The mycobacterial ImuA'-ImuB-DnaE2 mutasome: composition and recruitment in live cells

  1. Sophia Gessner
  2. Zela Alexandria-Mae Martin
  3. Michael Anton Reiche
  4. Joana A Santos
  5. Ryan Dinkele
  6. Atondaho Ramudzuli
  7. Neeraj Dhar
  8. Timothy J de Wet
  9. Saber Anoosheh
  10. Dirk M Lang
  11. Jesse Arron
  12. Teng Leong Chew
  13. Jennifer Herrmann
  14. Rolf Müller
  15. John D McKinney
  16. Roger Woodgate
  17. Valerie Mizrahi
  18. Česlovas Venclovas
  19. Meindert Hugo Lamers
  20. Digby F Warner  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Cape Town, South Africa
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
  4. University of Saskatchewan, Canada
  5. Umeå University, Sweden
  6. Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland, Germany
  7. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland
  8. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States
  9. Vilnius University, Lithuania

Abstract

A DNA damage-inducible mutagenic gene cassette has been implicated in the emergence of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis during anti-tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy. However, the molecular composition and operation of the encoded 'mycobacterial mutasome' - minimally comprising DnaE2 polymerase and ImuA′ and ImuB accessory proteins - remain elusive. Following exposure of mycobacteria to DNA damaging agents, we observe that DnaE2 and ImuB co-localize with the DNA polymerase III β subunit (β clamp) in distinct intracellular foci. Notably, genetic inactivation of the mutasome in an imuBAAAAGG mutant containing a disrupted β clamp-binding motif abolishes ImuB-β clamp focus formation, a phenotype recapitulated pharmacologically by treating bacilli with griselimycin and in biochemical assays in which this β clamp-binding antibiotic collapses pre-formed ImuB-β clamp complexes. These observations establish the essentiality of the ImuB-β clamp interaction for mutagenic DNA repair in mycobacteria, identifying the mutasome as target for adjunctive therapeutics designed to protect anti-TB drugs against emerging resistance.

Data availability

Source data for all figures contained in the manuscript and SI have been deposited in Dryad; see https://datadryad.org/stash/share/fjhwiXFEIIM5-6liMtXIQn0Ehq4NIKZ3690FiR8lWyI.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sophia Gessner

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zela Alexandria-Mae Martin

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Anton Reiche

    Advanced Imaging Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Joana A Santos

    Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ryan Dinkele

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Atondaho Ramudzuli

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Neeraj Dhar

    Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5887-8137
  8. Timothy J de Wet

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3978-5322
  9. Saber Anoosheh

    Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Dirk M Lang

    Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jesse Arron

    Advanced Imaging Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Teng Leong Chew

    Advanced Imaging Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jennifer Herrmann

    Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Rolf Müller

    Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland, Saarbrucken, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1042-5665
  15. John D McKinney

    School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0557-3479
  16. Roger Woodgate

    Laboratory of Genomic Integrity, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5581-4616
  17. Valerie Mizrahi

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4824-9115
  18. Česlovas Venclovas

    Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Meindert Hugo Lamers

    Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4205-1338
  20. Digby F Warner

    Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    For correspondence
    digby.warner@uct.ac.za
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4146-0930

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01HD085531)

  • Roger Woodgate
  • Digby F Warner

Norges Forskningsråd (261669)

  • Digby F Warner

South African Medical Research Council (SHIP and Extramural Unit)

  • Valerie Mizrahi
  • Digby F Warner

National Research Foundation

  • Valerie Mizrahi
  • Digby F Warner

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Senior International Research Scholars)

  • Valerie Mizrahi

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC Fellowship)

  • Meindert Hugo Lamers

National Research Foundation (104683)

  • Michael Anton Reiche

David and Elaine Potter Foundation (PhD Fellowship)

  • Zela Alexandria-Mae Martin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christina L Stallings, Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 16, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: November 17, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: August 1, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 2, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 11, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 825
    views
  • 143
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sophia Gessner
  2. Zela Alexandria-Mae Martin
  3. Michael Anton Reiche
  4. Joana A Santos
  5. Ryan Dinkele
  6. Atondaho Ramudzuli
  7. Neeraj Dhar
  8. Timothy J de Wet
  9. Saber Anoosheh
  10. Dirk M Lang
  11. Jesse Arron
  12. Teng Leong Chew
  13. Jennifer Herrmann
  14. Rolf Müller
  15. John D McKinney
  16. Roger Woodgate
  17. Valerie Mizrahi
  18. Česlovas Venclovas
  19. Meindert Hugo Lamers
  20. Digby F Warner
(2023)
The mycobacterial ImuA'-ImuB-DnaE2 mutasome: composition and recruitment in live cells
eLife 12:e75628.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75628

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75628

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Xiaolin Yu, Guangfei Duan ... Shi-Zhong Luo
    Research Article

    Secreted chemokines form concentration gradients in target tissues to control migratory directions and patterns of immune cells in response to inflammatory stimulation; however, how the gradients are formed is much debated. Heparan sulfate (HS) binds to chemokines and modulates their activities. In this study, we investigated the roles of HS in the gradient formation and chemoattractant activity of CCL5 that is known to bind to HS. CCL5 and heparin underwent liquid–liquid phase separation and formed gradient, which was confirmed using CCL5 immobilized on heparin-beads. The biological implication of HS in CCL5 gradient formation was established in CHO-K1 (wild-type) and CHO-677 (lacking HS) cells by Transwell assay. The effect of HS on CCL5 chemoattractant activity was further proved by Transwell assay of human peripheral blood cells. Finally, peritoneal injection of the chemokines into mice showed reduced recruitment of inflammatory cells either by mutant CCL5 (lacking heparin-binding sequence) or by addition of heparin to wild-type CCL5. Our experimental data propose that co-phase separation of CCL5 with HS establishes a specific chemokine concentration gradient to trigger directional cell migration. The results warrant further investigation on other heparin-binding chemokines and allows for a more elaborate insight into disease process and new treatment strategies.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Foteini Karapanagioti, Úlfur Águst Atlason ... Sebastian Obermaier
    Research Article

    The emergence of new protein functions is crucial for the evolution of organisms. This process has been extensively researched for soluble enzymes, but it is largely unexplored for membrane transporters, even though the ability to acquire new nutrients from a changing environment requires evolvability of transport functions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of environmental pressure in obtaining a new activity or altering a promiscuous activity in members of the amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC)-type yeast amino acid transporters family. We identify APC members that have broader substrate spectra than previously described. Using in vivo experimental evolution, we evolve two of these transporter genes, AGP1 and PUT4, toward new substrate specificities. Single mutations on these transporters are found to be sufficient for expanding the substrate range of the proteins, while retaining the capacity to transport all original substrates. Nonetheless, each adaptive mutation comes with a distinct effect on the fitness for each of the original substrates, illustrating a trade-off between the ancestral and evolved functions. Collectively, our findings reveal how substrate-adaptive mutations in membrane transporters contribute to fitness and provide insights into how organisms can use transporter evolution to explore new ecological niches.