BRAFV600E cooperates with CDX2 inactivation to promote serrated colorectal tumorigenesis

8 figures, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Overview of the result of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and somatic changes for selected proteins, genes, and phenotypic marker panels.

Each square represents the results for IHCs and molecular phenotypic features in individual serrated adenocarcinoma cases.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.002
Figure 1—source data 1

Clinicopathologic features, BRAF mutation status, and CDX2 expression in 36 human serrated morphology CRCs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Representative images of serrated adenocarcinoma cases.

All of these cases have (i) well to moderately differentiated glands in which the epithelium has a serrated appearance, (ii) eosinophilic cytoplasm, (iii) vesicular nuclei with basal location at least. Serrated CRCs with mucinous and trabecular patterns showed such components occupying more than 50% of the tumor region and retained serrated cytology. Some cases showed dirty necrosis, but only rarely, and may also possess small areas of mucinous differentiation. Scale bars, 100 μm for low magnification; 50 μm for high magnification.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Representative pattern of immunohistochemistry in serrated adenocarcinoma (SAC) cases with CDX2-negative (upper) and CDX2-positive (lower) staining.

The CDX2-negative SAC case showed membranous staining of β-catenin at invasive front, robust Annexin A10 and MUC5AC expression, but was negative for p16 expression. Conversely, the CDX2-positive SAC case showed nuclear staining of β-catenin at the invasive front, no Annexin A10 or MUC5AC expression, but was positive for p16 expression. Scale bars, 100 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.005
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Characteristics of CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice.

(A) Kaplan-Meier curves of CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA (Cdx2-/- BrafV600E, n = 7), CDX2P-CreERT2 Apcfl/+Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA (Apc+/- Cdx2-/- BrafV600E, n = 5), CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl (Cdx2-/-, n = 6), and CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA (BrafV600E, n = 5) mice, after two daily doses of TAM (150 mg/kg). p<0.002 when comparing Cdx2-/- or BrafV600E to Cdx2-/- BrafV600E or Apc+/- Cdx2-/- BrafV600E by log-rank test; p=0.158 when comparing Cdx2-/- BrafV600E to Apc+/- Cdx2-/- BrafV600E by log-rank test. (B) Macroscopic image of the tumors at the proximal colon-cecum-ileum junction of CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice. Left: protuberant tumor (T1) located at the proximal colon-cecum-ileum junction; Right: polypoid lesions (T2) that occupied at the entire terminal ileum to cecum region. # indicates the proximal colon; indicates the ileum. Scale bar, 10 mm (C) Histological features of the proximal colon-cecum-ileum junction tumor of CDX2P-CreERT2Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice. Two major components were found in the tumor: serrated region (upper right) and mucin-rich region (lower left). Scale bars, 200 μm for low magnification image (left); 50 μm for high magnification images (right). (D) Serrated region showing invasion into submucosa. Dashed-line highlights muscular mucosa. Scale bar, 100 μm. See also Figure 2—source data 1 for panel A.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.007
Figure 2—source data 1

Raw data for Kaplan Meier analysis shown in Figure 2A.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.008
Figure 2—source data 2

Tumor size and invasion in CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice post TAM Injection.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.009
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Combined Cdx2 inactivation and BrafV600E mutation in mouse intestinal epithelium promotes the formation of tumors with serrated morphology.

H and E staining of proximal colon tissues from a wild-type mouse (A), a CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA mouse (B) and a CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl mouse (C) after TAM injection. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) Genotyping of Braf and Cdx2 in serrated-region and mucin-rich region in the tumor of CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mutant mice using DNA samples obtained by Laser capture microdissection. Only serrated-region had BrafV600E mutation and both regions had Cdx2 loss. (E) Representative H and E (left panels) and immunohistochemical staining for β-catenin (right panels) in a CDX2P-CreERT2Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mouse 143 days after two daily doses of TAM (upper panels) or a CDX2P-CreERT2 Apcfl/+Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mouse 114 days after two daily doses of TAM (lower panels). Scale bars, 100 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.010
Figure 3 with 2 supplements
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the tumors at the ileum-cecum junction of CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice.

(A) Annexin A10 (left) and phospho-ERK (right) expression in serrated region (upper) and mucin-rich region (lower). Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) H and E (upper left) and IHC staining for CDX2 (upper middle), β-catenin (upper right), BrdU (lower left), p53 (lower middle) and MUC5AC (lower right) at the invasive region of the tumor. Scale bars, 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.011
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Tumors from CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice were MSS, and did not show significant methylation at the p16Ink4a promoter.

