Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus

  1. Morgan P Kain  Is a corresponding author
  2. Eloise B Skinner  Is a corresponding author
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Department of Health, Australia
  3. Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

Identifying the key vector and host species that drive the transmission of zoonotic pathogens is notoriously difficult but critical for disease control. We present a nested approach for quantifying the importance of host and vectors that integrates species' physiological competence with their ecological traits. We apply this framework to a medically important arbovirus, Ross River virus (RRV), in Brisbane, Australia. We find that vertebrate hosts with high physiological competence are not the most important for community transmission; interactions between hosts and vectors largely underpin the importance of host species. For vectors, physiological competence is highly important. Our results identify primary and secondary vectors of RRV and suggest two potential transmission cycles in Brisbane: an enzootic cycle involving birds and an urban cycle involving humans. The framework accounts for uncertainty from each fitted statistical model in estimates of species' contributions to transmission and has has direct application to other zoonotic pathogens.

Data availability

All data analyzed and all code generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Morgan P Kain

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kainm@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0605-7289
  2. Eloise B Skinner

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ebskinn@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk

    Public Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hamish McCallum

    School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erin A Mordecai

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (DEB-1518681)

  • Erin A Mordecai

Fogarty International Center (DEB-2011147)

  • Erin A Mordecai

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133439)

  • Morgan P Kain
  • Eloise B Skinner
  • Erin A Mordecai

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thomas S Churcher, Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 28, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 28, 2021
  3. Accepted: August 19, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 20, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 22, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Kain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,715
    views
  • 233
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Morgan P Kain
  2. Eloise B Skinner
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
(2021)
Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus
eLife 10:e67018.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Anna L Erdei, Aneth B David ... Teun Dekker
    Research Article Updated

    Over two decades ago, an intercropping strategy was developed that received critical acclaim for synergizing food security with ecosystem resilience in smallholder farming. The push–pull strategy reportedly suppresses lepidopteran pests in maize through a combination of a repellent intercrop (push), commonly Desmodium spp., and an attractive, border crop (pull). Key in the system is the intercrop’s constitutive release of volatile terpenoids that repel herbivores. However, the earlier described volatile terpenoids were not detectable in the headspace of Desmodium, and only minimally upon herbivory. This was independent of soil type, microbiome composition, and whether collections were made in the laboratory or in the field. Furthermore, in oviposition choice tests in a wind tunnel, maize with or without an odor background of Desmodium was equally attractive for the invasive pest Spodoptera frugiperda. In search of an alternative mechanism, we found that neonate larvae strongly preferred Desmodium over maize. However, their development stagnated and no larva survived. In addition, older larvae were frequently seen impaled and immobilized by the dense network of silica-fortified, non-glandular trichomes. Thus, our data suggest that Desmodium may act through intercepting and decimating dispersing larval offspring rather than adult deterrence. As a hallmark of sustainable pest control, maize–Desmodium push–pull intercropping has inspired countless efforts to emulate stimulo-deterrent diversion in other cropping systems. However, detailed knowledge of the actual mechanisms is required to rationally improve the strategy, and translate the concept to other cropping systems.

    1. Ecology
    Songdou Zhang, Shiheng An
    Insight

    The bacterium responsible for a disease that infects citrus plants across Asia facilitates its own proliferation by increasing the fecundity of its host insect.