Ecology and evolution of viruses infecting uncultivated SUP05 bacteria as revealed by single-cell- and meta- genomics

  1. Simon Roux
  2. Alyse K Hawley
  3. Monica Torres Beltran
  4. Melanie Scofield
  5. Patrick Schwientek
  6. Ramunas Stepanauskas
  7. Tanja Woyke
  8. Steven J Hallam
  9. Matthew B Sullivan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Arizona, United States
  2. University of British Columbia, Canada
  3. U.S Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, United States
  4. Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, United States

Abstract

Viruses modulate microbial communities and alter ecosystem functions. However, due to cultivation bottlenecks specific virus-host interaction dynamics remain cryptic. Here we examined 127 single-cell amplified genomes (SAGs) from uncultivated SUP05 bacteria isolated from a marine oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) to identify 69 viral contigs representing five new genera within dsDNA Caudovirales and ssDNA Microviridae. Infection frequencies suggest that ~1/3 of SUP05 bacteria are viral-infected, with higher infection frequency where oxygen-deficiency was most severe. Observed Microviridae clonality suggests recovery of bloom-terminating viruses, while systematic co-infection between dsDNA and ssDNA viruses posits previously unrecognized cooperation modes. Analyses of 186 microbial and viral metagenomes revealed that SUP05 viruses persisted for years, but remained endemic to the OMZ. Finally, identification of virus-encoded dissimilatory sulfite reductase suggests SUP05 viruses reprogram their host's energy metabolism. Together these results demonstrate closely coupled SUP05 virus-host co-evolutionary dynamics with potential to modulate biogeochemical cycling in climate-critical and expanding OMZs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simon Roux

    University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alyse K Hawley

    University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Monica Torres Beltran

    University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Melanie Scofield

    University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Patrick Schwientek

    U.S Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ramunas Stepanauskas

    Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tanja Woyke

    U.S Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Steven J Hallam

    University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Matthew B Sullivan

    University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    For correspondence
    mbsulli@email.arizona.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nicole Dubilier

Version history

  1. Received: April 17, 2014
  2. Accepted: August 27, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 29, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 16, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Roux et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,497
    Page views
  • 682
    Downloads
  • 147
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Simon Roux
  2. Alyse K Hawley
  3. Monica Torres Beltran
  4. Melanie Scofield
  5. Patrick Schwientek
  6. Ramunas Stepanauskas
  7. Tanja Woyke
  8. Steven J Hallam
  9. Matthew B Sullivan
(2014)
Ecology and evolution of viruses infecting uncultivated SUP05 bacteria as revealed by single-cell- and meta- genomics
eLife 3:e03125.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03125

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03125

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Anna L Erdei, Aneth B David ... Teun Dekker
    Research Article Updated

    Over two decades ago, an intercropping strategy was developed that received critical acclaim for synergizing food security with ecosystem resilience in smallholder farming. The push–pull strategy reportedly suppresses lepidopteran pests in maize through a combination of a repellent intercrop (push), commonly Desmodium spp., and an attractive, border crop (pull). Key in the system is the intercrop’s constitutive release of volatile terpenoids that repel herbivores. However, the earlier described volatile terpenoids were not detectable in the headspace of Desmodium, and only minimally upon herbivory. This was independent of soil type, microbiome composition, and whether collections were made in the laboratory or in the field. Furthermore, in oviposition choice tests in a wind tunnel, maize with or without an odor background of Desmodium was equally attractive for the invasive pest Spodoptera frugiperda. In search of an alternative mechanism, we found that neonate larvae strongly preferred Desmodium over maize. However, their development stagnated and no larva survived. In addition, older larvae were frequently seen impaled and immobilized by the dense network of silica-fortified, non-glandular trichomes. Thus, our data suggest that Desmodium may act through intercepting and decimating dispersing larval offspring rather than adult deterrence. As a hallmark of sustainable pest control, maize–Desmodium push–pull intercropping has inspired countless efforts to emulate stimulo-deterrent diversion in other cropping systems. However, detailed knowledge of the actual mechanisms is required to rationally improve the strategy, and translate the concept to other cropping systems.

    1. Ecology
    Songdou Zhang, Shiheng An
    Insight

    The bacterium responsible for a disease that infects citrus plants across Asia facilitates its own proliferation by increasing the fecundity of its host insect.