1. Neuroscience

Repeated social defeat stress enhances glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in the VTA and cocaine place conditioning

  1. Claire E Stelly
  2. Matthew B Pomrenze
  3. Jason B Cook
  4. Hitoshi Morikawa  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Claire E Stelly
  2. Matthew B Pomrenze
  3. Jason B Cook
  4. Hitoshi Morikawa
(2016)
Repeated social defeat stress enhances glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in the VTA and cocaine place conditioning
eLife 5:e15448.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Enduring memories of sensory cues associated with drug intake drive addiction. It is well known that stressful experiences increase addiction vulnerability. However, it is not clear how repeated stress promotes learning of cue-drug associations, as repeated stress generally impairs learning and memory processes unrelated to stressful experiences. Here, we show that repeated social defeat stress in rats causes persistent enhancement of long-term potentiation (LTP) of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Protein kinase A-dependent increase in the potency of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-induced Ca2+ signaling underlies LTP facilitation. Notably, defeated rats display enhanced learning of contextual cues paired with cocaine experience assessed using a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Enhancement of LTP in the VTA and cocaine CPP in behaving rats both require glucocorticoid receptor activation during defeat episodes. These findings suggest that enhanced glutamatergic plasticity in the VTA may contribute, at least partially, to increased addiction vulnerability following repeated stressful experiences.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.001

eLife digest

Daily stress increases the likelihood that people who take drugs will become addicted. A very early step in the development of addiction is learning that certain people, places, or paraphernalia are associated with obtaining drugs. These ‘cues’ – drug dealers, bars, cigarette advertisements, etc. – become powerful motivators to seek out drugs and can trigger relapse in recovering addicts. It is thought that learning happens when synapses (the connections between neurons in the brain) that relay information about particular cues become stronger. However, it is not clear how stress promotes the learning of cue-drug associations.

Stelly et al. investigated whether repeated episodes of stress make it easier to strengthen synapses on dopamine neurons, which are involved in processing rewards and addiction. For the experiments, rats were repeatedly exposed to a stressful situation – an encounter with an unfamiliar aggressive rat – every day for five days. Stelly et al. found that these stressed rats formed stronger associations between the drug cocaine and the place where they were given the drug (the cue). Furthermore, a mechanism that strengthens synapses was more sensitive in the stressed rats than in unstressed rats. These changes persisted for 10-30 days after the stressful situation, suggesting that stress might begin a period of time during which the individual is more vulnerable to addiction.

The experiments also show that a hormone called corticosterone – which is released during stressful experiences – is necessary for stress to trigger the changes in the synapses and behavior of the rats. However, corticosterone must work with other factors because giving this hormone to unstressed rats was not sufficient to trigger the changes seen in the stressed rats. Future experiments will investigate what these other stress factors are and how they work together with corticosterone.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.002

Introduction

Humans with a history of stressful or traumatic experiences are more prone to develop substance use disorders (Sinha, 2008). Adverse experience recruits the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stress response, culminating in release of glucocorticoids that enables the body to cope with insults to homeostasis (Munck et al., 1984). In rodent models, repeated activation of the stress response typically disrupts learning and cognition [e.g., spatial learning (Conrad et al., 1996), working memory (Mizoguchi et al., 2000), and cognitive flexibility (Liston et al., 2006)]. In contrast to these deficits, prior stress enhances the learning of Pavlovian cue-outcome associations driven by rewarding stimuli, assessed with conditioned place preference (CPP) (Kreibich et al., 2009; Burke et al., 2011; Chuang et al., 2011), or aversive/stressful stimuli, assessed with fear conditioning (Conrad et al., 1999; Sandi et al., 2001; Suvrathan et al., 2014). These effects of stress may have arisen from evolutionary pressure to rapidly acquire information predicting food, shelter, and predator threat during periods of duress. Augmented Pavlovian reward learning mechanisms in stressed individuals may also heighten susceptibility to addiction, as acquisition of cue-drug associations is a crucial early step in drug use, and powerful, enduring memories of drug-associated cues trigger craving and relapse as recreational use progresses to addiction (Hyman et al., 2006). However, it is not clear how repeated stressful experience promotes the learning of cue-drug/reward associations, as repeated stress is generally detrimental to synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory unrelated to stressful events (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Joels et al., 2006; Schwabe et al., 2012; Chattarji et al., 2015).

The mesolimbic dopamine system originating in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is critical for reward processing. VTA dopamine neurons tonically fire action potentials (APs) at 1–5 Hz, while responding to unexpected rewards with phasic burst firing (2–10 APs at 10–50 Hz). These dopamine neuron responses are hypothesized to drive the learning of Pavlovian cue-reward associations (Tsai et al., 2009; Darvas et al., 2014). Intriguingly, over the course of repeated cue-reward pairing, dopamine neurons acquire a conditioned burst response to reward-predictive cues, which is thought to encode the positive motivational valence of those cues and to invigorate reward-seeking behavior (Schultz, 1998; Berridge et al., 2009; Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010).

