparative review

    Chemical Senses 41:381–398.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw057

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Derby CD
    2. Blaustein DN

    (1988) Morphological and physiological characterization of individual olfactory interneurons connecting the brain and eyestalk ganglia of the crayfish

    Journal of Comparative Physiology A 163:777–794.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604055

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Derby CD
    2. Schmidt M

    (2018)

    Oxford Research Encyclopedia Neuroscience

    Crustacean Olfaction, Oxford Research Encyclopedia Neuroscience, USA, Oxford University Press.

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Duffy JE
    2. Morrison CL
    3. Ríos R

    (2000) Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps (Synalpheus)

    Evolution 54:503–516.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00053.x

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Esaka Y
    2. Yoshioka E
    3. Takeuchi Y
    4. Hur S-P
    5. Takemura A

    (2016) Effect of Light Intensity and Wavelength on Diurnal Activity of the Banded Coral Shrimp Stenopus hispidus (Decapoda, Stenopodidae): A Possible Adaptation for a Cleaner Shrimp in Reef Environments

    Pacific Science 70:191–200.

    https://doi.org/10.2984/70.2.5

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Fanenbruck M
    2. Harzsch S
    3. Wägele JW

    (2004) The brain of the remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships

    PNAS 101:3868–3873.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306212101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Fanenbruck M
    2. Harzsch S

    (2005) A brain atlas of Godzilliognomus frondosus yager, 1989 (Remipedia, Godzilliidae) and comparison with the brain of Speleonectes tulumensis Yager, 1987 (Remipedia, Speleonectidae): implications for arthropod relationships

    Arthropod Structure & Development 34:343–378.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2005.01.007

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Farris SM

    (2005a) Developmental organization of the mushroom bodies of Thermobia domestica (Zygentoma, Lepismatidae): insights into mushroom body evolution from a basal insect

    Evolution and Development 7:150–159.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05017.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Farris SM

    (2005b) Evolution of insect mushroom bodies: old clues, new insights

    Arthropod Structure & Development 34:211–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2005.01.008

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Farris SM

    (2013) Evolution of complex higher brain centers and behaviors: behavioral correlates of mushroom body elaboration in insects

    Brain, Behavior and Evolution 82:9–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000352057

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Farris SM
    2. Strausfeld NJ

    (2003) A unique mushroom body substructure common to basal cockroaches and to termites

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 456:305–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10517

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Fishilevich E
    2. Vosshall LB

    (2005) Genetic and functional subdivision of the Drosophila antennal lobe

    Current Biology 15:1548–1553.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.066

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. Book

    1. Fortuyn ABD

    (1920)

    Vergleichende Anatomie Des Nervensystems. Erster Tei!: Die Leitungsbahnen Im Nervensystem Der Wirbellosen Tiere

    Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn.

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Galizia CG
    2. Rössler W

    (2010) Parallel olfactory systems in insects: anatomy and function

    Annual Review of Entomology 55:399–420.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085442

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Getz WM
    2. Akers RP

    (1994) Honeybee olfactory sensilla behave as integrated processing units

    Behavioral and Neural Biology 61:191–195.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80075-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Giribet G

    (2004) Is ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects

    Organisms Diversity & Evolution 4:319–340.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2004.05.001

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Giribet G

    (2018) Current views on chelicerate phylogeny—A tribute to Peter Weygoldt

    Zoologischer Anzeiger 273:7–13.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2018.01.004

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Grabe V
    2. Sachse S

    (2018) Fundamental principles of the olfactory code

    Biosystems 164:94–101.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.10.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Groh KC
    2. Vogel H
    3. Stensmyr MC
    4. Grosse-Wilde E
    5. Hansson BS

    (2013) The hermit crab's nose-antennal transcriptomics

    Frontiers in Neuroscience 7:266.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00266

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Groh C
    2. Rössler W

    (2011) Comparison of microglomerular structures in the mushroom body Calyx of neopteran insects

    Arthropod Structure & Development 40:358–367.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2010.12.002

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Gronenberg W

    (1987)

    Anatomical and physiological properties of feedback neurons of the mushroom bodies in the bee brain

    Experimental Biology 46:115–125.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Grünert U
    2. Ache BW

    (1988) Ultrastructure of the aesthetasc (olfactory) sensilla of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus

    Cell and Tissue Research 251:95–103.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215452

    • Google Scholar
55. Book

    1. Hallberg E
    2. Skog M

    (2010) Chemosensory Sensilla in Crustaceans

    In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M, editors. Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 103–121.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_6

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Hanström B

    (1925) The olfactory centers in crustaceans

    Journal of Comparative Neurology 38:221–250.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.900380302

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Hanström B

    (1931) Neue untersuchungen über sinnesorgane und nervensystem der crustaceen. I

    Zeitschrift FüR Morphologie Und ÖKologie Der Tiere 23:80–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00446350

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Hanström B

    (1932)

    Neue untersuchungen über sinnesorgane und nervensysteme der crustaceen II Zoologische Jahrbücher

    Abteilung Für Anatomie Und Ontogenie Der Tiere 56:387–520.