(A) Microsatellite analysis of a tumor from a CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mouse and normal colon tissue was done using five microsatellite repeat markers previously shown to be informative in tumors from DNA mismatch repair–deficient mice. Tumors were scored as MSI if 2 of 5 markers showed instability. (B) Promoter region and coding region (boxed) for p16Ink4a gene were shown in the upper diagram. The 16 CpG dinucleotides are indicated. Genomic DNA from five tumors (T1 to T5) in CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice and five normal colon tissues (N1 to N5) were treated with sodium bisulfite. Subsequent PCRs were then performed at the p16Ink4a promoter. Amplified DNA fragments were cloned using the TA Cloning Kit. At least 10 clones were then randomly selected and sequenced for each samples. Solid circles are methylated CpG sites with empty circles showing no methylation.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.012
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Expression of intestinal stem cell markers, Wnt target genes and differentiation markers in mice.

RNAs were collected from wild-type (Control), CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl (Cdx2KO), CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA (BrafVE), CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA (Cdx2KOBrafVE), and CDX2P-CreERT2 Apcfl/fl(ApcKO) mice after TAM injection. (A) Expression of intestinal stem cell markers: Olfm4, Lgr5, Msi1, Cd133, Lrig, Hopx, Nkd1 and Bmi1. (B) Expression of Wnt target genes: Cd44, Axin2, Mmp7, EphB2, cMyc and Sox9. (C) Expression of differentiation markers: Muc2, Muc5ac, Anxa10 and Pdx1. Gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR, with normalization to β-actin expression. RNAs were collected from three mice per group. We fit a one-way ANOVA model with terms for the means of five groups to log-transformed gene expression data, and test differences in means for pairs of groups as well as Braf by Cdx2 interactions by testing if the average difference (of log-transformed data) between Cdx2KO BrafVE samples and BrafVE samples was larger or smaller than the difference between Cdx2KO and control samples, and called the anti-logarithm of this difference-of-differences the ratio of ratios. See also Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.013
Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1

Raw data for qRT-PCR analysis for mice shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.014
Activation of EGFR in tumor tissues of CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice.

Two representative tumors from CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice (T1 and T2) and cecum tissues from the TAM-treated Cre-negative control mouse (Normal cecum), the CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl (Cdx2-/-) mouse, or the CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA (BrafV600E) mouse were subjected to immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for active EGFR (phospho-EGFR Tyr845). Representative Imagines with low (top panels) and high (bottom panels) magnifications were shown. Scale bars, 100 μm for low magnification image (top); 20 μm for high magnification images (bottom).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.015
Global gene expression analyses show strong cooperative interactions of Cdx2 inactivation and BRAFV600E expression in gene regulation in mouse colon.

Global gene expression analyses were performed with RNAs from normal colon epithelium (NC), Cdx2-/--mutant, BrafV600E-mutant, Cdx2-/-BrafV600E-mutant, and Apc-/--mutant colon epithelium. (A) The principal components analysis showed the Cdx2-/- BrafV600E mutant epithelium clearly had distinct global patterns of gene expression from that of normal colon epithelium or mutant colon epithelium of the single mutant genotypes. See also Figure 5–source data 1. (B) Heat map showing the strong cooperative interactions of Cdx2 inactivation and BrafV600E activation in altering the expression of many genes. Genes were sorted by their expression based on the degree of interaction between Cdx2 inactivation and BrafV600E activation. Genes shown are those that gave p<0.01 for the interaction of Cdx2 inactivation and BrafV600E activation (the difference of the Cdx2-/- BrafV600E vs. BrafV600E difference and the Cdx2-/- vs. control difference, in log-space) and that also had the anti-logarithm of the difference of differences at least 10 (or smaller than 1/10) in mouse data. Genes below the dashed line show negative interaction between Cdx2 inactivation and BrafV600E activation. The heat map also showed the comparison of gene expression between the mouse data and human TCGA CRC data. The 18 CRC samples from human TCGA data that had low CDX2 and V600E mutations were compared to the 104 CRC samples with high CDX2 that were not BRAF mutant, and genes were selected with p-values of <0.01 (two-sample T-test) and fold-changes of >1.3 between the two groups. The genes selected by both human and mouse data sets are marked as red. See also Figure 5–source data 2,3.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.016
Figure 5—source data 1

Raw data for computing the principal components.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.017
Figure 5—source data 2

Comparison of mouse genes up- and down-regulated in Cdx2-/- BrafV600E tumors to gene signatures from human CRCs with low CDX2expression and BRAFV600E mutation (TCGA data) and human serrated carcinomas.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.018
Figure 5—source data 3

Raw data for comparison of mouse genes up- and down-regulated in Cdx2-/- BrafV600E tumors to gene signatures from human CRCswith low CDX2 expression and BRAFV600E mutation (TCGA data) and human serrated carcinomas.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.019
Figure 6 with 1 supplement
PDX1 expression in tumor tissues of CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice and human serrated benign tumor tissues.

