(A) Relationship between the actual and the predicted facial action coding system (FACS) composite scores for each cross-validation fold. (B) Distribution of the Pearson’s r scores across the …
(A) Fluctuations in the log-transformed facial action coding system (FACS) composite scores across trials in the two runs (shaded areas represent the standard deviation). There was no significant …
(A) Relationship between the actual and the predicted facial action coding system (FACS) composite scores for each cross-validation fold (k=10) using only the activity from the primary motor cortex …
(A) FEPS pattern expression scores significantly predict the log-transformed facial action coding system (FACS) scores. Each point represents a trial in the pain condition (n=533). (B) Distribution …
(A) Pattern similarity between the FEPS and other pain-related brain signatures using the weights of the full brain patterns. Pattern similarities were computed at the voxel level using the cosine …
Supplementary tables.
(A) Peak regions with positive weights contributing to the prediction of the facial expression scores. (B) Peak regions with negative weights contributing to the prediction of the facial expression scores. (C) Mixed-effect model results for the effect of pain ratings on the logarithmic transformed facial action coding system (FACS) scores. (D) Mixed-effect model results for the effect of runs and trials on the logarithmic transformed FACS scores. (E) Mixed-effect model results for the effect of runs and trials on the pain ratings. (F) Mixed-effect model results for the effect of the facial expression of pain signature (FEPS) expression scores and the pain ratings on the logarithmic transformed FACS scores.