Modulation of fracture healing by the transient accumulation of senescent cells

Version of Record

Accepted for publication after peer review and revision.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record published: October 19, 2021 (This version)
Accepted Manuscript published: October 7, 2021 (Go to version)
Accepted: September 29, 2021
Preprint posted: May 19, 2021 (Go to version)
Received: May 2, 2021

1. Of interest
Ketamine induces multiple individually distinct whole-brain functional connectivity signatures

Flora Moujaes, Jie Lisa Ji ... Alan Anticevic

Research Article Apr 17, 2024
Further reading

Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Senescent cells have detrimental effects across tissues with aging but may have beneficial effects on tissue repair, specifically on skin wound healing. However, the potential role of senescent cells in fracture healing has not been defined. Here, we performed an in silico analysis of public mRNAseq data and found that senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) markers increased during fracture healing. We next directly established that the expression of senescence biomarkers increased markedly during murine fracture healing. We also identified cells in the fracture callus that displayed hallmarks of senescence, including distension of satellite heterochromatin and telomeric DNA damage; the specific identity of these cells, however, requires further characterization. Then, using a genetic mouse model (Cdkn2a^LUC) containing a Cdkn2a^Ink4a-driven luciferase reporter, we demonstrated transient in vivo senescent cell accumulation during callus formation. Finally, we intermittently treated young adult mice following fracture with drugs that selectively eliminate senescent cells (‘senolytics’, Dasatinib plus Quercetin), and showed that this regimen both decreased senescence and SASP markers in the fracture callus and significantly accelerated the time course of fracture healing. Our findings thus demonstrate that senescent cells accumulate transiently in the murine fracture callus and, in contrast to the skin, their clearance does not impair but rather improves fracture healing.

Introduction

The worldwide burden of fractures is growing. One reason for this major public health problem is population aging, which is associated with progressive physiological decline, leading to an increased risk for many chronic diseases (Khosla et al., 2020). Hallmarks of aging that drive this deterioration include genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, stem cell exhaustion, altered intercellular communication, and cellular senescence (López-Otín et al., 2013). Recently, cellular senescence has emerged as a promising therapeutic target to prevent aging of multiple tissues, including the musculoskeletal system (Chandra et al., 2020; Farr et al., 2017; Farr et al., 2019; Farr and Khosla, 2019; Khosla et al., 2018; Khosla et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2018). Because the ‘geroscience hypothesis’ postulates that targeting fundamental mechanisms of aging, such as cellular senescence, can delay the onset of age-associated diseases as a group, a better understanding of the beneficial versus detrimental roles of senescent cells throughout the lifespan in various physiological contexts, such as fracture healing, is of considerable importance (Khosla et al., 2020).

Similar to other tissues, senescent cells accumulate within the aged bone microenvironment and are causal in the pathogenesis of age-related bone loss (Farr et al., 2016; Farr et al., 2017; Farr and Khosla, 2019). One key feature of the cellular senescence program is activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs), Cdkn2a^Ink4a (p16^Ink4a) and Cdkn1a^Cip1 (p21^Cip1), paralleled by apoptosis resistance via upregulation of senescent cell anti-apoptotic pathways (Tchkonia et al., 2013). In the murine bone marrow, predominantly Cdkn2a^Ink4a and to a lesser extent Cdkn1a^Cip1 have been linked to aging in diverse cellular populations such as B- and T-cells, myeloid cells, osteoprogenitors, osteoblasts, and osteocytes (Farr et al., 2016). Along with increased CDKI expression, senescent cells develop a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), consisting of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and extracellular matrix degrading proteins that can drive tissue dysfunction via paracrine and systemic intercellular signaling, and spread cellular senescence through a so-called ‘bystander effect’ (Lagnado et al., 2021; Nelson et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2015a). These detrimental effects can be alleviated by clearing senescent cells either genetically or by administration of senolytics – drugs that selectively kill senescent cells. For example, intermittent delivery of the senolytic cocktail, Dasatinib (D, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus Quercetin (Q, a natural flavonoid) has been shown to eliminate senescent cells in old mice and in humans and, in preclinical studies, slows the onset of aging by preventing multiple co-morbidities to thereby extend healthspan (Farr et al., 2016; Farr et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2015b). These findings are now being translated into humans, and D + Q is currently undergoing human trials for safety and efficacy to prevent age-related skeletal deterioration (NCT04313634).

In youth, beneficial physiological functions of senescent cells and their SASP have been suggested in skin wound healing, as senescent fibroblasts and endothelial cells are recruited to sites of injury where they release SASP factors that, in turn, attract various cell populations (e.g. immune cells) to accelerate skin wound healing. Indeed, after an early appearance in the healing skin wound, senescent cells induce myofibroblast differentiation and secrete PDGF-AA, a crucial factor necessary for proper wound healing (Demaria et al., 2014). However, the dynamics of skin wound healing do not directly translate to the various bone healing repair phases (i.e. inflammatory, soft callus, hard callus, and remodeling phase). Indeed, bone has the exclusive ability to form scar-free tissue de novo, although this process is slower than the typical wound healing process (Marsell and Einhorn, 2011). Importantly, manipulation at each stage can change the course of natural fracture healing events, which has been demonstrated by our group previously (Saul et al., 2019; Undale et al., 2011). Whether senescent cells appear in the healing skeleton as they do in skin wound healing or how these cells modulate fracture repair is not known. Indeed, to the extent that senolytic drugs progress to clinical use, particularly in patients with osteoporosis, it is critical to understand whether senescent cells play a similar, beneficial role in bone fracture healing as appears to be the case in the skin (Demaria et al., 2014). For example, if clearance of senescent cells impairs the timecourse or final outcome of the fracture healing process, that would clearly adversely impact the potential use of senolytic therapies in patients with osteoporosis.

In this context, the aims of this study were to characterize the potential appearance of senescent cells during fracture healing and establish whether targeting cellular senescence with senolytics impacts facture healing dynamics. Herein, we specifically focus on fracture healing in young adult mice to avoid the confounding effects of senescence with aging. We first defined the transcriptional profiles of the healing callus and performed an in-depth characterization of cellular senescence at various timepoints. We then leveraged a Cdkn2a^Ink4a-luciferase reporter mouse model (Cdkn2a^LUC) (Burd et al., 2013) to further validate the appearance and disappearance of these cells in vivo. Finally, we treated young adult fractured mice with senolytics to evaluate whether clearance of senescent cells adversely affected fracture healing, which is a critical issue in the further development of senolytic therapies for osteoporosis.

Results

Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a are induced during murine fracture healing

To evaluate transcriptome-wide changes underlying the different stages of fracture healing, we analyzed publicly available mRNA-seq data of murine femoral fracture sites as well as intact control femora at five specific time points (Coates et al., 2019). At each time point, post-fracture femora displayed a distinct gene expression profile upon clustering (Figure 1A). Within this dataset, samples collected on day 7 and 14 diverged most from the freshly fractured and intact bone. To identify cellular processes affected by fracture- and healing-associated mRNA expression changes, we performed gene ontology analyses comparing intact controls to femora 14 days post-fracture. As expected, cellular processes related to cell proliferation as well as apoptosis were significantly enriched (Figure 1B and C). To detect key common regulators among those biological processes, components of the respective gene sets were overlapped. Interestingly, the cell cycle regulators Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a were present in all gene lists (Figure 1D). Notably, the importance of Cdkn2a^Ink4^a and Cdkn1a^Cip1 during aging-associated bone deterioration has been previously observed by our group (Farr et al., 2016; Farr et al., 2017). Next, gene expression kinetics of Cdkn1a^Cip1, Cdkn2a^Ink4a, as well as the proliferation marker Mki67 were examined after the induction of femoral fracture (Figure 1E). Cdkn1a^Cip1 increased significantly very early following fracture (0.2 days), with a subsequent reduction, although at all time points its expression remained higher than levels in the intact contralateral femur. By contrast, Cdkn2a^Ink4a increased progressively up to day seven post-fracture and then plateaued. Mki67 expression gradually decreased during bone healing (Figure 1E), indicating a decrease in proliferation. Together, these findings suggest a potential function of Cdkn2a^Ink4a and Cdkn1a^Cip1 in regulating key cellular processes during fracture healing in mice with an emphasis on the late callus building phase around day 14.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

*Cdkn1a*^Cip1 and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a* are upregulated after the induction of femoral fractures in mice.

