Stable transplantation of human mitochondrial DNA by high-throughput, pressurized isolated mitochondrial delivery

  1. Alexander J Sercel
  2. Alexander N Patananan
  3. Tianxing Man
  4. Ting-Hsiang Wu
  5. Amy K Yu
  6. Garret W Guyot
  7. Shahrooz Rabizadeh
  8. Kayvan R Niazi
  9. Pei-Yu Chiou
  10. Michael A Teitell  Is a corresponding author
  1. UCLA, United States
  2. NanoCav, LLC, NantBio, Inc, and ImmunityBio, Inc, United States
  3. NanoCav, LLC, NantBio, Inc, and ImmunityBio, Inc, and NantOmics, LLC, United States

Abstract

Generating mammalian cells with specific mtDNA-nDNA combinations is desirable but difficult to achieve and would be enabling for studies of mitochondrial-nuclear communication and coordination in controlling cell fates and functions. We developed 'MitoPunch', a pressure-driven mitochondrial transfer device, to deliver isolated mitochondria into numerous target mammalian cells simultaneously. MitoPunch and MitoCeption, a previously described force-based mitochondrial transfer approach, both yield stable isolated mitochondrial recipient (SIMR) cells that permanently retain exogenous mtDNA, whereas coincubation of mitochondria with cells does not yield SIMR cells. Although a typical MitoPunch or MitoCeption delivery results in dozens of immortalized SIMR clones with restored oxidative phosphorylation, only MitoPunch can produce replication-limited, non-immortal human SIMR clones. The MitoPunch device is versatile, inexpensive to assemble, and easy to use for engineering mtDNA-nDNA combinations to enable fundamental studies and potential translational applications.

Data availability

Figure 1-source data 1. Numerical simulation of MitoPunch pressure generation during mitochondrial delivery. Cited in the legend of Figure 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander J Sercel

    Molecular Biology Institute Interdepartmental Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Alexander N Patananan

    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Tianxing Man

    Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ting-Hsiang Wu

    NanoCav, LLC, NantBio, Inc, and ImmunityBio, Inc, Culver City, United States
    Competing interests
    Ting-Hsiang Wu, T.-H.W. was an employee of NanoCav, LLC, and is currently employed by NantBio, Inc and ImmunityBio, Inc..
  5. Amy K Yu

    Molecular Biology Institute Interdepartmental Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Garret W Guyot

    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shahrooz Rabizadeh

    NanoCav, LLC, NantBio, Inc, and ImmunityBio, Inc, and NantOmics, LLC, Culver City, United States
    Competing interests
    Shahrooz Rabizadeh, S.R. is a board member of NanoCav, LLC, and employed by NantBio, Inc, ImmunityBio, Inc, and NantOmics, LLC..
  8. Kayvan R Niazi

    NanoCav, LLC, NantBio, Inc, and ImmunityBio, Inc, Culver City, United States
    Competing interests
    Kayvan R Niazi, K.R.N. is a board member of NanoCav, LLC, and employed by NantBio, Inc and ImmunityBio, Inc..
  9. Pei-Yu Chiou

    Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Pei-Yu Chiou, P.-Y.C. is a co-founder, board member, shareholder, and consultant for NanoCav, LLC, a private start-up company working on mitochondrial transfer techniques and applications..
  10. Michael A Teitell

    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    mteitell@mednet.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    Michael A Teitell, M.A.T. is a co-founder, board member, shareholder, and consultant for NanoCav, LLC, a private start-up company working on mitochondrial transfer techniques and applications..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4495-8750

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T32CA009120)

  • Alexander J Sercel
  • Alexander N Patananan

National Institutes of Health (R21CA227480)

  • Michael A Teitell

National Institutes of Health (P30CA016042)

  • Michael A Teitell

CIRM (RT3-07678)

  • Michael A Teitell

National Institutes of Health (T32GM007185)

  • Alexander J Sercel

American Heart Association (18POST34080342)

  • Alexander N Patananan

National Institutes of Health (T32GM008042)

  • Amy K Yu

National Science Foundation (CBET 1404080)

  • Pei-Yu Chiou

National Institutes of Health (R01GM114188)

  • Pei-Yu Chiou
  • Michael A Teitell

Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-15-1-0406)

  • Pei-Yu Chiou
  • Michael A Teitell

National Institutes of Health (R01GM073981)

  • Michael A Teitell

National Institutes of Health (R01CA185189)

  • Michael A Teitell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Sercel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,022
    views
  • 457
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander J Sercel
  2. Alexander N Patananan
  3. Tianxing Man
  4. Ting-Hsiang Wu
  5. Amy K Yu
  6. Garret W Guyot
  7. Shahrooz Rabizadeh
  8. Kayvan R Niazi
  9. Pei-Yu Chiou
  10. Michael A Teitell
(2021)
Stable transplantation of human mitochondrial DNA by high-throughput, pressurized isolated mitochondrial delivery
eLife 10:e63102.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63102

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63102

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.