Figures and data
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec276/ec27619e83d919e49ba7d835324dc7a29d02b983" alt=""
Surface characterization of silanized silicon wafers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fa6d/5fa6dc3e701a818c63960ae54a3ee01d296a13f0" alt=""
Pairs of samples for human testing by their frequency of instability formation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86981/8698161d2cd49156dcdce899a32bafa31795bfb1" alt=""
Mechanical testing and determination of frictional instability landscape in samples.
A) Schematic of friction testing apparatus. An elastomeric mock finger is connected to a force sensor and motorized stage. The mock finger was driven at four different driving velocities (v = 5-45 mm/s) at four different applied masses (M = 0-100 g, in addition to the deadweight of the mock finger), mimicking human exploration. B) Representative force curves of three types of frictional instabilities. Steady sliding, (SS, orange) shows no distinctive feature besides high frequency force oscillations due to stick-slip, which is above the electronic sensor noise. Slow frictional waves (SFW, blue) are slower, large amplitude oscillations corresponding to global or coherent stick-slip of the entire mock finger. Stiction spike (Sp, green) is where a single, large-magnitude stick-slip event is observed at the onset of steady sliding. C) Phase maps of frictional instabilities across all surfaces. Colors and intensities correspond to the type and frequency of each instability respectively at a given condition. Color map created by linear interpolation between experimental conditions, with location of conditions tested indicated by gray (×) marks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2952/a2952488d524d652725581e892477757ba9e3ffc" alt=""
Human subjects testing for discriminability between surfaces. A) Average accuracies of all pairs in a 3-AFC task. All pairs were statistically significantly distinguishable above chance (red line, 33%). Error bars are represented as 95% confidence intervals around the means. Ends of brackets with (*) above denote statistically significantly different accuracy rates. B) Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) of accuracy vs. the differences in steady sliding events. Accuracies of each trial across all subjects represented by gray ○ marks, and global averages represented by blue × marks. C) GLMM of response times vs. the differences in stiction spike events. P2 and P3 have the same x-axis value and are shifted for clarity. Mean times are represented by blue (×) marks, while medians are represented by red lines at notches of box plots. (D) GLMMs of accuracy vs. typically used material properties or parameters: average roughness Ra, global average friction coefficient across all conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef1f0/ef1f0aa38599cfb614131af7177fe60c4b40ce93" alt=""
Recording friction of a human finger exploring a surface. A) Setup to measure tangential and normal forces during fine touch. A coated sample is securely double-sided taped to a stage, connected to two red sensors to record tangential and normal forces. A motion tracker is also placed on the moving finger to record displacement while sliding. Two setups are used simultaneously, one for each hand. B) Formation of all instability phases during human exploration. C) Tangential forces experienced by two hands on the same surface chemistry.