Transcriptome-wide changes during femoral fracture healing in mice were analyzed using publicly available mRNA-seq data (GSE152677 Coates et al., 2019). (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) illustrates the variance of gene expression profiles when comparing intact controls to fractured femora (0.2, 1, 3, 7, and 14 days post fracture; n = 5 per time point). (B) Cellular pathways affected by gene expression changes 14 days after fracture compared to intact controls were detected using gene ontology (REVIGO; Supek et al., 2011). (C) REVIGO revealed that pathways associated with cell proliferation and cell death (GO:0048523, GO:0042127, GO:0010941, GO:0042981, GO: 0008285) were significantly affected 14 days after a mid-diaphyseal stabilized femoral fracture. (D) When overlapping these pathways, 42 genes were found to be present in all gene sets, including *Cdkn1a*^Cip1 and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*. (E) Normalized mRNA expression kinetics reveal an upregulation of *Cdkn1a*^Cip1 and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a* during fracture healing while *Mki67* levels decreased. The dotted line represents the normalized baseline expression of intact control femora. The small asterisks indicate differences from the control. A-E: n = 35, all female. Mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 1—source data 1 Source data (normalized counts, REVIGO results, DE genes) for Figure 1, panels A-E.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx

Senescent cells appear at fracture sites

For validation and extension of these in silico findings, we next induced femoral fractures in mice to further elucidate the possible roles of Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a in fracture healing. After our in silico approach pointed to the end of the second week as the potential time point of highest senescent cell burden, we determined Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a expression levels in the callus as well as the (intact) contralateral side after 4, 8, 14, and 28 days (Figure 2A). Notably, we detected a 20-fold increase in Cdkn1a^Cip1 and a 100-fold increase in Cdkn2a^Ink4a 14 days post fracture compared to the contralateral side (Figure 2B). Due to the major function of Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a in regulating cellular senescence (Farr et al., 2016; Tchkonia et al., 2013), we next tested for the presence of the most specific markers for cellular senescence by assessing senescence-associated distension of satellites (SADS) and telomere-associated DNA-damage foci (TAF) within the callus (Farr and Almeida, 2018; López-Otín et al., 2013). For this purpose, we performed immuno-fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the callus area after fracturing and stabilizing femora with an intramedullary pin. This analysis demonstrated that the number of SADS-positive senescent cells (Farr et al., 2016) in the callus was higher by ~6-fold with a peak on days 8 and 14 relative to the contralateral control (Figure 2C and D). In agreement with this finding, the fractured side contained more TAF-positive senescent cells (Figure 2E and F). Indeed, the number of TAF-positive senescent cells was highest in the fracture callus on day 14 and higher than in the contralateral side throughout the entire observation period (Figure 2F), mirroring the changes in senescence genes and SADS over the time course. In summary, the murine callus displays a profound induction of Cdkn1a^Cip1 and Cdkn2a^Ink4a expression as well as specific cellular senescence markers (SADS and TAF) 14 days after a femoral fracture.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Cellular senescence is induced during femoral fracture healing.

(A) Femoral fractures (Fx) were induced in male C57BL/6 mice with contralateral (Contra), intact control femora. Callus and controls were analyzed 4, 8, 14, and 28 days after fracture (n = 4 per time point). (B) *Cdkn1a^Cip1* and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a* mRNA expression levels during fracture healing were determined at each time point using rt-qPCR. *Cdkn1a^Cip1* was strongly induced 8–14 days and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a* 14 days post fracture. (C) Senescence-associated distension of satellites (SADS) were detected using immune-fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) Top: representative image of the contralateral side. Below: fractured side with four SADS. (D) The total number of SADS as well as percentage of SADS-positive cells ( ≥ 4 SADS/cell) at all time points was increased in the callus compared to the contralateral control femur. (E) Telomere-associated foci (TAF) were determined using FISH to detect telomeres (red) and immunofluorescent staining for γH2A.X (green). TAF (yellow, see arrowheads) were defined as sites of γH2A.X-associated DNA damage co-localized with telomeres (n = 70 cells were analyzed per bone). (F) The highest percentage of TAF were detected on day 14 of fracture healing. The number of TAF-positive senescent cells ( ≥ 3 TAF/cell) was increased in fractured bones throughout the entire healing period. B: n = 24 (n = 24 in Contra, n = 24 in Fx, n = 6 per timepoint), all male. C-D: n = 16 (n = 16 in Contra, n = 16 in Fx), all male. E-F: n = 20 (n = 4 per time point and n = 4 in contra on day 14), all male. Mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 2—source data 1 Source data (raw ct values, for Figure 2, panel B), raw numbers for SADS (panel D) and TAF (panel F).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

Cdkn2a^Ink4a-expressing cells accumulate in the callus in vivo and homozygous deletion of Cdkn2a^Ink4a increases callus volume

After observing the induction of senescence and upregulation of Cdkn2a^Ink4a in the fracture callus, we sought to confirm the accumulation of Cdkn2a^Ink4a -expressing cells in vivo at the fracture site and evaluate the effects of homozygous deletion of Cdkn2a^Ink4a on fracture healing. For this purpose, we utilized Cdkn2a^LUC mice, in which the firefly luciferase cDNA is knocked in into the translational start site of the endogenous Cdkn2a^INK4a locus (Burd et al., 2013). Thus, these mice serve as both reporter mice for Cdkn2a^Ink4a expression and, in the homozygous state, are a complete Cdkn2a^Ink4a knock out. Upon fracture induction, Cdkn2a^Ink4a-positive cells were visualized using bioluminescence (Figure 3A and B). Cdkn2a^Ink4a-driven luminescence peaked approximately 2 weeks after fracture induction and declined thereafter (Figure 3C). Notably, Cdkn2a^Ink4a luminescence kinetics mirrored the time course of Cdkn2a^Ink4a mRNA expression we observed in silico and ex vivo and also paralleled the changes in SADS and TAF we observed as described above (Figures 1E and 2C–F). We also analyzed the consequences of Cdkn2a^Ink4a-knockout on the time course of bone healing by weekly X-ray analyses performed according to Wehrle et al., 2019; Figure 3D and measurements of the relative callus area (Figure 3E and F). Although the overall time course of healing was not significantly altered in the Cdkn2a^Ink4a-deficient mice, post-mortem end point analysis revealed that the callus bone volume was significantly increased in these mice relative to the wild-type mice (Figure 3G). These findings thus demonstrate that Cdkn2a^Ink4a-positive cells accumulate at the fracture site in vivo and that complete loss of Cdkn2a^Ink4a expression does not impair, but rather increases callus volume during fracture healing.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

*Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-positive cells are present at the fracture site and negatively affect callus formation.

The involvement of *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-expressing cells in callus was evaluated in *Cdkn2a^LUC* or wild type (WT) mice. (A) Tibial fractures (Fx) were induced and *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-dependent luminescence was analyzed between 2 and 23 days after fracture using Xenogen. X-rays were performed weekly and callus was isolated at day 28 for subsequent rt-qPCR. (B) Representative Xenogen images of *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-associated luminescence at fracture sites in *Cdkn2a^LUC* mice. (C) Luminescence corresponding to *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-expression after tibial fracture in WT and *Cdkn2a^LUC* mice as detected using Xenogen. *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-associated luminescence reached its maximum 15 days after fracture while no signal was detected in WT controls. (D) Bone healing was scored based on X-ray analysis according to Wehrle and colleagues (Wehrle et al., 2019). Healing kinetics were similar among genotypes. (E) Relative callus area was quantified after X-ray analysis using FIJI. (F) *Cdkn2a^LUC* mice displayed an increase in callus area as determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC, p = 0.036). (G) Callus bone volume (BV) was measured and visualized postmortem using micro-CT. The depletion of *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*-expressing cells resulted in significantly elevated callus BV. B-C: 6 WT (3 males, 3 females), 8 *Cdkn2a^Luc* (4 males, 4 females), D-F: 6 WT (3 males, 3 females), 6 *Cdkn2a^Luc* (3 males, 3 females), G: 6 WT (3 males, 3 females), 6 *Cdkn2a^Luc* (3 males, 3 females). Mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Figure 3—source data 1 Source data (raw AU values, for Figure 3, panel B, C), raw scores (panel D), area (panel E), AUC (panel F), and BV (panel G).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx

Senescent cells and the SASP show distinct expression patterns in the fracture callus

Along with the appearance of cellular senescence, a locally detrimental bystander effect is caused by the Cdkn1a^Cip1- and Cdkn2a^Ink4a-positive cells via SASP secretion (Jurk et al., 2014; Schafer et al., 2018). As such, we performed a detailed analysis using qRT-PCR of the fracture callus over time. The SASP consists of, among others, growth factors and growth regulators (Figure 4A), out of which Igfbp3 showed a 20-fold increase by day 14. Remarkably, the chemokine Ccl7 was more than 70-fold increased on day 14 (Figure 4B). The protease Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (Pai1 or Serpine1) was elevated by more than 60-fold on day eight but declined substantially on day 14 (Figure 4C). Several transcription factors, including Nfkb1, showed a modest increase, while Foxo4 was significantly increased on days 8 and 14 (Figure 4D). In the TGFβ complex, Tgfb1 itself displayed an initial increase and then a substantial decrease on day 28 which was even significantly lower than levels detected in the intact bone (Figure 4E). Several members of the interleukin family such as Il6 and Il17a showed the typical rise within the first days of the fracture (inflammatory phase), whereas Il1b was downregulated (Figure 4F). Overall, the expression pattern of all senescence-associated and SASP genes was highly heterogeneous (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). However, distinct gene clusters displaying similar patterns could be constructed. For example, Cdkn2a^Ink4a and Cdkn1a^Cip1 were detected within a cluster consisting of growth factors (Igfbp3, Igfbp4, Vegfa), proteases (Mmp13), and transcription factors (Foxo4). The similarity in regulation was indicated by their high correlation coefficients (Figure 4G). To determine which cell population may be associated with SASP secretion, we analyzed a publicly available single cell dataset (Baryawno et al., 2019, Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, B). After evaluating key regulators within murine bone and marrow, we found the highest enrichment of SASP genes within the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) cluster (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B-F), which helped guide the subsequent studies below.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Multiple SASP factors show a marked increase in the healing callus, while distinct genes form similarly behaving clusters.

