Gut Bacteria: Synergy in symbiosis
Plants deploy a remarkable range of mechanical structures (such as thorns) and chemical weapons (such as toxins) to protect themselves against herbivores. Secondary metabolites from plants can harm herbivores by disrupting the transport of nutrients or the production of hormones. However, herbivores fight back by detoxifying, isolating or deactivating these metabolites (Mithöfer and Boland, 2012).
Gut microbes in herbivores are also involved in breaking down toxins into less dangerous chemicals (Dearing et al., 2022). Now, in eLife, Nancy Moran and colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin and the Gulbenkian Institute in Portugal – including Eric Motta as first author – report how symbiotic microbes can upgrade the detoxifying capacity of the Western honeybee against amygdalin, a widespread plant toxin (Motta et al., 2022).
Amygdalin is a cyanogenic compound that is found in the nectar and pollen of many of the plant species that bees frequent, including almond, apple and cherry trees. Although bees can fully degrade amygdalin, the mechanism behind this metabolism remained elusive.
Herbivores typically encode specific enzymes that help to break down plant toxins (Erb and Reymond, 2019). However, compared to other insects, bees encode relatively few of these genes, suggesting that the gut microbiome may be involved in degrading plant toxins, including amygdalin.
To test this hypothesis, Motta et al. compared the effects of amygdalin consumption in bees with and without their native gut microbes. They found that honeybees without their microbes can only partially degrade amygdalin into an intermediate, called prunasin. In honeybees harbouring gut microbes, on the other hand, amygdalin is fully broken down into hydrogen cyanide and other derivatives without apparent harmful effects on the bees (Figure 1).
Motta et al. then examined the different types of gut bacteria and their ability to cope with varying concentrations of amygdalin, and quantified the metabolic by-products. This revealed that only a few types of bacteria, including a strain of the genus Bifidobacterium, can break down amygdalin. Introducing this bacterial strain into honeybees without gut bacteria enabled them to fully degrade amygdalin, mirroring what happens in bees that harbour a native community of microbes.
Motta et al. then set out to identify the enzymes secreted by Bifidobacterium that are responsible for the break down. When grown in cultures containing amygdalin, the bacterium upregulated the expression of a gene encoding for glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 3, which belongs to a class of enzymes that is known to degrade amygdalin. Expressing the gene encoding GH3 in E. coli, which cannot normally degrade amygdalin, enabled it to break down the metabolite. This confirms the importance of GH3 for the metabolism of amygdalin.
Microbial symbionts are increasingly recognized for their role in reducing the toxicity of plant metabolites in insects. Local environments with a high abundance of toxins may exert a strong selection on microbes in these locations to degrade plant metabolites (Hammer and Bowers, 2015). Herbivores may leverage this metabolic diversity by acquiring new symbionts directly from the environment, or through the exchange of genetic material (e.g., horizontal gene transfer) between gut bacteria (Berasategui et al., 2017; Ceja-Navarro et al., 2015).
Gut symbionts in bees modulate a remarkable range of functions in their hosts, from fermenting complex sugars to fighting off parasites (Kwong et al., 2017; Kwong and Moran, 2016). Motta et al. show that these froles extend to metabolizing plant toxins. Characterizing amygdalin metabolism across different bee species would help clarify if the ability to fully degrade the toxin is a fixed feature of the gut microbiome, or if it is shaped by the environment and the distribution of amygdalin-producing plants. Ultimately, a better understanding of how hosts and gut symbionts interact to degrade toxins, may shed light on the effect of various plant metabolites on bee health, and the different strategies to counteract them.
References
-
Molecular interactions between plants and insect herbivoresAnnual Review of Plant Biology 70:527–557.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095910
-
Gut microbial communities of social beesNature Reviews. Microbiology 14:374–384.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.43
-
Dynamic microbiome evolution in social beesScience Advances 3:e1600513.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600513
-
Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspectsAnnual Review of Plant Biology 63:431–450.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Berasategui and Salem
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,140
- views
-
- 116
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
Honeybees use microbes to break down the toxins found in pollen and nectar
-
- Ecology
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Interspecies interactions involving direct competition via bacteriocin production play a vital role in shaping ecological dynamics within microbial ecosystems. For instance, the ribosomally produced siderophore bacteriocins, known as class IIb microcins, affect the colonization of host-associated pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae species. Notably, to date, only five of these antimicrobials have been identified, all derived from specific Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. We hypothesized that class IIb microcin production extends beyond these specific compounds and organisms. With a customized informatics-driven approach, screening bacterial genomes in public databases with BLAST and manual curation, we have discovered 12 previously unknown class IIb microcins in seven additional Enterobacteriaceae species, encompassing phytopathogens and environmental isolates. We introduce three novel clades of microcins (MccW, MccX, and MccZ), while also identifying eight new variants of the five known class IIb microcins. To validate their antimicrobial potential, we heterologously expressed these microcins in E. coli and demonstrated efficacy against a variety of bacterial isolates, including plant pathogens from the genera Brenneria, Gibbsiella, and Rahnella. Two newly discovered microcins exhibit activity against Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens, i.e., Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, providing the first evidence that class IIb microcins can target bacteria outside of the Enterobacteriaceae family. This study underscores that class IIb microcin genes are more prevalent in the microbial world than previously recognized and that synthetic hybrid microcins can be a viable tool to target clinically relevant drug-resistant pathogens. Our findings hold significant promise for the development of innovative engineered live biotherapeutic products tailored to combat these resilient bacteria.