A cross-sectional study of functional and metabolic changes during aging through the lifespan in male mice.

  1. Michael A Petr
  2. Irene Alfaras
  3. Melissa Krawcyzk
  4. Woei-Nan Bair
  5. Sarah J Mitchell
  6. Christopher H Morrell
  7. Stephanie A Studenski
  8. Nathan L Price
  9. Kenneth W Fishbein
  10. Richard G Spencer
  11. Morten Scheibye-Knudsen
  12. Edward G Lakatta
  13. Luigi Ferrucci
  14. Miguel A Aon
  15. Michel Bernier
  16. Rafael de Cabo  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. University of Pittsburgh, United States
  3. National Institute on Aging, NIH, United States
  4. University of Sciences, United States
  5. ETH Zürich, Switzerland
  6. Yale University, United States

Abstract

Aging is associated with distinct phenotypical, physiological, and functional changes, leading to disease and death. The progression of aging-related traits varies widely among individuals, influenced by their environment, lifestyle, and genetics. In this study, we conducted physiologic and functional tests cross-sectionally throughout the entire lifespan of male C57BL/6N mice. In parallel, metabolomics analyses in serum, brain, liver, heart, and skeletal muscle were also performed to identify signatures associated with frailty and age-dependent functional decline. Our findings indicate that declines in gait speed as a function of age and frailty are associated with a dramatic increase in the energetic cost of physical activity and decreases in working capacity. Aging and functional decline prompt organs to rewire their metabolism and substrate selection and towards redox-related pathways, mainly in liver and heart. Collectively, the data provide a framework to further understand and characterize processes of aging at the individual organism and organ levels.

Data availability

This study did not generate datasets or code. However, we are citing one of our previously published raw microarray datasets that was deposited to the NCBI GeneExpressionOmnibus database under accession number GSE81959.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael A Petr

    Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Irene Alfaras

    Aging Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Melissa Krawcyzk

    Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Woei-Nan Bair

    Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sciences, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah J Mitchell

    Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christopher H Morrell

    Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stephanie A Studenski

    Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nathan L Price

    Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kenneth W Fishbein

    Laboratory of Clinical Investigator, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Richard G Spencer

    Laboratory Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Morten Scheibye-Knudsen

    Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Edward G Lakatta

    Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Luigi Ferrucci

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6273-1613
  14. Miguel A Aon

    Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Michel Bernier

    Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Rafael de Cabo

    Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    decabora@grc.nia.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2830-5693

Funding

National Institute on Aging (AG000335-04)

  • Rafael de Cabo

The research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (ACUC) protocol of the National Institute on Aging (Protocol Number: TGB-277-2022)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,674
    views
  • 864
    downloads
  • 62
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael A Petr
  2. Irene Alfaras
  3. Melissa Krawcyzk
  4. Woei-Nan Bair
  5. Sarah J Mitchell
  6. Christopher H Morrell
  7. Stephanie A Studenski
  8. Nathan L Price
  9. Kenneth W Fishbein
  10. Richard G Spencer
  11. Morten Scheibye-Knudsen
  12. Edward G Lakatta
  13. Luigi Ferrucci
  14. Miguel A Aon
  15. Michel Bernier
  16. Rafael de Cabo
(2021)
A cross-sectional study of functional and metabolic changes during aging through the lifespan in male mice.
eLife 10:e62952.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62952

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62952

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jian Qiu, Margaritis Voliotis ... Martin J Kelly
    Research Article

    Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.