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Harzsch S
    2. Anger K
    3. Dawirs RR

    (1997)

    Immunocytochemical detection of acetylated α-tubulin and Drosophila synapsin in the embryonic crustacean nervous system

    The International Journal of Developmental Biology 41:477–484.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Harzsch S

    (2004) Phylogenetic comparison of serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in representatives of the chilopoda, diplopoda, and chelicerata: implications for arthropod relationships

    Journal of Morphology 259:198–213.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10178

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Harzsch S
    2. Rieger V
    3. Krieger J
    4. Seefluth F
    5. Strausfeld NJ
    6. Hansson BS

    (2011) Transition from marine to terrestrial ecologies: changes in olfactory and tritocerebral neuropils in land-living isopods

    Arthropod Structure & Development 40:244–257.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2011.03.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Harzsch S
    2. Hansson BS

    (2008) Brain architecture in the terrestrial hermit crab Coenobita clypeatus(Anomura, Coenobitidae), a crustacean with a good aerial sense of smell

    BMC Neuroscience 9:58.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-58

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Harzsch S
    2. Krieger J

    (2018) Crustacean olfactory systems: a comparative review and a crustacean perspective on olfaction in insects

    Progress in Neurobiology 161:23–60.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.11.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Harzsch S
    2. Waloszek D

    (2000) Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the ventral nerve cord of crustacea: a character to study aspects of arthropod phylogeny

    Arthropod Structure & Development 29:307–322.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-8039(01)00015-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Hattori D
    2. Aso Y
    3. Swartz KJ
    4. Rubin GM
    5. Abbott LF
    6. Axel R

    (2017) Representations of novelty and familiarity in a mushroom body compartment

    Cell 169:956–969.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.028

    • Google Scholar
66. Book

    1. Heisenberg M

    (1980) Mutants of brain structure and function: what is the significance of the mushroom bodies for behavior?

    In: Siddiqi O, Babu P, Hall L. M, Hall J. C, editors. Basic Life Sciences, 16. Springer. pp. 373–390.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7968-3_27

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Heisenberg M
    2. Borst A
    3. Wagner S
    4. Byers D

    (1985) Drosophila mushroom body mutants are deficient in olfactory learning

    Journal of Neurogenetics 2:1–30.

    https://doi.org/10.3109/01677068509100140

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Hof CHJ

    (1998) Fossil stomatopods (Crustacea: malacostraca) and their phylogenetic impact

    Journal of Natural History 32:1567–1576.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939800771101

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Hyžný M
    2. Klompmaker AA

    (2016)

    Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record

    Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 73:401–437.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Ito K
    2. Awano W
    3. Suzuki K
    4. Hiromi Y
    5. Yamamoto D

    (1997)

    The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells

    Development 124:761–771.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Ito K
    2. Suzuki K
    3. Estes P
    4. Ramaswami M
    5. Yamamoto D
    6. Strausfeld NJ

    (1998)

    The organization of extrinsic neurons and their implications in the functional roles of the mushroom bodies in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen

    Learning & Memory 5:52–77.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Ito K
    2. Shinomiya K
    3. Ito M
    4. Armstrong JD
    5. Boyan G
    6. Hartenstein V
    7. Harzsch S
    8. Heisenberg M
    9. Homberg U
    10. Jenett A
    11. Keshishian H
    12. Restifo LL
    13. Rössler W
    14. Simpson JH
    15. Strausfeld NJ
    16. Strauss R
    17. Vosshall LB
    18. Insect Brain Name Working Group

    (2014) A systematic nomenclature for the insect brain

    Neuron 81:755–765.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Jacoby CA

    (1981) Behavior of the purple shore crab Hemigrapsus nudus Dana, 1851

    Journal of Crustacean Biology 1:531–544.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1548130

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Jensen GC

    (2006) Three new species of Lebbeus (Crustacea: decapoda: hippolytidae) from the northeastern pacific

    Zootaxa 1383:23–43.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1383.1.2

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Jensen GC

    (2011) Feeding behavior of the horned shrimp, Paracrangon echinata (Caridea: Crangonidae)

    Journal of Crustacean Biology 31:246–248.

    https://doi.org/10.1651/10-3390.1

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Johnson VR

    (1977) Individual recognition in the banded shrimp Stenopus hispidus (Olivier)

    Animal Behaviour 25:418–428.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90017-3

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Kalderon D
    2. Rubin GM

    (1988) Isolation and characterization of Drosophila cAMP-dependent protein kinase genes

    Genes & Development 2:1539–1556.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2.12a.1539

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Kenning M
    2. Müller C
    3. Wirkner CS
    4. Harzsch S

