Distinct population code for movement kinematics and changes of ongoing movements in human subthalamic nucleus

  1. Dennis London  Is a corresponding author
  2. Arash Fazl
  3. Kalman Katlowitz
  4. Marisol Soula
  5. Michael Pourfar
  6. Alon Mogilner
  7. Roozbeh Kiani  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. NYU Langone Health, United States

Abstract

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is theorized to globally suppress movement through connections with downstream basal ganglia structures. Current theories are supported by increased STN activity when subjects withhold an uninitiated action plan, but a critical test of these theories requires studying STN responses when an ongoing action is replaced with an alternative. We perform this test in subjects with Parkinson's disease using an extended reaching task where the movement trajectory changes mid-action. We show that STN activity decreases during action switches, contrary to prevalent theories. Further, beta oscillations in the STN local field potential, which are associated with movement inhibition, do not show increased power or spiking entrainment during switches. We report an inhomogeneous population neural code in STN, with one sub-population encoding movement kinematics and direction and another encoding unexpected action switches. We suggest an elaborate neural code in STN that contributes to planning actions and changing the plans.

Data availability

All raw and processed data has been uploaded to Dryad. DOI: 10.5061/dryad.2jm63xsq2

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dennis London

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    dennis.london@nyulangone.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8134-2683
  2. Arash Fazl

    Center for Neuromodulation, Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kalman Katlowitz

    Neuroscience Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marisol Soula

    Neuroscience Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Pourfar

    Center for Neuromodulation, Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alon Mogilner

    Center for Neuromodulation, Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Roozbeh Kiani

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    roozbeh@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0614-6791

Funding

Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain (542997,543009)

  • Roozbeh Kiani

McKnight Scholar Award

  • Roozbeh Kiani

Pew Scholarship in the Biomedical Sciences

  • Roozbeh Kiani

National Institutes of Mental Health R01 (MH109180-01)

  • Roozbeh Kiani

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Subjects signed informed consent including consent to publish. The study protocol was approved by the NYU School of Medicine Office of Science and Research Institutional Review Board. Study ID: S16-01855

Copyright

© 2021, London et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,889
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dennis London
  2. Arash Fazl
  3. Kalman Katlowitz
  4. Marisol Soula
  5. Michael Pourfar
  6. Alon Mogilner
  7. Roozbeh Kiani
(2021)
Distinct population code for movement kinematics and changes of ongoing movements in human subthalamic nucleus
eLife 10:e64893.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64893

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64893

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Célian Bimbard, Flóra Takács ... Philip Coen
    Tools and Resources

    Electrophysiology has proven invaluable to record neural activity, and the development of Neuropixels probes dramatically increased the number of recorded neurons. These probes are often implanted acutely, but acute recordings cannot be performed in freely moving animals and the recorded neurons cannot be tracked across days. To study key behaviors such as navigation, learning, and memory formation, the probes must be implanted chronically. An ideal chronic implant should (1) allow stable recordings of neurons for weeks; (2) allow reuse of the probes after explantation; (3) be light enough for use in mice. Here, we present the ‘Apollo Implant’, an open-source and editable device that meets these criteria and accommodates up to two Neuropixels 1.0 or 2.0 probes. The implant comprises a ‘payload’ module which is attached to the probe and is recoverable, and a ‘docking’ module which is cemented to the skull. The design is adjustable, making it easy to change the distance between probes, the angle of insertion, and the depth of insertion. We tested the implant across eight labs in head-fixed mice, freely moving mice, and freely moving rats. The number of neurons recorded across days was stable, even after repeated implantations of the same probe. The Apollo implant provides an inexpensive, lightweight, and flexible solution for reusable chronic Neuropixels recordings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Georgin Jacob, RT Pramod, SP Arun
    Research Article

    Most visual tasks involve looking for specific object features. But we also often perform property-based tasks where we look for specific property in an image, such as finding an odd item, deciding if two items are same, or if an object has symmetry. How do we solve such tasks? These tasks do not fit into standard models of decision making because their underlying feature space and decision process is unclear. Using well-known principles governing multiple object representations, we show that displays with repeating elements can be distinguished from heterogeneous displays using a property we define as visual homogeneity. In behavior, visual homogeneity predicted response times on visual search, same-different and symmetry tasks. Brain imaging during visual search and symmetry tasks revealed that visual homogeneity was localized to a region in the object-selective cortex. Thus, property-based visual tasks are solved in a localized region in the brain by computing visual homogeneity.