Non-canonical Wnt signalling modulates the endothelial shear stress flow sensor in vascular remodelling

  1. Claudio A Franco
  2. Martin L Jones
  3. Miguel O Bernabeu
  4. Anne-Clemence Vion
  5. Pedro Barbacena
  6. Jieqing Fan
  7. Thomas Mathivet
  8. Catarina G Fonseca
  9. Anan Ragab
  10. Terry P Yamaguchi
  11. Peter V Coveney
  12. Richard A Lang
  13. Holger Gerhardt  Is a corresponding author
  1. London Research Institute, United Kingdom
  2. The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
  4. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  5. Vesalius Research Center, Belgium
  6. National Institutes of Health, United States
  7. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Endothelial cells respond to molecular and physical forces in development and vascular homeostasis. Deregulation of endothelial responses to flow-induced shear is believed to contribute to many aspects of cardiovascular diseases including atherosclerosis. However, how molecular signals and shear-mediated physical forces integrate to regulate vascular patterning is poorly understood. Here we show that endothelial non-canonical Wnt signalling regulates endothelial sensitivity to shear forces. Loss of Wnt5a/Wnt11 renders endothelial cells more sensitive to shear, resulting in axial polarization and migration against flow at lower shear levels. Integration of flow modelling and polarity analysis in entire vascular networks demonstrates that polarization against flow is achieved differentially in artery, vein, capillaries and the primitive sprouting front. Collectively our data suggest that non-canonical Wnt signalling stabilizes forming vascular networks by reducing endothelial shear sensitivity, thus keeping vessels open under low flow conditions that prevail in the primitive plexus.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claudio A Franco

    Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Martin L Jones

    Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Miguel O Bernabeu

    Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anne-Clemence Vion

    Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pedro Barbacena

    Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jieqing Fan

    The Visual Systems Group, Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas Mathivet

    Vascular Patterning Laboratory, Vesalius Research Center, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Catarina G Fonseca

    Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Anan Ragab

    Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Terry P Yamaguchi

    Cancer and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, NCI-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter V Coveney

    Centre for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Richard A Lang

    The Visual Systems Group, Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Holger Gerhardt

    Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    holger.gerhardt@mdc-berlin.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ewa Paluch, University College London, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal procedures were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Home Office Animal Act 1986 under the authority of project license PPL 80/2391.

Version history

  1. Received: March 26, 2015
  2. Accepted: February 3, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 4, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 11, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Franco et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,590
    Page views
  • 1,368
    Downloads
  • 112
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Claudio A Franco
  2. Martin L Jones
  3. Miguel O Bernabeu
  4. Anne-Clemence Vion
  5. Pedro Barbacena
  6. Jieqing Fan
  7. Thomas Mathivet
  8. Catarina G Fonseca
  9. Anan Ragab
  10. Terry P Yamaguchi
  11. Peter V Coveney
  12. Richard A Lang
  13. Holger Gerhardt
(2016)
Non-canonical Wnt signalling modulates the endothelial shear stress flow sensor in vascular remodelling
eLife 5:e07727.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07727

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07727

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Kazuki Hanaoka, Kensuke Nishikawa ... Kouichi Funato
    Research Article

    Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are junctures that perform important roles including coordinating lipid metabolism. Previous studies have indicated that vacuolar fission/fusion processes are coupled with modifications in the membrane lipid composition. However, it has been still unclear whether MCS-mediated lipid metabolism controls the vacuolar morphology. Here, we report that deletion of tricalbins (Tcb1, Tcb2, and Tcb3), tethering proteins at endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–plasma membrane (PM) and ER–Golgi contact sites, alters fusion/fission dynamics and causes vacuolar fragmentation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, we show that the sphingolipid precursor phytosphingosine (PHS) accumulates in tricalbin-deleted cells, triggering the vacuolar division. Detachment of the nucleus–vacuole junction (NVJ), an important contact site between the vacuole and the perinuclear ER, restored vacuolar morphology in both cells subjected to high exogenous PHS and Tcb3-deleted cells, supporting that PHS transport across the NVJ induces vacuole division. Thus, our results suggest that vacuolar morphology is maintained by MCSs through the metabolism of sphingolipids.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.