    (2013) The malacostraca (Crustacea) from a neurophylogenetic perspective: new insights from brain architecture in Nebalia herbstii Leach, 1814 (Leptostraca, phyllocarida)

    Zoologischer Anzeiger - a Journal of Comparative Zoology 252:319–336.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2012.09.003

    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Kenning M
    2. Harzsch S

    (2013) Brain anatomy of the marine isopod Saduria entomon Linnaeus, 1758 (Valvifera, isopoda) with special emphasis on the olfactory pathway

    Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 7:32.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2013.00032

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Klagges BR
    2. Heimbeck G
    3. Godenschwege TA
    4. Hofbauer A
    5. Pflugfelder GO
    6. Reifegerste R
    7. Reisch D
    8. Schaupp M
    9. Buchner S
    10. Buchner E

    (1996)

    Invertebrate synapsins: a single gene codes for several isoforms in Drosophila

    The Journal of Neuroscience 16:3154–3165.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Kollmann M
    2. Huetteroth W
    3. Schachtner J

    (2011) Brain organization in collembola (springtails)

    Arthropod Structure & Development 40:304–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Kozma MT
    2. Schmidt M
    3. Ngo-Vu H
    4. Sparks SD
    5. Senatore A
    6. Derby CD

    (2018) Chemoreceptor proteins in the caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus: expression of ionotropic receptors, gustatory receptors, and TRP channels in two chemosensory organs and brain

    PLOS ONE 13:e0203935.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203935

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Krieger J
    2. Sandeman RE
    3. Sandeman DC
    4. Hansson BS
    5. Harzsch S

    (2010) Brain architecture of the largest living land arthropod, the giant robber crab Birgus latro (Crustacea, anomura, Coenobitidae): evidence for a prominent central olfactory pathway?

    Frontiers in Zoology 7:25.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-7-25

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Krieger J
    2. Grandy R
    3. Drew MM
    4. Erland S
    5. Stensmyr MC
    6. Harzsch S
    7. Hansson BS

    (2012a) Giant robber crabs monitored from space: gps-based telemetric studies on christmas island (Indian ocean)

    PLOS ONE 7:e49809.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049809

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Krieger J
    2. Sombke A
    3. Seefluth F
    4. Kenning M
    5. Hansson BS
    6. Harzsch S

    (2012b) Comparative brain architecture of the European shore crab Carcinus maenas (Brachyura) and the common hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus (Anomura) with notes on other marine hermit crabs

    Cell and Tissue Research 348:47–69.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1353-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Krieger J
    2. Braun P
    3. Rivera NT
    4. Schubart CD
    5. Müller CH
    6. Harzsch S

    (2015) Comparative analyses of olfactory systems in terrestrial crabs (Brachyura): evidence for aerial olfaction?

    PeerJ 3:e1433.

    https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1433

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Krieger J
    2. Hörnig MK
    3. Sandeman RE
    4. Sandeman DC
    5. Harzsch S

    (2019) Masters of communication: the brain of the banded cleaner shrimp Stenopus hispidus (Olivier, 1811) with an emphasis on sensory processing Areas

    Journal of Comparative Neurology 2019:1–27.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24831

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Kühn-Bühlmann S
    2. Wehner R

    (2006) Age-dependent and task-related volume changes in the mushroom bodies of visually guided desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor

    Journal of Neurobiology 66:511–521.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20235

    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Lane ME
    2. Kalderon D

    (1993) Genetic investigation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase function in Drosophila development

    Genes & Development 7:1229–1243.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.7.7a.1229

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Lange AB
    2. Chan K

    (2008) Dopaminergic control of foregut contractions in Locusta migratoria

    Journal of Insect Physiology 54:222–230.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.09.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Leitch B
    2. Laurent G

    (1996) GABAergic synapses in the antennal lobe and mushroom body of the locust olfactory system

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 372:487–514.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960902)372:4<487::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Li Z
    2. Rossi EA
    3. Hoheisel JD
    4. Kalderon D
    5. Rubin CS

    (1999) Generation of a novel A kinase anchor protein and a myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate-like analog from a single gene

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:27191–27200.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.38.27191

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Li Y
    2. Strausfeld NJ

    (1997) Morphology and sensory modality of mushroom body extrinsic neurons in the brain of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 387:631–650.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971103)387:4<631::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Li Y
    2. Strausfeld NJ

    (1999) Multimodal efferent and recurrent neurons in the medial lobes of cockroach mushroom bodies

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 409:647–663.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990712)409:4<647::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Limbaugh C
    2. Pederson H
    3. Chace FA

    (1961)

    Shrimps that clean fishes

    Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 11:237–257.

