PMCA generated prions from the olfactory mucosa of patients with Fatal Familial Insomnia cause prion disease in mice

  1. Edoardo Bistaffa
  2. Alba Marín Moreno
  3. Juan Carlos Espinosa
  4. Chiara Maria Giulia De Luca
  5. Federico Angelo Cazzaniga
  6. Sara Maria Portaleone
  7. Luigi Celauro
  8. Giuseppe Legname
  9. Giorgio Giaccone
  10. Juan Maria Torres
  11. Fabio Moda  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Italy
  2. Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Spain
  3. ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Università Degli Studi di Milano, Italy
  4. Scuola Internazionale Superiore Di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Italy

Abstract

Background: Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI) is a genetic prion disease caused by the D178N mutation in the prion protein gene (PRNP) in coupling phase with methionine at PRNP 129. In 2017, we have shown that the olfactory mucosa (OM) collected from FFI patients contained traces of PrPSc detectable by Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCA).

Methods In this work, we have challenged PMCA generated products obtained from OM and brain homogenate of FFI patients in BvPrP-Tg407 transgenic mice expressing the bank vole prion protein to test their ability to induce prion pathology.

Results: All inoculated mice developed mild spongiform changes, astroglial activation and PrPSc deposition mainly affecting the thalamus. However, their neuropathological alterations were different from those found in the brain of BvPrP-Tg407 mice injected with raw FFI brain homogenate.

Conclusions: Although with some experimental constraints, we show that PrPSc present in OM of FFI patients is potentially infectious.

Funding: This work was supported in part by the Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2013-02355724 and Ricerca Corrente), MJFF, ALZ, Alzheimer's Research UK and the Weston Brain Institute (BAND2015), and Euronanomed III (Speedy) to FM; by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [grant AGL2016-78054-R (AEI/FEDER, UE)] to J.M.T. and J.C.E.; A.M.-M. was supported by a fellowship from the INIA (FPI-SGIT-2015-02).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Edoardo Bistaffa

    Division of Neurology 5 and Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alba Marín Moreno

    Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Valdeolmos (Madrid), Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Juan Carlos Espinosa

    Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Valdeolmos (Madrid), Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6719-9902
  4. Chiara Maria Giulia De Luca

    Division of Neurology 5 and Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Federico Angelo Cazzaniga

    Division of Neurology 5 and Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sara Maria Portaleone

    Department of Health Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Luigi Celauro

    Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory of Prion Biology, Scuola Internazionale Superiore Di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Trieste, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Giuseppe Legname

    Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory of Prion Biology, Scuola Internazionale Superiore Di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Trieste, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Giorgio Giaccone

    Division of Neurology 5 and Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Juan Maria Torres

    Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Valdeolmos (Madrid), Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0443-9232
  11. Fabio Moda

    Division of Neurology 5 and Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    Fabio.Moda@istituto-besta.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2820-9880

Funding

Ministero della Salute (GR-2013-02355724)

  • Fabio Moda

Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Corrente)

  • Fabio Moda

MJFF, ALZ, Alzheimer's Research UK and the Weston Brain Institute (BAND2015)

  • Fabio Moda

Euronanomed III (Speedy)

  • Fabio Moda

Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (AGL2016-78054-R (AEI/FEDER,UE))

  • Juan Maria Torres

INIA (Fellowship FPI-SGIT-2015-02)

  • Alba Marín Moreno

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: We conducted animal experiments in accordance with the Code for Methods and Welfare Considerations in Behavioural Research with Animals (Directive 2010/63/EU) and made every effort to minimize suffering. Experiments developed in Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (Madrid, Spain) were evaluated by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria and approved by the General Directorate of the Madrid Community Government (permit no. PROEX 263-15)

Human subjects: Written informed consent for participation in research and all procedures for sample collection and experimental studies were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments and were approved by the Ethical Committee of "Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta" (Milan, Italy).

Copyright

© 2021, Bistaffa et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,682
    views
  • 140
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Edoardo Bistaffa
  2. Alba Marín Moreno
  3. Juan Carlos Espinosa
  4. Chiara Maria Giulia De Luca
  5. Federico Angelo Cazzaniga
  6. Sara Maria Portaleone
  7. Luigi Celauro
  8. Giuseppe Legname
  9. Giorgio Giaccone
  10. Juan Maria Torres
  11. Fabio Moda
(2021)
PMCA generated prions from the olfactory mucosa of patients with Fatal Familial Insomnia cause prion disease in mice
eLife 10:e65311.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65311

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65311

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Medicine
    Yongli Qin, Jumpei Shirakawa ... Baohong Zhao
    Research Article

    The IncRNA Malat1 was initially believed to be dispensable for physiology due to the lack of observable phenotypes in Malat1 knockout (KO) mice. However, our study challenges this conclusion. We found that both Malat1 KO and conditional KO mice in the osteoblast lineage exhibit significant osteoporosis. Mechanistically, Malat1 acts as an intrinsic regulator in osteoblasts to promote osteogenesis. Interestingly, Malat1 does not directly affect osteoclastogenesis but inhibits osteoclastogenesis in a non-autonomous manner in vivo via integrating crosstalk between multiple cell types, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and chondrocytes. Our findings substantiate the existence of a novel remodeling network in which Malat1 serves as a central regulator by binding to β-catenin and functioning through the β-catenin-OPG/Jagged1 pathway in osteoblasts and chondrocytes. In pathological conditions, Malat1 significantly promotes bone regeneration in fracture healing. Bone homeostasis and regeneration are crucial to well-being. Our discoveries establish a previous unrecognized paradigm model of Malat1 function in the skeletal system, providing novel mechanistic insights into how a lncRNA integrates cellular crosstalk and molecular networks to fine tune tissue homeostasis, remodeling and repair.

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Berit Siedentop, Viacheslav N Kachalov ... Sebastian Bonhoeffer
    Research Article

    Background:

    Under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics.

    Methods:

    We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE, and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to 24 November 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. Patients were considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials’ risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.

    Results:

    42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68–2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2=77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions.

    Conclusions:

    The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.

    Funding:

    Support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 310030B_176401 (SB, BS, CW), grant 32FP30-174281 (ME), grant 324730_207957 (RDK)) and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, cooperative agreement AI069924 (ME)) is gratefully acknowledged.