A small protein encoded by a putative lncRNA regulates apoptosis and tumorigenicity in human colorectal cancer cells

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are often associated with polysomes, indicating coding potential. However, only a handful of endogenous proteins encoded by putative lncRNAs have been identified and assigned a function. Here, we report the discovery of a putative gastrointestinal tract-specific lncRNA (LINC00675) that is regulated by the pioneer transcription factor FOXA1 and encodes a conserved small protein of 79 amino acids which we termed FORCP (FOXA1-Regulated Conserved Small Protein). FORCP transcript is undetectable in most cell types but is abundant in well-differentiated colorectal cancer (CRC) cells where it functions to inhibit proliferation, clonogenicity and tumorigenesis. The epitope-tagged and endogenous FORCP protein predominantly localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In response to ER stress, FORCP depletion results in decreased apoptosis. Our findings on the initial characterization of FORCP demonstrate that FORCP is a novel, conserved small protein encoded by a mis-annotated lncRNA that regulates apoptosis and tumorigenicity in well-differentiated CRC cells.

Data availability

RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data related to this manuscript has been submitted to GEO under accession number GSE140536.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiao Ling Li

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lőrinc Pongor

    Developmental Therapeutics Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Wei Tang

    Molecular Epidemiology Section, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Sudipto Das

    Protein Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.,, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Bruna R Muys

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Matthew F Jones

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Sarah B Lazar

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Emily A Dangelmaier

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Corrine CR Hartford

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Ioannis Grammatikakis

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Qinyu Hao

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7059-7741
  12. Qinyu Sun

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Aaron Schetter

    Molecular Genetics and Carcinogenesis Section, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jennifer L Martindale

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. BinWu Tang

    Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Lisa M Jenkins

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Ana I Robles

    Molecular Genetics and Carcinogenesis Section, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Robert L Walker

    Molecular Genetics Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Stefan Ambs

    Molecular Epidemiology Section, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Raj Chari

    Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Lab for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Svetlana A Shabalina

    National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Myriam Gorospe

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Perwez S Hussain

    Pancreatic Cancer Unit at the Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  24. Curtis C Harris

    Pancreatic Cancer Unit at the Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. Paul S Meltzer

    Molecular Genetics Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  26. Kannanganattu V Prasanth

    Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4587-8362
  27. Mirit I Aladjem

    Developmental Therapeutics Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  28. Thorkell Andresson

    Protein Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.,, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  29. Ashish Lal

    Regulatory RNAs and Cancer Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    ashish.lal@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    Ashish Lal, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4299-8177

Funding

National Institutes of Health (ZIA BC 011646)

  • Ashish Lal

National Science Foundation (NSF-EAGER)

  • Kannanganattu V Prasanth

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM132458)

  • Kannanganattu V Prasanth

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maureen E Murphy, The Wistar Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal protocols (protocol number LC-070-3) were approved by the National Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee following AALAAC guidelines and policies.

Version history

  1. Received: November 18, 2019
  2. Accepted: October 27, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 28, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 18, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,196
    views
  • 500
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiao Ling Li
  2. Lőrinc Pongor
  3. Wei Tang
  4. Sudipto Das
  5. Bruna R Muys
  6. Matthew F Jones
  7. Sarah B Lazar
  8. Emily A Dangelmaier
  9. Corrine CR Hartford
  10. Ioannis Grammatikakis
  11. Qinyu Hao
  12. Qinyu Sun
  13. Aaron Schetter
  14. Jennifer L Martindale
  15. BinWu Tang
  16. Lisa M Jenkins
  17. Ana I Robles
  18. Robert L Walker
  19. Stefan Ambs
  20. Raj Chari
  21. Svetlana A Shabalina
  22. Myriam Gorospe
  23. Perwez S Hussain
  24. Curtis C Harris
  25. Paul S Meltzer
  26. Kannanganattu V Prasanth
  27. Mirit I Aladjem
  28. Thorkell Andresson
  29. Ashish Lal
(2020)
A small protein encoded by a putative lncRNA regulates apoptosis and tumorigenicity in human colorectal cancer cells
eLife 9:e53734.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53734

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53734

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ibtisam Ibtisam, Alexei F Kisselev
    Short Report

    Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.