    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Liu X
    2. Davis RL

    (2009) The GABAergic anterior paired lateral neuron suppresses and is suppressed by olfactory learning

    Nature Neuroscience 12:53–59.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2235

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Long SM

    (2018) A novel protocol for generating intact, whole-head spider cephalothorax tissue sections

    BioTechniques 64:163–169.

    https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2018-2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Machon J
    2. Krieger J
    3. Meth R
    4. Zbinden M
    5. Ravaux J
    6. Montagné N
    7. Chertemps T
    8. Harzsch S

    (2019) Neuroanatomy of a hydrothermal vent shrimp provides insights into the evolution of crustacean integrative brain centers

    eLife 8:e47550.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47550

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Martin JW
    2. Vetter EW
    3. Cash-Clark CE

    (1996) Description, external morphology, and natural history observations of Nebalia hessleri, new species (Phyllocarida: leptostraca), from southern California, with a key to the extant families and genera of the leptostraca

    Journal of Crustacean Biology 16:347–372.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1548892

    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Maza FJ
     2. Sztarker J
     3. Shkedy A
     4. Peszano VN
     5. Locatelli FF
     6. Delorenzi A

     (2016) Context-dependent memory traces in the crab's mushroom bodies: Functional support for a common origin of high-order memory centers

     PNAS 113:E7957–E7965.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612418113

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. McCormack E
     2. Ashelby CW
     3. McGrath D

     (2016) A review of the leptostraca of the british isles with discussion of the genus Sarsinebalia dahl

     Nauplius 24:e2016006.

     https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016006

     • Google Scholar
102. 1. McKinzie ME
     2. Benton JL
     3. Beltz BS
     4. Mellon DeF

     (2003) Parasol cells of the hemiellipsoid body in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii: dendritic branching patterns and functional implications

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 462:168–179.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10716

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. McLaughlin PA
     2. Komai T
     3. Lemaitre R
     4. Rahayu DL
     5. Listyo D

     (2010)

     Annotated checklist of anomuran decapod crustaceans of the world (exclusive of the kiwaoidea and families Chirostylidae and Galatheidae of the galatheoidea). Part I - Lithodoidea, lomisoidea and paguroidea

     Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Suppl 23:5–107.

     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Mellon DeF
     2. Alones V
     3. Lawrence MD

     (1992) Anatomy and fine structure of neurons in the deutocerebral projection pathway of the crayfish olfactory system

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 321:93–111.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903210109

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Mellon DeF

     (2000) Convergence of multimodal sensory input onto higher-level neurons of the crayfish olfactory pathway

     Journal of Neurophysiology 84:3045–3055.

     https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3043

     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Mellon DeF

     (2003) DOE: dendritic initiation and propagation of spikes and spike bursts in a multimodal sensory interneuron: The crustacean parasol cell

     Journal of Neurophysiology 90:2465–2477.

     https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00310.2003

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Mellon DeF
     2. Alones VE

     (1997) Response properties of higher level neurons in the central olfactory pathway of the crayfish

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 181:205–216.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050107

     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Meth R
     2. Wittfoth C
     3. Harzsch S

     (2017) Brain architecture of the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei boone, 1931 (Malacostraca, Dendrobranchiata): Correspondence of Brain Structure and Sensory Input? 

     Cell Tissue Research 369:255–271.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2607-y

     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Missbach C
     2. Dweck HK
     3. Vogel H
     4. Vilcinskas A
     5. Stensmyr MC
     6. Hansson BS
     7. Grosse-Wilde E

     (2014) Evolution of insect olfactory receptors

     eLife 3:e02115.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02115

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Montgomery SH
     2. Merrill RM
     3. Ott SR

     (2016) Brain composition in Heliconius butterflies, posteclosion growth and experience-dependent neuropil plasticity

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 524:1747–1769.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23993

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Ng PKL
     2. Guinot D
     3. Davie PJF

     (2008)

     Systema brachyurorum: part I. an annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world

     Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement Series 17:1–286.

     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Oakley TH
     2. Wolfe JM
     3. Lindgren AR
     4. Zaharoff AK

     (2013) Phylotranscriptomics to bring the understudied into the fold: monophyletic ostracoda, fossil placement, and pancrustacean phylogeny

     Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:215–233.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss216

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Owald D
     2. Felsenberg J
     3. Talbot CB
     4. Das G
     5. Perisse E
     6. Huetteroth W
     7. Waddell S

     (2015) Activity of defined mushroom body output neurons underlies learned olfactory behavior in Drosophila

     Neuron 86:417–427.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.025

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. Book

     1. Owen R

     (1843)

     Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals, Delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843

     London, England: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.