(A) H and E staining (left) and PDX1 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the tumor of CDX2-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice. (B) H and E staining (left) and PDX1 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in a representative human serrated adenocarcinoma case. Scale bars for panels A and B, 200 μm for low magnification image (top); 50 μm for high magnification images (bottom). (C) Expression pattern of CDX2 and PDX1 in human serrated benign tumors. (Upper panel) CDX2 expression was retained in Goblet cell rich HPP but significantly decreased in all of the other serrated tumors. (Lower panel) Robust aberrant PDX1 expression was seen in all of the serrated tumors, but was absent in normal colon. Scale bars, 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.022
Figure 6—source data 1

Expression of PDX1, CDX2 and ANXA10 in 395 Human CRCs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.023
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Distribution of PDX1 expression in mouse gastrointestinal tract.

(A) In a wild type mouse, only normal tissues from the antrum region of the stomach and the duodenum have strong PDX1 expression. (B) Robust PDX1 expression was seen in the cells at the apical side of the colon of CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl mice both seven and twenty-one days post TAM injection. Scale bars, 100 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.024
Organoids derived from Cdx2-/- and BrafV600E-mutant colon epithelium showed serrated glandular morphology and PDX1 expression.

Organoids were generated from proximal colon of wild-type, CDX2P-CreERT2 Apcfl/fl, CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl, CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA, and CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice after TAM injection. Representative organoids from each mouse were shown for H and E (upper panels), and immunohistochemical staining for CDX2 (middle panels) and PDX1 (lower panels). Scale bars, 200 μm for low magnification; 50 μm for high magnification (for H and E).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.025
Figure 8 with 1 supplement
Cooperative effects of CDX2 and BRAF function in regulating gene expression in organoids derived from Cdx2-/- and BrafV600E-mutant colon epithelium.

Organoids were generated from epithelium at proximal colon-cecum junction of wild-type (Control), CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl (Cdx2KO), CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA (BrafVE), and CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA (Cdx2KOBrafVE) mice after 7 days following two daily doses of TAM (150 mg/kg) injection. The organoids were plated in Matrigel for 3 days, and then were treated with DMSO (−) or 6 μM of MEK1/2 inhibitor, AZD6244 (+), daily for two consecutive days before harvest for RNA extraction. Gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR, with normalization to β-actin expression. Independent RNA samples were prepared from triplicate treatments for each treatment group. (A) Expression of Anxa10, and the genes showing cooperative interactions of CDX2 silencing and BRAFV600E expression in both mouse tissues and organoid system. (B) Expression of the MAPK target genes, Dusp6 and Fos, to show the effectiveness of AZD6244 treatment. (C) We fit a one-way ANOVA model with terms for the means of four groups of genotypes (for both DMSO and AZD6244 treatments) to log-transformed gene expression data, and test differences in means for pairs of groups as well as Braf by Cdx2 interactions by testing if the average difference (of log-transformed data) between Cdx2KO BrafVE samples and BrafVE samples was larger or smaller than the difference between Cdx2KO and control samples, and called the anti-logarithm of this difference-of-differences the ratio of ratios. In addition, we also tested the effects of AZD6244 on gene expression within each genotype groups. See also Figure 8—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.026
Figure 8—source data 1

Raw data for qRT-PCR analysis for organoids shown in Figure 8.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.027
Figure 8—figure supplement 1
MAPK activity in organoids was significantly blocked by the treatment with MEK inhibitor, AZD6244.

Organoids were generated from proximal colon-cecum junction of wild-type, CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl, CDX2P-CreERT2 BrafCA, and CDX2P-CreERT2 Cdx2fl/fl BrafCA mice after 7 days following TAM injection. The organoids were plated in Matrigel for 3 days, and then were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or MEK inhibitor (AZD6244) at 6 μM daily for two consecutive days before harvest for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for phosphor-ERK. Representative Images with low (upper panels) and high (lower panels) magnifications were shown. Scale bars, 100 μm for low magnification images (upper panels); 20 μm for high magnification images (lower panels).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.028

Tables

Table 1

Immunohistochemistry and molecular features of 36 human serrated morphology CRCs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.006

CDX2 (+)

CDX2 (-)

*p value

BRAF mut

BRAF wt

*p value

Immunohistochemistry

MUC5AC(+)

2

15

0.0008

11

6

0.335

MUC5AC(-)

13

6

9

10

MUC6(+)

0

6

0.031

6

1

0.104

MUC6(-)

