Spinal lumbar dI2 interneurons contribute to stability of bipedal stepping

  1. Baruch Haimson
  2. Yoav Hadas
  3. Nimrod Bernat
  4. Artur Kania
  5. Monica A Daley
  6. Yuval Cinnamon
  7. Aharon Lev-Tov  Is a corresponding author
  8. Avihu Klar  Is a corresponding author
  1. IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel, Israel
  2. Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Canada
  3. University of California, Irvine, United States
  4. Institute of Animal Science Poultry and Aquaculture Sci. Dept. Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel, Israel
  5. Hebrew University, Israel

Abstract

Peripheral and intraspinal feedback is required to shape and update the output of spinal networks that execute motor behavior. We report that lumbar dI2 spinal interneurons in chicks receive synaptic input from afferents and premotor neurons. These interneurons innervate contralateral premotor networks in the lumbar and brachial spinal cord, and their ascending projections innervate the cerebellum. These findings suggest that dI2 neurons function as interneurons in local lumbar circuits, are involved in lumbo-brachial coupling, and that part of them deliver peripheral and intraspinal feedback to the cerebellum. Silencing of dI2 neurons leads to destabilized stepping in P8 hatchlings, with occasional collapses, variable step profiles and a wide-base walking gait, suggesting that dI2 neurons may contribute to the stabilization of the bipedal gait.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and the supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Baruch Haimson

    Department of Medical Neurobiology,, IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel, jerusalem, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0163-6196
  2. Yoav Hadas

    Department of Medical Neurobiology,, IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel, Jerusalem, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nimrod Bernat

    Department of Medical Neurobiology,, IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel, jerusalem, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Artur Kania

    Anatomy and Cell Biology, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5209-2520
  5. Monica A Daley

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yuval Cinnamon

    Institute of Animal Science Poultry and Aquaculture Sci. Dept, Institute of Animal Science Poultry and Aquaculture Sci. Dept. Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aharon Lev-Tov

    Department of Medical Neurobiology,, IMRIC, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel, Jerisalem, Israel
    For correspondence
    aharonl@ekmd.huji.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Avihu Klar

    Medical Neurobiology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
    For correspondence
    avihu@mail.huji.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9248-2179

Funding

Israel Science Foundation

  • Avihu Klar

US Israel Binational Science Foundation BSF

  • Avihu Klar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Muriel Thoby-Brisson, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments involved with animals were conducted in accordance with the designated Experiments in Animals Ethic Committee policies and under its approval.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 8, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 11, 2020
  3. Accepted: August 11, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 16, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 17, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Haimson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,924
    views
  • 182
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Baruch Haimson
  2. Yoav Hadas
  3. Nimrod Bernat
  4. Artur Kania
  5. Monica A Daley
  6. Yuval Cinnamon
  7. Aharon Lev-Tov
  8. Avihu Klar
(2021)
Spinal lumbar dI2 interneurons contribute to stability of bipedal stepping
eLife 10:e62001.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62001

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62001

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.