Glutamatergic inputs activating NMDA receptors (NMDARs) drive the transition from tonic firing to bursting in dopamine neurons (Overton and Clark, 1997; Zweifel et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011); therefore, potentiation of cue-driven NMDAR inputs may contribute to the acquisition of conditioned bursting. Indeed, NMDAR-mediated transmission undergoes long-term potentiation (LTP) when cue-like glutamatergic input stimulation is repeatedly paired with reward-like bursting in dopamine neurons (Harnett et al., 2009). LTP induction requires amplification of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals by preceding activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs; more specifically mGluR1) coupled to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3). Here, IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) detect the coincidence of IP3 generated by glutamatergic input activating mGluRs and burst-driven Ca2+ entry. IP3 enhances Ca2+-induced activation of IP3Rs by promoting access to the stimulatory Ca2+ sites, thereby promoting Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (Taylor and Laude, 2002). In this study, we demonstrate that repeated social defeat stress (1) enhances NMDAR LTP in the VTA via an increase in IP3 sensitivity of IP3Rs and (2) promotes acquisition of cocaine CPP in behaving rats, and both of these effects require glucocorticoid action during defeat stress.

Results

Repeated social stress increases mGluR-dependent facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals

NMDAR LTP induction requires mGluR/IP3-induced facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals (Harnett et al., 2009). Therefore, we first examined the effect of the group I mGluR agonist DHPG (1 µM; 5-min perfusion) on burst-evoked Ca2+ signals, assessed by the size of Ca2+-activated SK currents (termed burst IK(Ca)) in control and stressed animals. Rats were unhandled, handled, or socially defeated (at the end of the dark cycle) for 1, 5, or 10 consecutive days, and VTA slices were prepared 1–2 days after the final handling/defeat session. The magnitude of DHPG effect on IK(Ca) was significantly larger in animals that underwent 5 or 10 days of defeat stress compared to unhandled and handled controls, whereas a single defeat session failed to alter the DHPG effect (Figures 1A and B). There was no significant difference between unhandled and handled controls. The effect of stress plateaued by 5 days, as comparable enhancement of DHPG effect was observed after 10-day defeat. Basal burst IK(Ca) was consistent across groups (Figure 1C), suggesting no alterations in AP-evoked Ca2+ influx. DHPG-induced inward currents, which are independent of Ca2+ signaling (Guatteo et al., 1999), were not affected (Figure 1D); thus the stress-induced increase in IK(Ca) facilitation results from changes in IP3 signaling downstream of mGluRs.

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
mGluR-dependent facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals is enhanced after repeated social defeat.

(A) Example traces (left) and summary time graph (right) illustrating the facilitating effect of DHPG (1 µM) on burst IK(Ca) in neurons from unhandled rats (traces not shown), rats handled for 5 days, and rats that underwent social defeat for 1, 5, or 10 days. (B) Summary bar graph showing the magnitude of DHPG-induced burst IK(Ca) facilitation (unhandled: 20 cells from 12 rats, handled: 20 cells from 13 rats, 1 day defeat: 19 cells from 11 rats, 5 day defeat: 21 cells from 13 rats, 10 day defeat: 19 cells from 10 rats; F4,94 = 6.19, p<0.001, one-way ANOVA). *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (Bonferroni post hoc test). (C) The size of basal burst IK(Ca) was not altered by social defeat. (D) DHPG-induced inward currents were not affected by social defeat. Inset: Example traces of DHPG-induced currents from unhandled and 5-day defeated rats (5-min DHPG perfusion at the horizontal bar). (E) Summary graph depicting DHPG effect on burst IK(Ca) after different intervals following 5-day social defeat. Data in 6–7 weeks old unhandled and 1–2 day interval groups were from those in panels A–D (6–7 weeks old unhandled: 20 cells from 12 rats, 1–2 day interval: 21 cells from 13 rats, 10-day interval: 17 cells from 8 rats, 30-day interval: 16 cells from 9 rats, 10–11 weeks old unhandled: 15 cells from 7 rats).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.003

Next, to examine the persistence of repeated stress effect, the interval between the last social defeat session and recording was prolonged to 10 and 30 days. Although stress-induced enhancement displayed gradual recovery, DHPG effect was still elevated after 30 days compared to age-matched controls (Figure 1E). Subsequent electrophysiology experiments were performed in 5-day defeated rats (with 1–2 day interval) and controls (unhandled and handled controls combined).

Protein kinase a mediates IP3R sensitization in socially defeated animals

To directly examine alterations in IP3 signaling, we applied different concentrations of IP3 (expressed in µM·µJ; see Methods and materials) into the cytosol using flash photolysis of caged IP3, and IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release was assessed by flash-evoked SK currents(IIP3) (Figure 2A). The average IP3 concentration-response curve displayed a leftward shift in defeated rats compared to controls (Figure 2B). Accordingly, the average EC50 valuewas significantly smaller in the defeated group (Figure 2C). Maximal IIP3 amplitude did not differ between groups (Figure 2D), indicating a change in the potency, but not the efficacy, of IP3 in eliciting Ca2+ release.

Figure 2
Download asset Open asset
PKA activity maintains increased IP3R sensitivity in socially defeated rats.