SASP-associated factors can be subdivided into functional subunits. (A) mRNA expression of the growth factors *Vegfa*, *Igfbp3,* and *Igfbp4* substantially increased during the callus forming phase (days 2–15). (B) The chemokines *Ccl2* and *Pdgfa* more profoundly rose in gene expression levels in the soft callus (days 2–7) but not in the hard callus (days 8–14) phase, while *Ccl7* was more than 70-fold increased on day 14. (C) Expression of the protease *Serpine1* was elevated in the soft callus phase, similar to *Pdgfa*, while *Mmp9* and *Mmp13* peaked on day 14. (D) The transcription factors *Foxo4*, *Nfkb1,* and *Tp53* peaked on day 8, marking the beginning of hard callus formation. (E) TGFβ-associated genes displayed heterogeneous expression patterns. While *Tgfbr1* peaked on day 14, *Tgfb1* reached a plateau on days 8 and 14, and *Tgfb2* gradually declined after an initial peak on day 4. (F) Among the interleukins, *Il1b* was negatively regulated in the beginning of the healing phase, while *Il6* shortly peaked in the inflammatory and soft callus phase. *Il17a* showed a gradually decline, comparable to *Tgfb2*. (G) The largest cluster displaying similar gene expression patterns among all senescence-associated and SASP-gene markers included the key cell cycle regulators *Cdkn2a^Ink4a* and *Cdkn1a^Cip1*. The square size is proportional to the correlation coefficient, which is also depicted in the left bottom corner. Significant results were indicated with asterisks. A-G: n = 24 (n = 24 in Contra, n = 24 in Fx, 6 per time point per group), all male. Mean ± SEM. Multiple t-test (FDR); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 4—source data 1 Source data (raw ct values, for Figure 4, panel A-F), raw matrix (panel G).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx

Senescence in MSCs can be partially rescued by senolytic treatment in vitro

Based on the above experimental and in silico analyses, we next aimed to determine the effects of senolytics on MSCs in vitro. For this purpose, MSCs were isolated from murine bone marrow, cultured in vitro until confluent, and then treated with D + Q. The senolytic cocktail did not exert effects on cell numbers (Figure 5A and B). Subsequently, the cells were treated with 100 μM H₂O₂ to induce senescence (Figure 5C and D). Senescent cells were detected using SA-β-Gal staining and, as anticipated, addition of H₂O₂ resulted in profound cellular senescence (Figure 5D). Treatment with D + Q rescued this effect by significantly reducing the percentage of senescent cells from 33.1% to 13.1% (-60.3%; Figure 5C and D). Next, we treated mice with vehicle or D + Q in vivo and extracted MSCs to grow them ex vivo (Figure 5E). The relative cell number of isolated MSCs was increased after 5 weeks of D + Q treatment in vivo (Figure 5F) while SA-β-Gal staining revealed a minor reduction in the number on senescent cells (–18.8%, Figure 5G and H). However, a priori in vivo treatment with D + Q did not significantly reduce the proportion of cells becoming senescent after H₂O₂ treatment (Figure 5G and H). Together, our in vitro studies suggest that H₂O₂-induced senescence in MSCs can be partially rescued by D + Q treatment.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

D + Q treatment can partially rescue senescence in MSCs in vitro.

(A) Bone marrow MSCs were isolated from wild-type mice and grown in vitro until a confluence of approximately 70 % was observed. (B) After seeding the same cell numbers, MSCs were incubated with 200 nM Dasatinib and 50 µM Quercetin (D + Q) or vehicle solution for 24 hr. Relative cell numbers were evaluated 24 hr after D + Q or vehicle treatment (n = 6 per treatment). Besides using an automated cell counter, cells were stained using crystal violet to visualize cell densities. D + Q treatment did not change relative cell numbers. (C) MSCs were treated with 100 µM H₂O₂ for 4 hr to induce senescence, washed with PBS and cultured for another three days. Afterwards, cells were treated with D + Q or vehicle solution for 24 hr. After fixation, senescent cells were visualized using SA-β-Gal staining and quantified using FIJI (n = 4). (D) Representative images of SA-β-Gal staining. While H₂O₂-induced senescence, this effect was rescued by subsequent D + Q treatment. (E) Wild type mice were treated with 5 mg/kg BW Dasatinib and 50 mg/kg body weight Quercetin or vehicle via oral gavage weekly for 5 weeks. Bone marrow MSCs were isolated and cultured in vitro. (F) Relative cell number of D + Q-treated mice was increased 48 hr after seeding the same cell numbers (n = 6). Cell confluence was visualized using crystal violet staining. (G) In vivo treatment with D + Q resulted in a minor reduction in the number on senescent cells. H₂O₂ treatment induced cellular senescence in a comparable manner to the previous approach (C). (H) Representative images of SA-β-Gal staining. An a priori in vivo treatment with D + Q did not significantly reduce the proportion of cells becoming senescent after H₂O₂ treatment. A-H: n = 16, all male (n = 8 in Veh, n = 8 in D + Q). Mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 5—source data 1 Raw cell numbers for Figure 5, panel B, F, raw cell numbers (panel C, G).: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx

Pharmacological clearance of senescent cells does not impair but rather accelerates the time course of fracture healing in vivo

Based on our findings with the Cdkn2a^Ink4a knock out mice and D + Q effects on senescent MSCs in vitro, we hypothesized that, in contrast to skin wound healing (Demaria et al., 2014), clearance of senescent cells using D + Q treatment would enhance fracture healing in vivo. To test this, we treated wild-type mice with D + Q one day before fracture and on a weekly basis post fracture (Figure 6A). Based on our previous experiments where markers of senescence peaked on day 14 (Figures 1E and 2B–F), we sacrificed one mouse cohort at this time point and performed gene expression analysis of callus tissue. The senescence and SASP markers Cdkn2a^Ink4a and Foxo4 displayed decreased mRNA levels in response to D + Q treatment, with a borderline decrease in Pdgfa (Figure 6B) along with additional SASP factors (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A); of interest, some factors (e.g., Gdf15 and Pdgfb) increased following D + Q treatment (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). The reduction of Cdkn2a^Ink4A mRNA was confirmed at the protein level (Figure 6C). To address the impact of D + Q treatment on fracture healing, weekly X-rays were performed and tibia healing was classified according to Wehrle et al., 2019. Notably, we detected significantly improved healing kinetics after the clearance of senescent cells with D + Q treatment (Figure 6D). Weekly two-plane assessments of the callus area confirmed an increased callus area 2 weeks after fracture (Figure 6E and F). In addition, the relative callus area was already reduced by week five in the D + Q group, indicating an accelerated callus restoration (i.e. earlier approach to the remodeling phase) after the maximum area had been reached (Figure 6F). Micro-CT analysis after 5 weeks demonstrated a higher callus volume in D + Q-treated mice (Figure 6G). Finally, we evaluated biomechanical properties of healed tibiae using torsional testing of the tibiae. In agreement with the elevated callus area and higher healing score on day 14, senolytic treatment resulted in a significant increase in the maximal torque that the healed bones were able to sustain before fracture, although the increase in bone stiffness did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 6H). Thus, D + Q treatment reduced gene expression levels of senescence markers/SASP markers and, in contrast to findings in skin wound healing (Demaria et al., 2014), did not impair but rather accelerated the time course of fracture healing.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

D + Q treatment accelerates the time course of fracture healing.

(A) Senescent cells were cleared by oral gavage of wild type mice one day before tibial fracture and weekly with 5 mg/kg BW Dasatinib plus 50 mg/kg BW Quercetin or vehicle solution(B) mRNA levels of the senescence and SASP markers *Cdkn2a^Ink4a*, *Pdgfa* and *Foxo4* were reduced by D + Q treatment 14 days after fracture induction as detected using rt-qPCR. (C) Western blot analysis of callus material revealed reduction of Cdkn2a^INK4A protein level in response to D + Q. (D) Bone healing was assessed using X-ray analysis according to Wehrle et al., 2019. Bone healing was significantly improved with D + Q. (E) Representative X-ray images of vehicle- and D + Q-treated mice 14 days after tibial fracture. Callus volume appeared to be increased with D + Q. (F) Relative callus area was detected after X-ray analysis and quantification using FIJI, showing an acceleration in the time course of callus formation. (G) Callus bone volume at 5 weeks determined using μCT was increased in D + Q-treated mice. (H) Biomechanical analysis of the tibiae revealed a significant increase in maximum torque upon senolytic treatment and a non-significant increase in bone stiffness. Mean ± SEM. B, C: n = 11 (5 Veh [3 males, 2 females], 6 DQ [3 males, 3 females]), D-G: n = 34, all females (17 Veh, 17 DQ), H: n = 31, all females (14 Veh, 17 DQ; note that three bones from the Veh group could not be analyzed due to technical issues in preparing these bones for torsional testing). For B: Univariate linear model with the covariate ‘sex’, D-H: One-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 6—source data 1 Raw ct values for Figure 6, panel B. Raw scores for Figure 6, panel D. Raw callus area values for Figure 6, panel F. Raw values for Figure 6, panel G and H.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-69958-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 6—source data 2 Raw uncropped and annotated blot images for Figure 6, panel C.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69958/elife-69958-fig6-data2-v2.zip
Download elife-69958-fig6-data2-v2.zip

Discussion

Cellular senescence is generally considered in the context of its adverse effects during aging (Baker et al., 2011). Clearance of senescent cells has been shown to reverse age-associated symptoms and diseases in mice and senolytic therapies are now in early phase clinical trials for a range of age-associated disorders (Khosla et al., 2020; Palmer et al., 2021; Tchkonia et al., 2021). Similarly, clearance of Cdkn2a^Ink4a-positive senescent cells using genetic approaches has been shown to reduce age-associated diseases and extend healthspan in mice (Braun et al., 2012; Chandra et al., 2020; Farr et al., 2019; Saul and Kosinsky, 2021; Xu et al., 2018). However, previous studies on skin wound healing have suggested a beneficial role of transiently appearing senescent cells in that process (Demaria et al., 2014). This, in large part, has formed the basis for the hypothesis that senescent cells, although detrimental in the context of aging, may be beneficial for tissue repair via the secretion of the SASP, in part by attracting immune cells and initiating the tissue repair process (Kowald et al., 2020). However, whether this concept holds true across tissues beyond the skin is of considerable importance, particularly for the potential translation of senolytic therapies for osteoporosis. Indeed, a detrimental effect of senescent cell clearance on fracture repair would pose a substantial roadblock for the development of senolytic therapies for osteoporosis. Relevant to this issue, we demonstrate senescent cells in the dynamically healing bone and define the time course of appearance and subsequent disappearance of these cells from the fracture callus. Importantly, using both a genetic and pharmacological model, we reduce the senescent cell burden and demonstrate no adverse effects, but rather beneficial effects (i.e. increased callus volume in the Cdkn2a^Ink4a knock out model and accelerated timecourse of healing with senolytics) on fracture healing.

