Abstract

The presence and identity of neural progenitors in the enteric nervous system (ENS) of vertebrates is a matter of intense debate. Here we demonstrate that the non-neuronal ENS cell compartment of teleosts shares molecular and morphological characteristics with mammalian enteric glia but cannot be identified by the expression of canonical glia markers. However, unlike their mammalian counterparts, which are generally quiescent and do not undergo neuronal differentiation during homeostasis, we show that a relatively high proportion of zebrafish enteric glia proliferate under physiological conditions giving rise to progeny that differentiate into enteric neurons. We also provide evidence that, similar to brain neural stem cells, the activation and neuronal differentiation of enteric glia are regulated by Notch signalling. Our experiments reveal remarkable similarities between enteric glia and brain neural stem cells in teleosts and open new possibilities for use of mammalian enteric glia as a potential source of neurons to restore the activity of intestinal neural circuits compromised by injury or disease.

Data availability

High-throughput sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE145885.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sarah McCallum

    Development and Homeostasis of the Nervous System Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Yuuki Obata

    Development and Homeostasis of the Nervous System Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Evangelia Fourli

    Development and Homeostasis of the Nervous System Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Stefan Boeing

    Bionformatics & Biostatistics Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Christopher J Peddie

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Qiling Xu

    Neural Development Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Stuart Horswell

    Bionformatics & Biostatistics Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Robert Kelsh

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Lucy Collinson

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. David Wilkinson

    Neural Development Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6757-7080
  11. Carmen Pin

    Clinical and Quantitative Pharmacology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Carmen Pin, Carmen Pin is affiliated with AstraZeneca. The author has no financial interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8734-6167
  12. Vassilis Pachnis

    Nervous System Development and Homeostasis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    vassilis.pachnis@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tiffany A Heanue

    Development and Homeostasis of the Nervous System Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    tiffany.heanue@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6678-8246

Funding

The Francis Crick Institute (core funding)

  • Vassilis Pachnis

BBSRC (BB/L022974/1)

  • Vassilis Pachnis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Julia Ganz

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were carried out in compliance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (UK) and in accordance with the regulatory standards of the UK Home Office (Project Licence PCBBB9ABB). Experimental protocols were approved by the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB) of the Francis Crick Institute.

Version history

  1. Received: February 17, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 26, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 27, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 28, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, McCallum et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,309
    views
  • 413
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sarah McCallum
  2. Yuuki Obata
  3. Evangelia Fourli
  4. Stefan Boeing
  5. Christopher J Peddie
  6. Qiling Xu
  7. Stuart Horswell
  8. Robert Kelsh
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. David Wilkinson
  11. Carmen Pin
  12. Vassilis Pachnis
  13. Tiffany A Heanue
(2020)
Enteric glia as a source of neural progenitors in adult zebrafish
eLife 9:e56086.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56086

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56086

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhuqing Wang, Yue Wang ... Wei Yan
    Research Article

    Despite rapid evolution across eutherian mammals, the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs are located in a region flanked by two highly conserved protein-coding genes (SLITRK2 and FMR1) on the X chromosome. Intriguingly, these miRNAs are predominantly expressed in the testis, suggesting a potential role in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Here, we report that the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs were derived from the MER91C DNA transposons. Selective inactivation of individual miRNAs or clusters caused no discernible defects, but simultaneous ablation of five clusters containing 19 members of the MIR-506 family led to reduced male fertility in mice. Despite normal sperm counts, motility, and morphology, the KO sperm were less competitive than wild-type sperm when subjected to a polyandrous mating scheme. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses revealed that these X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs, in addition to targeting a set of conserved genes, have more targets that are critical for spermatogenesis and embryonic development during evolution. Our data suggest that the MIR-506 family miRNAs function to enhance sperm competitiveness and reproductive fitness of the male by finetuning gene expression during spermatogenesis.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.