(A) Example traces of IIP3 evoked by different concentrations of IP3 (2000, 6000, 16000, 48000, and 140000 µM·µJ) in control and defeated rats. (B) Averaged IP3 concentration-response curves from control and defeated rats. IIP3 amplitudes were normalized to the maximal value (estimated from fit to a logistic equation) in each cell. Recordings were made with normal internal solution or with PKI (control: 12 cells from 8 rats, defeat: 12 cells from 7 rats, control + PKI: 15 cells from 9 rats, defeat + PKI: 14 cells from 8 rats; treatment (defeat/PKI): F3,196 = 4.88, p<0.01; IP3 concentration: F4,196 = 1214, p<0.001; treatment × IP3 concentration: F12,196 = 4.42, p<0.001; mixed two-way ANOVA). ***p<0.001 vs. control (Bonferroni post hoc test). Lines represent logistic fit to the averaged data in each group. (C) Summary bar graph depicting the average EC50 values (EC50 determined in each cell) in the 4 groups shown in (B) (defeat: F1,49 = 5.11, p<0.05; PKI: F1,49 = 5.11, p<0.05; two-way ANOVA). *p<0.05 (Bonferroni post hoc test). (D) The maximal IIP3 amplitude was not affected by social defeat experience or PKI during recording.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.004

Protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent phosphorylation of IP3Rs increases their IP3 sensitivity (Wagner et al., 2008). To determine the involvement of PKA in stress-induced IP3R sensitization, the effect of a selective peptide inhibitor of PKA, PKI-(6–22)-amide (PKI; 200 µM, loaded into the cytosol via the whole-cell pipette for >15–20 min after break-in), was tested. PKI reversed the leftward shift in IP3 concentration-response curve, and thus the decrease in EC50 value, in stressed animals, while having no significant effect on maximal IIP3 amplitude (Figures 2B–D). PKI had no effect in the control group, suggesting low basal PKA activity in non-stressed animals. It should be noted that PKI eliminated the difference in IP3 potency between the two groups. These data indicate that repeated social stress sensitizes IP3Rs via a PKA-dependent mechanism.

Repeated social stress enhances NMDAR LTP

We next examined whether repeated social defeat affects NMDAR LTP induction, which requires mGluR/IP3-dependent facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals and is gated by PKA (Harnett et al., 2009). Application of a low concentration of IP3 preceding APs can effectively facilitate IK(Ca) (Cui et al., 2007; Ahn et al., 2010; Bernier et al., 2011). Thus, the LTP induction protocol consisted of applying a low concentration of IP3 (250 µM·µJ) 50 ms prior to simultaneous pairing of a burst with a brief train of synaptic stimuli (Figure 3A), the latter being necessary to activate NMDARs at stimulated synapses at the time of burst for LTP induction (Harnett et al., 2009; Whitaker et al., 2013). This induction protocol produced little LTP in control animals, while large LTP was induced in defeated animals (Figure 3B and C). IP3 application, which caused little IIP3 by itself, caused facilitation of burst IK(Ca) (assessed immediately before LTP induction), which was significantly larger in cells from defeated animals (Figure 3D). Furthermore, the magnitude of LTP was positively correlated with that of IP3-induced facilitation of IK(Ca) across neurons from both groups (Figure 3E). Robust LTP was induced in control rats when a higher IP3 concentration (500 µM·µJ), which produced larger IK(Ca) facilitation, was used during induction (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These results suggest that the enhanced LTP in defeated rats is a consequence of increased IP3R sensitivity enabling greater facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
NMDAR-mediated transmission is more susceptible to LTP induction after social defeat.

(A) Example experiments to induce NMDAR LTP in neurons from control and defeated rats. Time graphs of NMDAR EPSCs are shown with example traces at times indicated by numbers (baseline: gray, post-induction: black). The LTP induction protocol (IP3-synaptic stimulation-burst combination; illustrated in top inset) was delivered after 10-min baseline recording (at arrow). (B) Summary time graph of baseline-normalized NMDAR EPSCs in LTP experiments (control: 7 cells from 7 rats, defeat: 7 cells from 7 rats). (C) Summary of NMDAR LTP magnitude in control and defeated rats (t12 = 3.93, **p<0.01, unpaired t-test). (D) Example traces (left; from the defeated rat shown in A) and summary (right) of IK(Ca) facilitation by IP3 assessed before LTP induction (t12 = 4.65, ***p<0.001, unpaired t-test). (E) The magnitude of NMDAR LTP is plotted versus the magnitude of IP3-induced facilitation of IK(Ca). Dashed line is a linear fit to all data points from both control and defeated rats.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.005

It has been reported that repeated stress alters NMDAR expression in certain brain areas (Fitzgerald et al., 1996; Yuen et al., 2012; Costa-Nunes et al., 2014; Chattarji et al., 2015). We found that bath application of NMDA (10 µM) produced comparable inward currents in control and defeated rats (Figure 4); thus repeated defeat stress caused no significant changes in global NMDAR-mediated excitation.