As noted earlier, we focused this initial study on young adult mice in order to avoid potential confounding due to aging and to define the possible physiological role of senescent cells in fracture healing. At a gene expression level and using two independent post-transcriptional techniques (SADS and TAF), which are the most specific markers for cellular senescence (Anderson et al., 2019; Farr et al., 2016; Hewitt et al., 2012) we were able to first describe the appearance of senescent cells within the physiologically healing murine bone. Moreover, we established a timecourse of cellular senescence peaking on day 14 in healing long bones and made use of a genetic knock out model of Cdkn2a^Ink4a, the Cdkn2a^LUC mouse (19), to both visually detect and assess the role of Cdkn2a^Ink4a knock out on fracture healing. In line with the findings by Demaria et al. in skin wound healing (Demaria et al., 2014), a transient increase of Cdkn2a^Ink4a-positive cells was detected in the final stages of the anabolic and beginning catabolic phase of fracture healing. The healing process itself, however, was not fundamentally changed by the functional reduction of Cdkn2a^Ink4a but the callus volume was significantly enhanced in mice with Cdkn2a^Ink4a deletion relative to wild-type controls.

Our analysis of publically available single-cell RNAseq data (Baryawno et al., 2019) indicated that MSCs in murine bone and bone marrow are an important cell population undergoing senescence and we further demonstrated effects of D + Q in clearing senescent MSCs in vitro. However, the precise identity of the cells undergoing transient senescence in the fracture callus remains unclear. This is particularly important in the fracture callus, as there are several stages of fracture healing (Claes et al., 2012; Marsell and Einhorn, 2011), including formation of a hematoma (~days 1–5), fibrocartilagenous phase (~days 5–11), bone formation (~days 11–18), and bone remodeling (after day 18); thus, multiple other cell types (e.g. cartilage cells, others) in addition to MSCs could be undergoing senescence, and characterizing these senescent cells is the focus of ongoing work in our laboratory.

The role of the SASP in the skeletal system has mostly been shown to be adverse (Farr and Khosla, 2019; Millerand et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2020). We demonstrate here a substantial increase in the SASP during fracture healing, with some SASP factors increasing during the inflammatory phase and others in early and late callus forming phases. Although multiple approaches have been used to subclassify the SASP (Acosta et al., 2013; Basisty et al., 2020; Coppé et al., 2010; Özcan et al., 2016), we for the first time elucidated its components within healing bone and found specific Cdkn2a^Ink4a and Cdkn1a^Cip1 clusters of associated SASP factors with a concordant timecourse during fracture healing. Elucidating the potential therapeutic applicability of these findings, we made use of a first-generation senolytic cocktail, D + Q. This treatment has successfully moved from preclinical studies after reducing the cellular senescence burden in bone (Farr et al., 2017) and adipose tissue (Xu et al., 2018) and is currently in multiple clinical trials, including for the prevention and/or treatment of osteoporosis (NCT04313634). We demonstrated its efficiency in reducing MSC senescence in vitro and treated healing murine long bones in vivo with this senolytic regimen. Following senolytic treatment, the senescence marker Cdkn2a^Ink4a was substantially reduced, along with a number of SASP markers. The time course of bone healing was accelerated, and biomechanical bone parameters partly enhanced (i.e. maximal torque). Notably, some SASP markers, specifically Gdf15 and Pdgfb, were increased after the senolytic treatment. It has been hypothesized that up to a certain threshold, a transient senescent burden may be favoring healing (e.g. skin wounds), while above this threshold there may be a failure of wound closure, as observed in chronic wounds (de Magalhães and Passos, 2018; Pratsinis et al., 2019; Wilkinson and Hardman, 2020). Our findings suggest that cellular senescence in healing bone follows a transient time course that peaks around the second week of fracture healing, thereby potentially suppressing callus formation. Given that senolytics do not kill all senescent cells, but rather reduce their proportion (e.g. by ~30 % Zhu et al., 2015) our data demonstrate that this reduction is sufficient to enhance callus formation and at least does not impair the biomechanical properties of the healed bone.

In addition to implications for senolytic therapies for osteoporosis, our findings also have potential biological implications. Specifically, the concept of senescent cells as physiologically facilitating tissue repair which, to date, has been definitively demonstrated principally in the skin (Demaria et al., 2014) may be overly simplistic. Thus, contrary to the skin and uniquely in the living organism, bone has the ability to fully recover without losing its integrity and form a scar. As such, it is possible that the transient appearance of senescent cells is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism during injury repair, with beneficial effects on skin wound healing, which is associated with scar formation. By contrast, the lack of scar formation in bone and the already highly inflammatory state following fracture (Marsell and Einhorn, 2011) may render these transiently appearing senescent cells less useful and, as demonstrated in our study, potentially detrimental, to injury repair in bone. Clearly, further studies are needed to test this hypothesis, but our findings should stimulate a reconsideration of senescent cells as generally beneficial in the setting of tissue injury and repair.

In summary, we demonstrate that cellular senescence is present in fracture callus development using both transcriptional and more specific analyses evaluating distension of satellite heterochromatin and telomeric DNA damage, hallmarks of cellular senescence (López-Otín et al., 2013). We established the time course of Cdkn2a^Ink4a or Cdkn1a^Cip1 expression during fracture healing, associated well-described SASP components to these key senescent genes, and reduced the senescent burden with senolytics. Importantly, this approach did not impair, but rather enhanced the fracture healing process in vivo. Collectively, our findings have clinical implications for the development of senolytic therapies for osteoporosis and also have biological relevance for our concept of senescent cells as facilitating healing, as these beneficial versus detrimental effects of senescent cells on injury repair may vary across tissues.

Materials and methods

Key resources table

Reagent type (species) or resource	Designation	Source or reference	Identifiers	Additional information
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)	C57BL/6	Charles River Laboratories	RRID:IMSR_CRL:027
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)	Alb.B6.Cdkn2a-Luciferase	Sharpless Lab, North Carolina, USA	RRID:IMSR_NCIMR:01XBT
Cell line (Mus musculus)	MSC (normal, adult)	This paper	-	freshly isolated from C57BL/6 mice
Antibody	γ-H2A.X, anti-rabbit antibody	Cell Signaling	RRID:AB_2118009	“(1:200)”
Antibody	goat, anti-rabbit antibody	Vector Laboratories	RRID:AB_2313606	“(1:200)”
Antibody	Cy5 Streptavidin, anti-rabbit antibody	Vector Laboratories	RRID:AB_2868518	“(1:500)”
Other	TelC-Cy3	PNA Bio	RRID:AB_2893285	(PNA) probe
Other	CENPB-Cy3	PNA Bio	RRID:AB_2893286	(PNA) probe
Antibody (WB)	Cdkn2aINK4A	Abcam	RRID:AB_2891084	(“1:1,000”)
Antibody (WB)	Beta-Actin	Cell Signaling	RRID:AB_2223172	(“1:1,000”)
Chemical compound, drug	Xenolight RediJect Coelentarazine h	Calipers	#760,506
Software, algorithm	GraphPad Prism software	San Diego, CA	RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithm	R 4.0.3	San Diego, CA	RRID:SCR_001905
Other	DAPI stain	Life Technologies	RRID:AB_2629482

Animal studies

Request a detailed protocol

Animal studies were performed under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and experiments were performed in accordance with Mayo Clinic IACUC guidelines. All assessments were performed in a blinded fashion. Mice were housed in ventilated cages and maintained within a pathogen-free, accredited facility under a 12-hr light/dark cycle with constant temperature (23 °C) and access to food (diet details are specified below) and water ad libitum. We used young adult C57BL/6 N mice (starting at four months, ending at 5–6 months of age) for our experimental procedures. For anesthesia during surgery, we used isoflurane (vaporizer, 1.5–2% in oxygen, inhalation) for induction and maintenance until the surgery was complete (about 20 min).

A schematic of the study design in each of the three study phases (WT, Cdkn2a^LUC, D + Q) and respective timelines for the treatments is shown in Figures 2A, 3A and 6A.

For the first study (WT), four-month-old male C57BL/6 N WT mice (n = 24, all male) of comparable mean body weights received a standardized, closed diaphyseal femoral fracture. After a lateral parapatellar knee incision, the left femur was exposed while the tendons and muscles were protected. After that, a transverse osteotomy with a rotary bone saw was introduced. An Insect Pin (Fine Science Tools, 26001–30, Austerlitz Insect Pin rod diameter 0.03 mm) was inserted retrogradely from the trochlear groove to stabilize the transverse femoral shaft fracture. After wound closure, postoperative pain management was performed with subcutaneous buprenorphine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg body weight [BW]) and the correct position of the pin was immediately affirmed by X-ray. Normal weight bearing postoperatively was allowed. X-rays were performed on a weekly basis as described in Radiographical fracture healing assessment. For each timepoint (4, 8, 14, 28 days), n = 6 male mice per time point were used (n = 24 mice, all male).

