Motor processivity and speed determine structure and dynamics of microtubule-motor assemblies

  1. Rachel A Banks
  2. Vahe Galstyan
  3. Heun Jin Lee
  4. Soichi Hirokawa
  5. Athena Ierokomos
  6. Tyler D Ross
  7. Zev Bryant
  8. Matthew Thomson
  9. Rob Phillips  Is a corresponding author
  1. California Institute of Technology, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States

Abstract

Active matter systems can generate highly ordered structures, avoiding equilibrium through the consumption of energy by individual constituents. How the microscopic parameters that characterize the active agents are translated to the observed mesoscopic properties of the assembly has remained an open question. These active systems are prevalent in living matter; for example, in cells, the cytoskeleton is organized into structures such as the mitotic spindle through the coordinated activity of many motor proteins walking along microtubules. Here, we investigate how the microscopic motor-microtubule interactions affect the coherent structures formed in a reconstituted motor-microtubule system. This question is of deeper evolutionary significance as we suspect motor and microtubule type contribute to the shape and size of resulting structures. We explore key parameters experimentally and theoretically, using a variety of motors with different speeds, processivities, and directionalities. We demonstrate that aster size depends on the motor used to create the aster, and develop a model for the distribution of motors and microtubules in steady-state asters that depends on parameters related to motor speed and processivity. Further, we show that network contraction rates scale linearly with the single-motor speed in quasi one-dimensional contraction experiments. In all, this theoretical and experimental work helps elucidate how microscopic motor properties are translated to the much larger scale of collective motor-microtubule assemblies.

Data availability

All data associated with this study are stored on the CaltechData archive at DOI 10.22002/D1.2152.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachel A Banks

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vahe Galstyan

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Heun Jin Lee

    Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Soichi Hirokawa

    Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5584-2676
  5. Athena Ierokomos

    Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tyler D Ross

    Department of Computing and Mathematical Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zev Bryant

    Department of Bioengi, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Matthew Thomson

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rob Phillips

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    phillips@pboc.caltech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3082-2809

Funding

Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi 1816)

  • Rachel A Banks
  • Vahe Galstyan
  • Heun Jin Lee
  • Soichi Hirokawa
  • Matthew Thomson
  • Rob Phillips

John Templeton Foundation (51250)

  • Rachel A Banks
  • Vahe Galstyan
  • Heun Jin Lee
  • Soichi Hirokawa
  • Matthew Thomson
  • Rob Phillips

National Institutes of Health (1R35 GM118043-01)

  • Rachel A Banks
  • Vahe Galstyan
  • Heun Jin Lee
  • Soichi Hirokawa
  • Rob Phillips

John Templeton Foundation (60973)

  • Rachel A Banks
  • Vahe Galstyan
  • Heun Jin Lee
  • Soichi Hirokawa
  • Matthew Thomson
  • Rob Phillips

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Banks et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,261
    views
  • 204
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rachel A Banks
  2. Vahe Galstyan
  3. Heun Jin Lee
  4. Soichi Hirokawa
  5. Athena Ierokomos
  6. Tyler D Ross
  7. Zev Bryant
  8. Matthew Thomson
  9. Rob Phillips
(2023)
Motor processivity and speed determine structure and dynamics of microtubule-motor assemblies
eLife 12:e79402.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79402

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79402

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee
    Research Article

    Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Marta Urbanska, Yan Ge ... Jochen Guck
    Research Article

    Cell mechanical properties determine many physiological functions, such as cell fate specification, migration, or circulation through vasculature. Identifying factors that govern the mechanical properties is therefore a subject of great interest. Here, we present a mechanomics approach for establishing links between single-cell mechanical phenotype changes and the genes involved in driving them. We combine mechanical characterization of cells across a variety of mouse and human systems with machine learning-based discriminative network analysis of associated transcriptomic profiles to infer a conserved network module of five genes with putative roles in cell mechanics regulation. We validate in silico that the identified gene markers are universal, trustworthy, and specific to the mechanical phenotype across the studied mouse and human systems, and demonstrate experimentally that a selected target, CAV1, changes the mechanical phenotype of cells accordingly when silenced or overexpressed. Our data-driven approach paves the way toward engineering cell mechanical properties on demand to explore their impact on physiological and pathological cell functions.