Figure 4
Download asset Open asset
Summary time graph depicting inward currents induced by 1-min perfusion of NMDA (10 μM) in VTA dopamine neurons from control (8 cells from 3 rats) and 5 day defeated rats (6 cells from 2 rats).
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.007

Repeated stress appears to differentially modulate tonic firing of VTA dopamine neurons recorded in vivo, as both an increase and decrease have been reported with different stress paradigms (Cao et al., 2010; Valenti et al., 2012; Tye et al., 2013). However, repeated social defeat failed to alter tonic firing measured in ex vivo slices (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the amplitude of hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (Ih), which contribute to intrinsic dopamine neuron pacemaker activity (Neuhoff et al., 2002), was not affected (Figure 5B).

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
Tonic firing is unaltered by social defeat.

(A) Example traces (left) and summary (right) of tonic firing frequency in VTA neurons from control and defeated rats (control: 15 cells from 3 rats, 5 defeats: 9 cells from 3 rats; t22 = 0.066, p=0.95, unpaired t-test). In these experiments, loose-patch recordings (<20 MΩ seal) were made using pipettes filled with 150 mM NaCl to monitor tonic pacemaker firing. (B) Example traces (left; voltage step depicted at bottom) and summary (right) of Ih currents recorded in cells from animals that underwent control procedures or 1, 5, or 10 days of defeat (data were obtained from the same cells shown in Figures 1A–D; F4,94 = 2.01, p=0.10, one-way ANOVA).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.008

Glucocorticoid receptor activation is necessary but not sufficient for stress-induced IP3R sensitization

A major consequence of stress-induced HPA axis activation is the secretion of glucocorticoids (corticosterone in rodents) into the blood (Munck et al., 1984). Thus, we sought to determine whether corticosterone, which readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, is involved in the increase in IP3R sensitivity with repeated stress. Corticosterone activates both glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs); however, MRs are typically saturated by circadian fluctuations in corticosterone, while lower-affinity GRs are activated by levels attained with stress (Joels and de Kloet, 1994). Therefore, the role of GRs was examined by treating rats with the antagonist mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 30 min prior to each defeat session. The DHPG effect on burst IK(Ca) was significantly enhanced by repeated defeat in the vehicle-treated group, while there was no effect of stress in the mifepristone-treated group (Figure 6A). Thus, blockade of GRs during defeat sessions prevented IP3R sensitization. Next, rats were treated with corticosterone (2.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg, i.p.; at the end of the dark cycle) for 5 days (no social defeat). The lowest dose (2.5 mg/kg) produces elevation in blood corticosterone concentration comparable to that evoked by a moderate stressor (Graf et al., 2013), while higher doses (≥10 mg/kg) have been used to simulate severe stress levels (Akirav et al., 2004). None of the tested doses significantly altered the DHPG effect on burst IK(Ca) (Figure 6B). Together, these results show that GR signaling is necessary, but not sufficient, for IP3R sensitization.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
Stress-induced, but not cocaine-induced, IP3R sensitization is prevented by GR blockade.

(A) Example traces (left) and summary (right) of DHPG-induced burst IK(Ca) facilitation in neurons from animals that were injected with vehicle or mifepristone before undergoing control handling or social defeat sessions (vehicle + control: 8 cells from 5 rats, vehicle + defeat: 10 cells from 4 rats, mifepristone + control: 10 cells from 5 rats, mifepristone + defeat: 11 cells from 4 rats; defeat × mifepristone: F1,35 = 4.56, p<0.05, two-way ANOVA). *p<0.05 (Bonferroni post hoc test). (B) Summary bar graph showing that repeated corticosterone treatment (once daily for 5 days) failed to affect DHPG-induced burst IK(Ca) facilitation (vehicle: 8 cells from 5 rats, 2.5 mg/kg: 11 cells from 5 rats, 5 mg/kg: 10 cells from 4 rats, 15 mg/kg: 12 cells from 7 rats). (C) Summary bar graph demonstrating that mifepristone pretreatment failed to block the increase in DHPG effect resulting from repeated cocaine treatment (10 mg/kg, i.p., once daily for 5 days) (saline: 17 cells from 7 rats, cocaine: 16 cells from 7 rats, mifepristone + saline: 21 cells from 8 rats, mifepristone + cocaine: 16 cells from 6 rats; cocaine: F1,66 = 11.4, p<0.01, two-way ANOVA). *p<0.05 (Bonferroni post hoc test).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.009

It has been shown that repeated psychostimulant treatment sensitizes IP3Rs and enhances NMDAR LTP (Ahn et al., 2010). As addictive drugs, including psychostimulants, stimulate corticosterone secretion (Armario, 2010), we next examined the role of GR signaling in psychostimulant-induced IP3R sensitization. Rats were treated with mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min prior to injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline for 5 days. The effect of DHPG on burst IK(Ca) was significantly larger in cocaine-treated animals, which was not affected by mifepristone pretreatment (Figure 6C). Thus, GR signaling is not involved in psychostimulant-induced IP3R sensitization.