For the Cdkn2a^LUC study, Alb.B6.Cdkn2a-Luciferase mice were used as described in detail elsewhere (Burd et al., 2013). Cdkn2a^LUC mice were used: Alb.B6.Cdkn2a-Luciferase mice (n = 6 Cdkn2a^WT/WT (3 males, 3 females) and n = 8 Cdkn2a^LUC/LUC(4 males, 4 females), herein referred to as WT and Cdkn2a^LUC, respectively) with a homogenous Alb.B6.Cdkn2a^Luc/Luc and their littermates were used. Here, we performed a left transverse tibia fracture. The mid-shaft tibia was incised along the anterior side of the tibia, and an unilateral transverse osteotomy with a rotary bone saw was performed. The fractured bone was stabilized with an intramedullary Insect Pin was retrogradely implemented (Wang et al., 2016). X-rays and pain management was performed as described in the WT study. In addition to weekly X-rays, luminescence was detected (see Bioluminescence). The bioluminescence assay was performed in n = 8 mice, while two additional mice received weekly X-rays.

For the D + Q study, 4-month-old female C57BL/6 mice (n = 34 in total) were randomized to either vehicle (Veh, n = 17) or Dasatinib plus Quercetin (D + Q, n = 17) treatment on a weekly basis (Figure 6A). Vehicle or D + Q was administered via oral gavage. The weekly treatment regimen was verified to be effective in eliminating senescent cells by our group previously (Farr et al., 2017). Senolytics were diluted in 10 % EtOH, 30 % PEG, 60 % Phosal-50and administered via oral gavage at dosages of 5 mg/kg BW Dasatinib and 50 mg/kg BW Quercetin, respectively, in a total volume of 100 μl. The surgical procedure was performed as described above and weekly X-rays were carried out to indicate the fracture healing course. Postmortem, both intact and fractured tibiae were stored in 0.9 % saline (NaCl)-soaked gauze at –20 °C for direct scanning with ex vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) (see Skeletal imaging) and subsequent biomechanical strength testing by standardized rotational testing (see torsional testing).

Mouse tissue collection and assessments

View detailed protocol

Prior to sacrifice, body mass (g) was recorded and serum was collected in the morning under fasting conditions from anesthetized mice via cardiac puncture and stored at –80 °C. In the Cdkn2a^LUC and D + Q study, tibiae, femora, and humeri were excised from the mice and skeletal muscle/connective tissues were removed after euthanasia. The left tibia was stored in 0.9 % saline (NaCl) soaked gauze at –20 °C for direct ex vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning (see Skeletal imaging) and subsequent biomechanical strength testing by standardized torsional testing (see torsional testing). In the WT study, both non-decalcified femora were embedded in methyl-methacrylate and sectioned for immunohistochemistry (IHC) (see Skeletal histomorphometry assessments), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (see Senescence-associated distension of satellites [SADS]).

In the D + Q study, the right tibia, both femora and both humeri were used to extract and culture bone marrow stem cells (BMSC; see Cell culture experiments). In the D + Q study and WT study, for fracture RNA analysis, the pin was removed, and the visually verified callus area removed after cleaning the bone from surrounding tissue. This callus area was minced with a scalpel in FACS buffer, and homogenized in QIAzol Lysis Reagent (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), and frozen at –80 °C for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) mRNA gene expression analyses (see Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis).

Skeletal imaging: radiographical fracture healing assessment

Request a detailed protocol

All imaging and analysis was performed in a blinded fashion as described by our group previously (Undale et al., 2011). Briefly, radiographs of the fractured femora or tibiae were taken under anesthesia after surgery and on a weekly basis. Therein, mice were in a supine position and both limbs extended. Anteroposterior (ap) and lateral (lat) planes were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated by two blinded researchers and scored for fracture healing using the score by Wehrle et al., 2019 and Undale et al., 2011. After a satisfactory accordance was obtained (R² = 0.89, Figure 6—figure supplement 1B), we decided to report the initially CT-based score by Wehrle et al. only, since the two planes gave us a good representation of all four cortices. The radiographs of fracture callus were quantified and analyzed with FIJI (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), as described elsewhere (Liu et al., 2018).

Skeletal imaging: ex vivo micro-CT imaging

Request a detailed protocol

At study endpoint, callus volume of the left (fractured) tibia (proximal metaphysis to distal metaphysis) was performed. Scan settings were: 55 kVp, 10.5 μm voxel size, 21.5 diameter, 145mA, 300 ms integration time. For the callus volume measurement, a threshold of 190 and 450 were chosen according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Scanco Medical AG, Basserdorf, Switzerland).

Bioluminescence

Request a detailed protocol

In vivo luminescence was measured with a Xenogen IVIS Spectrum instrument and Living Image software (5 min medium binning). Bioluminescent signal quantification (photons/s/cm²/sr) of the fracture region was measured with the Living Image software. Mice were i.p. injected with 15 μg of Xenolight RediJect Coelentarazine h (Calipers). After 25 min, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and imaging was performed.

Torsional testing of tibiae

View detailed protocol

Tests of torsional load were performed in a blinded fashion. After removal of the pins and embedding of the tibial plateau as the distal tibia, the torsional load was applied at speed of 5°/s for a maximum of 36 s. Maximum rotation angle at failure (Deg) and stiffness (N-cm/degree) were used as primary endpoints. Maximum torque was the highest force that the bone could sustain before fracture, and stiffness was calculated from the linear portion of the loading curve (higher values for both are indicative of stronger bone) (Undale et al., 2011).

mRNA-sequencing (mRNA-seq) and analysis mRNA sequencing data was obtained from GSE152677 (Coates et al., 2019). Thirty-five female femoral fracture mRNA-seq datasets were aligned to the mouse reference genome mm10. The fastq-dump files were obtained from the BioProject PRJNA640062. Quality control of fastq files was carried out via FastQC (version 0.72) and reads were mapped to the mouse reference genome [mm10] using HISAT2 (version 2.1.0) on Galaxy (version 7). Read counts were generated using the featureCounts tool (version 2.0.1) and analyzed for differential gene expression using DESeq2 (version 2.11.40.6). Significantly differentially regulated genes were selected by a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P-value < 0.05 and log2-fold changes above 0.5 or below –0.5. The used R-packages for the downstream analysis were PCAtools (2.2.0) and corrplot (0.84).

Analysis of published single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data

Request a detailed protocol

Publicly available single cell RNA-seq data based on bone and bone marrow from C57BL/6 J mice (n = 4 each, all male) (Baryawno et al., 2019; van Gastel et al., 2020) (GSE128423) were analyzed. Sequencing data were aligned to the mouse reference genome mm10 and cells with at least 500 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), log10 genes per UMI >0.8, > 250 genes per cell and a mitochondrial ratio of less than 0.2 % were extracted, normalized and integrated using the Seurat package v3.0 in R 4.0.2. Subsequent R-packages were Nebulosa (3.13) and Monocle (2.18.0).

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis

Request a detailed protocol

For callus analyses, callus and contralateral intact bone were removed as described in Coates et al., 2019 and immediately homogenized in QIAzol Lysis Reagent (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), and stored at –80 °C. Briefly, after soft tissue removal, a 7 mm section around the fracture site (and a 7 mm section at the same location on the intact contralateral site) was extracted and homogenized in QIAzol. Subsequent RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and targeted gene expression measurements of mRNA levels by qRT-PCR were performed as described previously (Eckhardt et al., 2020). Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions using QIAzol Lysis Reagent. Purification with RNeasy Mini Columns (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) was subsequently performed. On-column RNase-free DNase solution (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), was applied to degrade contaminating genomic DNA. RNA quantity was assessed with Nanodrop spectrophotometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE). Standard reverse transcriptase was performed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies, Foster City, CA). Transcript mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR on the ABI Prism 7900HT Real Time System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA), using SYBR green (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The mouse primer sequences, designed using Primer Express Software Version 3.0 (Applied Biosystems), for the genes measured by SYBR green are provided in Supplementary file 1. Input RNA was normalized using two reference genes (Actb, Gapdh) from which the most stable reference gene was determined by the geNorm algorithm. For each sample, the median cycle threshold (Ct) of each gene (run in triplicate) was normalized to the geometric mean of the median Ct of the most stable reference gene. The delta Ct for each gene was used to calculate the relative mRNA expression changes for each sample. Genes with Ct values > 35 were considered not expressed (NE), as done previously (Farr et al., 2016).

