Abstract

Brains are not engineered solutions to a well-defined problem but arose through selective pressure acting on random variation. It is therefore unclear how well a model chosen by an experimenter can relate neural activity to experimental conditions. Here we developed 'Model identification of neural encoding (MINE)'. MINE is an accessible framework using convolutional neural networks (CNN) to discover and characterize a model that relates aspects of tasks to neural activity. Although flexible, CNNs are difficult to interpret. We use Taylor decomposition approaches to understand the discovered model and how it maps task features to activity. We apply MINE to a published cortical dataset as well as experiments designed to probe thermoregulatory circuits in zebrafish. MINE allowed us to characterize neurons according to their receptive field and computational complexity, features which anatomically segregate in the brain. We also identified a new class of neurons that integrate thermosensory and behavioral information which eluded us previously when using traditional clustering and regression-based approaches.

Data availability

All data generated in this study is publicly available. Links are provided in the 'Materials and Methods - Code and data availability' section.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jamie D Costabile

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    Jamie D Costabile, is employed by Hitachi Solutions America, Ltd., Irvine, CA.
  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sina Schwinn

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Martin Haesemeyer

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    haesemeyer.1@osu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2704-3601

Funding

National Institutes of Health (5R01NS123887-02)

  • Jamie D Costabile
  • Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  • Martin Haesemeyer

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

  • Sina Schwinn
  • Martin Haesemeyer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal handling and experimental procedures were approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol #: 2019A00000137 and 2019A00000137-R1).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Damon A Clark, Yale University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 3, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 6, 2022
  3. Accepted: June 5, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 6, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 29, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Costabile et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 978
    Page views
  • 130
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jamie D Costabile
  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  3. Sina Schwinn
  4. Martin Haesemeyer
(2023)
Model discovery to link neural activity to behavioral tasks
eLife 12:e83289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83289

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    David J Torres, Paulus Mrass ... Judy L Cannon
    Research Article Updated

    T cells are required to clear infection, and T cell motion plays a role in how quickly a T cell finds its target, from initial naive T cell activation by a dendritic cell to interaction with target cells in infected tissue. To better understand how different tissue environments affect T cell motility, we compared multiple features of T cell motion including speed, persistence, turning angle, directionality, and confinement of T cells moving in multiple murine tissues using microscopy. We quantitatively analyzed naive T cell motility within the lymph node and compared motility parameters with activated CD8 T cells moving within the villi of small intestine and lung under different activation conditions. Our motility analysis found that while the speeds and the overall displacement of T cells vary within all tissues analyzed, T cells in all tissues tended to persist at the same speed. Interestingly, we found that T cells in the lung show a marked population of T cells turning at close to 180o, while T cells in lymph nodes and villi do not exhibit this “reversing” movement. T cells in the lung also showed significantly decreased meandering ratios and increased confinement compared to T cells in lymph nodes and villi. These differences in motility patterns led to a decrease in the total volume scanned by T cells in lung compared to T cells in lymph node and villi. These results suggest that the tissue environment in which T cells move can impact the type of motility and ultimately, the efficiency of T cell search for target cells within specialized tissues such as the lung.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Ricardo Omar Ramirez Flores, Jan David Lanzer ... Julio Saez-Rodriguez
    Research Article

    Biomedical single-cell atlases describe disease at the cellular level. However, analysis of this data commonly focuses on cell-type centric pairwise cross-condition comparisons, disregarding the multicellular nature of disease processes. Here we propose multicellular factor analysis for the unsupervised analysis of samples from cross-condition single-cell atlases and the identification of multicellular programs associated with disease. Our strategy, which repurposes group factor analysis as implemented in multi-omics factor analysis, incorporates the variation of patient samples across cell-types or other tissue-centric features, such as cell compositions or spatial relationships, and enables the joint analysis of multiple patient cohorts, facilitating the integration of atlases. We applied our framework to a collection of acute and chronic human heart failure atlases and described multicellular processes of cardiac remodeling, independent to cellular compositions and their local organization, that were conserved in independent spatial and bulk transcriptomics datasets. In sum, our framework serves as an exploratory tool for unsupervised analysis of cross-condition single-cell atlases and allows for the integration of the measurements of patient cohorts across distinct data modalities.