Repeated social stress promotes learning of cocaine-associated cues in a GR-dependent manner

Next, the effect of social defeat stress was tested on acquisition of cocaine CPP, in which animals learn to associate a particular context with drug reward. Acquisition of psychostimulant CPP is inhibited by mGluR1 or NMDAR antagonist in the VTA, while CPP expression is attenuated by NMDAR antagonist, but not by mGluR1 antagonist, in the VTA (Whitaker et al., 2013), supporting the potential role of NMDAR LTP in driving CPP. Rats underwent stress or control procedures for 5 days, then underwent 1-day CPP conditioning with cocaine (5 mg/kg, i.p.). It should be noted that a single psychostimulant treatment does not cause IP3R sensitization (Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013). Stressed rats displayed robust preference for the cocaine-paired side after 1-day conditioning, while unhandled and handled controls showed small preference (Figure 7A). The 1-day CPP score was significantly larger in stressed rats compared to unhandled and handled controls (Figure 7B). Control rats developed significant cocaine CPP comparable to that observed in stressed rats after 3-day conditioning with the same dose of cocaine (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). These data suggest that repeated defeat experience promotes the rate of learning of cocaine-associated cues.

Figure 7 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Social defeat promotes cocaine-induced CPP via a GR-dependent mechanism.

(A) Summary of changes in the preference for the cocaine-paired side following 1-day conditioning in unhandled, handled, and defeated rats (unhandled: t7 = 2.51, p<0.05; handled: t7 = 1.90, p=0.10; defeat: t6 = 11.0, p<0.001; paired t-test). (B) Summary of 1-day cocaine CPP scores in unhandled, handled, and defeated rats (F2,20 = 25.2, p<0.001, one-way ANOVA). ***p<0.001 (Bonferroni post hoc test). (C) Summary of changes in the preference for the cocaine-paired side following 1-day conditioning in rats pretreated with vehicle or mifepristone 30 min prior to social defeat or handling sessions (vehicle + defeat: t8 = 5.30, p<0.001; mifepristone + defeat: t8 = 1.90, p=0.09; mifepristone + handled: t7 = 0.95, p=0.37; paired t-test). (D) Summary of 1-day cocaine CPP scores in the 3 groups shown in panel C (F2,23 = 4.90, p<0.05, one-way ANOVA). *p<0.05 (Bonferroni post hoc test). None of the treatments in this figure affected the overall activity level during the pretest (Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.010

Finally, we asked whether GR signaling, which is necessary for IP3R sensitization, also plays a role in promoting cocaine CPP. As in the electrophysiology experiments, rats were treated with mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 30 min before each social defeat session. An additional group received mifepristone followed by control handling procedure. We found that mifepristone suppressed cocaine CPP in stressed rats to a level comparable to that observed in mifepristone-treated controls (Figure 7C and D). Therefore, GR activation during stress is required for CPP enhancement.

Discussion

Repeated stressful experience leads to metaplasticity, i.e., experience-dependent changes in the capacity of synapses to undergo activity-dependent plasticity (Abraham, 2008), in different brain areas (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Joels et al., 2006; Schwabe et al., 2012; Chattarji et al., 2015). The present study demonstrates that repeated social defeat facilitates the induction of LTP of NMDAR-mediated transmission in VTA dopamine neurons while causing no alterations in global NMDAR-mediated excitation or intrinsic firing activity. Importantly, socially defeated animals display enhanced acquisition of cocaine CPP, a form of Pavlovian conditioning that requires NMDAR-dependent bursting in the VTA (Zweifel et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011; Whitaker et al., 2013).

Repeated social defeat results in increased sensitivity of IP3Rs, which serve as a coincidence detector of presynaptic activity (causing mGluR-dependent IP3 generation) and postsynaptic bursting (driving Ca2+ influx) during NMDAR LTP induction (Harnett et al., 2009). Inhibition of PKA completely reversed the increase in the potency of IP3, indicating the role of PKA-dependent phosphorylation in stress-induced IP3R sensitization, as has been suggested in previous studies demonstrating similar changes following repeated drug exposure (Ahn et al., 2010; Bernier et al., 2011). It is of note that dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, in contrast to VTA neurons recorded in the present study, display significant PKA-dependent regulation of IP3-induced Ca2+ signaling and NMDAR LTP induction in control rats, which cannot be further enhanced by repeated drug exposure (Harnett et al., 2009; Ahn et al., 2010).

It has been reported that repeated social defeat (10 days) in mice leads to long-lasting (>4 weeks) alterations in gene expression and behavior (e.g., reduced social contact), with little recovery unless treated with antidepressants (Berton et al., 2006; Tsankova et al., 2006). In the present study, mGluR/IP3 action on burst-evoked Ca2+ signals remained elevated for 10–30 days following the 5-day defeat paradigm in rats, although displaying gradual decline during the 30-day stress-free period. It remains to be determined how this recovery is affected by different stress paradigms (e.g., duration or type/severity) and treatments following stress experience.

