Anti-ferroptotic mechanism of IL4i1-mediated amino acid metabolism

  1. Leonie Zeitler
  2. Alessandra Fiore
  3. Claudia Meyer
  4. Marion Russier
  5. Gaia Zanella
  6. Sabine Suppmann
  7. Marco Gagaro
  8. Sachdev S Sidhu
  9. Somasekar Seshagiri
  10. Caspar Ohnmacht
  11. Thomas Köcher
  12. Francesca Fallarino
  13. Andreas Linkermann
  14. Peter J Murray  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Germany
  2. Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
  3. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany
  4. Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
  5. University of Toronto, Canada
  6. SciGenom, India
  7. Helmholtz Zentrum, Germany
  8. Vienna BioCenter, Austria
  9. Technical University of Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Interleukin-4-induced-1 (IL4i1) is an amino acid oxidase secreted from immune cells. Recent observations have suggested that IL4i1 is pro-tumorigenic via unknown mechanisms. As IL4i1 has homologues in snake venoms (LAAO, L-amino acid oxidases), we used comparative approaches to gain insight into the mechanistic basis of how conserved amino acid oxidases regulate cell fate and function. Using mammalian expressed recombinant proteins, we found venom LAAO kills cells via hydrogen peroxide generation. By contrast, mammalian IL4i1 is non-cytotoxic and instead elicits a cell productive gene expression program inhibiting ferroptotic redox death by generating indole-3-pyruvate (I3P) from tryptophan. I3P suppresses ferroptosis by direct free radical scavenging and through the activation of an anti-oxidative gene expression program. Thus, the pro-tumor effects of IL4i1 are likely mediated by local anti-ferroptotic pathways via aromatic amino acid metabolism, arguing that an IL4i1 inhibitor may modulate tumor cell death pathways.

Data availability

RNAseq data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE161159, GSE167136.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leonie Zeitler

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Alessandra Fiore

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Claudia Meyer

    Sektion Nephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Marion Russier

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9633-9804
  5. Gaia Zanella

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sabine Suppmann

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Marco Gagaro

    Dipartimento di medicina e chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Sachdev S Sidhu

    Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7755-5918
  9. Somasekar Seshagiri

    Research Foundation, SciGenom, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Caspar Ohnmacht

    Center of Allergy and Environment, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Thomas Köcher

    Core Facilities GmbH, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    Thomas Köcher, Thomas Köcher is affiliated with Vienna BioCenter Core Facilities GmbH. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  12. Francesca Fallarino

    Dipartimento di medicina e chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Andreas Linkermann

    Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Peter J Murray

    Immunoregulation, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    murray@biochem.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6329-9802

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TRR 127)

  • Andreas Linkermann
  • Peter J Murray

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 2599)

  • Caspar Ohnmacht
  • Peter J Murray

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TRR 205)

  • Andreas Linkermann

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Peter J Murray

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Zeitler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,557
    views
  • 778
    downloads
  • 82
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leonie Zeitler
  2. Alessandra Fiore
  3. Claudia Meyer
  4. Marion Russier
  5. Gaia Zanella
  6. Sabine Suppmann
  7. Marco Gagaro
  8. Sachdev S Sidhu
  9. Somasekar Seshagiri
  10. Caspar Ohnmacht
  11. Thomas Köcher
  12. Francesca Fallarino
  13. Andreas Linkermann
  14. Peter J Murray
(2021)
Anti-ferroptotic mechanism of IL4i1-mediated amino acid metabolism
eLife 10:e64806.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64806

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64806

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Zewei Zhao, Longyun Hu ... Zhonghan Yang
    Research Article

    The induction of adipose thermogenesis plays a critical role in maintaining body temperature and improving metabolic homeostasis to combat obesity. β3-adrenoceptor (β3-AR) is widely recognized as a canonical β-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays a crucial role in mediating adipose thermogenesis in mice. Nonetheless, the limited expression of β3-AR in human adipocytes restricts its clinical application. The objective of this study was to identify a GPCR that is highly expressed in human adipocytes and to explore its potential involvement in adipose thermogenesis. Our research findings have demonstrated that the adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor A3 (ADGRA3), an orphan GPCR, plays a significant role in adipose thermogenesis through its constitutively active effects. ADGRA3 exhibited high expression levels in human adipocytes and mouse brown fat. Furthermore, the knockdown of Adgra3 resulted in an exacerbated obese phenotype and a reduction in the expression of thermogenic markers in mice. Conversely, Adgra3 overexpression activated the adipose thermogenic program and improved metabolic homeostasis in mice without exogenous ligand. We found that ADGRA3 facilitates the biogenesis of beige human or mouse adipocytes in vitro. Moreover, hesperetin was identified as a potential agonist of ADGRA3, capable of inducing adipocyte browning and ameliorating insulin resistance in mice. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the overexpression of constitutively active ADGRA3 or the activation of ADGRA3 by hesperetin can induce adipocyte browning by Gs-PKA-CREB axis. These findings indicate that the utilization of hesperetin and the selective overexpression of ADGRA3 in adipose tissue could serve as promising therapeutic strategies in the fight against obesity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.