     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Pan X
     2. Bourland WA
     3. Song W

     (2013) Protargol synthesis: an in-house protocol

     Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60:609–614.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12067

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Perisse E
     2. Owald D
     3. Barnstedt O
     4. Talbot CB
     5. Huetteroth W
     6. Waddell S

     (2016) Aversive learning and appetitive motivation toggle Feed-Forward inhibition in the Drosophila Mushroom Body

     Neuron 90:1086–1099.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.034

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Porter ML
     2. Pérez-Losada M
     3. Crandall KA

     (2005) Model-based multi-locus estimation of decapod phylogeny and divergence times

     Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37:355–369.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.06.021

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Ramm T
     2. Scholtz G

     (2017) No sight, no smell? - Brain anatomy of two amphipod crustaceans with different lifestyles

     Arthropod Structure & Development 46:537–551.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2017.03.003

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Regier JC
     2. Shultz JW

     (2001) Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics

     Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20:136–148.

     https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0956

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Robertson HM
     2. Baits RL
     3. Walden KKO
     4. Wada‐Katsumata A
     5. Schal C

     (2018) Enormous expansion of the chemosensory gene repertoire in the omnivorous German cockroach Blattella germanica

     Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 330:265–278.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22797

     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Rytz R
     2. Croset V
     3. Benton R

     (2013) Ionotropic receptors (IRs): chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors in Drosophila and beyond

     Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 43:888–897.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.02.007

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Sandeman DC
     2. Scholtz G
     3. Sandeman RE

     (1993) Brain evolution in decapod crustacea

     Journal of Experimental Zoology 265:112–133.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402650204

     • Google Scholar
123. Book

     1. Sandeman DC
     2. Kenning M
     3. Harzsch S

     (2014)

     Adaptive trends in malacostracan brain form and function related to behaviour

     In: Derby C. D, Thiel M, editors. Crustacean Nervous System and Their Control of Behaviour, the Natural History of the Crustacea. Oxford University Press. pp. 11–48.

     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Sandeman DC
     2. Luff SE

     (1973) The structural organization of glomerular neuropile in the olfactory and accessory lobes of an australian freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor

     Zeitschrift FürR Zellforschung Und Mikroskopische Anatomie 142:37–61.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00306703

     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Sayre ME
     2. Strausfeld NJ

     (2019) Mushroom bodies in crustaceans: Insect‐like organization in the caridid shrimp Lebbeus groenlandicus

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 527:2371–2387.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24678

     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Schachtner J
     2. Schmidt M
     3. Homberg U

     (2005) Organization and evolutionary trends of primary olfactory brain centers in Tetraconata (Crustacea+hexapoda)

     Arthropod Structure & Development 34:257–299.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2005.04.003

     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Schindelin J
     2. Arganda-Carreras I
     3. Frise E
     4. Kaynig V
     5. Longair M
     6. Pietzsch T
     7. Preibisch S
     8. Rueden C
     9. Saalfeld S
     10. Schmid B
     11. Tinevez JY
     12. White DJ
     13. Hartenstein V
     14. Eliceiri K
     15. Tomancak P
     16. Cardona A

     (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

     Nature Methods 9:676–682.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
128. Book

     1. Schmidt M

     (2016) Malacostraca

     In: Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Harzsch S, Purschke G, editors. Structure & Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 529–582.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682201.003.0045

     • Google Scholar
129. Book

     1. Schmidt M
     2. Mellon DeF

     (2010) Neuronal Processing of Chemical Information in Crustaceans

     In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M, editors. Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. New York, Berlin: Springer. pp. 123–147.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_7

     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Schneider D
     2. Steinbrecht RA

     (1968)

     Checklist of insect olfactory sensilla

     Symposia of the Zoological Society London 23:279–297.

     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Schwentner M
     2. Combosch DJ
     3. Pakes Nelson J
     4. Giribet G

     (2017) A phylogenomic solution to the origin of insects by resolving Crustacean-Hexapod relationships

     Current Biology 27:1818–1824.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.040

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
132. 1. Schwentner M
     2. Richter S
     3. Rogers DC
     4. Giribet G

     (2018) Tetraconatan phylogeny with special focus on malacostraca and branchiopoda: highlighting the strength of taxon-specific matrices in phylogenomics

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:20181524.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1524

     • Google Scholar
133. 1. Sharma PP
     2. Kaluziak ST
     3. Pérez-Porro AR
     4. González VL
     5. Hormiga G
     6. Wheeler WC
     7. Giribet G

     (2014) Phylogenomic interrogation of arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal

     Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:2963–2984.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu235

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
134. 1. Shen H
     2. Braband A
     3. Scholtz G

     (2013) Mitogenomic analysis of decapod crustacean phylogeny corroborates traditional views on their relationships

     Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66:776–789.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.002

     • Google Scholar
135. 1. Siegfried CA

     (1982) Trophic relations of Crangon franciscorum Stimpson and Palaemon macrodactylus rathbum: predation on the opossum shrimp, Neomysis mercedis Holmes

     Hydrobiologia 89:129–139.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006166

     • Google Scholar
136. 1. Silbering AF
     2. Rytz R
     3. Grosjean Y
     4. Abuin L
     5. Ramdya P
     6. Jefferis GS
     7. Benton R

     (2011) Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct Drosophila olfactory subsystems

     Journal of Neuroscience 31:13357–13375.