Mouse studies have also shown that individual animals display different susceptibility to repeated social defeat when assessed by the degree of social avoidance, which correlates with biochemical and physiological changes in the mesolimbic system (Krishnan et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2010). In particular, these studies observed hyperactivity of VTA dopamine neurons, assessed in vivo or ex vivo, associated with an increase in Ih, after 10-day defeat in susceptible mice. However, these parameters were not affected by 5-day social defeat in the current study conducted in rats.

How could repeated stress lead to increased PKA activity regulating IP3Rs in the VTA? Stress, including social defeat, promotes bursting in a subpopulation of VTA dopamine neurons, causing increased dopamine transients in the nucleus accumbens (Anstrom et al., 2009; Brischoux et al., 2009). Bursting also releases dopamine locally from the soma and dendrites, activating somatodendritic D2 autoreceptors (Beckstead et al., 2004). Chronic stimulation of Gi-coupled receptors, such as D2 receptors, is known to upregulate the cAMP-PKA pathway (Hyman et al., 2006), which may contribute to stress-induced IP3R sensitization. Interestingly, intra-VTA blockade of NMDARs during each social defeat episode, which would suppress dopamine neuron bursting, has been shown to prevent repeated stress-induced increases in cocaine self-administration (Covington et al., 2008).

GR signaling during defeat sessions is necessary for the enhancement of IP3R sensitivity. Stress-induced activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system is regulated by glucocorticoids (Marinelli and Piazza, 2002). Recent evidence implicates GRs expressed in projection areas, not in the VTA, in long-term glucocorticoid regulation of dopamine neuron activity (Ambroggi et al., 2009; Butts et al., 2011; Barik et al., 2013). Furthermore, glucocorticoids can also enhance synthesis of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a major stress-related neuropeptide, and activation of CRF neurons in brain areas providing major CRF inputs to the VTA (Makino et al., 1994; Rodaros et al., 2007; Kolber et al., 2008). GR blockade may therefore attenuate CRF-induced excitation of dopamine neurons during stress (Kalivas et al., 1987; Ungless et al., 2003; Wanat et al., 2008; Holly et al., 2015). We found that GR activation alone is not sufficient for IP3R sensitization. Thus, the potential GR mechanisms described above may act to amplify glutamatergic input-driven bursting activity during stress episodes, likely further enhanced by stress-induced activation of noradrenergic inputs stimulating dopamine neurons via α1 adrenergic receptors (Grenhoff et al., 1995; Paladini et al., 2001; Morilak et al., 2005), thereby enabling large local dopamine release in the VTA. In this regard, it is interesting that repeated cocaine treatment was capable of causing similar enhancement of mGluR/IP3 action in a GR-independent manner. Dopamine levels in the VTA caused by cocaine alone are likely sufficient to induce D2-mediated upregulation of the cAMP-PKA pathway.

Increased IP3R sensitivity drives the enhancement of NMDAR LTP induction in socially defeated animals. Our recent study demonstrated the involvement of L-type Ca2+ channels (LTCCs) in NMDAR LTP (Degoulet et al., 2015). Although glucocorticoid-induced upregulation of LTCCs has been reported in the hippocampus and amygdala (Karst et al., 2002; Chameau et al., 2007), pharmacological activation of these channels does not enhance NMDAR LTP in dopamine neurons (Degoulet et al., 2015); thus changes in LTCCs are unlikely to play a role in LTP enhancement.

CPP experiments showed that repeated social defeat promoted acquisition of the preference for contextual cues paired with cocaine experience, in accordance with previous studies demonstrating enhanced drug CPP following a period of repeated stress (Kreibich et al., 2009; Burke et al., 2011). Blockade of the critical components regulating NMDAR LTP induction (i.e., NMDARs, group I mGluRs, PKA, or LTCCs) in the VTA during conditioning has been shown to suppress CPP acquisition (Harnett et al., 2009; Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013; Degoulet et al., 2015). In the present study, systemic GR blockade during defeat episodes prevented both the enhancement of the LTP induction mechanism and that of cocaine CPP acquisition, consistent with the potential role of NMDAR plasticity in this form of Pavlovian learning. However, enhanced CPP acquisition observed in defeated rats may well be caused by an increase in the primary rewarding action of cocaine itself. The relative contribution of these two possibilities, i.e., enhanced learning mechanism vs. enhanced cocaine reward, remains to be determined.

It is well known that repeated stress impairs LTP of AMPAR-mediated transmission in the hippocampus (Foy et al., 1987; Shors et al., 1989), an effect that requires GR activation during stress (Xu et al., 1998). LTP is similarly impaired in the prefrontal cortex (Goldwater et al., 2009). By contrast, repeated stress leads to enhancement of AMPAR LTP in the lateral amygdala, which underlies Pavlovian fear conditioning driven by stressful/aversive stimuli (Rodriguez Manzanares et al., 2005; Suvrathan et al., 2014). Alterations in the function/expression of NMDARs are implicated in these forms of metaplasticity, as NMDARs play a key role in AMPAR LTP induction (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Chattarji et al., 2015). Here, we described a distinct form of stress-induced metaplasticity in the VTA, i.e., enhancement of mGluR/IP3-dependent NMDAR LTP, which may, at least in part, contribute to the enhanced drug reward-based Pavlovian learning. This may illuminate a key mechanism by which stressful experience increases vulnerability to addiction, a chronic relapsing disorder perpetuated by memories of drug-associated stimuli.

