Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus

  1. Morgan P Kain  Is a corresponding author
  2. Eloise B Skinner  Is a corresponding author
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Department of Health, Australia
  3. Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

Identifying the key vector and host species that drive the transmission of zoonotic pathogens is notoriously difficult but critical for disease control. We present a nested approach for quantifying the importance of host and vectors that integrates species' physiological competence with their ecological traits. We apply this framework to a medically important arbovirus, Ross River virus (RRV), in Brisbane, Australia. We find that vertebrate hosts with high physiological competence are not the most important for community transmission; interactions between hosts and vectors largely underpin the importance of host species. For vectors, physiological competence is highly important. Our results identify primary and secondary vectors of RRV and suggest two potential transmission cycles in Brisbane: an enzootic cycle involving birds and an urban cycle involving humans. The framework accounts for uncertainty from each fitted statistical model in estimates of species' contributions to transmission and has has direct application to other zoonotic pathogens.

Data availability

All data analyzed and all code generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Morgan P Kain

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    kainm@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0605-7289
  2. Eloise B Skinner

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ebskinn@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk

    Public Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hamish McCallum

    School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erin A Mordecai

    Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (DEB-1518681)

  • Erin A Mordecai

Fogarty International Center (DEB-2011147)

  • Erin A Mordecai

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133439)

  • Morgan P Kain
  • Eloise B Skinner
  • Erin A Mordecai

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Kain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,943
    views
  • 251
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Morgan P Kain
  2. Eloise B Skinner
  3. Andrew F van den Hurk
  4. Hamish McCallum
  5. Erin A Mordecai
(2021)
Physiology and ecology combine to determine host andvector importance for Ross River virus
eLife 10:e67018.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67018

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Ming-Qiang Wang, Shi-Kun Guo ... Chao-Dong Zhu
    Research Article

    Environmental factors can influence ecological networks, but these effects are poorly understood in the realm of the phylogeny of host-parasitoid interactions. Especially, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the ways that biotic factors, including plant species richness, overall community phylogenetic and functional composition of consumers, and abiotic factors such as microclimate, determine host-parasitoid network structure and host-parasitoid community dynamics. To address this, we leveraged a 5-year dataset of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their parasitoids collected in a highly controlled, large-scale subtropical tree biodiversity experiment. We tested for effects of tree species richness, tree phylogenetic, and functional diversity, and species and phylogenetic composition on species and phylogenetic diversity of both host and parasitoid communities and the composition of their interaction networks. We show that multiple components of tree diversity and canopy cover impacted both, species and phylogenetic composition of hosts and parasitoids. Generally, phylogenetic associations between hosts and parasitoids reflected nonrandomly structured interactions between phylogenetic trees of hosts and parasitoids. Further, host-parasitoid network structure was influenced by tree species richness, tree phylogenetic diversity, and canopy cover. Our study indicates that the composition of higher trophic levels and corresponding interaction networks are determined by plant diversity and canopy cover, especially via trophic links in species-rich ecosystems.

    1. Ecology
    Itai Bloch, David Troupin ... Nir Sapir
    Research Article

    Optimal foraging theory posits that foragers adjust their movements based on prey abundance to optimize food intake. While extensively studied in terrestrial and marine environments, aerial foraging has remained relatively unexplored due to technological limitations. This study, uniquely combining BirdScan-MR1 radar and the Advanced Tracking and Localization of Animals in Real-Life Systems biotelemetry system, investigates the foraging dynamics of Little Swifts (Apus affinis) in response to insect movements over Israel’s Hula Valley. Insect movement traffic rate (MoTR) substantially varied across days, strongly influencing swift movement. On days with high MoTR, swifts exhibited reduced flight distance, increased colony visit rate, and earlier arrivals at the breeding colony, reflecting a dynamic response to prey availability. However, no significant effects were observed in total foraging duration, flight speed, or daily route length. Notably, as insect abundance increased, inter-individual distances decreased. These findings suggest that Little Swifts optimize their foraging behavior in relation to aerial insect abundance, likely influencing reproductive success and population dynamics. The integration of radar technology and biotelemetry systems provides a unique perspective on the interactions between aerial insectivores and their prey, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of optimal foraging strategies in diverse environments.