     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-11.2011

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
137. 1. Siveter DJ
     2. Briggs DEG
     3. Siveter DJ
     4. Sutton MD
     5. Legg D

     (2017) A new crustacean from the Herefordshire (Silurian) Lagerstätte, UK, and its significance in malacostracan evolution

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284:20170279.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0279

     • Google Scholar
138. 1. Sjöholm M
     2. Sinakevitch I
     3. Strausfeld NJ
     4. Ignell R
     5. Hansson BS

     (2006) Functional division of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of male Spodoptera littoralis revealed by antibodies against aspartate, taurine, FMRF-amide, Mas-allatotropin and DC0

     Arthropod Structure & Development 35:153–168.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2006.03.001

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
139. 1. Skoulakis EM
     2. Kalderon D
     3. Davis RL

     (1993) Preferential expression in mushroom bodies of the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A and its role in learning and memory

     Neuron 11:197–208.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(93)90178-T

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
140. 1. Stegner ME
     2. Stemme T
     3. Iliffe TM
     4. Richter S
     5. Wirkner CS

     (2015) The brain in three crustaceans from cavernous darkness

     BMC Neuroscience 16:19.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0138-6

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
141. 1. Stegner ME
     2. Richter S

     (2011) Morphology of the brain in Hutchinsoniella macracantha (Cephalocarida, crustacea)

     Arthropod Structure & Development 40:221–243.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2011.04.001

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
142. 1. Stemme T
     2. Iliffe TM
     3. Bicker G
     4. Harzsch S
     5. Koenemann S

     (2012) Serotonin immunoreactive interneurons in the brain of the remipedia: new insights into the phylogenetic affinities of an enigmatic crustacean taxon

     BMC Evolutionary Biology 12:168.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-168

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
143. 1. Stemme T
     2. Iliffe TM
     3. Bicker G

     (2016) Olfactory pathway in Xibalbanus tulumensis: remipedian hemiellipsoid body as homologue of hexapod mushroom body

     Cell and Tissue Research 363:635–648.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-015-2275-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
144. 1. Stensmyr MC
     2. Erland S
     3. Hallberg E
     4. Wallén R
     5. Greenaway P
     6. Hansson BS

     (2005) Insect-like olfactory adaptations in the terrestrial giant robber crab

     Current Biology 15:116–121.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.069

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
145. 1. Stern M

     (2009) The PM1 neurons, movement sensitive centrifugal visual brain neurons in the locust: anatomy, physiology, and modulation by identified octopaminergic neurons

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195:123–137.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0392-5

     • Google Scholar
146. Book

     1. Strausfeld NJ

     (1976)

     Atlas of an Insect Brain

     Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

     • Google Scholar
147. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Hansen L
     3. Li Y
     4. Gomez RS
     5. Ito K

     (1998)

     Evolution, discovery, and interpretations of arthropod mushroom bodies

     Learning & Memory 5:11–37.

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
148. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Homberg U
     3. Kloppenburg P
     4. Homburg U
     5. Kloppenberg P

     (2000) Parallel organization in honey bee mushroom bodies by peptidergic kenyon cells

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 424:179–195.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20000814)424:1<179::AID-CNE13>3.0.CO;2-K

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
149. 1. Strausfeld NJ

     (2002) Organization of the honey bee mushroom body: representation of the Calyx within the vertical and gamma lobes

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 450:4–33.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10285

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
150. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Sinakevitch I
     3. Vilinsky I

     (2003) The mushroom bodies of Drosophila Melanogaster: an immunocytological and golgi study of kenyon cell organization in the calyces and lobes

     Microscopy Research and Technique 62:151–169.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10368

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
151. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Strausfeld CM
     3. Loesel R
     4. Rowell D
     5. Stowe S

     (2006) Arthropod phylogeny: onychophoran brain organization suggests an archaic relationship with a chelicerate stem lineage

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:1857–1866.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3536

     • Google Scholar
152. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Sinakevitch I
     3. Okamura JY

     (2007) Organization of local interneurons in optic glomeruli of the dipterous visual system and comparisons with the antennal lobes

     Developmental Neurobiology 67:1267–1288.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20396

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
153. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Sinakevitch I
     3. Brown SM
     4. Farris SM

     (2009) Ground plan of the insect mushroom body: functional and evolutionary implications

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 513:265–291.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21948

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
154. Book

     1. Strausfeld NJ

     (2012)

     Arthropod Brains: Evolution, Functional Elegance, and Historical Significance

     Boston, MA: Harvard Belknap Press.

     • Google Scholar
155. 1. Strausfeld NJ

     (2019)

     Oxford Handbook of Invertebrate Neurobiology

     The Divergent Evolution of Arthropod Brains: Ground Pattern Organization and Stability Through Geological Time, Oxford Handbook of Invertebrate Neurobiology, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190456757.013.2.