Materials and methods

Animals

Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories, Houston, Texas) were housed in groups of 2–3 on a 12 hr light/dark cycle with food and water available ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Resident-intruder social defeat paradigm

Request a detailed protocol

Twelve week-old male resident rats were vasectomized and pair-housed with 6 week-old females. Residents (used for ~8–10 months) were screened for aggression (biting or pinning within 1 min) by introducing a male intruder to the home cage. Intruders and controls were young males (4–5 weeks old at the beginning) housed in groups of 2–3. For defeat sessions, residents and intruders were taken to a darkened procedure room at the end of the dark cycle. Intruders were introduced to residents’ home cages after removing females. Following 5 min of direct contact, a perforated Plexiglass barrier was inserted for 25 min to allow sensory contact. For repeated defeat, intruders underwent one session daily with a novel resident. Handled controls were taken to a darkened procedure room and placed in novel cages for 30 min. Unhandled controls remained undisturbed in the colony. Intruders and controls were housed separately.

In vivo drug treatments

Request a detailed protocol

All drug and vehicle solutions were administered via i.p. injections (1 ml/kg). Mifepristone and corticosterone (both from Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, Missouri) were dissolved in 30% propylene glycol plus 1% Tween-20 in 0.9% saline. Cocaine-HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) was dissolved in 0.9% saline.

Electrophysiology

Request a detailed protocol

Midbrain slices were prepared and recordings were made in the lateral VTA located 50–150 μm from the medial border of the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract, as in our previous studies (Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013; Degoulet et al., 2015). Tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons in this area (i.e., lateral part of the parabrachial pigmented nucleus) largely project to the ventrolateral striatum (Ikemoto, 2007) and show little VGluT2 coexpression (Trudeau et al., 2014). Putative dopamine neurons in the lateral VTA were identified by spontaneous firing of broad APs (>1.2 ms) at 1–5 Hz in cell-attached configuration and large Ih currents (>200 pA; evoked by a 1.5 s hyperpolarizing step of 50 mV) in whole-cell configuration (Ford et al., 2006; Lammel et al., 2008; Margolis et al., 2008). Cells were voltage-clamped at –62 mV (corrected for –7 mV liquid junction potential).

A 2 ms depolarizing pulse of 55 mV was used to elicit an unclamped AP. For bursts, 5 APs were evoked at 20 Hz. The time integral of the outward tail current, termed IK(Ca) (calculated after removing the 20 ms window following each depolarizing pulse; expressed in pC), was used as a readout of AP-evoked Ca2+ transients, as it is eliminated by TTX and also by apamin, a blocker of Ca2+-activated SK channels (Cui et al., 2007).

Flash photolysis

Request a detailed protocol

Cells were loaded with caged IP3 (50–400 µM; generous gift from Dr. Kamran Khodakhah) through the recording pipette. A UV flash (~1 ms) was applied with a xenon arc lamp driven by a photolysis system (Cairn Research, Faversham, UK). The UV flash was focused through a 60× objective onto a ~350 μm area surrounding the recorded neuron. Photolysis of caged compounds is proportional to the UV flash intensity; therefore, the concentration of IP3 was defined as the product of caged IP3 concentration in the pipette (µM) and flash intensity (µJ) measured at the focal plane of the objective (expressed in µM·µJ).

NMDAR LTP experiments

Request a detailed protocol

Synaptic stimuli were delivered with a bipolar tungsten electrode placed ~50–100 μm rostral to the recorded neuron. To isolate NMDAR EPSCs, recordings were performed in DNQX (10 µM), picrotoxin (100 µM), CGP54626 (50 nM), and sulpiride (100 nM) to block AMPA/kainate, GABAA, GABAB, and D2 dopamine receptors, and in glycine (20 µM) and low Mg2+ (0.1 mM) to enhance NMDAR activation. NMDAR EPSCs were monitored every 20 s. The LTP induction protocol consisted of photolytic application of IP3 (250 µM·µJ) 50 ms prior to the simultaneous delivery of synaptic stimulation (20 stimuli at 50 Hz) and a burst (5 APs at 20 Hz), repeated 10 times every 20 s. LTP magnitude was determined by comparing the average EPSC amplitude 30 min post-induction with the average EPSC amplitude pre-induction (each from a 5 min window).

Place conditioning

Request a detailed protocol

A CPP box (Med Associates, St. Albans, Vermont) consisting of two distinct compartments separated by a small middle chamber was used for conditioning. One compartment had a mesh floor with white walls, while the other had a grid floor with black walls. A discrete cue (painted ceramic weight) was placed in the rear corner of each compartment (black one in the white wall side, white one in the black wall side; Figure 7—figure supplement 3) for further differentiation. One day after undergoing repeated stress or control procedures, rats were pretested for initial side preference by exploring the entire CPP box for 15 min. The percentage of time spent in each compartment was determined after excluding the time spent in the middle chamber. Rats with initial side preference >60% were excluded. Starting the next day, rats were subjected to 1-day or 3-day conditioning, in which they were given a saline injection in the morning and confined to one compartment, then in the afternoon given cocaine (5 mg/kg) and confined to the other compartment (10 min each). Compartment assignment was counterbalanced such that animals had, on average, ~50% initial preference for the cocaine-paired side. A 15 min posttest was performed 1 day after the last conditioning session. The CPP score was determined by subtracting the preference for the cocaine-paired side during pretest from that during posttest. The experimenter performing CPP experiments was blind to animal treatments.