Senescence-associated distension of satellites (SADS) analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Our group recently demonstrated that with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), senescent cells display large-scale unraveling of peri-centromeric satellite heterochromatin DNA, referred to as SADS, a feature of senescent cells which has been demonstrated in osteocytes, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, glial cells and multiple other cell types (Farr et al., 2017; Farr et al., 2019; Ogrodnik et al., 2019; Swanson et al., 2013). As described in detail previously, SADS identification was performed on non-decalcified mouse femur sections by FISH (Farr et al., 2017; Farr et al., 2019; Farr and Khosla, 2019). We cut longitudinal femur sections and assessed the SADS-positive cells within the callus area. After 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) crosslinking of femur sections for 20 min, sections were washed three times (five minutes each in PBS), and dehydrated in ethanol (70%, 90%, 100%, each for 3 min). Sections were air dried, denatured for 10 min at 80 °C in hybridization buffer (0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2; 25 mM MgCl₂; 70 % formamide [Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO], 5 % blocking reagent [Roche] with 1.0 μg/mL of Cy3-labeled (F3002) CENPB-specific [ATTCGTTGGAAACGGGA] peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe [Panagene Inc, Korea]) and hybridized in a dark room for 2 hr at room temperature (RT). Subsequently, the femur sections were washed and mounted with vectashield DAPI-containing mounting media (Life Technologies). With a confocal microscope, SADS (i.e. decondensed and elongated centromeres) were visualized and quantified in a blinded fashion; a senescent cell was defined with a cut-off ≥4 SADS per cell (Farr et al., 2017; Farr et al., 2019).

Western blot analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Protein was isolated from the pink, organic phase obtained after RNA extraction using QIAzol as previously described (Hummon et al., 2007). Briefly, 300 µl ethanol were added to approximately 700 µl organic phase and incubated at RT for 3 min. Upon centrifugation (2000xg, 4 °C, 5 min), the supernatant was mixed with 1.5 ml isopropanol and incubated at RT for 10 min. Samples were spun down (12,000xg, 4 °C, 10 min) and the pellet was resuspended in 2 ml 0.3 M guanidine hydrochloride in 95 % ethanol and kept at RT for 20 min. After centrifugation (12,000xg, 4 °C, 5 min), the previous step was repeated by resuspending the pellet in 0.3 M guanidine hydrochloride, incubating at RT and spinning down the sample. This step was repeated by washing the protein pellet in ethanol and air-drying at RT for 5 min. Proteins were solubilized in 0.5 ml 1 % SDS and after centrifugation (10,000xg, 4 °C, 10 min), protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford assay (Bio Rad, 5000201) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 4× Laemmli buffer (Bio Rad, 161–0747) was added, samples were boiled at 95 °C for 5 min and 20 µg protein/sample was separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane (0.45 μm, IPVH00010, Millipore) and detected using antibodies targeting Cdkn2a^INK4A (Abcam, #ab211542, 1:1000) and Beta-Actin (Cell Signaling, #4970, 1:1000). After incubation with HRP-coupled secondary antibodies, proteins were visualized using a BioRad Universal Hood II Gel Documentation System.

Telomere-associated foci (TAF) analysis

Request a detailed protocol

To determine cellular senescence in the diaphyseal bone and callus, TAF was performed on murine left femora of non-decalcified methylmethacrylate (MMA)-embedded sections (n = 4/group, n = 16 altogether, all male). Our protocol was adapted from Coppé et al., 2008 and described before (Eckhardt et al., 2020). In brief, bone sections were de-plasticized and hydrated in EtOH gradient followed by water and PBS. Antigen was retrieved by incubation in Tris-EDTA (pH 9.0) at 95 °C for 15 min. After cool-down and hydration with water and PBS (0.5 % Tween-20/0.1 % Triton100X), slides were placed in a blocking buffer (1:60 normal goat serum [Vector Laboratories; Cat. #S-1000] in 0.1 % BSA/PBS) for 30 min at RT. The primary antibody targeting γ-H2A.X (Cell Signaling, #9718, 1:200) was diluted in blocking buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humid chamber. The next day, slides were washed with 0.5 % Tween-20/0.1 % Triton100X in PBS followed by PBS alone, and then incubated for 30 min with secondary goat, anti-rabbit antibody biotinylated (Vector Laboratories, #BA-1000, 1:200) in blocking buffer. Afterwards, slides were washed with 0.5 % Tween-20/0.1 % Triton100X in PBS followed by PBS alone, and then incubated for 60 min with the tertiary antibody (Cy5 Streptavidin, Vector Laboratories, #SA-1500, 1:500) in PBS. Slides were subsequently washed three times with PBS, followed by FISH for TAF detection. Following 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) crosslinking for 20 min, sections were washed three times (5 min each in PBS), and dehydrated in graded ice-cold EtOH (70%, 90%, and 100 % for 3 min each). Sections were dried and denatured for 10 min at 80 °C in hybridization buffer (0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2, 25 mM MgCl2, 70 % formamide [Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO], 5 % blocking reagent [Roche] with 1.0 μg/mL of Cy-3-labeled telomere-specific [CCCTAA] peptide nucleic acid [PNA] probe [TelC-Cy3, Panagene Inc, Korea; Cat. #F1002]). The slides were then hybridized in a humid chamber for 2 hr at RT. Sections were washed and mounted with vectashield DAPI-containing mounting media (Life Technologies) prior to image acquisition and analysis. The number of TAF per cell was quantified in a blinded fashion by examining overlap of signals from the telomere probe with γ-H2A.X. The mean number of TAF per cell in bone diaphysis and/ or callus was quantified using FIJI (Image J; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), and the percentage (%) of TAF-positive (TAF+) cells was calculated for each mouse based on the following criteria: % of cells with ≥1 TAF, % of cells with ≥2 TAF, and % of cells with ≥3 TAF, respectively. A senescent cell was defined with a cut-off ≥3 TAF per cell (Anderson et al., 2019).

Cell culture experiments

Request a detailed protocol

Metaphyses were cut in the right tibia, both femora and both humeri to flush the bone marrow and culture bone marrow MSCs in 75 ml flasks at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 in growth medium (DMEM, 15 % FBS, 1 % Glutamax (100 x), 1 % Anti/Anti (100 x), 0.5 % Gentamicin). The medium was changed every other day and cells were plated onto 24- or 96-well plates for functional characterization assays. Senescence was induced by treating cells with 100 μM H2O2 for 4 hr (Dasari et al., 2006; Duan et al., 2005; Kornienko et al., 2019; Park et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2021). In vitro senolytics treatment was performed by incubating cells with 200 nM Dasatinib and 50 μM Quercetin or DMSO as vehicle for 24 hr as described elsewhere (Zhu et al., 2015).

SA-Β-Gal staining

Request a detailed protocol

To assess senescence in vitro, cellular SA-β-Gal activity was measured as described previously (Xu et al., 2015b). After BMSCs were washed in PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed with 2 % formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) and 25 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min, they were washed three times using PBS. Cells were then incubated in SA-β-Gal solution (1 mg/ml X-Gal, 40 mM citric acid, pH 6.0, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl₂) at 37 °C for 16 hr. Cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and stored in PBS at 37 °C until analysis. DAPI (Life Technologies) was used to stain nuclei for cell counting. In blinded fashion, ten images per well were taken from random fields using fluorescence microscopy (Nikon Eclipse Ti). Total cell numbers were determined automatically (IX Pico, Molecular Devices, processed using the CellReporterXpress software) and visualized using crystal violet. For this purpose, cells were fixed in 4 % formaldehyde in PBS for 20 min and, upon washing with PBS, stained with 1 % (w/v) crystal violet in 20 % ethanol for 20 min. Excess dye was removed and upon drying, images were acquired.

Statistics

Graphical data are shown as Means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) unless otherwise specified. The sample sizes were determined based on previously conducted and published experiments (e.g. Farr et al., 2016; Farr et al., 2017) in which statistically significant differences were observed among various bone parameters in response to multiple interventions in our laboratory. The used animal numbers are indicated in the Figure Legends; all samples presented represent biological replicates. No mice, samples, or data points were excluded from analyses. Data were examined for normality and distribution using dot plots and histograms; all variables were examined for skewness and kurtosis. If the normality or equal variance assumptions for parametric analysis methods were not met, data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (e.g. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, Mann-Whitney U test). For parametric tests, depending on the comparison, differences between groups were analyzed by independent samples t-test or one-way ANOVA, where justified as appropriate. When ANOVA determined a statistically significant (p < 0.05) effect, pairwise multiple comparisons were performed and the Tukey post-hoc method was applied. Statistical analyses were performed using either GraphPad Prism (Version 9.0) or R version 4.0.2. A p-value < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Data availability

RNA-seq data was generated from GSE152677.

The following previously published data sets were used

1. Coates BA
2. McKenzie JA
3. Buettmann EG
4. Liu X
5. Gontarz PM
6. Zhang B
7. Silva MJ
(2020) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
ID GSE152677. Transcriptional profiling of intramembranous and endochondral ossification after fracture in mice.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152677