     • Google Scholar
156. 1. Strausfeld NJ
     2. Sayre ME

     (2020) Mushroom bodies in Reptantia reflect a major transition in crustacean brain evolution

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 528:261–282.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24752

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
157. 1. Sullivan JM
     2. Benton JL
     3. Sandeman DC
     4. Beltz BS

     (2007) Adult neurogenesis: a common strategy across diverse species

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 500:574–584.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21187

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
158. 1. Sullivan JM
     2. Beltz BS

     (2001) Neural pathways connecting the deutocerebrum and lateral protocerebrum in the brains of decapod crustaceans

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 441:9–22.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.1394

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
159. 1. Sullivan JM
     2. Beltz BS

     (2004) Evolutionary changes in the olfactory projection neuron pathways of eumalacostracan crustaceans

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 470:25–38.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.11026

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
160. 1. Sullivan JM
     2. Beltz BS

     (2005) Integration and segregation of inputs to higher-order neuropils of the crayfish brain

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 481:118–126.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20346

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
161. 1. Sztarker J
     2. Strausfeld NJ
     3. Tomsic D

     (2005) Organization of optic lobes that support motion detection in a semiterrestrial crab

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 493:396–411.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20755

     • Google Scholar
162. 1. Takemura SY
     2. Aso Y
     3. Hige T
     4. Wong A
     5. Lu Z
     6. Xu CS
     7. Rivlin PK
     8. Hess H
     9. Zhao T
     10. Parag T
     11. Berg S
     12. Huang G
     13. Katz W
     14. Olbris DJ
     15. Plaza S
     16. Umayam L
     17. Aniceto R
     18. Chang LA
     19. Lauchie S
     20. Ogundeyi O
     21. Ordish C
     22. Shinomiya A
     23. Sigmund C
     24. Takemura S
     25. Tran J
     26. Turner GC
     27. Rubin GM
     28. Scheffer LK

     (2017) A connectome of a learning and memory center in the adult Drosophila brain

     eLife 6:e26975.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26975

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
163. 1. Tanaka NK
     2. Tanimoto H
     3. Ito K

     (2008) Neuronal assemblies of the Drosophila mushroom body

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 508:711–755.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21692

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
164. 1. Thazhath R
     2. Liu C
     3. Gaertig J

     (2002) Polyglycylation domain of beta-tubulin maintains axonemal architecture and affects cytokinesis in Tetrahymena

     Nature Cell Biology 4:256–259.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb764

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
165. 1. Thoen HH
     2. Strausfeld NJ
     3. Marshall J

     (2017) Neural organization of afferent pathways from the stomatopod compound eye

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:3010–3030.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24256

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
166. 1. Thoen HH
     2. Sayre ME
     3. Marshall J
     4. Strausfeld NJ

     (2018) Representation of the stomatopod's retinal midband in the optic lobes: Putative neural substrates for integrating chromatic, achromatic and polarization information

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 526:1148–1165.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24398

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
167. 1. Thoen HH
     2. Wolff GH
     3. Marshall J
     4. Sayre ME
     5. Strausfeld NJ

     (2019)

     The reniform body: an integrative lateral protocerebral neuropil complex of eumalacostraca identified in stomatopoda and brachyura

     Journal of Comparative Neurology 3:In press.

     • Google Scholar
168. 1. Tierney AJ
     2. Thompson CS
     3. Dunham DW

     (1986) Fine structure of aesthetasc chemoreceptors in the crayfish Orconectes propinquus

     Canadian Journal of Zoology 64:392–399.

     https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-061

     • Google Scholar
169. 1. Tsang LM
     2. Lin F-J
     3. Chu KH
     4. Chan T-Y

     (2008) Phylogeny of thalassinidea (Crustacea, decapoda) inferred from three rDNA sequences: implications for morphological evolution and superfamily classification

     Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46:216–223.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00459.x

     • Google Scholar
170. 1. Tsang LM
     2. Schubart CD
     3. Ahyong ST
     4. Lai JC
     5. Au EY
     6. Chan TY
     7. Ng PK
     8. Chu KH

     (2014) Evolutionary history of true crabs (Crustacea: decapoda: brachyura) and the origin of freshwater crabs

     Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:1173–1187.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu068

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
171. 1. Tuchina O
     2. Koczan S
     3. Harzsch S
     4. Rybak J
     5. Wolff G
     6. Strausfeld NJ
     7. Hansson BS

     (2015) Central projections of antennular chemosensory and mechanosensory afferents in the brain of the terrestrial hermit crab (Coenobita clypeatus; Coenobitidae, anomura)

     Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 9:94.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00094

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
172. 1. Van Der Wal C
     2. Ahyong ST
     3. Ho SYW
     4. Lo N

     (2017) The evolutionary history of stomatopoda (Crustacea: malacostraca) inferred from molecular data