15

15

14

15

MUC2(+)

9

17

0.260

13

13

0.456

MUC2(-)

6

4

7

3

MLH1 retained

14

18

0.626

16

16

0.113

MLH1 loss

1

3

4

0

MSH2 retained

15

21

20

16

MSH2 loss

0

0

0

0

β-catenin membranous

4

13

0.049

14

3

0.003

β-catenin nucleus

11

8

6

13

p53 mut

8

13

0.736

15

6

0.052

p53 wt

7

8

5

10

p16 retained

11

7

0.041

7

11

0.092

p16 loss

4

14

13

5

Annexin A10 (+)

6

18

0.010

20

4

1.4 × 10−6

Annexin A10 (-)

9

3

0

12

Molecular features

MSI

1

4

0.376

4

1

0.355

MSS

14

17

16

15

CIMP phenotype (+)

2

10

0.040

11

1

0.004

CIMP phenotype (-)

13

11

9

15

Total

15

21

20

16

  1. *p values are from Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2

Top 10 gene sets for lists of genes up- and down-regulated in tumors with Cdx2−/− and BrafV600E mutations.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.020

Up or down genes

Gene set title

Number of genes on list

Number of those genes we selected

P-value (Fisher Exact)

Observed/expected

Rank of gene set

Estimated FDR (Q-value)

Up

HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION

186

69

1.0E-28

4.57

1

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_UP

192

41

7.3E-09

2.63

2

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_HYPOXIA

189

36

1.1E-06

2.35

3

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_COAGULATION

126

27

2.4E-06

2.64

4

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_TNFA_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB

189

35

3.2E-06

2.28

5

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_DN

141

28

7.6E-06

2.45

6

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_ANGIOGENESIS

36

12

1.5E-05

4.11

7

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_INFLAMMATORY_RESPONSE

189

32

5.3E-05

2.09

8

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_IL2_STAT5_SIGNALING

193

30

4.2E-04

1.92

9

0.000

Up

HALLMARK_APICAL_JUNCTION

191

29

7.6E-04

1.87

10

0.001

Down

HALLMARK_CHOLESTEROL_HOMEOSTASIS

72

17

2.7E-09

5.86

1

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_ADIPOGENESIS

191

22

9.3E-06

2.86

2

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_XENOBIOTIC_METABOLISM

194

22

1.2E-05

2.81

3

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_LATE

189

21

2.6E-05

2.76

4

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_MTORC1_SIGNALING

193

21

3.5E-05

2.70

5

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM

109

14

1.2E-04

3.19

6

0.000

Down

HALLMARK_FATTY_ACID_METABOLISM

149

16

3.4E-04

2.67

7

0.004

Down

HALLMARK_PEROXISOME

101

12

7.4E-04

2.95

8

0.005

Down

HALLMARK_GLYCOLYSIS

193

18

8.2E-04

2.31

9

0.004

Down

HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY

190

17

1.8E-03

2.22

10

0.005

  1. Results of enrichment testing the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) v5.1 for the Hallmark collection of 50 gene sets. We selected genes with significant Cdx2 by Braf interactions, asking that p<0.01 and that the fold-change between Cdx2+Braf and Braf was at least 1.3 times larger (or smaller) than the fold-change between Cdx2 and control, which selected 1453 up distict mouse genes and 767 down mouse genes (out of 22326 distinct mouse genes). We mapped to human genes choosing only 1-to-1 best homologs using NCBI's Homologene version 68, which left 1277 up and 634 down distict human genes, out of a total of 15735 genes. We tested our up and down genes separately for over-representation in 50 Hallmark gene sets using one-sided Fisher Exact tests. Shown are the 10 gene sets in the collection that gave the smallest p-values. The last column gives the estimated false discovery rates (Q-values) based on 100 data sets in which the human gene identifiers were randomly permuted.

Table 2—source data 1

Results of enrichment testing the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) v5.1 for the hallmark collection of 50 gene sets.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.021

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Antibodies for immunohistochemistry study.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331.029

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Naoya Sakamoto
  2. Ying Feng
  3. Carmine Stolfi
  4. Yuki Kurosu
  5. Maranne Green
  6. Jeffry Lin
  7. Megan E Green
  8. Kazuhiro Sentani
  9. Wataru Yasui
  10. Martin McMahon
  11. Karin M Hardiman
  12. Jason R Spence
  13. Nobukatsu Horita
  14. Joel K Greenson
  15. Rork Kuick
  16. Kathleen R Cho
  17. Eric R Fearon
(2017)
BRAFV600E cooperates with CDX2 inactivation to promote serrated colorectal tumorigenesis
eLife 6:e20331.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331