1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Neuroscience

Model discovery to link neural activity to behavioral tasks

  1. Jamie D Costabile
  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  3. Sina Schwinn
  4. Martin Haesemeyer  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Ohio State University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83289
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Jamie D Costabile
  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  3. Sina Schwinn
  4. Martin Haesemeyer
(2023)
Model discovery to link neural activity to behavioral tasks
eLife 12:e83289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83289
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Brains are not engineered solutions to a well-defined problem but arose through selective pressure acting on random variation. It is therefore unclear how well a model chosen by an experimenter can relate neural activity to experimental conditions. Here we developed 'Model identification of neural encoding (MINE)'. MINE is an accessible framework using convolutional neural networks (CNN) to discover and characterize a model that relates aspects of tasks to neural activity. Although flexible, CNNs are difficult to interpret. We use Taylor decomposition approaches to understand the discovered model and how it maps task features to activity. We apply MINE to a published cortical dataset as well as experiments designed to probe thermoregulatory circuits in zebrafish. MINE allowed us to characterize neurons according to their receptive field and computational complexity, features which anatomically segregate in the brain. We also identified a new class of neurons that integrate thermosensory and behavioral information which eluded us previously when using traditional clustering and regression-based approaches.

Data availability

All data generated in this study is publicly available. Links are provided in the 'Materials and Methods - Code and data availability' section.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jamie D Costabile

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    Jamie D Costabile, is employed by Hitachi Solutions America, Ltd., Irvine, CA.

  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Sina Schwinn

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Martin Haesemeyer

    Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    haesemeyer.1@osu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2704-3601

Funding

National Institutes of Health (5R01NS123887-02)

  • Jamie D Costabile
  • Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  • Martin Haesemeyer

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

  • Sina Schwinn
  • Martin Haesemeyer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal handling and experimental procedures were approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol #: 2019A00000137 and 2019A00000137-R1).

Copyright

© 2023, Costabile et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,770
    views
  • 198
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jamie D Costabile
  2. Kaarthik A Balakrishnan
  3. Sina Schwinn
  4. Martin Haesemeyer
(2023)
Model discovery to link neural activity to behavioral tasks
eLife 12:e83289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83289

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83289

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology

    Barcode-free multiplex plasmid sequencing using Bayesian analysis and nanopore sequencing

    Masaaki Uematsu, Jeremy M Baskin
    Tools and Resources

    Plasmid construction is central to life science research, and sequence verification is arguably its costliest step. Long-read sequencing has emerged as a competitor to Sanger sequencing, with the principal benefit that whole plasmids can be sequenced in a single run. Nevertheless, the current cost of nanopore sequencing is still prohibitive for routine sequencing during plasmid construction. We develop a computational approach termed Simple Algorithm for Very Efficient Multiplexing of Oxford Nanopore Experiments for You (SAVEMONEY) that guides researchers to mix multiple plasmids and subsequently computationally de-mixes the resultant sequences. SAVEMONEY defines optimal mixtures in a pre-survey step, and following sequencing, executes a post-analysis workflow involving sequence classification, alignment, and consensus determination. By using Bayesian analysis with prior probability of expected plasmid construction error rate, high-confidence sequences can be obtained for each plasmid in the mixture. Plasmids differing by as little as two bases can be mixed as a single sample for nanopore sequencing, and routine multiplexing of even six plasmids per 180 reads can still maintain high accuracy of consensus sequencing. SAVEMONEY should further democratize whole-plasmid sequencing by nanopore and related technologies, driving down the effective cost of whole-plasmid sequencing to lower than that of a single Sanger sequencing run.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology

    In silico screening by AlphaFold2 program revealed the potential binding partners of nuage-localizing proteins and piRNA-related proteins

    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Neural population dynamics underlying evidence accumulation in multiple rat brain regions

    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.