References

1. Acosta JC
2. Banito A
3. Wuestefeld T
4. Georgilis A
5. Janich P
6. Morton JP
7. Athineos D
8. Kang TW
9. Lasitschka F
10. Andrulis M
11. Pascual G
12. Morris KJ
13. Khan S
14. Jin H
15. Dharmalingam G
16. Snijders AP
17. Carroll T
18. Capper D
19. Pritchard C
20. Inman GJ
21. Longerich T
22. Sansom OJ
23. Benitah SA
24. Zender L
25. Gil J
(2013) A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence
Nature Cell Biology 15:978–990.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2784
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Alquicira-Hernandez J
2. Powell JE
(2021) Nebulosa recovers single cell gene expression signals by kernel density estimation
Bioinformatics 18:btab003.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab003
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Anderson R
2. Lagnado A
3. Maggiorani D
4. Walaszczyk A
5. Dookun E
6. Chapman J
7. Birch J
8. Salmonowicz H
9. Ogrodnik M
10. Jurk D
11. Proctor C
12. Correia-Melo C
13. Victorelli S
14. Fielder E
15. Berlinguer-Palmini R
16. Owens A
17. Greaves LC
18. Kolsky KL
19. Parini A
20. Douin-Echinard V
21. LeBrasseur NK
22. Arthur HM
23. Tual-Chalot S
24. Schafer MJ
25. Roos CM
26. Miller JD
27. Robertson N
28. Mann J
29. Adams PD
30. Tchkonia T
31. Kirkland JL
32. Mialet-Perez J
33. Richardson GD
34. Passos JF
(2019) Length-independent telomere damage drives post-mitotic cardiomyocyte senescence
The EMBO Journal 38:e100492.
https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100492
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2011) Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders
Nature 479:232–236.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10600
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Baryawno N
2. Przybylski D
3. Kowalczyk MS
4. Kfoury Y
5. Severe N
6. Gustafsson K
7. Kokkaliaris KD
8. Mercier F
9. Tabaka M
10. Hofree M
11. Dionne D
12. Papazian A
13. Lee D
14. Ashenberg O
15. Subramanian A
16. Vaishnav ED
17. Rozenblatt-Rosen O
18. Regev A
19. Scadden DT
(2019) A Cellular Taxonomy of the Bone Marrow Stroma in Homeostasis and Leukemia
Cell 177:1915–1932.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.040
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Basisty N
2. Kale A
3. Jeon OH
4. Kuehnemann C
5. Payne T
6. Rao C
7. Holtz A
8. Shah S
9. Sharma V
10. Ferrucci L
11. Campisi J
12. Schilling B
(2020) A proteomic atlas of senescence-associated secretomes for aging biomarker development
PLOS Biology 18:e3000599.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000599
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Braun H
2. Schmidt BMW
3. Raiss M
4. Baisantry A
5. Mircea-Constantin D
6. Wang S
7. Gross ML
8. Serrano M
9. Schmitt R
10. Melk A
(2012) Cellular senescence limits regenerative capacity and allograft survival
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 23:1467–1473.
https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011100967
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Burd CE
2. Sorrentino JA
3. Clark KS
4. Darr DB
5. Krishnamurthy J
6. Deal AM
7. Bardeesy N
8. Castrillon DH
9. Beach DH
10. Sharpless NE
(2013) Monitoring tumorigenesis and senescence in vivo with a p16(INK4a)-luciferase model
Cell 152:340–351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.010
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Butler A
2. Hoffman P
3. Smibert P
4. Papalexi E
5. Satija R
(2018) tegrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Nature Biotechnology 36:411–420.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chandra A
2. Lagnado AB
3. Farr JN
4. Monroe DG
5. Park S
6. Hachfeld C
7. Tchkonia T
8. Kirkland JL
9. Khosla S
10. Passos JF
11. Pignolo RJ
(2020) Targeted reduction of senescent cell burden alleviates focal radiotherapy-related bone loss
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 35:1119–1131.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3978
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions
Nature Reviews. Rheumatology 8:133–143.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Coates BA
2. McKenzie JA
3. Buettmann EG
4. Liu X
5. Gontarz PM
6. Zhang B
7. Silva MJ
(2019) Transcriptional profiling of intramembranous and endochondral ossification after fracture in mice
Bone 127:577–591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.022
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Coppé JP
2. Patil CK
3. Rodier F
4. Sun Y
5. Muñoz DP
6. Goldstein J
7. Nelson PS
8. Desprez PY
9. Campisi J
(2008) Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor
PLOS Biology 6:0060301.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression
Annual Review of Pathology 5:99–118.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144
- Google Scholar
(2006) Oxidative stress induces premature senescence by stimulating caveolin-1 gene transcription through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/Sp1-mediated activation of two GC-rich promoter elements
Cancer Research 66:10805–10814.
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1236
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. de Magalhães JP
2. Passos JF
(2018) Stress, cell senescence and organismal ageing
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 170:2–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2017.07.001
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Demaria M
2. Ohtani N
3. Youssef SA
4. Rodier F
5. Toussaint W
6. Mitchell JR
7. Laberge RM
8. Vijg J
9. Van Steeg H
10. Dollé MET
11. Hoeijmakers JHJ
12. de Bruin A
13. Hara E
14. Campisi J
(2014) An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA
Developmental Cell 31:722–733.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Duan J
2. Duan J
3. Zhang Z
4. Tong T
(2005) Irreversible cellular senescence induced by prolonged exposure to H2O2 involves DNA-damage-and-repair genes and telomere shortening
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 37:1407–1420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2005.01.010
- Google Scholar
1. Eckhardt BA
2. Rowsey JL
3. Thicke BS
4. Fraser DG
5. O’Grady KL
6. Bondar OP
7. Hines JM
8. Singh RJ
9. Thoreson AR
10. Rakshit K
11. Lagnado AB
12. Passos JF
13. Vella A
14. Matveyenko AV
15. Khosla S
16. Monroe DG
17. Farr JN
(2020) Accelerated osteocyte senescence and skeletal fragility in mice with type 2 diabetes
JCI Insight 5:135236.
https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.135236
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farr JN
2. Fraser DG
3. Wang H
4. Jaehn K
5. Ogrodnik MB
6. Weivoda MM
7. Drake MT
8. Tchkonia T
9. LeBrasseur NK
10. Kirkland JL
11. Bonewald LF
12. Pignolo RJ
13. Monroe DG
14. Khosla S
(2016) Identification of Senescent Cells in the Bone Microenvironment
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 31:1920–1929.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2892
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farr JN
2. Xu M
3. Weivoda MM
4. Monroe DG
5. Fraser DG
6. Onken JL
7. Negley BA
8. Sfeir JG
9. Ogrodnik MB
10. Hachfeld CM
11. LeBrasseur NK
12. Drake MT
13. Pignolo RJ
14. Pirtskhalava T
15. Tchkonia T
16. Oursler MJ
17. Kirkland JL
18. Khosla S
(2017) Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice
Nature Medicine 23:1072–1079.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4385
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farr JN
2. Almeida M
(2018) The Spectrum of Fundamental Basic Science Discoveries Contributing to Organismal Aging
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33:1568–1584.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3564
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farr JN
2. Khosla S
(2019) Cellular senescence in bone
Bone 121:121–133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.01.015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Farr JN
2. Rowsey JL
3. Eckhardt BA
4. Thicke BS
5. Fraser DG
6. Tchkonia T
7. Kirkland JL
8. Monroe DG
9. Khosla S
(2019) Independent roles of estrogen deficiency and cellular senescence in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis: evidence in young adult mice and older humans
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 34:1407–1418.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3729
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hewitt G
2. Jurk D
3. Marques FDM
4. Correia-Melo C
5. Hardy T
6. Gackowska A
7. Anderson R
8. Taschuk M
9. Mann J
10. Passos JF
(2012) Telomeres are favoured targets of a persistent DNA damage response in ageing and stress-induced senescence
Nature Communications 3:708.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1708
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) Isolation and solubilization of proteins after TRIzol extraction of RNA and DNA from patient material following prolonged storage
BioTechniques 42:467–470.
https://doi.org/10.2144/000112401
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jurk D
2. Wilson C
3. Passos JF
4. Oakley F
5. Correia-Melo C
6. Greaves L
7. Saretzki G
8. Fox C
9. Lawless C
10. Anderson R
11. Hewitt G
12. Pender SL
13. Fullard N
14. Nelson G
15. Mann J
16. van de Sluis B
17. Mann DA
18. von Zglinicki T
(2014) Chronic inflammation induces telomere dysfunction and accelerates ageing in mice
Nature Communications 2:4172.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5172
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Inhibiting cellular senescence: a new therapeutic paradigm for age-related osteoporosis
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 103:1282–1290.
https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02694
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) The role of cellular senescence in ageing and endocrine disease
Nature Reviews. Endocrinology 16:263–275.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-020-0335-y
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) High doses of synthetic antioxidants induce premature senescence in cultivated mesenchymal stem cells
Scientific Reports 9:1296.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37972-y
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) On the evolution of cellular senescence
Aging Cell 19:e13270.
https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13270
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lagnado A
2. Leslie J
3. Ruchaud-Sparagano MH
4. Victorelli S
5. Hirsova P
6. Ogrodnik M
7. Collins AL
8. Vizioli MG
9. Habiballa L
10. Saretzki G
11. Evans SA
12. Salmonowicz H
13. Hruby A
14. Geh D
15. Pavelko KD
16. Dolan D
17. Reeves HL
18. Grellscheid S
19. Wilson CH
20. Pandanaboyana S
21. Doolittle M
22. von Zglinicki T
23. Oakley F
24. Gallage S
25. Wilson CL
26. Birch J
27. Carroll B
28. Chapman J
29. Heikenwalder M
30. Neretti N
31. Khosla S
32. Masuda CA
33. Tchkonia T
34. Kirkland JL
35. Jurk D
36. Mann DA
37. Passos JF
(2021) Neutrophils induce paracrine telomere dysfunction and senescence in ROS-dependent manner
The EMBO Journal 40:e106048.
https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020106048
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liu YZ
2. Akhter MP
3. Gao X
4. Wang XY
5. Wang XB
6. Zhao G
7. Wei X
8. Wu HJ
9. Chen H
10. Wang D
11. Cui L
(2018) Glucocorticoid-induced delayed fracture healing and impaired bone biomechanical properties in mice
Clinical Interventions in Aging 13:1465–1474.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S167431
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) The hallmarks of aging
Cell 153:1194–1217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Marsell R
2. Einhorn TA
(2011) The biology of fracture healing
Jury 42:551–555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019)
Danger signals and inflammaging in osteoarthritis

