Abstract rules drive adaptation in the subcortical sensory pathway

  1. Alejandro Tabas  Is a corresponding author
  2. Glad Mihai
  3. Stefan Kiebel
  4. Robert Trampel
  5. Katharina von Kriegstein
  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  2. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Abstract

The subcortical sensory pathways are the fundamental channels for mapping the outside world to our minds. Sensory pathways efficiently transmit information by adapting neural responses to the local statistics of the sensory input. The longstanding mechanistic explanation for this adaptive behaviour is that neural activity decreases with increasing regularities in the local statistics of the stimuli. An alternative account is that neural coding is directly driven by expectations of the sensory input. Here we used abstract rules to manipulate expectations independently of local stimulus statistics. The ultra-high-field functional-MRI data show that abstract expectations can drive the response amplitude to tones in the human auditory pathway. These results provide first unambiguous evidence of abstract processing in a subcortical sensory pathway. They indicate that the neural representation of the outside world is altered by our prior beliefs even at initial points of the processing hierarchy.

Data availability

Derivatives (beta maps and log-likelihood maps, computed with SPM) and all code used for data processing and analysis are publicly available in https://osf.io/f5tsy/.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alejandro Tabas

    Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    alejandro.tabas@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8643-1543
  2. Glad Mihai

    Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stefan Kiebel

    Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robert Trampel

    Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Katharina von Kriegstein

    Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7989-5860

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (SENSOCOM (647051))

  • Katharina von Kriegstein

Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg

  • Alejandro Tabas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy D Griffiths, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, Germany (ethics approval number 273/14-ff). All listeners provided written informed consent and received monetary compensation for their participation.

Version history

  1. Received: October 30, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 3, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 8, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 5, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Tabas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,039
    views
  • 471
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alejandro Tabas
  2. Glad Mihai
  3. Stefan Kiebel
  4. Robert Trampel
  5. Katharina von Kriegstein
(2020)
Abstract rules drive adaptation in the subcortical sensory pathway
eLife 9:e64501.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64501

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64501

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alastair MacDonald, Alina Hebling ... Kevin Yackle
    Research Article

    Intonation in speech is the control of vocal pitch to layer expressive meaning to communication, like increasing pitch to indicate a question. Also, stereotyped patterns of pitch are used to create distinct sounds with different denotations, like in tonal languages and, perhaps, the 10 sounds in the murine lexicon. A basic tone is created by exhalation through a constricted laryngeal voice box, and it is thought that more complex utterances are produced solely by dynamic changes in laryngeal tension. But perhaps, the shifting pitch also results from altering the swiftness of exhalation. Consistent with the latter model, we describe that intonation in most vocalization types follows deviations in exhalation that appear to be generated by the re-activation of the cardinal breathing muscle for inspiration. We also show that the brainstem vocalization central pattern generator, the iRO, can create this breath pattern. Consequently, ectopic activation of the iRO not only induces phonation, but also the pitch patterns that compose most of the vocalizations in the murine lexicon. These results reveal a novel brainstem mechanism for intonation.

    1. Neuroscience
    Anna K Gillespie, Daniela Astudillo Maya ... Loren M Frank
    Research Article

    Hippocampal replay – the time-compressed, sequential reactivation of ensembles of neurons related to past experience – is a key neural mechanism of memory consolidation. Replay typically coincides with a characteristic pattern of local field potential activity, the sharp-wave ripple (SWR). Reduced SWR rates are associated with cognitive impairment in multiple models of neurodegenerative disease, suggesting that a clinically viable intervention to promote SWRs and replay would prove beneficial. We therefore developed a neurofeedback paradigm for rat subjects in which SWR detection triggered rapid positive feedback in the context of a memory-dependent task. This training protocol increased the prevalence of task-relevant replay during the targeted neurofeedback period by changing the temporal dynamics of SWR occurrence. This increase was also associated with neural and behavioral forms of compensation after the targeted period. These findings reveal short-timescale regulation of SWR generation and demonstrate that neurofeedback is an effective strategy for modulating hippocampal replay.