     PeerJ 5:e3844.

     https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3844

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
173. 1. van Dijk LJA
     2. Janz N
     3. Schäpers A
     4. Gamberale-Stille G
     5. Carlsson MA

     (2017) Experience-dependent mushroom body plasticity in butterflies: consequences of search complexity and host range

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284:20171594.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1594

     • Google Scholar
174. 1. Vaughan DB
     2. Grutter AS
     3. Costello MJ
     4. Hutson KS

     (2017) Cleaner fishes and shrimp diversity and a re-evaluation of cleaning symbioses

     Fish and Fisheries 18:698–716.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12198

     • Google Scholar
175. 1. Viallanes H

     (1884)

     Etudes histologiques et organologiques sur les centres nerveux et les organes de sens des animaux articulés, premières mémoire, le ganglion optique de la langouste (Palinurus vulgaris)

     Annales Des Sciences Naturelles, 6me Série 17:2–74.

     • Google Scholar
176. 1. Wachowiak M
     2. Diebel CE
     3. Ache BW

     (1996) Functional organization of olfactory processing in the accessory lobe of the spiny lobster

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 178:211–226.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188163

     • Google Scholar
177. 1. Wachowiak M
     2. Ache BW

     (1994) Morphology and physiology of multiglomerular olfactory projection neurons in the spiny lobster

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 175:35–48.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00217435

     • Google Scholar
178. 1. Wittfoth C
     2. Harzsch S
     3. Wolff C
     4. Sombke A

     (2019) The “amphi”-brains of amphipods: new insights from the neuroanatomy of Parhyale hawaiensis (Dana, 1853)

     Frontiers in Zoology 16:30.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-019-0330-0

     • Google Scholar
179. 1. Wolfe JM
     2. Daley AC
     3. Legg DA
     4. Edgecombe GD

     (2016) Fossil calibrations for the arthropod tree of life

     Earth-Science Reviews 160:43–110.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.008

     • Google Scholar
180. 1. Wolfe JM
     2. Breinholt JW
     3. Crandall KA
     4. Lemmon AR
     5. Lemmon EM
     6. Timm LE
     7. Siddall ME
     8. Bracken-Grissom HD

     (2019) A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286:20190079.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0079

     • Google Scholar
181. 1. Wolff G
     2. Harzsch S
     3. Hansson BS
     4. Brown S
     5. Strausfeld N

     (2012) Neuronal organization of the hemiellipsoid body of the land hermit crab, Coenobita clypeatus: correspondence with the mushroom body ground pattern

     The Journal of Comparative Neurology 520:2824–2846.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23059

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
182. 1. Wolff GH
     2. Thoen HH
     3. Marshall J
     4. Sayre ME
     5. Strausfeld NJ

     (2017) An insect-like mushroom body in a crustacean brain

     eLife 6:e29889.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29889

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
183. 1. Wolff GH
     2. Strausfeld NJ

     (2015) Genealogical correspondence of mushroom bodies across invertebrate phyla

     Current Biology 25:38–44.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.049

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
184. 1. Wolff GH
     2. Strausfeld NJ

     (2016) Genealogical correspondence of a forebrain centre implies an executive brain in the protostome–deuterostome bilaterian ancestor

     Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:20150055.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0055

     • Google Scholar
185. 1. Yang MY
     2. Armstrong JD
     3. Vilinsky I
     4. Strausfeld NJ
     5. Kaiser K

     (1995) Subdivision of the Drosophila mushroom bodies by enhancer-trap expression patterns

     Neuron 15:45–54.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90063-2

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
186. 1. Zeil J
     2. Hemmi JM

     (2006) The visual ecology of fiddler crabs

     Journal of Comparative Physiology A 192:1–25.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-005-0048-7

     • Google Scholar
187. 1. Zhai D
     2. Ortega-Hernández J
     3. Wolfe JM
     4. Hou X
     5. Cao C
     6. Liu Y

     (2019) Three-Dimensionally preserved appendages in an early cambrian Stem-Group pancrustacean

     Current Biology 29:171–177.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.060

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
188. 1. Zrzavý J
     2. Štys P

     (1997) The basic body plan of arthropods: insights from evolutionary morphology and developmental biology

     Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10:353–367.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s000360050029

     • Google Scholar
189. 1. Zwaka H
     2. Bartels R
     3. Grünewald B
     4. Menzel R

     (2018) Neural organization of A3 mushroom body extrinsic neurons in the honeybee brain

     Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 12:57.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00057

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Nicholas James Strausfeld

   Department of Neuroscience, School of Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   flybrain@email.arizona.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1115-1774

2. Gabriella Hanna Wolff

   Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   gabwolff@uw.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0075-4975

3. Marcel Ethan Sayre

   Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   marcel.sayre@biol.lu.se

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2667-4228

• 2,854

  views

• 388

  downloads

• 37

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.