A cellular mechanism for inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski
  2. Oscar A Carrillo
  3. Julia Bleier
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  5. Molly McQuillan
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin
  8. Carlos D Aizenman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brown University, United States
  2. Bard College, United States
  3. Roger Williams University, United States

Abstract

To build a coherent view of the external world, an organism needs to integrate multiple types of sensory information from different sources, a process known as multisensory integration (MSI). In a prior study (Felch et al. 2016) we showed that the temporal dependence of MSI in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles is mediated by the network dynamics of the recruitment of local inhibition by sensory input. This was one of the first cellular-level mechanisms described for MSI. Here we expand this cellular level view of MSI by focusing on the principle of inverse effectiveness, another central feature of MSI stating that the amount of multisensory enhancement observed inversely depends on the size of unisensory responses. We show that non-linear summation of crossmodal synaptic responses, mediated by NMDA-type glutamate receptor (NMDARs) activation, form the cellular basis for inverse effectiveness, both at the cellular and behavioral levels.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Oscar A Carrillo

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Julia Bleier

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Molly McQuillan

    Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski

    Digital Services, Roger Williams University, Bristol, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin

    Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0429-1728
  8. Carlos D Aizenman

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    Carlos_Aizenman@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7378-7217

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH F31 NS09379001)

  • Torrey LS Truszkowski

National Science Foundation (NSF IOS 1353044)

  • Torrey LS Truszkowski
  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Julia Bleier
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  • Christopher P Truszkowski
  • Carlos D Aizenman

American Physiological Society

  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

Bard Summer Research Institute, Bard College

  • Molly McQuillan
  • Arseny S Khakhalin

Brown University

  • Oscar A Carrillo
  • Julia Bleier
  • Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gary L Westbrook, Vollum Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (1607000219) of Brown University.

Version history

  1. Received: January 25, 2017
  2. Accepted: March 15, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 18, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 24, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 31, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Truszkowski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,200
    views
  • 423
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Torrey LS Truszkowski
  2. Oscar A Carrillo
  3. Julia Bleier
  4. Carolina Ramirez-Vizcarrondo
  5. Molly McQuillan
  6. Christopher P Truszkowski
  7. Arseny S Khakhalin
  8. Carlos D Aizenman
(2017)
A cellular mechanism for inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration
eLife 6:e25392.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25392

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25392

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Olujolagbe Layinka, Luca D Hargitai ... Florence YN Leung
    Feature Article

    Improving our understanding of autism, ADHD, dyslexia and other neurodevelopmental conditions requires collaborations between genetics, psychiatry, the social sciences and other fields of research.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.