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 37:48–56.
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) A senescent cell bystander effect: senescence-induced senescence
Aging Cell 11:345–349.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00795.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ogrodnik M
2. Zhu Y
3. Langhi LGP
4. Tchkonia T
5. Krüger P
6. Fielder E
7. Victorelli S
8. Ruswhandi RA
9. Giorgadze N
10. Pirtskhalava T
11. Podgorni O
12. Enikolopov G
13. Johnson KO
14. Xu M
15. Inman C
16. Palmer AK
17. Schafer M
18. Weigl M
19. Ikeno Y
20. Burns TC
21. Passos JF
22. von Zglinicki T
23. Kirkland JL
24. Jurk D
(2019) Obesity-Induced Cellular Senescence Drives Anxiety and Impairs Neurogenesis
Cell Metabolism 29:1061–1077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Özcan S
2. Alessio N
3. Acar MB
4. Mert E
5. Omerli F
6. Peluso G
7. Galderisi U
(2016) Unbiased analysis of senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP) to identify common components following different genotoxic stresses
Aging 8:1316–1329.
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100971
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Senolytics: Potential for Alleviating Diabetes and Its Complications
Endocrinology 162:bqab058.
https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqab058
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Park SY
2. Jeong AJ
3. Kim GY
4. Jo A
5. Lee JE
6. Leem SH
7. Yoon JH
8. Ye SK
9. Chung JW
(2017) Lactoferrin Protects Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Oxidative Stress-Induced Senescence and Apoptosis
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27:1877–1884.
https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1707.07040
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Scarless wound healing: From development to senescence
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 146:325–343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Saul D
2. Weber M
3. Zimmermann MH
4. Kosinsky RL
5. Hoffmann DB
6. Menger B
7. Taudien S
8. Lehmann W
9. Komrakova M
10. Sehmisch S
(2019) Effect of the lipoxygenase inhibitor baicalein on bone tissue and bone healing in ovariectomized rats
Nutrition & Metabolism 16:4.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-018-0327-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Saul D
2. Kosinsky RL
(2021) Epigenetics of Aging and Aging-Associated Diseases
Ternational Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:E401.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010401
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Targeting Senescent Cells in Fibrosis: Pathology, Paradox, and Practical Considerations
Current Rheumatology Reports 20:3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-018-0712-x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Supek F
2. Bošnjak M
3. Škunca N
4. Šmuc T
5. Gibas C
(2011) REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms
PLOS ONE 6:e21800.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021800
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) Higher-order unfolding of satellite heterochromatin is a consistent and early event in cell senescence
The Journal of Cell Biology 203:929–942.
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201306073
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype: therapeutic opportunities
The Journal of Clinical Investigation 123:966–972.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI64098
- Google Scholar
(2021) New Horizons: Novel Approaches to Enhance Healthspan Through Targeting Cellular Senescence and Related Aging Mechanisms
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 106:e1481–e1487.
https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa728
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Undale A
2. Fraser D
3. Hefferan T
4. Kopher RA
5. Herrick J
6. Evans GL
7. Li X
8. Kakar S
9. Hayes M
10. Atkinson E
11. Yaszemski MJ
12. Kaufman DS
13. Westendorf JJ
14. Khosla S
(2011) Induction of fracture repair by mesenchymal cells derived from human embryonic stem cells or bone marrow
Journal of Orthopaedic Research 29:1804–1811.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21480
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. van Gastel N
2. Stegen S
3. Eelen G
4. Schoors S
5. Carlier A
6. Daniëls VW
7. Baryawno N
8. Przybylski D
9. Depypere M
10. Stiers PJ
11. Lambrechts D
12. Van Looveren R
13. Torrekens S
14. Sharda A
15. Agostinis P
16. Lambrechts D
17. Maes F
18. Swinnen JV
19. Geris L
20. Van Oosterwyck H
21. Thienpont B
22. Carmeliet P
23. Scadden DT
24. Carmeliet G
(2020) Lipid availability determines fate of skeletal progenitor cells via SOX9
Nature 579:111–117.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2050-1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wang C
2. Inzana JA
3. Mirando AJ
4. Ren Y
5. Liu Z
6. Shen J
7. O’Keefe RJ
8. Awad HA
9. Hilton MJ
(2016) NOTCH signaling in skeletal progenitors is critical for fracture repair
The Journal of Clinical Investigation 126:1471–1481.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI80672
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wehrle E
2. Kuhn GA
3. Scheuren AC
4. Hofmann S
5. Müller R
(2019) Evaluation of longitudinal time-lapsed in vivo micro-CT for monitoring fracture healing in mouse femur defect models
Scientific Reports 9:17445.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53822-x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wilkinson HN
2. Hardman MJ
(2020) Senescence in Wound Repair: Emerging Strategies to Target Chronic Healing Wounds
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 8:773.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00773
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xu M
2. Palmer AK
3. Ding H
4. Weivoda MM
5. Pirtskhalava T
6. White TA
7. Sepe A
8. Johnson KO
9. Stout MB
10. Giorgadze N
11. Jensen MD
12. LeBrasseur NK
13. Tchkonia T
14. Kirkland JL
(2015a) Targeting senescent cells enhances adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age
eLife 4:e12997.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12997
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xu M
2. Tchkonia T
3. Ding H
4. Ogrodnik M
5. Lubbers ER
6. Pirtskhalava T
7. White TA
8. Johnson KO
9. Stout MB
10. Mezera V
11. Giorgadze N
12. Jensen MD
13. LeBrasseur NK
14. Kirkland JL
(2015b) JAK inhibition alleviates the cellular senescence-associated secretory phenotype and frailty in old age
PNAS 112:6301–6310.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515386112
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xu M
2. Pirtskhalava T
3. Farr JN
4. Weigand BM
5. Palmer AK
6. Weivoda MM
7. Inman CL
8. Ogrodnik MB
9. Hachfeld CM
10. Fraser DG
11. Onken JL
12. Johnson KO
13. Verzosa GC
14. Langhi LGP
15. Weigl M
16. Giorgadze N
17. LeBrasseur NK
18. Miller JD
19. Jurk D
20. Singh RJ
21. Allison DB
22. Ejima K
23. Hubbard GB
24. Ikeno Y
25. Cubro H
26. Garovic VD
27. Hou X
28. Weroha SJ
29. Robbins PD
30. Niedernhofer LJ
31. Khosla S
32. Tchkonia T
33. Kirkland JL
(2018) Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age
Nature Medicine 24:1246–1256.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0092-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xu M
2. Su X
3. Xiao X
4. Yu H
5. Li X
6. Keating A
7. Wang S
8. Zhao RC
(2021) Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Senescence Reduces the Wound Healing-Promoting Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Partially via miR-146a
Aging and Disease 12:102–115.
https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2020.0624
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yao Z
2. Murali B
3. Ren Q
4. Luo X
5. Faget DV
6. Cole T
7. Ricci B
8. Thotala D
9. Monahan J
10. van Deursen JM
11. Baker D
12. Faccio R
13. Schwarz JK
14. Stewart SA
(2020) Therapy-Induced Senescence Drives Bone Loss
Cancer Research 80:1171–1182.
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2348
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhu Y
2. Tchkonia T
3. Pirtskhalava T
4. Gower AC
5. Ding H
6. Giorgadze N
7. Palmer AK
8. Ikeno Y
9. Hubbard GB
10. Lenburg M
11. O’Hara SP
12. LaRusso NF
13. Miller JD
14. Roos CM
15. Verzosa GC
16. LeBrasseur NK
17. Wren JD
18. Farr JN
19. Khosla S
20. Stout MB
21. McGowan SJ
22. Fuhrmann-Stroissnigg H
23. Gurkar AU
24. Zhao J
25. Colangelo D
26. Dorronsoro A
27. Ling YY
28. Barghouthy AS
29. Navarro DC
30. Sano T
31. Robbins PD
32. Niedernhofer LJ
33. Kirkland JL
(2015) The Achilles’ heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs
Aging Cell 14:644–658.
https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12344
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Dominik Saul
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
3. Department of Trauma, Orthopedics and Reconstructive Surgery, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Resources, Supervision, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0673-3710
David G Monroe
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
3. Division of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Jennifer L Rowsey
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Robyn Laura Kosinsky

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Stephanie J Vos
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Madison L Doolittle
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Joshua N Farr
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
3. Division of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
Farr.Joshua@mayo.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3179-6414
Sundeep Khosla
1. Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
2. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
3. Department of Trauma, Orthopedics and Reconstructive Surgery, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
4. Division of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
khosla.sundeep@mayo.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2936-4372

Funding

National Institute on Aging (P01 AG062413)

Joshua N Farr
Sundeep Khosla

National Institute on Aging (R21 AG065868)

Joshua N Farr
Sundeep Khosla

National Institute on Aging (R01 AG063707)

David G Monroe

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK128552)

Joshua N Farr

German Research Foundation (413501650)

Dominik Saul

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, 413501650) (DS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants P01 AG062413 (SK, JNF), R21 AG065868 (SK, JNF), R01 DK128552 (JNF), R01 AG063707 (DGM), and Mildred Scheel postdoc fellowship by the German Cancer Aid (RLK).

Ethics

Animal studies were performed under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and experiments were performed in accordance with Mayo Clinic IACUC guidelines.

Version history

Received: May 2, 2021
Preprint posted: May 19, 2021 (view preprint)
Accepted: September 29, 2021
Accepted Manuscript published: October 7, 2021 (version 1)
Version of Record published: October 19, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.