Lineage-specific differences and regulatory networks governing human chondrocyte development

Abstract

To address large gaps in our understanding of the molecular regulation of articular and growth plate cartilage development in humans, we used our directed differentiation approach to generate these distinct cartilage tissues from human embryonic stem cells. The resulting transcriptomic profiles of hESC-derived articular and growth plate chondrocytes were similar to fetal epiphyseal and growth plate chondrocytes, with respect to genes both known and previously unknown to cartilage biology. With the goal to characterize the regulatory landscapes accompanying these respective transcriptomes, we mapped chromatin accessibility in hESC-derived chondrocyte lineages, and mouse embryonic chondrocytes, using ATAC-sequencing. Integration of the expression dataset with the differentially accessible genomic regions revealed lineage-specific gene regulatory networks. We validated functional interactions of two transcription factors (RUNX2 in growth plate chondrocytes and RELA in articular chondrocytes) with their predicted genomic targets. The maps we provide thus represent a framework for probing regulatory interactions governing chondrocyte differentiation. This work constitutes a substantial step towards comprehensive and comparative molecular characterizations of distinct chondrogenic lineages, and sheds new light on human cartilage development and biology.

Data availability

The accession number for the raw ATAC-seq and RNA-seq datasets reported in this paper will be publicly available upon acceptance on GEO under accession GSE195688.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel Richard

    Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Steven Pregizer

    Department of Orthopedic Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Divya Venkatasubramanian

    Department of Orthopedic Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Rosanne M Raftery

    Department of Orthopedic Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pushpanathan Muthuirulan

    Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zun Liu

    Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Terence D Capellini

    Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. April M Craft

    Department of Orthopedic Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    april.craft@childrens.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4423-8008

Funding

NIAMS (R01-AR073821)

  • April M Craft

NIAMS (R01-AR070139)

  • Terence D Capellini

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Di Chen, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was performed according to approved institutional animal care and use committee protocols at Harvard University (IACUC 13-04-161).

Human subjects: Human fetal donor samples were collected from the first trimester termination via the University of Washington (UW) Birth Defects Research Laboratory (BRDL) in full compliance with the ethical guidelines of the NIH and with the approval of UW Review Boards for the collection and distribution of human tissue for research, and Harvard University and Boston Children's Hospital for the receipt and use of such materials, and Harvard University and Boston Children's Hospital for the receipt and use of such materials (Capellini: IRB16-1504; Craft: IRB-P00017303). This is not deemed human subjects research.All reported research involving human embryonic stem cells was approved by IRB (IRB-P00017303) and ESCRO (ESCRO-2015.4.24) regulatory bodies at Boston Children's Hospital.

Version history

  1. Received: May 3, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: May 25, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: March 14, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 15, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 3, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Richard et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,241
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniel Richard
  2. Steven Pregizer
  3. Divya Venkatasubramanian
  4. Rosanne M Raftery
  5. Pushpanathan Muthuirulan
  6. Zun Liu
  7. Terence D Capellini
  8. April M Craft
(2023)
Lineage-specific differences and regulatory networks governing human chondrocyte development
eLife 12:e79925.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79925

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79925

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Arya Y Nakhe, Prasanna K Dadi ... David A Jacobson
    Research Article

    The gain-of-function mutation in the TALK-1 K+ channel (p.L114P) is associated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). TALK-1 is a key regulator of β-cell electrical activity and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The KCNK16 gene encoding TALK-1 is the most abundant and β-cell-restricted K+ channel transcript. To investigate the impact of KCNK16 L114P on glucose homeostasis and confirm its association with MODY, a mouse model containing the Kcnk16 L114P mutation was generated. Heterozygous and homozygous Kcnk16 L114P mice exhibit increased neonatal lethality in the C57BL/6J and the CD-1 (ICR) genetic background, respectively. Lethality is likely a result of severe hyperglycemia observed in the homozygous Kcnk16 L114P neonates due to lack of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and can be reduced with insulin treatment. Kcnk16 L114P increased whole-cell β-cell K+ currents resulting in blunted glucose-stimulated Ca2+ entry and loss of glucose-induced Ca2+ oscillations. Thus, adult Kcnk16 L114P mice have reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and plasma insulin levels, which significantly impairs glucose homeostasis. Taken together, this study shows that the MODY-associated Kcnk16 L114P mutation disrupts glucose homeostasis in adult mice resembling a MODY phenotype and causes neonatal lethality by inhibiting islet insulin secretion during development. These data suggest that TALK-1 is an islet-restricted target for the treatment for diabetes.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Arne Elofsson, Ling Han ... Luca Jovine
    Research Article

    A crucial event in sexual reproduction is when haploid sperm and egg fuse to form a new diploid organism at fertilization. In mammals, direct interaction between egg JUNO and sperm IZUMO1 mediates gamete membrane adhesion, yet their role in fusion remains enigmatic. We used AlphaFold to predict the structure of other extracellular proteins essential for fertilization to determine if they could form a complex that may mediate fusion. We first identified TMEM81, whose gene is expressed by mouse and human spermatids, as a protein having structural homologies with both IZUMO1 and another sperm molecule essential for gamete fusion, SPACA6. Using a set of proteins known to be important for fertilization and TMEM81, we then systematically searched for predicted binary interactions using an unguided approach and identified a pentameric complex involving sperm IZUMO1, SPACA6, TMEM81 and egg JUNO, CD9. This complex is structurally consistent with both the expected topology on opposing gamete membranes and the location of predicted N-glycans not modeled by AlphaFold-Multimer, suggesting that its components could organize into a synapse-like assembly at the point of fusion. Finally, the structural modeling approach described here could be more generally useful to gain insights into transient protein complexes difficult to detect experimentally.