Dynamics and maintenance of categorical responses in primary auditory cortex during task engagement

  1. Rupesh K Chillale
  2. Shihab Shamma
  3. Srdjan Ostojic
  4. Yves Boubenec  Is a corresponding author
  1. École Normale Supérieure - PSL, France
  2. University of Maryland, United States

Abstract

Grouping sets of sounds into relevant categories is an important cognitive ability that enables the association of stimuli with appropriate goal-directed behavioral responses. In perceptual tasks, the primary auditory cortex (A1) assumes a prominent role by concurrently encoding both sound sensory features and task-related variables. Here we sought to explore the role of A1 in the initiation of sound categorization, shedding light on its involvement in this cognitive process. We trained ferrets to discriminate click trains of different rates in a Go/No-Go delayed categorization task and recorded neural activity during both active behavior and passive exposure to the same sounds. Purely categorical response components were extracted and analyzed separately from sensory responses to reveal their contributions to the overall population response throughout the trials. We found that categorical activity emerged during sound presentation in the population average and was present in both active behavioral and passive states. However, upon task engagement, categorical responses to the No-Go category became suppressed in the population code, leading to an asymmetrical representation of the Go stimuli relative to the No-Go sounds and prestimulus baseline. The population code underwent an abrupt change at stimulus offset, with sustained responses after the Go sounds during the delay period. Notably, the categorical responses observed during the stimulus period exhibited a significant correlation with those extracted from the delay epoch, suggesting an early involvement of A1 in stimulus categorization.

Data availability

Data is available on Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8371083.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rupesh K Chillale

    Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Shihab Shamma

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Srdjan Ostojic

    Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives Computationnelle (INSERM U960), École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    Srdjan Ostojic, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7473-1223
  4. Yves Boubenec

    Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, École Normale Supérieure - PSL, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    boubenec@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0106-6947

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0017)

  • Rupesh K Chillale
  • Shihab Shamma
  • Srdjan Ostojic
  • Yves Boubenec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02)

  • Rupesh K Chillale
  • Shihab Shamma
  • Srdjan Ostojic
  • Yves Boubenec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-JCJC-DynaMiC)

  • Yves Boubenec

H2020 European Research Council (ERC 787836-NEUME)

  • Shihab Shamma

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew J King, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (protocol authorization: 21022) andstrictly comply with the European directives on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes(2010/63/EU).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 20, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 20, 2022
  3. Accepted: November 12, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 16, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 17, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Chillale et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 652
    views
  • 121
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rupesh K Chillale
  2. Shihab Shamma
  3. Srdjan Ostojic
  4. Yves Boubenec
(2023)
Dynamics and maintenance of categorical responses in primary auditory cortex during task engagement
eLife 12:e85706.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85706

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85706

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.

    1. Neuroscience
    Josue M Regalado, Ariadna Corredera Asensio ... Priyamvada Rajasethupathy
    Research Article

    Learning requires the ability to link actions to outcomes. How motivation facilitates learning is not well understood. We designed a behavioral task in which mice self-initiate trials to learn cue-reward contingencies and found that the anterior cingulate region of the prefrontal cortex (ACC) contains motivation-related signals to maximize rewards. In particular, we found that ACC neural activity was consistently tied to trial initiations where mice seek to leave unrewarded cues to reach reward-associated cues. Notably, this neural signal persisted over consecutive unrewarded cues until reward-associated cues were reached, and was required for learning. To determine how ACC inherits this motivational signal we performed projection-specific photometry recordings from several inputs to ACC during learning. In doing so, we identified a ramp in bulk neural activity in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-to-ACC projections as mice received unrewarded cues, which continued ramping across consecutive unrewarded cues, and finally peaked upon reaching a reward-associated cue, thus maintaining an extended motivational state. Cellular resolution imaging of OFC confirmed these neural correlates of motivation, and further delineated separate ensembles of neurons that sequentially tiled the ramp. Together, these results identify a mechanism by which OFC maps out task structure to convey an extended motivational state to ACC to facilitate goal-directed learning.