Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus

  1. Morgan P Kain  Is a corresponding author
  2. Eloise B Skinner  Is a corresponding author
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Department of Health, Australia
  3. Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

Identifying the key vector and host species that drive the transmission of zoonotic pathogens is notoriously difficult but critical for disease control. We present a nested approach for quantifying the importance of host and vectors that integrates species' physiological competence with their ecological traits. We apply this framework to a medically important arbovirus, Ross River virus (RRV), in Brisbane, Australia. We find that vertebrate hosts with high physiological competence are not the most important for community transmission; interactions between hosts and vectors largely underpin the importance of host species. For vectors, physiological competence is highly important. Our results identify primary and secondary vectors of RRV and suggest two potential transmission cycles in Brisbane: an enzootic cycle involving birds and an urban cycle involving humans. The framework accounts for uncertainty from each fitted statistical model in estimates of species' contributions to transmission and has has direct application to other zoonotic pathogens.

Data availability

All data analyzed and all code generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Morgan P Kain

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kainm@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0605-7289
  2. Eloise B Skinner

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ebskinn@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk

    Public Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hamish McCallum

    School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erin A Mordecai

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (DEB-1518681)

  • Erin A Mordecai

Fogarty International Center (DEB-2011147)

  • Erin A Mordecai

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133439)

  • Morgan P Kain
  • Eloise B Skinner
  • Erin A Mordecai

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thomas S Churcher, Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 28, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 28, 2021
  3. Accepted: August 19, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 20, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 22, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Kain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,775
    views
  • 237
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Morgan P Kain
  2. Eloise B Skinner
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
(2021)
Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus
eLife 10:e67018.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Lan Pang, Gangqi Fang ... Jianhua Huang
    Research Article

    The success of an organism depends on the molecular and ecological adaptations that promote its beneficial fitness. Parasitoids are valuable biocontrol agents for successfully managing agricultural pests, and they have evolved diversified strategies to adapt to both the physiological condition of hosts and the competition of other parasitoids. Here, we deconstructed the parasitic strategies in a highly successful parasitoid, Trichopria drosophilae, which parasitizes a broad range of Drosophila hosts, including the globally invasive species D. suzukii. We found that T. drosophilae had developed specialized venom proteins that arrest host development to obtain more nutrients via secreting tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), as well as a unique type of cell—teratocytes—that digest host tissues for feeding by releasing trypsin proteins. In addition to the molecular adaptations that optimize nutritional uptake, this pupal parasitoid has evolved ecologically adaptive strategies including the conditional tolerance of intraspecific competition to enhance parasitic success in older hosts and the obligate avoidance of interspecific competition with larval parasitoids. Our study not only demystifies how parasitoids weaponize themselves to colonize formidable hosts but also provided empirical evidence of the intricate coordination between the molecular and ecological adaptations that drive evolutionary success.

    1. Ecology
    Keisuke Atsumi, Yuusuke Nishida ... Shogoro Fujiki
    Research Article

    Comprehensive biodiversity data is crucial for ecosystem protection. The Biome mobile app, launched in Japan, efficiently gathers species observations from the public using species identification algorithms and gamification elements. The app has amassed >6 million observations since 2019. Nonetheless, community-sourced data may exhibit spatial and taxonomic biases. Species distribution models (SDMs) estimate species distribution while accommodating such bias. Here, we investigated the quality of Biome data and its impact on SDM performance. Species identification accuracy exceeds 95% for birds, reptiles, mammals, and amphibians, but seed plants, molluscs, and fishes scored below 90%. Our SDMs for 132 terrestrial plants and animals across Japan revealed that incorporating Biome data into traditional survey data improved accuracy. For endangered species, traditional survey data required >2000 records for accurate models (Boyce index ≥ 0.9), while blending the two data sources reduced this to around 300. The uniform coverage of urban-natural gradients by Biome data, compared to traditional data biased towards natural areas, may explain this improvement. Combining multiple data sources better estimates species distributions, aiding in protected area designation and ecosystem service assessment. Establishing a platform for accumulating community-sourced distribution data will contribute to conserving and monitoring natural ecosystems.