Principles of operation of a cerebellar learning circuit

  1. David J Herzfeld  Is a corresponding author
  2. Nathan J Hall
  3. Marios Tringides
  4. Stephen G Lisberger
  1. Duke University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

We provide behavioral evidence using monkey smooth pursuit eye movements for four principles of cerebellar learning. Using a circuit-level model of the cerebellum, we link behavioral data to learning's neural implementation. The four principles are: (1) early, fast, acquisition driven by climbing fiber inputs to the cerebellar cortex, with poor retention; (2) learned responses of Purkinje cells guide transfer of learning from the cerebellar cortex to the deep cerebellar nucleus, with excellent retention; (3) functionally different neural signals are subject to learning in the cerebellar cortex versus the deep cerebellar nuclei; and (4) negative feedback from the cerebellum to the inferior olive reduces the magnitude of the teaching signal in climbing fibers and limits learning. Our circuit-level model, based on these four principles, explains behavioral data obtained by strategically manipulating the signals responsible for acquisition and recall of direction learning in smooth pursuit eye movements across multiple timescales.

Data availability

The data for each figure is included in a Figure Composer FYP file and can be viewed, exported, and further analyzed using the freely available Figure Composer tool (https://sites.google.com/a/srscicomp.com/datanav/figure-composer). This tool is platform agnostic and runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux systems. The source code used to generate the cerebellar model results (Figure 10) is included as a Jupyter notebook. This source code makes use of Julia but can be viewed without installing Julia.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David J Herzfeld

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    david.herzfeld@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9910-0658
  2. Nathan J Hall

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marios Tringides

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephen G Lisberger

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7859-4361

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS092623)

  • Stephen G Lisberger

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS103216)

  • Nathan J Hall

National Eye Institute (K99-EY030528)

  • David J Herzfeld

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jennifer L Raymond, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1997) and had been approved in advance by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Duke University (Protocol A085-18-04).

Version history

  1. Received: January 16, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 29, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 30, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 28, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Herzfeld et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,347
    views
  • 616
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David J Herzfeld
  2. Nathan J Hall
  3. Marios Tringides
  4. Stephen G Lisberger
(2020)
Principles of operation of a cerebellar learning circuit
eLife 9:e55217.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55217

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55217

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sara Ibañez, Nilapratim Sengupta ... Christina M Weaver
    Research Article

    Normal aging leads to myelin alterations in the rhesus monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which are positively correlated with degree of cognitive impairment. It is hypothesized that remyelination with shorter and thinner myelin sheaths partially compensates for myelin degradation, but computational modeling has not yet explored these two phenomena together systematically. Here, we used a two-pronged modeling approach to determine how age-related myelin changes affect a core cognitive function: spatial working memory. First, we built a multicompartment pyramidal neuron model fit to monkey dlPFC empirical data, with an axon including myelinated segments having paranodes, juxtaparanodes, internodes, and tight junctions. This model was used to quantify conduction velocity (CV) changes and action potential (AP) failures after demyelination and subsequent remyelination. Next, we incorporated the single neuron results into a spiking neural network model of working memory. While complete remyelination nearly recovered axonal transmission and network function to unperturbed levels, our models predict that biologically plausible levels of myelin dystrophy, if uncompensated by other factors, can account for substantial working memory impairment with aging. The present computational study unites empirical data from ultrastructure up to behavior during normal aging, and has broader implications for many demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis or schizophrenia.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nicholas GW Kennedy, Jessica C Lee ... Nathan M Holmes
    Research Article

    How is new information organized in memory? According to latent state theories, this is determined by the level of surprise, or prediction error, generated by the new information: a small prediction error leads to the updating of existing memory, large prediction error leads to encoding of a new memory. We tested this idea using a protocol in which rats were first conditioned to fear a stimulus paired with shock. The stimulus was then gradually extinguished by progressively reducing the shock intensity until the stimulus was presented alone. Consistent with latent state theories, this gradual extinction protocol (small prediction errors) was better than standard extinction (large prediction errors) in producing long-term suppression of fear responses, and the benefit of gradual extinction was due to updating of the conditioning memory with information about extinction. Thus, prediction error determines how new information is organized in memory, and latent state theories adequately describe the ways in which this occurs.