Figure 4—figure supplement 1. | A quantitative framework for whole-body coordination reveals specific deficits in freely walking ataxic mice

Open accessCopyright infoDownload PDFDownload figures

A quantitative framework for whole-body coordination reveals specific deficits in freely walking ataxic mice

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Affiliation details

Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Download figureOpen in new tabFigure 4—figure supplement 1. Comparison of gait patterns between control and pcd mice.

(A) Smoothed probability density of diagonal (FL-HR) pair stance phase lags and speed obtained by kernel density estimation for all strides of size-matched controls (left, n = 3400, N = 11) and pcd (right, n = 3052, N = 3). Color code is estimated stride density. (B) Smoothed probability density of ipsilateral pair (FL-HL) stance phase lags and % stance duration for all strides of size-matched controls (left) and pcd (right), plotted according to the convention of Figure 5 of Hildebrand (1989). Color code is estimated stride density. (C) Polar plots of stance to swing phasing aligned to front right paw for controls (left) and pcd (right).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07892.014