Transcription termination and antitermination of bacterial CRISPR arrays

  1. Anne M Stringer
  2. Gabriele Baniulyte
  3. Erica Lasek-Nesselquist
  4. Kimberley D Seed
  5. Joseph T Wade  Is a corresponding author
  1. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, United States
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States

Abstract

A hallmark of CRISPR-Cas immunity systems is the CRISPR array, a genomic locus consisting of short, repeated sequences ('repeats') interspersed with short, variable sequences ('spacers'). CRISPR arrays are transcribed and processed into individual CRISPR RNAs that each include a single spacer, and direct Cas proteins to complementary sequence in invading nucleic acid. Most bacterial CRISPR array transcripts are unusually long for untranslated RNA, suggesting the existence of mechanisms to prevent premature transcription termination by Rho, a conserved bacterial transcription termination factor that rapidly terminates untranslated RNA. We show that Rho can prematurely terminate transcription of bacterial CRISPR arrays, and we identify a widespread antitermination mechanism that antagonizes Rho to facilitate complete transcription of CRISPR arrays. Thus, our data highlight the importance of transcription termination and antitermination in the evolution of bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems.

Data availability

Raw ChIP-seq data are available from EBI ArrayExpress/ENA using accession number E-MTAB-7242. Raw sequencing data for conjugation experiments involving V. cholerae are available from EBI ArrayExpress/ENA using accession number E-MTAB-9631.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anne M Stringer

    Division of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Gabriele Baniulyte

    Division of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0235-7938
  3. Erica Lasek-Nesselquist

    Bioinformatics Core Facility, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kimberley D Seed

    Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0139-1600
  5. Joseph T Wade

    Division of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, United States
    For correspondence
    joseph.wade@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9779-3160

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM122836)

  • Joseph T Wade

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI126416)

  • Joseph T Wade

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI127652)

  • Kimberley D Seed

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award)

  • Kimberley D Seed

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Blake Wiedenheft, Montana State University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 23, 2020
  2. Accepted: October 29, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 30, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 13, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Stringer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,656
    views
  • 248
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anne M Stringer
  2. Gabriele Baniulyte
  3. Erica Lasek-Nesselquist
  4. Kimberley D Seed
  5. Joseph T Wade
(2020)
Transcription termination and antitermination of bacterial CRISPR arrays
eLife 9:e58182.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58182

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58182

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Can Hu, Xue-Ting Zhu ... Jin-Qiu Zhou
    Research Article

    Telomeres, which are chromosomal end structures, play a crucial role in maintaining genome stability and integrity in eukaryotes. In the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the X- and Y’-elements are subtelomeric repetitive sequences found in all 32 and 17 telomeres, respectively. While the Y’-elements serve as a backup for telomere functions in cells lacking telomerase, the function of the X-elements remains unclear. This study utilized the S. cerevisiae strain SY12, which has three chromosomes and six telomeres, to investigate the role of X-elements (as well as Y’-elements) in telomere maintenance. Deletion of Y’-elements (SY12), X-elements (SY12XYΔ+Y), or both X- and Y’-elements (SY12XYΔ) did not impact the length of the terminal TG1-3 tracks or telomere silencing. However, inactivation of telomerase in SY12, SY12XYΔ+Y, and SY12XYΔ cells resulted in cellular senescence and the generation of survivors. These survivors either maintained their telomeres through homologous recombination-dependent TG1-3 track elongation or underwent microhomology-mediated intra-chromosomal end-to-end joining. Our findings indicate the non-essential role of subtelomeric X- and Y’-elements in telomere regulation in both telomerase-proficient and telomerase-null cells and suggest that these elements may represent remnants of S. cerevisiae genome evolution. Furthermore, strains with fewer or no subtelomeric elements exhibit more concise telomere structures and offer potential models for future studies in telomere biology.