Dynamics and maintenance of categorical responses in primary auditory cortex during task engagement

  1. Rupesh K Chillale
  2. Shihab Shamma
  3. Srdjan Ostojic
  4. Yves Boubenec  Is a corresponding author
  1. École Normale Supérieure - PSL, France
  2. University of Maryland, United States

Abstract

Grouping sets of sounds into relevant categories is an important cognitive ability that enables the association of stimuli with appropriate goal-directed behavioral responses. In perceptual tasks, the primary auditory cortex (A1) assumes a prominent role by concurrently encoding both sound sensory features and task-related variables. Here we sought to explore the role of A1 in the initiation of sound categorization, shedding light on its involvement in this cognitive process. We trained ferrets to discriminate click trains of different rates in a Go/No-Go delayed categorization task and recorded neural activity during both active behavior and passive exposure to the same sounds. Purely categorical response components were extracted and analyzed separately from sensory responses to reveal their contributions to the overall population response throughout the trials. We found that categorical activity emerged during sound presentation in the population average and was present in both active behavioral and passive states. However, upon task engagement, categorical responses to the No-Go category became suppressed in the population code, leading to an asymmetrical representation of the Go stimuli relative to the No-Go sounds and prestimulus baseline. The population code underwent an abrupt change at stimulus offset, with sustained responses after the Go sounds during the delay period. Notably, the categorical responses observed during the stimulus period exhibited a significant correlation with those extracted from the delay epoch, suggesting an early involvement of A1 in stimulus categorization.

Data availability

Data is available on Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8371083.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rupesh K Chillale

    Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Shihab Shamma

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Srdjan Ostojic

    Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives Computationnelle (INSERM U960), École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    Srdjan Ostojic, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7473-1223
  4. Yves Boubenec

    Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    boubenec@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0106-6947

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0017)

  • Rupesh K Chillale
  • Shihab Shamma
  • Srdjan Ostojic
  • Yves Boubenec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02)

  • Rupesh K Chillale
  • Shihab Shamma
  • Srdjan Ostojic
  • Yves Boubenec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-JCJC-DynaMiC)

  • Yves Boubenec

H2020 European Research Council (ERC 787836-NEUME)

  • Shihab Shamma

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (protocol authorization: 21022) andstrictly comply with the European directives on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes(2010/63/EU).

Copyright

© 2023, Chillale et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 775
    views
  • 136
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rupesh K Chillale
  2. Shihab Shamma
  3. Srdjan Ostojic
  4. Yves Boubenec
(2023)
Dynamics and maintenance of categorical responses in primary auditory cortex during task engagement
eLife 12:e85706.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85706

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85706

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Simonas Griesius, Amy Richardson, Dimitri Michael Kullmann
    Research Article

    Non-linear summation of synaptic inputs to the dendrites of pyramidal neurons has been proposed to increase the computation capacity of neurons through coincidence detection, signal amplification, and additional logic operations such as XOR. Supralinear dendritic integration has been documented extensively in principal neurons, mediated by several voltage-dependent conductances. It has also been reported in parvalbumin-positive hippocampal basket cells, in dendrites innervated by feedback excitatory synapses. Whether other interneurons, which support feed-forward or feedback inhibition of principal neuron dendrites, also exhibit local non-linear integration of synaptic excitation is not known. Here, we use patch-clamp electrophysiology, and two-photon calcium imaging and glutamate uncaging, to show that supralinear dendritic integration of near-synchronous spatially clustered glutamate-receptor mediated depolarization occurs in NDNF-positive neurogliaform cells and oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. Supralinear summation was detected via recordings of somatic depolarizations elicited by uncaging of glutamate on dendritic fragments, and, in neurogliaform cells, by concurrent imaging of dendritic calcium transients. Supralinearity was abolished by blocking NMDA receptors (NMDARs) but resisted blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Blocking L-type calcium channels abolished supralinear calcium signalling but only had a minor effect on voltage supralinearity. Dendritic boosting of spatially clustered synaptic signals argues for previously unappreciated computational complexity in dendrite-projecting inhibitory cells of the hippocampus.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets ... Boris C Bernhardt
    Research Article Updated

    Complex structural and functional changes occurring in typical and atypical development necessitate multidimensional approaches to better understand the risk of developing psychopathology. Here, we simultaneously examined structural and functional brain network patterns in relation to dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Several components were identified, recapitulating the psychopathology hierarchy, with the general psychopathology (p) factor explaining most covariance with multimodal imaging features, while the internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental dimensions were each associated with distinct morphological and functional connectivity signatures. Connectivity signatures associated with the p factor and neurodevelopmental dimensions followed the sensory-to-transmodal axis of cortical organization, which is related to the emergence of complex cognition and risk for psychopathology. Results were consistent in two separate data subsamples and robust to variations in analytical parameters. Although model parameters yielded statistically significant brain–behavior associations in unseen data, generalizability of the model was rather limited for all three latent components (r change from within- to out-of-sample statistics: LC1within = 0.36, LC1out = 0.03; LC2within = 0.34, LC2out = 0.05; LC3within = 0.35, LC3out = 0.07). Our findings help in better understanding biological mechanisms underpinning dimensions of psychopathology, and could provide brain-based vulnerability markers.