Data analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t-test or ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Normality of data distribution was confirmed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The difference was considered significant at p<0.05.

References

    1. Fitzgerald LW
    2. Ortiz J
    3. Hamedani AG
    4. Nestler EJ
    (1996)
    Drugs of abuse and stress increase the expression of GluR1 and NMDAR1 glutamate receptor subunits in the rat ventral tegmental area: common adaptations among cross-sensitizing agents
    Journal of Neuroscience 16:274–282.
    1. Guatteo E
    2. Mercuri NB
    3. Bernardi G
    4. Knöpfel T
    (1999)
    Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors mediate an inward current in rat substantia nigra dopamine neurons that is independent from calcium mobilization
    Journal of Neurophysiology 82:1974–1981.
    1. Kalivas PW
    2. Duffy P
    3. Latimer LG
    (1987)
    Neurochemical and behavioral effects of corticotropin-releasing factor in the ventral tegmental area of the rat
    The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 242:757–763.
    1. Mizoguchi K
    2. Yuzurihara M
    3. Ishige A
    4. Sasaki H
    5. Chui DH
    6. Tabira T
    (2000)
    Chronic stress induces impairment of spatial working memory because of prefrontal dopaminergic dysfunction
    The Journal of Neuroscience 20:1568–1574.
    1. Neuhoff H
    2. Neu A
    3. Liss B
    4. Roeper J
    (2002)
    I(h) channels contribute to the different functional properties of identified dopaminergic subpopulations in the midbrain
    The Journal of Neuroscience 22:1290–1302.
    1. Schultz W
    (1998)
    Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
    Journal of Neurophysiology 80:1–27.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claire E Stelly

    1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    2. Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    CES, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Matthew B Pomrenze

    1. Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    2. Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    MBP, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Jason B Cook

    1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    2. Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    JBC, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Hitoshi Morikawa

    1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    2. Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    HM, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    For correspondence
    morikawa@utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2948-493X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (AA007471)

  • Jason B Cook

National Institutes of Health (DA015687)

  • Hitoshi Morikawa

National Institutes of Health (AA015521)

  • Hitoshi Morikawa

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants DA015687 and AA015521. JBC was supported by NIH training grant AA007471. We thank Dr. Kamran Khodakhah for the generous gift of caged IP3 made in his lab at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We also thank Dr. Michela Marinelli for comments on this manuscript and Dr. Kevin Lominac and Nhi Le for assistance with CPP experiment.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol ID: AUP-2013-00177).

Version history

  1. Received: February 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 7, 2016
  3. Version of Record published: July 4, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Stelly et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,296
    views
  • 443
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Claire E Stelly
  2. Matthew B Pomrenze
  3. Jason B Cook
  4. Hitoshi Morikawa
(2016)
Repeated social defeat stress enhances glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in the VTA and cocaine place conditioning
eLife 5:e15448.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Chronic intermittent hypoxia reveals role of the Postinspiratory Complex in the mediation of normal swallow production

    Alyssa D Huff, Marlusa Karlen-Amarante ... Jan-Marino Ramirez
    Research Advance

    Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder that results in multiple bouts of intermittent hypoxia. OSA has many neurological and systemic comorbidities, including dysphagia, or disordered swallow, and discoordination with breathing. However, the mechanism in which chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) causes dysphagia is unknown. Recently, we showed the postinspiratory complex (PiCo) acts as an interface between the swallow pattern generator (SPG) and the inspiratory rhythm generator, the preBötzinger complex, to regulate proper swallow-breathing coordination (Huff et al., 2023). PiCo is characterized by interneurons co-expressing transporters for glutamate (Vglut2) and acetylcholine (ChAT). Here we show that optogenetic stimulation of ChATcre:Ai32, Vglut2cre:Ai32, and ChATcre:Vglut2FlpO:ChR2 mice exposed to CIH does not alter swallow-breathing coordination, but unexpectedly disrupts swallow behavior via triggering variable swallow motor patterns. This suggests that glutamatergic–cholinergic neurons in PiCo are not only critical for the regulation of swallow-breathing coordination, but also play an important role in the modulation of swallow motor patterning. Our study also suggests that swallow disruption, as seen in OSA, involves central nervous mechanisms interfering with swallow motor patterning and laryngeal activation. These findings are crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying dysphagia, both in OSA and other breathing and neurological disorders.

    1. Neuroscience

    Unifying network model links recency and central tendency biases in working memory

    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience

    Octopamine integrates the status of internal energy supply into the formation of food-related memories

    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.