Abstract

Senescent cells accumulate in fat with aging. We previously found genetic clearance of senescent cells from progeroid INK-ATTAC mice prevents lipodystrophy. Here we show that primary human senescent fat progenitors secrete activin A and directly inhibit adipogenesis in non-senescent progenitors. Blocking activin A partially restored lipid accumulation and expression of key adipogenic markers in differentiating progenitors exposed to senescent cells. Mouse fat tissue activin A increased with aging. Clearing senescent cells from 18-month-old naturally-aged INK-ATTAC mice reduced circulating activin A, blunted fat loss, and enhanced adipogenic transcription factor expression within 3 weeks. JAK inhibitor suppressed senescent cell activin A production and blunted senescent cell-mediated inhibition of adipogenesis. Eight weeks-treatment with ruxolitinib, an FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor, reduced circulating activin A, preserved fat mass, reduced lipotoxicity, and increased insulin sensitivity in 22-month-old mice. Our study indicates targeting senescent cells or their products may alleviate age-related dysfunction of progenitors, adipose tissue, and metabolism.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ming Xu

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Allyson K Palmer

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Allyson K Palmer, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  3. Husheng Ding

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Megan M Weivoda

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tamar Pirtskhalava

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Tamar Pirtskhalava, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  6. Thomas A White

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Anna Sepe

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kurt O Johnson

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Michael B Stout

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nino Giorgadze

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Nino Giorgadze, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  11. Michael D Jensen

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Nathan K LeBrasseur

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tamar Tchkonia

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Tamar Tchkonia, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  14. James L Kirkland

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    For correspondence
    Kirkland.James@mayo.edu
    Competing interests
    James L Kirkland, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Dillin, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures (A21013, A37715 and A16315) were approved by the IACUC at Mayo Clinic

Human subjects: The protocol (10-005236) was approved by the Mayo Clinic Foundation Institutional Review Board for Human Research. Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from all human subjects.

Version history

  1. Received: November 13, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 4, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 22, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Xu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,892
    Page views
  • 2,334
    Downloads
  • 414
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ming Xu
  2. Allyson K Palmer
  3. Husheng Ding
  4. Megan M Weivoda
  5. Tamar Pirtskhalava
  6. Thomas A White
  7. Anna Sepe
  8. Kurt O Johnson
  9. Michael B Stout
  10. Nino Giorgadze
  11. Michael D Jensen
  12. Nathan K LeBrasseur
  13. Tamar Tchkonia
  14. James L Kirkland
(2015)
Targeting senescent cells enhances adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age
eLife 4:e12997.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12997

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12997

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Amir Hossein Kayvanjoo, Iva Splichalova ... Elvira Mass
    Research Article Updated

    During embryogenesis, the fetal liver becomes the main hematopoietic organ, where stem and progenitor cells as well as immature and mature immune cells form an intricate cellular network. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) reside in a specialized niche, which is essential for their proliferation and differentiation. However, the cellular and molecular determinants contributing to this fetal HSC niche remain largely unknown. Macrophages are the first differentiated hematopoietic cells found in the developing liver, where they are important for fetal erythropoiesis by promoting erythrocyte maturation and phagocytosing expelled nuclei. Yet, whether macrophages play a role in fetal hematopoiesis beyond serving as a niche for maturing erythroblasts remains elusive. Here, we investigate the heterogeneity of macrophage populations in the murine fetal liver to define their specific roles during hematopoiesis. Using a single-cell omics approach combined with spatial proteomics and genetic fate-mapping models, we found that fetal liver macrophages cluster into distinct yolk sac-derived subpopulations and that long-term HSCs are interacting preferentially with one of the macrophage subpopulations. Fetal livers lacking macrophages show a delay in erythropoiesis and have an increased number of granulocytes, which can be attributed to transcriptional reprogramming and altered differentiation potential of long-term HSCs. Together, our data provide a detailed map of fetal liver macrophage subpopulations and implicate macrophages as part of the fetal HSC niche.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Smrithi Prem, Bharati Dev ... Emanuel DiCicco-Bloom
    Research Article Updated

    Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by common behavioral characteristics, raising the possibility of shared pathogenic mechanisms. Yet, vast clinical and etiological heterogeneity suggests personalized phenotypes. Surprisingly, our iPSC studies find that six individuals from two distinct ASD subtypes, idiopathic and 16p11.2 deletion, have common reductions in neural precursor cell (NPC) neurite outgrowth and migration even though whole genome sequencing demonstrates no genetic overlap between the datasets. To identify signaling differences that may contribute to these developmental defects, an unbiased phospho-(p)-proteome screen was performed. Surprisingly despite the genetic heterogeneity, hundreds of shared p-peptides were identified between autism subtypes including the mTOR pathway. mTOR signaling alterations were confirmed in all NPCs across both ASD subtypes, and mTOR modulation rescued ASD phenotypes and reproduced autism NPC-associated phenotypes in control NPCs. Thus, our studies demonstrate that genetically distinct ASD subtypes have common defects in neurite outgrowth and migration which are driven by the shared pathogenic mechanism of mTOR signaling dysregulation.