Unleashing a novel function of endonuclease G in mitochondrial genome instability

  1. Sumedha Dahal
  2. Humaira Siddiqua
  3. Shivangi Sharma
  4. Ravi K Babu
  5. Diksha Rathore
  6. Sheetal Sharma
  7. Sathees Raghavan  Is a corresponding author
  1. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India
  2. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, India

Abstract

Having its genome makes the mitochondrion a unique and semiautonomous organelle within cells. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a double-stranded closed circular molecule of about 16 kb coding for 37 genes. Mutations, including deletions in the mitochondrial genome, can culminate in different human diseases. Mapping the deletion junctions suggests that the breakpoints are generally seen at hotspots. '9-bp deletion' (8271-8281), seen in the intergenic region of cytochrome c oxidase II/tRNALys, is the most common mitochondrial deletion. While it is associated with several diseases like myopathy, dystonia, and hepatocellular carcinoma, it has also been used as an evolutionary marker. However, the mechanism responsible for its fragility is unclear. In the current study, we show that Endonuclease G, a mitochondrial nuclease responsible for nonspecific cleavage of nuclear DNA during apoptosis, can induce breaks at sequences associated with '9-bp deletion' when it is present on a plasmid or in the mitochondrial genome. Through a series of in vitro and intracellular studies, we show that Endonuclease G binds to G-quadruplex structures formed at the hotspot and induces DNA breaks. Therefore, we uncover a new role for Endonuclease G in generating mtDNA deletions, which depends on the formation of G4 DNA within the mitochondrial genome. In summary, we identify a novel property of Endonuclease G, besides its role in apoptosis and the recently described elimination of paternal mitochondria during fertilisation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data for each data is provided along with the figures

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sumedha Dahal

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Humaira Siddiqua

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shivangi Sharma

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ravi K Babu

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Diksha Rathore

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sheetal Sharma

    Department of Experimental Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sathees Raghavan

    Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
    For correspondence
    sathees@iisc.ac.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3003-1417

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (37(1692)/17/EMR-11)

  • Sathees Raghavan

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (21/01/2016-BRNS/35074)

  • Sathees Raghavan

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/PR/3458/COE/34/33/2015)

  • Sathees Raghavan

IISc-DBT partnership programme (BT/PR27952-INF/22/212/2018)

  • Sathees Raghavan

Indian Institute of Science

  • Sumedha Dahal

Indian Institute of Science

  • Humaira Siddiqua

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wolf-Dietrich Heyer, University of California, Davis, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Indian National Law on animal care and use. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee protocols (CAF-SOP) of the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Central Animal Facility (CAF/Ethics/526/2016).

Version history

  1. Received: April 29, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: May 27, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 16, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 17, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: November 21, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: November 30, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Dahal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,133
    views
  • 174
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sumedha Dahal
  2. Humaira Siddiqua
  3. Shivangi Sharma
  4. Ravi K Babu
  5. Diksha Rathore
  6. Sheetal Sharma
  7. Sathees Raghavan
(2022)
Unleashing a novel function of endonuclease G in mitochondrial genome instability
eLife 11:e69916.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69916

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69916

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mathieu C Husser, Nhat P Pham ... Alisa Piekny
    Tools and Resources

    Endogenous tags have become invaluable tools to visualize and study native proteins in live cells. However, generating human cell lines carrying endogenous tags is difficult due to the low efficiency of homology-directed repair. Recently, an engineered split mNeonGreen protein was used to generate a large-scale endogenous tag library in HEK293 cells. Using split mNeonGreen for large-scale endogenous tagging in human iPSCs would open the door to studying protein function in healthy cells and across differentiated cell types. We engineered an iPS cell line to express the large fragment of the split mNeonGreen protein (mNG21-10) and showed that it enables fast and efficient endogenous tagging of proteins with the short fragment (mNG211). We also demonstrate that neural network-based image restoration enables live imaging studies of highly dynamic cellular processes such as cytokinesis in iPSCs. This work represents the first step towards a genome-wide endogenous tag library in human stem cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.